Language and Science Learning

Handbook of Research on Science Education

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 57-74

  Carlsen, William S ^a  

^a Penn State s College of Education   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145510832     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203824696-4     Document Type: Chapter

References (101)

1. Adey, P. (1999). The science of thinking, and science for thinking: A description of cognitive acceleration through science education (CASE), Innodata Monographs No. 2. Geneva: International Bureau of Education.
2. Anderson, O. R., Randle, D., and Covotsos, T. (2001). The role of ideational networks in laboratory inquiry learning and knowledge of evolution among seventh grade students. Science Education, 85, 410-425.
3. Au, K. H., and Mason, J. M. (1983). Cultural congruence in classroom participation structures:Achieving a balance of rights. Discourse Processes, 6, 145-167.
4. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
5. Bernstein, B. (1961). Social class and linguistic development. In A. Halsey, J. Floud, and B. Bernstein (Eds.), Education, economy and society (pp. 288-314). New York: Free Press.
6. Blanton, M. L., Westbrook, S. L., and Carter, G. (2001, April). Using Valsiner’s zone theory to interpret change in classroom practice: Beyond the zone of proximal development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
7. Bowen, G. M., and Roth, W.-M. (2002). The “socialization” and enculturation of ecologists in formal and informal settings. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 6(3), Article 01. Retrieved November 20, 2004, from http://unr.edu/homepage/crowther/ejse/bowenroth.html
8. Brannigan, A. (1981). The social basis of scientific discoveries. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
9. Candela, A. (1995). Consensus construction as a collective task in Mexican science classes. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 26, 458-474.
10. Carlsen, W. S. (1991a). Questioning in classrooms: A sociolinguistic perspective. Review of Educational Research, 61, 157-178.
11. Carlsen, W. S. (1991b). Subject-matter knowledge and science teaching: A pragmatic perspective. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Vol. 2. Teachers’ knowledge of subject matter as it relates to their teaching practice (pp. 115-143). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
12. Carlsen, W. S. (1997). Never ask a question if you don’t know the answer: The tension in teaching between modeling scientific argument and maintaining law and order. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 32(2), 14-23.
13. Chaiklin, S., and Lave, J. (1993). Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
14. Charnitski, C. W., and Harvey, F. A. (1999, February). Integrating science and mathematics curricula using computer mediated communications: AVygotskian perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Houston, TX.
15. Chomsky, N. (1972). Language and mind. New York: Harcourt.
16. Crawford, T., Kelly, G. J., and Brown, C. (2000). Ways of knowing beyond facts and laws of science:An ethnographic investigation of student engagement in scientific practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 237-258.
17. Curtis, S., and Millar, R. (1988). Language and conceptual understanding in science: A comparison of English and Asian-language-speaking children. Research in Science and Technological Education, 6, 61-77.
18. Dörries, M. (Ed.). (2002). Experimenting in tongues: Studies in science and language. Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.
19. Driver, R. (1983). The pupil as scientist? Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
20. Duran, B. J., Dugan, T., and Weffer, R. (1998). Language minority students in high school: The role of language in learning biology concepts. Science Education, 82, 311-341.
21. Erickson, F., and Mohatt, G. (1982). Cultural organization of participant structures in two classrooms of Indian students. In G. D. Spindler (Ed.), Doing the ethnography of schooling: Educational anthropology in action (pp. 132-174). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
22. Fisher, K. M., Wandersee, J. H., and Moody, D. E. (2000). Mapping biology knowledge. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
23. Geddis, A. N. (1998). Analyzing discourse about controversial issues in the science classroom. In D. A. Roberts and L. Östman (Eds.), Problems of meaning in science curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.
24. Gee, J. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis. New York: Routledge.
25. Groisman, A., Shapiro, B., and Willinsky, J. (1991). The potential of semiotics to inform understanding of events in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 13, 217-226.
26. Halliday, M. A. K., and Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science. London: Falmer Press.
27. Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
28. Hewson, M. G., and Hamlyn, J. (1984). The influence of intellectual environment on conceptions of heat. European Journal for Science Education, 6, 245-262.
29. Hoadley, C. M., and Linn, M. C. (2000). Teaching science through online, peer discussions: Speakeasy in the knowledge integration environment. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 839-857.
30. Hogan, K. (1999). Thinking aloud together: A test of an intervention to foster students’ collaborative scientific reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 1085-1109.
