The assessment of principal performance: A multilevel evaluation approach

Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 11-28

  Heck, Ronald H ^a   Marcoulides, George A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002423554     PISSN: 0920525X     EISSN: 15730425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF00139466     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Andrews, R., & Soder, R. (1987). Principal instructional leadership and school achievement. Instructional Leadership, 44, 9-11.
2. Bossert, S., Dwyer, D., Rowan, B., & Lee, J. (1982). The instructional management role of the principal. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(3), 34-64.
3. Boyan, N. (1988). Describing and explaining administrator behavior. In N. Boyan (Ed). Handbook of research on educational administration. New York: Longman.
4. Bryk, A., & Raudenbush, S. (1992). Hierachical linear models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Cronbach. L. (1971). Test validation. In R. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational measurement, 2nd edition. Washington, DC: American Council on Education, 166-195.
6. Cronbach. L., & Meehl, P. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
7. Duke, D., & Iwanicki, E. (1992). Principal assessment and the notion of "fit." Peabody Journal of Education, 68(1), 25-36.
8. Education Week. (January 25, 1995). Cincinnati links administrators' pay, performance, 1, 6.
9. Ginsberg, R., & Berry, B. (1990). The folklore of principal evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 3(3), 205-230.
10. Glasman, N., & Heck, R. (1992). The changing role of the principal: Implications for principal assessment. Peabody Journal of Education, 68(1), 5-24.
11. Glasman, N., & Heck, R. (in press). Role-based evaluation of principals: Developing an appraisal system. In K. Leithwood (Ed.) The international handbook of research on educational leadership and administration. New York: Kluwer Press.
12. Hallinger, P., Bickman, L., & Davis, K. (1989). What makes a difference? School context, principal leadership, and student achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, March.
13. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (in press). The principal's role in school effectiveness: An assessment of methodological progress, 1980-1995. In K. Leithwood (Ed.) The international handbook of research on educational leadership and administration. New York: Kluwer Press.
14. Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1986). The social context of effective schools. American Journal of Education, 94(3), 329-355.
15. Hart, A. (1992). The social and organizational influences of principals: Evaluating principals in context. Peabody Journal of Education, 68(1), 37-57.
16. Heck, R., (1993). School context, principal leadership, and achievement: The case of secondary schools in Singapore. The Urban Review, 25(2), 151-166.
17. Heck, R., & Glasman, N. (1993). Merging evaluation and administration. Peabody Journal of Education, 68(2), 132-142.
18. Heck, R., Larsen, T., & Marcoulides, G. (1990). Instructional leadership and school performance: Validation of a causal model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26(2), 94-125.
19. Heck, R., Marcoulides, G., & Glasman, N. (1989). The application of causal modeling techniques to administrative decision making: The case of teacher allocation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 25(3), 253-267.
20. Heck, R., & Marcoulides, G. (1992). Principal assessment: Conceptual problem, methodological problem, or both? Peabody Journal of Education, 68(1), 124-144.
21. Heck, R., & Marcoulides, G., & Lang, P. (1991). Principal leadership and school achievement: The application of discriminant techniques. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2(2), 115-135.
22. Heck, R. & Mayor, R. (1993). School characteristics, school academic indicators and student outcomes: Implications for policies to improve schools. Journal of Education Policy, 8(2), 143-154.
23. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation, (1988). The personnel evaluation standards: How to assess systems for evaluating educators. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24. Leithwood, K. (1994). Leadership for restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(4), 498-518.
25. Leithwood, K, Jantzi, D., Silins, H., & Dart, B. (1993). Using the appraisal of school leaders as an instrument for school restructuring. Peabody Journal of Education, 68(2), 85-109.
26. Marcoulides, G. (1989). Performance appraisal: Issues of validity. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 2(2), 3-12.
27. Marcoulides, G., & Heck, R. (1992). Assessing instructional leadership effectiveness with g theory. International Journal of Management in Education, 6(3), 4-13.
28. Marcoulides, G., & Heck, R. (1993a). Organizational culture and performance: Proposing and testing a model. Organization Science, 3(4), 209-225.
29. Marcoulides, G., & Heck, R. (1993b). Examining administrative leadership behavior: A comparison of principals and vice principals. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 7(1), 81-94.
30. National Council on Measurement in Education (1984). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
31. Peters, S., & Bagenstos, N. (1988). State mandated principal evaluation: A report on practices. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, New Orleans, April.
32. Peterson, K. (1978-1979). The principal's tasks. Administrator's Notebook, 26(8), 1-4.
33. Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. (1986). A hierarchical model for studying school effects. Sociology of Education, 59, 1-17.
34. Rowan, B., Raudenbush, S., & Kan, S. (1991). Organizational design in high schools: A multilevel analysis. American Journal of Education, 99(2), 238-266.
35. Scriven, M. (1995). Duties of the teacher. Paper presented at the Hawaii Institute on Assessment and Accountability, Honolulu, January 23.
36. Sirotnik, K., & Burstein, L, (1985). Measurement and statistical issues in multilevel research on schooling. Educational Administration Quarterly, 21(3), 169-186.
37. Snyder, J., & Ebmeier, H. (1992). Empirical linkages among principal behaviors and intermediate outcomes: Implications for principal evaluation. Peabody Journal of Education, 68(1), 75-107.
38. Stufflebeam, D. (1995). Professional standards for assessing and improving educational personnel evaluation systems. Paper presented at the Hawaii Institute on Assessment and Accountability, Honolulu, January 24.
39. Stufflebeam, D., & Nevo, D. (1993). Principal evaluation: New directions for improvement. Peabody Journal of Education, 68(2), 24-47.
40. Webster, W. & Menro, R. (1995). Evaluation for improved school level decision-making and productivity. Paper presented at the Hawaii Institute on Assessment and Accountability, Honolulu, January 23.