Synthetic Learning Environments

Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, Third Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 317-327

  Cannon Bowers, Janis A ^a   Bowers, Clint A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Simulation: A working representation of reality; used in training to represent devices and process and may be low or high in terms of physical or functional fidelity.; Synthetic learning environments: A learning environment characterized in terms of a particular technology, subject matter, learner characteristics, and pedagogical principles; a synthetic experience, as opposed to a real world interaction with an actual device or process, is created for the learner through a simulation, game, or other technology.

Indexed keywords

EID: 85144927962     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203880869-30     Document Type: Chapter

References (100)

1. Abell, M. and Galinsky, M. (2002). Introducing students to computer-based group work practice. J. Social Work Educ., 38(1), 39-54.
2. Andrews, D. H. and Bell, H. H. (2000). Simulation-based training. In Training and Retraining: A Handbook for Business, Industry, Government, and the Military, edited by S. Tobias and J. D. Fletcher, pp. 357-384. New York: Macmillan.*
3. Baker, E. L. and O’Neil, Jr., H. F. (2003). Technological fluency: needed skills for the future. In Technology Applications in Education: A Learning View, edited by H. F. O’Neil, Jr., and R. S. Perez, pp. 245-265. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.*
4. Baylor, A.L. (2001). Agent-based learning environments for investigating teaching and learning. J. Educ. Comput. Res., 26, 249-270.
5. Bielaczyc, K. and Collins, A. (1999). Learning communities in classrooms: a reconceptualization of educational practice. In Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, Vol. II, edited by C. M. Reigeluth, pp. 269-292. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Bransford, J. D., Sherwood, R. D., Hasselbring, T. S., Kinzer, C. K., and Williams, S. M. (1990). Anchored instruction: why we need it and how technology can help. In Cognition, Education, and Multimedia: Exploring Ideas in High Technology, edited by D. Nix and R. J. Spiro, pp. 115-141. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R., Eds. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.*
8. Brosnan, M. (1999). Modeling technophobia: a case for word processing. Comput. Hum. Behav., 15(2), 105-121.
9. Brown, A. L. and Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In Classroom Lessons: Integrating Cognitive Theory and Classroom Instruction, edited by K. McGilly, pp. 229-272. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Brown, A. L. and Campione, J. C. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: on procedures, principles, and systems. In Innovations in Learning: New Environments for Education, edited by L. Schauble and R. Glaser, pp. 289-325. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Brown, S. J., Lieberman, D. A., Gemeny, B. A., Fan, Y. D., Wilson, C. M., and Pasta, D. J. (1997). Education video game for juvenile diabetes: results of a controlled trial. Med. Inform., 22(1), 77-79.
12. Cameron, B. and Dwyer, F. (2005). The effect of online gaming, cognition and feedback type in facilitating delayed achievement of different learning objectives. J. Interact. Learn. Res., 16(3), 243-258.
13. Cannon-Bowers, J. A. and Bowers, C. (in press). Synthetic learning environments: on developing a science of simulation, games, and virtual worlds for training. In Learning, Training, and Development in Organizations, edited by S. Koslowski and E. Salas. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Cannon-Bowers, J. A. and Salas, E. (1998). Team performance and training in complex environments: recent findings from applied research. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci., 7, 83-87.
15. Cartier, J. L. and Stewart, J. (2000). Teaching the nature of inquiry: further development in a high school genetics curriculum. Sci. Educ., 9, 247-267.
16. Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., and Farr, M. J., Eds. (1988). The Nature of Expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Clark, R. and Wittrock, M. C. (2000). Psychological principles in training. In Training and Retraining: A Handbook for Business, Industry, Government, and the Military, edited by S. Tobias and J. D. Fletcher, pp. 51-84. New York: Macmillan.
18. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (CTGV). (1992). Anchored instruction in science and mathematics: theoretical basis, developmental projects, and initial research findings. In Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Psychology, and Educational Theory and Practice, edited by R. A. Duschl and R. J. Hamilton, pp. 244-273. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.*
19. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (CTGV). (1997). The Jasper Project: Lessons in Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment, and Professional Development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (CTGV). (2000). Adventures in anchored instruction: lessons from beyond the ivory tower. In Advances in Instructional Psychology: Educational Design and Cognitive Science, Vol. 5, edited by R. Glaser, pp. 35-99. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optical Experience. New York: Harper Perennial.
22. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., and Ryan, R. M. (1999). A metaanalytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychol. Bull., 125, 627-668.
