Multimodal Instructional Practices

Handbook of Research on New Literacies

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 871-898

  Stein, Pippa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145134085     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410618894-36     Document Type: Chapter

References (72)

1. Archer, A. (2006). Opening up spaces through symbolic objects: Harnessing students’ multimodal resources in developing English academic literacy in an Engineering course.English Studies in Africa, 49(1), pp. 189-206.
2. Baker, D., and Street, B. (2006). ‘So, What about Multimodal Literacies?' in K. Pahl, and K. J. Rowsell, (Eds.). Travel Notes from the New Literacy Studies. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 219-233.
3. Barthes, R. (1974). S/Z. New York: Hill and Wang.
4. Barton, D., Hamilton, M., and Ivanic, R. (2000). Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context. London: Routledge.
5. Beach, R., and O’Brian, D. (2005). Playing texts against each other in the multimodal English classroom. English in Education, 39(2), 44-59.
6. Bearne, E. (2003). Rethinking literacy: Communication, representation, and text. Reading:Literacy and Language, 37(3), 98-103. Retrieved September 10, 2006 from http://www. ukla.org/site/publications/pdf/literacypapers
7. Bearne, E. (2005). Multimodal texts: What they are and how children use them. In J. Evans (Eds.), Literacy moves on: Using popular culture, new technologies, and critical literacy in the primary classroom (pp. 13-29). London: David Fulton.
8. Brenner, J., and Andrew, D. (2006). ‘Be an artist in words, that you may be strong, for the tongue is a sword’: Developing academic writing in a visual literacy course. English Studies in Africa, 49, 207-215.
9. Comber, B., Nixon, H., Ashmore, L., Loo, S., and Cook, J. (2005). Urban renewal from the inside out: Spatial and critical literacies in a low socioeconomic school community.Mind, Culture and Activity: Semiotic, Dialogic and Material Spaces (special issue), 13(3), 226-243.
10. Cope, B., and Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge.
11. Cope, B., Kalantzis, M., and Harvey, A. (2003, March). Assessing multiliteracies and the new basics. Assessment in Education, 10(1), 15-26.
12. Cummins, J. (2001). Negotiating identities: Education for empowerment in a diverse society (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: California Association for Bilingual Education.
13. de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life (S. Rendell, Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
14. Doneman, M. (1997). Multimediating. In C. Lankshear, C. Bigum, C. Durrant, B. Green, E. Honan, W. Morgan, et al. (Eds.), Digital rhetorics: Literacies and technologies in education - current practices and future directio ns (pp.). Canberra: Department of Employment, Education, Training, and Youth Affairs. [Vol 3, Children’s Literacy National Projects, pp. 131-148, ]? Brisbane: QUT/DEETYA.
15. Ferreira, A. (2006). Multiliteracies and standardized examinations: A personal reflection on the South African matric English language examination. English Studies in Africa, 49, 163-188.
16. Franks. A. (2003). Palmer’s kiss: Shakespeare, school drama, and semiotics. In C. Jewitt and G. Kress. (Eds.). Multimodal Literacy, (pp. 155-172). New York: Peter Lang.
17. Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). London:Taylor and Francis.
18. Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
19. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. London: Arnold.
20. Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. Hull, G., and Schultz, K. (Eds.). (2002). School’s out! Bridging out of school literacies with classroom practices. New York/London: Teachers College Press.
22. Jewitt, C. (2003). Rethinking assessment: Multimodality, literacy and computer-mediated learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, Practice, 10(1), 83-102.
23. Jewitt, C. (2006). Technology, literacy, learning. London: Routledge Falmer.
24. Jewitt, C., and Kress, G. (Eds.). (2003). Multimodal literacy. New York: Peter Lang.
25. Johnson, D., and Kress, G. (2003, March). Globalization, literacy and society: Redesigning pedagogy and assessment. Assessment in Education, 10(1), 5-14.
26. Kendrick, M., Mckay, R., and Moffatt, L. (2005). The portrayal of self in children’s drawings of home, school, and community literacies. In J. Anderson, M. Kendrick, T. Rogers, and S. Smythe (Eds.), Portraits of literacy across families, communities, and schools: Intersections and tensions pp. 185-204. New Jersey and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Kenner, C. (2003). Embodied knowledges: Young children’s engagement with the act of writing. In C. Jewitt and G. Kress (Eds.), Multimodal literacy (pp.). New York: Peter Lang.
28. Kenner, C. (2004). Becoming biliterate: Young children learning different writing systems.Cambridge, UK: Stoke on Trent.
29. Kress, G. (1997). Before writing: Rethinking the paths to literacy. London: Routledge.
30. Kress, G. (2000). Multimodality. In B. Cope and M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy, learning, and the design of Social Futures (pp. 182-202). London: Routledge.
31. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
32. Kress, G., and van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London:Routledge.
33. Kress G., and van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal disourse. London: Arnold.
34. Kress, G., and van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
35. Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Bourne, J., Franks, A., Hardcastle, J., Jones, K., et al. (2005). English in urban classrooms. London: Routledge Falmer.
36. Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., and Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning:Rhetorics of the science classroom. London: Continuum.
37. Lancaster, L. (2003). Beginning at the beginning: How a child constructs time multimodally. In C. Jewitt and G. Kress (Eds.), Multimodal literacy (pp. 107-122). New York: Peter Lang.
38. Lankshear, C., and Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
39. Lemke, J. (2000). Multimedia literacy demands of the scientific curriculum. Linguistics and Education, 10(3), 247-271.
40. Martinec, R. (2000). Construction of identity in Michael Jackson’s ‘Jam.' Social Semiotics, 10(3), 313-29.
41. Mavers, D. (2003). Communicating meanings though image composition, spatial arrangement, and links in primary school student mind maps. In C. Jewitt, and G. Kress (Eds.), Multimodal literacy (pp. 19-33). New York: Peter Lang.
42. McCarthey, S. J., and Moje, E. (2002). Conversations: Identity matters. Reading Research Quarterly, 27(2), 228-238.
43. Millard, E. (2006). Transformative pedagogy: Teachers creating a literacy of fusion. In K. Pahl, and J. Rowsell (Eds.), Travelnotes from the new literacy studies: Instances of practice (pp. 228-238). Clevedon, U.K.: Multilingual Matters.
44. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-92.
45. Newfield, D., Andrew, A., Stein, P., and Maungedzo, R. (2003, March). No number can describe how good it was: Assessment issues in the multimodal classroom. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 10(1), 61-81.
46. Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction. London: Routledge.
47. O’Halloran, K. (2000). Classroom discourse in mathematics: A multisemiotic analysis. Linguistics and Education, 10(3), 359-388.
48. O’Halloran, K. (Ed.). (2004). Multimodal discourse analysis. London: Continuum.
49. Ormerod, F., and Ivanic, R. (2002). Materiality in children’s meaning making practices. Visual Communication, 1(1), 65-91.
50. Pahl, K. (1999). Transformations: Children’s meaning making in nursery education. Cambridge, UK: Stoke on Trent.
51. Pahl, K., and Rowsell, J. (2005). Literacy and education. London/Thousand Oaks, CA/New Delhi: Paul Chapman Publishing.
52. Pahl, K., and Rowsell, J. (Eds.). (2006). Travelnotes from the new literacy studies: Instances of practice. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
53. Prinsloo, M. (2004). Literacy is child’s play: Making sense in Khwezi Park. Language and Education, 18(4), 291-303.
54. Rogers, T., and Schofield, A. (2005). Things thicker than words: Portraits of youth multiple literacies in an alternative secondary program. In J. Anderson, M. Kendrick, T. Rogers, and S. Smythe (Eds.), Portraits of literacy across families, communities, and schools:Intersections and tension s (pp. 205-223). New Jersey/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
55. Rose, G. (2001). Visual methodologies. London: Sage.
56. Scollon, R., and Wong-Scollon, S. (2003). Discourses in place. London: Routledge.
57. Shortis, T., and Jewitt, C. (2005). A ‘multimodal ecology of text’ in advanced level English language examinations? English in Education, 39(2), 76-96.
58. Smagorinsky, P., Zoss, M., and O’Donnell-Allen, C. (2005). Mask-making as identity project in a high school English class: A case study. English in Education, 39(2), 60-75.
59. Stein, P. (2003). The Olifantsvlei fresh stories project: Multimodality, creativity, and fixing in the semiotic chain. In C. Jewitt and G. Kress (Eds.), Multimodal iteracy (pp. 123-138). New York: Peter Lang.
60. Stein, P. (2004). Representation, rights, and resources: Multimodal pedagogies in the language and literacy classroom. In B. Norton and K. Tooney (Eds.), Critical pedagogies and language learning (pp. 95-115). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
61. Stein, P. (2007). Multimodal Pedagogies in Diverse Classrooms: Rights, Representation and Resources. London: Routledge (in press).
62. Street, B. (Ed.). (2005). Literacies across educational contexts. Philadelphia: Caslon Inc.
63. Street, B., and Baker, D. (2006). So, what about multimodal numeracies? In K. Pahl and J. Rowsell (Eds.), Travelnotes from the new literacy studies: Instances of practice (pp. 118-146). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
64. Thesen, L. (2001). Modes, literacies, and power: A university case study. Language and Education, 15(2/3), 132-145.
65. Unsworth, L. (2001). Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum: Changing contexts of text and image in classroom practice. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
66. United Kingdom Literacy Association [UKLA]. (2004). More than Words: Multimodal Texts in the Classroom, London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. Retrieved June 12, 2007 from http://www.qca.org.uk/9054.html
67. van Leeuwen, T. (1999). Speech, music, sound. London: Macmillan.
68. van Leeuwen, T. (2000). It was just like magic: A multimodal analysis of children’s writing.Linguistics and Education, 10(3), 273-305.
69. van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. London/New York: Routledge.
70. Wells, G. (2000). Modes of meaning in a science activity. Linguistics and Education, 10(3), 307-34.
71. Wemmer, K., and Drew, M. (2004). Designing think trails: Using multiliteracies pedagogy to reshape academic knowledge into clinical reasoning. Unpublished paper, Department of Audiology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
72. Wyatt-Smith, C., and Kimber, K. (2005). Valuing and evaluating student-generated online multimodal texts: Rethinking what counts. English in Education, 39(2), 22-44.