The portrayal of self in children's drawings of home, school, and community literacies

Portraits of Literacy Across Families Communities and Schools: Intersections and Tensions

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 185-204

  Kendrick, Maureen ^a   McKay, Roberta ^b   Moffatt, Lyndsay ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70450100332     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410612830     Document Type: Chapter

References (38)

1. Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (2000). Literacy practices. In D.Barton, M.Hamilton, & R.Ivanič (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 7-15). London: Routledge.
2. Bruner, J.S. (1964). The course of cognitive growth. American Psychologist, 19, 1-15.
3. Cherland, M.R. (1994). Private practices: Girls reading fiction and constructing identity. Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.
4. Cope, B., Kalantzis, M., & The New London Group. (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge.
5. Davies, B. (1993). Beyond dualism and towards multiple subjectivities. In L.Christian-Smith (Ed.), Texts of desire: Essays on fiction, femininity, and schooling (pp. 145-173). London: Falmer.
6. Eisner, E.W. (1985). The art of educational evaluation: A personal view. London: Falmer Press.
7. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
8. Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on social situations of mental patients and other inmates. New York: Anchor.
9. Goldstone, B. (1999). Brave new worlds: The changing image of the picture book. New Advocate, 12, 331-343.
10. Hamilton, M. (2000). Expanding the new literacy studies: Using photographs to explore literacy as social practice. In D.Barton, M.Hamilton, & R.Ivanič (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 16-34). London: Sage.
11. Heath, S.B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Kanno, Y., & Norton, B. (2003). Imagined communities and educational possibilities: Introduction. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 2(4), 241-249.
13. Kendrick, M., & McKay, R. (2002). Uncovering literacy narratives through children's drawings: An illustrative example. Canadian Journal of Education, 27(1), 45-60.
14. Kendrick, M., & McKay, R. (2004). Drawing as an alternative way of understanding young children's constructions of literacy. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 4(1), 109-128.
15. Kress, G. (1997). Before writing: Rethinking the paths to literacy. London: Routledge.
16. Kress, G. (2000a). Multimodality. In B.Cope & M.Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 182-202). London: Routledge.
17. Kress, G. (2000b). "You've just got to learn how to see": Curriculum subjects, young people and schooled engagement with the world. Linguistics and Education, 11(4), 401-415.
18. Kress, G., & Jewitt, C. (2003). Introduction. In C.Jewitt & G.Kress (Eds.), Multimodal literacy (pp. 1-18). New York: Peter Lang.
19. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
20. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
21. Luke, A. (1997). Critical approaches to literacy. In V.Edwards & D.Corson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education: Volume 2, Literacy (pp. 50-57). Boston: Kluwer.
22. Martino, W. (1995). Boys and literacy: Exploring the construction of hegemonic masculinities and the formation of literate capacities for boys in the English classroom. English in Australia, 112, 11-24.
23. McKay, R., & Kendrick, M. (2001). Children draw their images of reading and writing. Language Arts, 78, 529-533.
24. Mirzoeff, N. (1999). An introduction to visual culture. London: Routledge.
25. Newkirk, T. (2000). Misreading masculinity: Speculations on the great gender gap in writing. Language Arts, 77, 294-300.
26. Nixon, H. (2001, December). "Slow and steady-not enough pace!": The absence of the visual in valued middle primary literate competencies. Paper presented the Australian Association for Research in Education National Conference, Fremantle, Australia.
27. Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity, and educational change. England: Pearson Education.
28. Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2003). Introduction. In B.Norton & K.Toohey (Eds.), Critical pedagogies and language learning (pp. 1-17). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
29. Pahl, K. (2003). Children's text-making at home: Transforming meaning across modes. In C. Jewitt & G.Kress (Eds.), Multimodal literacy (pp. 139-154). New York: Peter Lang.
30. Piaget, J. (1969). The mechanisms of perception. London: Routledge & K.Paul.
31. Rose, G. (2001). Visual methodologies. London: Sage.
32. Schwartzman, H. (1976). Children's play: A sideways glance at make-believe. In D.F.Lancy & B.A.Tindall (Eds.), The study of play: Problems and prospects (pp. 208-215). New York: Leisure Press.
33. Solsken, J.W. (1993). Literacy, gender, and work in families and in schools. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
34. Stein, P. (2003). Representation, rights, and resources: Multimodal pedagogies in the language and literacy classroom. In B.Norton & K.Toohey (Eds.), Critical pedagogies and language learning (pp. 95-115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Toohey, K. (2000). Learning English at school: Identity, social relations and classroom practice. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
36. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
38. Wiesner, D. (2000). The three pigs. New York: Clarion Books.