Evaluation of School Principals

International Handbook on the Preparation and Development of School Leaders

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 263-279

  Pashiardis, Petros ^a   Brauckmann, Stefan ^b,c  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY OF CYPRUS   (Cyprus)

^b GERMAN INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH   (Germany)

^c POTSDAM INSTITUTE FOR CLIMATE IMPACT RESEARCH PIK   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145531031     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203872239-21     Document Type: Chapter

References (48)

1. Browne-Ferrigno, T. and Fusarelli, B. C. J. (2005). The Kentucky Principalship: Model of School Leadership Reconfigured by ISLLC Standards and Reform Policy Implementation. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4, 127-156.
2. Cheng, Y. C. (2002). The Changing Context of School Leadership: Implications for Paradigm Shift. In K. Leithwood and P. Hallinger (Eds.). Second International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration (pp. 485-518). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
3. Cheung, R. B. and Walker, A. (2006). Inner Worlds and Outer Limits: The Formation of Beginning School Principals in Hong-Kong. Journal of Educational Administration, 44(4), 389-407.
4. Council of Chief State School Officers (1996). Interstate School leaders Licensure Consortium: Standards for School Leaders. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
5. Crow, G. M. (2006). Complexity and the beginning principal in the United States: perspectives on Socialization. Journal of Educational Administration, 44(4), 310-325.
6. Davis, E. E. and Garner, E. (2003). Current Practices of Evaluating Superintendents and Principals in a Standards-Based Environment. Technical Report 2002-2005. Pocatello, ID: ICEE.
7. Davis, S., Darling-Hammond, L., LaPointe, M. and Meyerson, D. (2005). School Leadership Study - Developing Successful Principals. Review of Research. Stanford, CA: SELI.
8. Davis, S. H. and Hensley, P. H. (2000). The Politics of Principal Evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13(4), 383-403.
9. Department for Education and Skills (2004). National Standards for Headteachers. Nottingham: DfES.
10. Earl, L. and Katz, S. (2002). Leading Schools in a Data-Rich World. In K. Leithwood and P. Hallinger (Eds.). Second International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration (pp. 485-518). Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic.
11. Gronn, P. and Ribbins, P. (2003). Evolving Formations: The Making of Secondary School Principals on Selected Small Islands. In P. Pashiardis and P. Ribbins (Eds.). International Studies in Educational Administration. Special Issue on the Making of Secondary School Principals on Selected Small Islands, 31(2), 76-94.
12. Heck, R. H. and Marcoulides, G. A. (1996). The Assessment of Principal Performance: A. Multilevel Evaluation Approach. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 10, 11-28.
13. Hill, J. S. (2005). Developing a Culture of Assessment: Insights from Theory and Experience. Journal of Political Science Education, 1, 29-37.
14. Hoy, K. and Miskel, I. (2005). Educational Administration. Theory, Research and Practice. New York:McGraw Hill.
15. Johnson, N. J. and Rose, L. M. (1997). Portfolios. Clarifying, Constructing and Enhancing. Lancaster, PA:Technomic Publishing Company.
16. Johnston, M. and Thomas, M. (2005). Riding the wave of administrator accountability: a portfolio approach. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(4), 368-386.
17. Kellaghan, T. and Greany, V. (2001). Using assessment to improve the quality of education. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning (UNESCO).
18. Kimball, S. M. (2006). Case Study of the Initiation of Standards-Based Principal Performance Evaluation in Washoe County School District. Consortium for Policy research in Education, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
19. Kythreotis, A. and Pashiardis, P. (2006). Exploring Leadership Role in School Effectiveness and the Validation of Models of Principals’ Effects on Students’ Achievement. CCEAM Conference “Recreating Linkages between Theory and Praxis in Educational Leadership”. Nicosia, Cyprus, 12-17 October, 2006.
20. Lashway, L. (2003). Improving Principal Evaluation. Clearinghouse on Educational Policy Management. Eric Digest 172.
21. Leithwood, K., Aitken, R. and Jantzi, D. (2001). Making Schools Smarter. A System for Monitoring School and District Progress. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
22. Marcoulides, G. A., Larsen, T. J. and Heck, R. H. (1995). Examining the generalizability of a leadership model: issues for assessing administrator performance. International Journal of Educational Management, 9(6), 4-9.
