Science, Culture, and the Emergence of Language

Science Education

Volumn 86, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 368-385

  Roth, Wolff Michael ^a   Lawless, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036243189     PISSN: 00368326     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sce.10008     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Amann, K., & Knorr-Cetina, K. D. (1990). The fixation of (visual) evidence. In M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 85-121). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
2. Bates, E. (1999). Plasticity, localization and language development. In S. H. Broman & J. M. Fletcher (Eds.), The changing nervous system: Neurobehavioral consequences of early brain disorders (pp. 214-253). New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Bazerman, C. (1987). Shaping written knowledge. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
4. Bourdieu, P. (1997). Méditations pascaliennes [Pascalian meditations]. Paris: Seuil.
5. Cadoz, C. (1994). Les réalités virtuelles [Virtual realities]. Paris: Flammarion.
6. Chi, M. T. H. (1991). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learing and discovery in science. In R. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (pp. 129-186). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
7. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Churchland, P. M. (1989). A neurocomputational perspective: The nature of mind and the structure of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
9. De Jong, E. D. (2000). Autonomous formation of concepts and communication. Doctoral dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Brussel. Available at http://arti.vub.ac.be/̃edwin/thesis [2000-12-09].
10. Fuller, S. (1992). Social epistemology and the research agenda of science study. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 390-428). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Fuller, S. (1997). Science. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
12. Garfinkel, H., Lynch, M., & Livingston, E. (1981). The work of a discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11, 131-158.
13. Goldin-Meadow, S., Alibali, M., & Church, R. B. (1993). Transitions in concept acquisition: Using the hands to read the mind. Psychological Review, 100, 279-297.
14. Goldin-Meadow, S., Wein, D., & Chang, C. (1992). Assessing knowledge through gesture: Using children's hands to read their minds. Cognition and Instruction, 9, 201-219.
15. Gooding, D. (1990). Experiment and the making of meaning: Human agency in scientific observation and experiment. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
16. Gooding, D. (1992). Putting agency back into experiment. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as practice and culture (pp. 65-112). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
17. Goodman, N. (1978). Ways of worldmaking. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
18. Goodwin, C. (1995). Seeing in depth. Social Studies of Science, 25, 237-274.
19. Haviland, J. B. (1993). Anchoring, iconicity, and orientation in Guugu Yimithirr pointing gestures. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 3, 3-45.
20. Heidegger, M. (1977). Sein und Zeit [Being and time], Tübingen, Germany: Max Niemeyer. (English translation consulted is that by Joan Stambaugh, State University of New York Press, 1996.)
21. Iverson, J. M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1998). Why people gesture when they speak. Nature, 396, 228.
22. Kendon, Adam (1997). Gesture. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26, 109-128.
23. Kirsh, D., & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18, 513-549.
24. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
27. Lemke, J. (in press). Mathematics in the middle: Measure, picture, gesture, sign, and word. In M. Anderson, V. Cifarelli, A. Saenz-Ludlow, & A. Vile (Eds.), Semiotic perspectives on mathematics education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Levinson, S. C. (1997). Language and cognition: The cognitive consequences of spatial description in Guugu Yimithirr, Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 7, 98-131.
29. Lock, A. (1997). The role of gesture in the establishment of symbolic abilities: Continuities and discontinuities in early language development. Evolution of Communication, 1, 159-192.
30. Luhmann, N. (1995). Die Kunst der Gesellschaft [The art of society]. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
31. Mannheim, K. (1936/1966). Ideology and utopia: An introduction to the sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
32. Miller, G. (1981). Language and speech. New York: Freeman.
33. Ochs, E., Gonzales, P., & Jacoby, S. (1996). "When I come down I'm in the domain state": Grammar and graphic representation in the interpretive activity of physicists. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 328-369). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, & science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
35. Quine, W. V. (1995). From stimulus to science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36. Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Roth, W.-M. (1996a). The co-evolution of situated language and physics knowing. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 3, 171-191.
38. Roth, W.-M. (1996b). Thinking with hands, eyes, and signs: Multimodal science talk in a grade 6/7 unit on simple machines. Interactive Learning Environments, 4, 170-187.
39. Roth, W.-M. (1999a). Discourse and agency in school science laboratories. Discourse Processes, 28, 27-60.
40. Roth, W.-M. (1999b). The evolution of umwelt and communication. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 6(4), 5-23.
41. Roth, W.-M. (2000). From gesture to scientific language. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1683-1714.
42. Roth, W.-M. (in press-a). From epistemic (ergotic) actions to scientific discourse: The bridging function of gestures. Pragmatics & Cognition.
43. Roth, W.-M. (in press-b). From action to discourse: The bridging function of gestures. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research.
44. Roth, W.-M. (in press-c). Gestures: Their role in teaching and learning. Review of Educational Research.
45. Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, G. M. (1999a). Digitising lizards or the topology of vision in ecological fieldwork. Social Studies of Science, 29, 627-654.
46. Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, G. M. (1999b). Of cannibals, missionaries, and converts: Graphing competencies from grade 8 to professional science inside (classrooms) and outside (field/laboratory). Science, Technology, & Human Values, 24, 179-212.
47. Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, G. M. (in press). Of disciplined bodies and disciplined minds. Qualitative Sociology.
48. Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, G. M. (2001). Professionals read graphs: A semiotic analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 159-194.
49. Roth, W.-M., & Duit, R. (1997). Learning in real time: How understandings emerge from physics students' laboratory activities, In M. G. Shafto & P. Langley (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 1028). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Roth, W.-M., McRobbie, C., Lucas, K. B., & Boutonné, S. (1997a). The local production of order in traditional science laboratories: A phenomenological analysis. Learning and Instruction, 7, 107-136.
51. Roth, W.-M., McRobbie, C., Lucas, K. B., & Boutonné, S. (1997b). Why do students fail to learn from demonstrations? A social practice perspective on learning in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 509-533.
52. Roth, W.-M., & Roychoudhury, A. (1992). The social construction of scientific concepts or the concept map as conscription device and tool for social thinking in high school science. Science Education, 76, 531-557.
53. Steels, L. (1997). The synthetic modeling of language origins. Evolution of Communication, 1, 1-34.
54. Thagard, P. (1996). The concept of disease: Structure and change. Communication and Cognition, 29, 445-478.
55. Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
56. Vogt, P. (2000). Lexicon grounding on mobile robots. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel. Available at http://arti.vub.ac.be/̃paul/thesis.html [2000-12-09].
57. Weissberg, J.-L. (1999). Présences a distance. Déplacement virtuel et réseaux numériques: Pourquoi nous ne croyons plus la télévision [Presence at a distance. Virtual displacement and numerical networks: Why we no longer believe in television]. Paris: Éditions I'Harmattan.
58. Widlock, T. (1997). Orientation in the wild: The shared cognition of Hai∥om bushpeople. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 3, 317-332.
59. Woolgar, S. (1990). Time and documents in researcher interaction: Some ways of making out what is happening in experimental science. In M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 123-152). Cambridge, MA: MIT.