31. Hogan, K., and Corey, C. (2001). Viewing classrooms as cultural contexts for fostering scientific literacy. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 32, 214-243.
32. Hogan, K., and Maglienti, M. (2001). Comparing the epistemological underpinnings of students’ and scientists’ reasoning about conclusions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 663-687.
33. Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K., and Pressley, M. (1999). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 17, 379-432.
34. Howe, A. C. (1996). Development of science concepts within a Vygotskian framework. Science Education, 80, 35-51.
35. Jordan, B. (1989). Cosmopolitical obstetrics: Some insights from the training of traditional midwives. Social Science and Medicine, 28, 925-944.
36. Kelly, G. J. (1997). Research traditions in comparative context: A philosophical challenge to radical constructivism. Science Education, 81, 355-375.
37. Kelly, G. J., Brown, C., and Crawford, T. (2000). Experiments, contingencies, and curriculum: Providing opportunities for learning through improvisation in science teaching. Science Education, 84, 624-657.
38. Kelly, G. J., Carlsen, W. S., and Cunningham, C. M. (1993). Science education in sociocultural context:Perspectives from the sociology of science. Science Education, 77, 207-220.
39. Kelly, G. J., and Chen, C. (1999). The sound of music: Constructing science as sociocultural practices through oral and written discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 883-915.
40. Keys, C. W. (1994). The development of scientific reasoning skills in conjunction with collaborative writing assignments: An interpretive study of six ninth-grade students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 1003-1022.
41. Keys, C. W. (1995). An interpretive study of students’ use of scientific reasoning during a collaborative report writing intervention in ninth grade general science. Science Education, 79, 415-435.
42. Keys, C. W. (1999). Revitalizing instruction in scientific genres: Connecting knowledge production with writing to learn in science. Science Education, 83, 115-130.
43. Keys, C. W., Hand, B., Prain, V., and Collins, S. (1999). Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigations in secondary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 1065-1084.
44. Kittleson, J. M., and Southerland, S. A. (2004). The role of discourse in group knowledge construction:A case study of engineering students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 267-293.
45. Knorr-Cetina, K. D. (1983). The ethnographic study of scientific work: Towards a constructivist interpretation of science. In K. D. Knorr-Cetina and M. Mulkay (Eds.), Science observed: Perspectives on the social study of science (pp. 115-140). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
46. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago.
47. Latour, B., and Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
48. Lave, J., and Wenger, E. (1992). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
49. Lavoie, D. R. (1999). Effects of emphasizing hypothetico-predictive reasoning within the science learning cycle on high school student’s process skills and conceptual understandings in biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 1127-1147.
50. Lee, O. (1999). Science knowledge, world views, and information sources in social and cultural contexts:Making sense after a natural disaster. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 187-219.
51. Lee, O., and Fradd, S. (1996). Interactional patterns of linguistically diverse students and teachers:Insights for promoting science learning. Linguistics and Education, 8, 269-297.
52. Lee, O., and Fradd, S. H. (1998). Science for all, including students from non-English language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 27(4), 12-21.
53. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
54. Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 296-316.
55. Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
56. Longino, H. E. (2002). The fate of knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
57. Lubben, F., Netshisaulu, T., and Campbell, B. (1999). Students’ use of cultural metaphors and their scientific understandings related to heating. Science Education, 83, 761-774.
58. McDonald, J. T., and Abell, S. K. (2002, April). Essential elements of inquiry-based science and its connection to generative and authoritative student discourse. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
59. Medawar, P. (1974). Is the scientific paper a fraud? In E. W. Jenkins and R. C. Whitfield (Eds.), Readings in science education (pp. 14-16). London: McGraw-Hill.
60. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61. Mishler, E. G. (1978). Studies in dialogue and discourse. III. Utterance structure and utterance function in interrogative sequences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 7, 279-305.
62. Moje, E. B., Collazo, T., Carrillo, R., and Marx, R. W. (2001). “Maestro, what is ‘quality’?" Language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 469-498.
63. Mortimer, E. F., and Machado, A. H. (2000). Anomalies and conflicts in classroom discourse. Science Education, 84, 429-444.
64. Mulkay, M. (1991). Sociology of science: A sociological pilgrimage. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