23. Merton, R. (1963). Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press.
24. Murphy, J. (2005). Unpacking the Foundations of ISLLC Standards and Addressing Concerns in the Academic Community. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(1), 154-191.
25. Pashiardis, P. (1998). Researching the Characteristics of Effective Primary School Principals in Cyprus. A Qualitative Approach. Educational Management and Administration, 26(2), 117-130.
26. Pashiardis, P. (2001). Secondary Principals in Cyprus: The Views of the Principal Versus the Views of the Teachers- A Case Study. International Studies in Educational Administration, 29(3), 11-23.
27. Pashiardis, P. and Orphanou, S. (1999). An Insight Into Elementary Principalship in Cyprus: The Teachers’ Perspective. International Journal of Educational Management, 13(5), 241-251.
28. Pashiardis, P., Savvides I. and Tsiakkiros, A. (2005). Meta-Evaluation of the Proposed Systems. In P. Pashiardis, I. Savvides and A. Tsiakkiros (Ed.). The Evaluation of Teachers’ Work: from Theory to Praxis (pp. 343-349). Athens: Ellin Publishing House (in Greek).
29. Philips, D. (2003). Lessons from New Zealand’s National Qualifications Framework. Journal of Education and Work, 16(3), 289-304.
30. Porter, A., Murphy, J., Goldring, E., Elliott, S. and Linn, R. L. (2005). A Proposal to Develop and Test an Education Leadership Performance Assessment. Report Submitted to the Wallace Foundation by Vanderbilt University.
31. Quong, T. (2006). Asking the Hard Questions: Being a Beginning Principal in Australia. Journal of Educational Administration, 44(4), 376-388.
32. Rasch, L. (2004). Employee Performance Appraisal and the 95/5 Rule. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 28, 407-414.
33. Reeves, D. B. (2004). Assessing Educational Leaders. Evaluating Performance for Improved Individual and Organizational Results. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
34. Robbins, P. and Alvy, H.B. (2003). The Principal’s Companion. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
35. Sackney, L. and Walker, K. (2006). Canadian Perspectives on Beginning Principals: Their Role in Building Capacity for Learning Communities. Journal of Educational Administration, 44(4), 341-358.
36. Scheerens J. and Witziers, B. (2005). Educational Leadership and Student Performance. University of Twente:Department of Educational Organisation and Management.
37. Scriven, M. (1995). A unified theory approach to teacher evaluation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 21, 111-129.
38. Smith, W.J. (2002). School Leadership and Self-Assessment: Guiding the Agenda for Change. In K. Leithwood and P. Hallinger (Ed.). Second International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration (pp. 485-518). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
39. Stevenson, H. (2006). Moving Towards, Into and Through Principalship: Developing a Framework for Researching the Career Trajectories of School Leaders. Journal of Educational Administration, 44(4), 408-420.
40. Thomas, D. W., Holdaway, E. A. and Ward, K. L. (2000). Policies and Practices Involved in the Evaluation of School Principals. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 14(3), 215-240.
41. Usdan, M., McCloud, B. and Podmostko, M. (2000). Leadership for Student Learning: Reinventing the Principalship. School Leadership for the 21st Century Initiative. A Report of the Task Force on the Principalship.Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership.
42. Vaughan, S. (2003). Performance: Self as the Principal Evaluator. Human Resource Development International, 6(3), 371-385.
43. Weindling, D. (1999). Stages of Leadership. In T. Bush, L. Bell, R. Bolam, R. Glatter and P. Ribbins (Eds.), Educational Management: Redefining Theory, Policy and Practice (pp. 90-101). London: Paul Chapman.
44. Weindling, D. and Dimmock, C. (2006). Sitting in the “Hot Seat”. New headteachers in the UK. Journal of Educational Administration, 44(4), 326-340.
45. White, D. R., Crooks, S. M. and Melton, J. K. (2002). Design Dynamics of a Leadership Assessment Academy:Principal Self-Assessment Using Research and Technology. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 16(1), 45-61.
46. Wong, P. (2004). The professional development of school principals: Insights from evaluating a programme in Hong-Kong. School leadership and Management, 24(2), 139-162.
47. Wong, K. and Ng, H. (2003). On Hong Kong: The Making of Secondary School Principals. In P. Pashiardis and P. Ribbins (Ed.). International Studies in Educational Administration, Special Issue on the Making of Secondary School Principals on Selected Small, 31(2), 35-53.
48. Waters, T. Marzano, R. J. and McNulty, B. (2003). Balanced Leadership: What 30 Years of Research Tells Us About the Effect of Leadership on Student Achievement. Denver, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.