23. Dede, C., Salzman, M., Loftin, R. B., and Sprague, D. (1999). Multisensory immersion as a modeling environment for learning complex scientific concepts. In Computer Modeling and Simulation in Science Education, edited by N. Roberts, W. Feurzeig, and B. Hunter, pp. 282-319. New York: Springer-Verlag.*
24. DeGroot, A. (1965). Thought and Choice in Chess. The Hague: Mouton.
25. Dickey, M. (2005). Three-dimensional virtual worlds and distance learning: two case studies of active worlds as a medium for distance education. Br. J. Educ. Technol., 36(3), 439-451.
26. Dunn, S. (2003). Effects of a Simulation Game on Trainees’ Knowledge and Attitudes About Age-Related Changes in Learning and Work Behaviors of Older Workers. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International.
27. Dwyer, D. J., Oser, R. L., Salas, E., and Fowlkes, J. E. (1999). Performance measurement in distributed environments: initial results and implications for training. Milit. Psychol., 11, 189-215.
28. Egan, D. E. and Schwartz, B. J. (1979). Chunking in recall of symbolic drawings. Mem. Cogn., 7, 149-158.
29. Ellis, R., Marcus, G., and Taylor, R. (2005). Learning through inquiry: student difficulties with online course-based material. J. Comput. Assist. Learn., 21(4), 239-252.
30. Emurian, H. (2005). Web-based programmed instruction: evidence of rule-governed learning. Comput. Hum. Behav., 21(6), 893-915.
31. Epstein, J. A. and Harackiewicz, J. M. (1992). Winning is not enough: the effects of competition and achievement motivation on intrinsic interest. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 18, 128-138.
32. Fowlkes, J., Lane, N., Salas, E., Franz, T., and Oser, R. (1994). Improving the measurement of team performance: the TARGETs methodology. Milit. Psychol., 6(1), 47.
33. Fowlkes, J., Dwyer, D., and Oser, R. (1998). Event-based approach to training. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol., 8, 209-22.
34. Galvao, J. R., Martins, P. G., and Gomes, M. R. (2000). Modeling realty with simulation games for a cooperative learning. In Proc. of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC 2000), December 10-13, Orlando, FL, pp. 1692-1698.
35. Garg, A., Norman, G. R., Eva, K., Spero, L., and Sharan, S. (2002). Is there any real virtue of virtual reality? The minor role of multiple orientations in learning anatomy from computers. Acad. Med., 77, S97-S99.
36. Gee, J. P. (2003). What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.*
37. Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cogn. Sci., 7, 155-170.
38. Gerhard, M., Moore, D. J., and Hobbs, D. (2004). Embodiment and copresence in collaborative interfaces. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud., 61, 453-480.
39. Gist, M. E., Stevens, C. K., and Baveta, E. G. (1991). Effects of self-efficacy and post-training intervention on the acquisition and maintenance of complex interpersonal skills. Personnel Psychol., 44(4), 837-861.
40. Glaser, R. (1989). Expertise in learning: how do we think about instructional processes now that we have discovered knowledge structure? In Complex Information Processing: The Impact of Herbert A. Simon, edited by D. Klahr and D. Kotosfky, pp. 269-282. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41. Gobet, F. and Simon, H. A. (1996). Recall of random and distorted positions: implications for the theory of expertise. Mem. Cogn., 24, 493-503.
42. Goeters, K. (2002). Evaluation of the effects of CRM training by the assessment of non-technical skills under LOFT. Hum. Factors Aerospace Safety, 2(1), 71-86.
43. Gredler, M. E. (2004). Games and Simulations and Their Relationships to Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.*
44. Green, C. and Bavelier, D. (2003). Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature, 423(6939), 534-537.
45. Hasan, B. (2003). The influence of specific computer experiences on computer self-efficacy beliefs. Comput. Hum. Behav., 19(4), 443-450.
46. Honebein, P. C., Duffy, T. M., and Fishman, B. J. (1993). Constructivism and the design of learning environments: Context and authentic activities for learning. In Designing Environments for Constructive Learning, edited by T. M. Duffy, J. Lowyck, and D. H. Jonassen, pp. 87-108. New York: Springer-Verlag.
47. Hunt, N. and Bohlin, R. (1993). Teacher education students’ attitudes toward using computers. J. Res. Comput. Educ., 25(4), 487.
48. Jentsch, F. and Bowers, C. (1998). Evidence for the validity of PC-based simulations in studying aircrew coordination. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol., 8(3), 243-260.