65. Philips, S. U. (1972). Participant structures and communicative competence: Warm springs children in community and classroom. In C. B. Cazden, V. P. John, and D. Hymes (Eds.), Functions of language in the classroom (pp. 370-394). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
66. Piaget, J. (1969). The child’s conception of the world. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams, and Co. (original work published 1929).
67. Polman, J. L., and Pea, R. D. (2001). Transformative communication as a cultural tool for guiding inquiry science. Science Education, 85, 223-238.
68. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., and Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-227.
69. Prain, V., and Hand, B. (1999). Students’ perceptions of writing for learning in secondary school science. Science Education, 83, 151-162.
70. Rivard, L. P., and Straw, S. B. (2000). The effect of talk and writing on learning science: An exploratory study. Science Education, 84, 566-593.
71. Rogoff, B. (1994). Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1, 209-229.
72. Roth, W.-M. (1995a). Authentic school science: Knowing and learning in open-inquiry science laboratories. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
73. Roth, W.-M. (1995b). Inventors, copycats, and everyone else: The emergence of shared resources and practices as defining aspects of classroom communities. Science Education, 79, 475-502.
74. Roth, W.-M. (2001). Situating cognition. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 27-61.
75. Roth, W.-M., Bowen, G. M., and Masciotra, D. (2002). From thing to sign and “natural object”:Toward a genetic phenomenology of graph interpretation. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 27, 327-356.
76. Roth, W.-M., and Lawless, D. (2002). Science, culture, and the emergence of language. Science Education, 86, 368-385.
77. Roth, W.-M., and Tobin, K. (2001). The implications of coteaching/cogenerative dialogue for teacher evaluation: Learning from multiple perspectives of everyday practice. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 15, 7-29.
78. Roth, W.-M., and Welzel, M. (2001). From activity to gestures and scientific language. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 103-136.
79. Rowlands, S. (2000). Turning Vygotsky on his head: Vygotsky’s “scientifically based method” and the socioculturalist’s “social other.” Science and Education, 9, 537-575.
80. Rowlands, S., Graham, T., and Berry, J. (1999). Can we speak of alternative frameworks and conceptual change in mechanics? Science and Education, 8, 241-271.
81. Russell, T. L. (1983). Analyzing arguments in science classroom discourse: Can teachers’ questions distort scientific authority? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 27-45.
82. Säljö, R. (1998). Learning inside and outside schools: Discursive practices and sociocultural dynamics. In D. A. Roberts and L. Östman (Eds.), Problems of meaning in science curriculum (pp. 39-53). New York: Teachers College Press.
83. Sandoval, W. A., and Morrison, K. (2003). High school students’ ideas about theories and theory change after a biological inquiry unit. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 369-392.
84. Shapin, S., and Shaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the air pump. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
85. Shultz, J. J., Erickson, F., and Florio, S. (1982). Where’s the floor? Aspects of the cultural organization of social relationships in communication at home and in school. In P. Gilmore and A. Glatthorn (Eds.), Children in and out of school: Ethnography and education (pp. 88-123). Washington, DC:Center for Applied Linguistics.
86. Stoddart, T., Pinal, A., Latzke, M., and Canaday, D. (2002). Integrating inquiry science and language development for English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 664-687.
87. Sutton, C. (1992). Words, science, and learning. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
88. Sutton, C. (1998). New perspectives on language in science. In B. J. Fraser and K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (Vol. 1, pp. 27-38). Dordrecht, the Netherlands:Kluwer Academic.
89. Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
90. Trautmann, N. M., Carlsen, W. S., Eick, C. J., Gardner, F., Jr., Kenyon, L., Moscovici, H., et al. (2003). Online peer review: Learning science as it’s practiced. Journal of College Science Teaching, 32, 443-447.
91. Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (original work published 1934).
92. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.
93. Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
94. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
95. Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality. New York: Wiley.
96. Wilson, J. M. (1999). Using words about thinking: Content analyses of chemistry teachers’ classroom talk. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 1067-1084.
97. Wittgenstein, L. (1967). Philosophical investigations. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
98. Wong, D., and Pugh, K. (2001). Learning science: A Deweyan perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 317-336.
99. Woolgar, S. (1976). Writing an intellectual history of scientific development: The use of discovery accounts. Social Studies of Science, 6, 395-422.
100. Yore, L. D., Bisanz, G. L., and Hand, B. M. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy:25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 6, 689-725.
101. Yore, L. D., Hand, B. M., and Prain, V. (2002). Scientists as writers. Science Education, 86, 672-692.