49. Jentsch, F., Bowers, C., Berry, D., Dougherty, W., and Hitt II, J. M. (2001). Generating line-oriented flight simulation scenarios with the RRLOE computerized tool set. In Proc. of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting, October 8-12, Minneapolis, MN.
50. Johnson, D. (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull., 89(1), 47-62.
51. Johnson, R. (2005). An empirical investigation of sources of application-specific computer-self-efficacy and mediators of the efficacy-performance relationship. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud., 62(6), 737-758
52. Johnston, J. H., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., and Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (1995). Event-based performance measurement system for shipboard command teams. In Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Command and Control Research and Technology, pp. 274-276. Washington, D.C.: The Center for Advanced Command and Technology.
53. Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Revisiting activity theory as a framework for designing student-centered learning environments. In Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments, edited by D. H. Jonassen and S. M. Land, pp. 89-121. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.*
54. Jonassen, D. H. and Grabowski, B. (1993). Handbook of Individual Differences, Learning, and Instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.*
55. Kearsley, G. and Schneiderman, B. (1998). Engagement theory: a framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Educ. Technol., 38, 20-23.*
56. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
57. Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E., and Mainemelis, C. (2001). Experiential learning theory: previous research and new directions. In Perspectives on Thinking, Learning, and Cognitive Styles (The Educational Psychology Series), edited by R. J. Sternberg and L. Zhang, pp. 227-247. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
58. Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: mathematical knowing and teaching. Am. Educ. Res. J., 27(1), 29-63.
59. Lane, J., Slavin, S., and Ziv, A. (2001). Simulation in medical education: a review. Simul. Gaming, 32(3), 297-314.*
60. Lehrer, R. and Schauble, L. (2000). Modeling in mathematics and science. In Advances in Instructional Psychology: Educational Design and Cognitive Science, Vol. 5, edited by R. Glaser, pp. 101-159. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
61. Lesgold, A. (1988). Toward a theory of curriculum for use in designing intelligent instructional systems. In Learning Issues for Intelligent Tutoring Systems, edited by H. Mandl and A. Lesgold, pp. 114-137. New York: Springer-Verlag.
62. Link, M., Armsby, P., Hubal, R., and Guinn, C. (2006). Accessibility and acceptance of responsive virtual human technology as a survey interviewer training tool. Comput. Hum. Behav., 22(3), 412-426.
63. Locke, E. A. and Latham, G. P. (1990). Work motivation: the high performance cycle. In Work Motivation, edited by U. Kleinbeck and H. Quast, pp. 3-25. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
64. Locke, E. A., Shaw, K. N., and Saari, L. M. (1981) Goal setting and task performance: 1969-1980. Psychol. Bull., 90, 125-152
65. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychol. Rev., 95, 492-527.
66. MacArthur, C. and Malouf, D. (1991). Teachers’ beliefs, plans, and decisions about computer-based instruction. J. Spec. Educ., 25(1), 44.
67. Mayer, R. E. and Massa, L. (2003). Three facets of visual and verbal learners: cognitive ability, cognitive style, and learning preference. J. Educ. Psychol., 95(4), 833-846.
68. McClean, P., Saini-Eidukat, B., Schwert, D., Slator, B. M., and White, A. (2001). Virtual worlds in large enrollment science classes significantly improve authentic learning. In Selected Papers from the 12th International Conference on College Teaching and Learning, edited by J. A. Chambers, pp. 111-118. Jacksonville, FL: Center for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning.
69. McFarland, D. and Hamilton, D. (2006). Adding contextual specificity to the technology acceptance model. Comput. Hum. Behav., 22(3), 427-447.
70. Moreno, R. and Mayer, R. E. (2004). Personalized messages that promote science learning in virtual environments. J. Educ. Psychol., 96, 165-173.
71. Nelson, L. M. (1999). Collaborative problem solving. In Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, Vol. II, edited by C. M. Reigeluth, pp. 241-267. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
72. Nemeth, E. (1999). Gender differences in reaction to public achievement feedback. Educ. Stud., 25, 297-310.
73. Pederson, P. B. (2003) “Walking the Talk”: Simulations in Multicultural Training. Alexandria, VA: Association for Multicultural Counseling and Development.
74. Petraglia, J. (1998). Reality by Design: The Rhetoric and Technology of Authenticity in Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
75. Pleban, R., Matthews, M., Salter, M., and Eakin, D. (2002). Training and assessing complex decision making in a virtual environment. Percept. Motor Skills, 94(3), 871-882.
76. Prensky, M. (2002). The motivation of gameplay or the real 21st century learning revolution. On Horizon, 10(1), 5-11.
77. Raghavan, K., Satoris, M. L., and Glaser, R. (1997). The impact of model-centered instruction on student learning: the area and volume units. J. Comput. Math. Sci. Teaching, 16, 363-404.
78. Reeve, J. and Deci, E. L. (1996). Elements within the competitive situation that affect intrinsic motivation. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 22, 24-33.
79. Ricci, K., Salas, E., and Cannon-Bowers, J. (1996). Do computer-based games facilitate knowledge acquisition and retention? Milit. Psychol., 8(4), 295-307.
80. Roenker, D., Cissell, G., Ball, K., Wadley, V., and Edwards, J. (2003). Speed-of-processing and driving simulator training result in improved driving performance. Hum. Factors, 45(2), 218-233.
81. Roessingh, J. (2005). Transfer of manual flying skills from PCbased simulation to actual flight: comparison of in-flight measured data and instructor ratings. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol., 15(1), 67-90.
82. Ryan, R. M. and Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. Am. Psychol., 55, 68-78.
83. Salas, E. and Cannon-Bowers J. A. (1997). Methods, tools, and strategies for team training. In Training for a Rapidly Changing Workplace: Applications of Psychological Research, edited by M. A. Quinones and A. Ehrenstein, pp. 249-280. Washington, D.C.: APA.
84. Salas, E. and Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2001). The science of training: a decade of progress. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 52, 471-499.
85. Schank, R. C., Berman, T. R., and MacPherson, K. A. (1999). Learning by doing. In Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, Vol. II, edited by C. M. Reigeluth, pp. 161-181. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
86. Scherpereel, C. (2005). Changing mental models: business simulation exercises. Simul. Gaming, 36(3), 388-403.
87. Schmidt, R. A. and Bjork, R. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychol. Sci., 3(4), 207-217.
88. Schunk, D. H. and Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Self-regulatory processes during computer skill acquisition: goal and self-evaluative influences. J. Educ. Psychol., 91, 251-260.
89. Shih, P., Muñoz, D., and Sánchez, F. (2006). The effect of previous experience with information and communication technologies on performance in a Web-based learning program. Comput. Hum. Behav., 22(6), 962-970.
90. Sideridis, G. (2005). Goal orientation, academic achievement, and depression: evidence in favor of a revised goal theory framework. J. Educ. Psychol., 97(3), 366-375.
91. Slater, M., Sadagic, A., Usoh, M., and Schroeder, R. (2000). Small-group behaviour in a virtual and real environment: a comparative study. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ., 9, 37-15.
92. Smith-Jentsch, K. A., Jentsch, F. G., Payne, S. C., and Salas, E. (1996). Can pretraining experiences explain individual differences in learning? J. Appl. Psychol., 81, 909-936.
93. Spagnolli, A., Varotto, D., and Mantovani, G. (2003). An ethnographic, action-based approach to human experience in virtual environments. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud., 59(6), 797-822.
94. Squire, K. (2003). Video games in education. Int. J. Intell. Simul. Gaming, (2), 1.
95. Squire, K., Barnett, M., Grant, J. M., and Higginbotham, T. (2004). Electromagnetism supercharged! Learning physics with digital simulation games. In Proc. of the Sixth Int. Conf. of the Learning Sciences (ICLS). June 22-26, Los Angeles, CA.
96. Stewart, J., Cartier, J. L., and Passmore, C. M. (2005). Developing an understanding through model-based inquiry. In How Students Learn: History, Mathematics, and Science Inquiry in the Classroom, edited by M. S. Donovan and J. D. Bransford, pp. 515-565. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
97. Tannenbaum, S. I., Mathieu, J. E., Salas, E., and Cannon-Bowers, J. (1991). Meeting trainees’ expectations: the influence of training fulfillment on the development of commitment, selfefficacy, and motivation. J. Appl. Psychol., 76(6), 759-769.
98. Vogel, J. J., Vogel, D. S., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Bowers, C. A., Muse, K., and Wright, M. (2006). Computer gaming and interactive simulations for learning: a meta-analysis. J. Educ. Comput. Res., 34(3), 229-243.*
99. Waller, D. (2000). Individual differences in spatial learning from computer-simulated environments. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl., 6(4), 307-321.
100. Zimmerman, C., Raghavan, K., and Sartoris, M. L. (2003). The impact of MARS curriculum on students’ ability to coordinate theory and evidence. Int. J. Sci. Educ., 25, 1247-1271.