Web-based programmed instruction: Evidence of rule-governed learning

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 893-915

  Emurian, Henry H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

Author keywords

Java training; Programmed instruction; Rule governed behavior; Software self efficacy

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; WEB BROWSERS;

JAVA TRAINING; PROGRAMMED INSTRUCTION; RULE-GOVERNED BEHAVIOR; SOFTWARE SELF-EFFICACY;

JAVA PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE;

EID: 14644411804     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Aiken L.R. Psychological testing and assessment. (pp. 250-251):2000;Allyn and Bacon, Inc, Needham Heights, MA
2. Anderson J.R., Conrad F.G., Corbett A.T. Skill acquisition and the LISP tutor. Cognitive Science. 13:1989;467-505
3. Anderson J.R., Corbett A.T., Koedinger K.R., Pelletier R. Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. Journal of Learning Science. 4:1995;167-207
4. Anger W.K., Rohlman D.S., Reed R.R., Lundeen C.A., Eckerman D.A. cTRAIN: A computer-aided training system developed in SuperCard for teaching skills using behavioral education principles. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers. 33:2001;277-281
5. Austin J.L. Behavioral approaches to college teaching. Austin J., Carr J.E. Handbook of applied behavior analysis. 2000;449-471 Context Press, Reno, NV
6. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. 1997;W.H. Freeman and Company, New York
7. Barnett S.M., Ceci S.J. When and where do we apply what we learn. A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin. 128:2002;612-637
8. Bitzer D.L., Braunfield W.W., Lichtenberger W.W. PLATO II: A multiple-student, computer-controlled, automatic teaching device. Coulson J.E. Programmed learning and computer-based instruction. 1962;205-216 Wiley, New York
9. Boyce T.E., Hineline P.N. Interteaching: A strategy for enhancing the user-friendliness of behavioral arrangements in the college classroom. The Behavior Analyst. 25:2002;215-226
10. Braams, B., Carson, C. (No Date). New York city open logical debate on mathematics education reform. Available: URL http://www.math.nyu.edu/mfdd/ braams/nychold/ [Web page]
11. Bransford J.D., Brown A.L., Cocking R.R. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (expanded edition). 2000;National Academy Press, Washington, DC
12. Brock J.F. Computer-based instruction. Salvendy G. Handbook of human factors and ergonomics. 1997;578-593 Wiley, New York
13. Carpentier F., Smeets P.M., Barnes-Holmes D. Matching unrelated stimuli with same discriminative functions: Training order effects. Behavioral Processes. 60:2003;215-226
14. Catania A.C. The taxonomy of verbal behavior. Lattal K.A., Perone M. Handbook of research methods in human operant behavior. 1998;405-433 Plenum Press, New York
15. Coulson J.E. A computer-based laboratory for research and development in education. Coulson J.E. Programmed learning and computer-based instruction. 1962;191-204 Wiley, New York
16. Critchfield T.S. Evaluating the function of applied behavior analysis: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 35:2002;423-426
17. Crosbie J., Kelly G. Effects of imposed postfeedback delays in programmed instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 27:1994;483-491
18. Crowder N.A. Intrinsic and extrinsic programming. Coulson J.E. Programmed learning and computer-based instruction. 1962;58-66 Wiley, New York
19. TM : How to program 3rd ed.:1999;Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
20. TM : How to program 4th ed.:2002;Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
21. Deterline W.A. An introduction to programmed instruction. 1962;Prentice-Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
22. Dillenburger K., O'Reilly M.F., Keenan M. Advances in behavior analysis. 1997;University College Dublin Press, Dublin
23. TM : Consideration of learner performance and software self-efficacy Computers in Human Behavior. 20(3):2004;423-459
24. Emurian H.H., Durham A.G. A personalized system of instruction for teaching Java. Khosrowpour M. Managing information technology in a global economy. 2001;155-160 Idea Group Publishing, Hershey
25. Emurian H.H., Durham A.G. Enhanced learning on a programmed instruction tutoring system for JAVA. Khosrowpour M. Issues and trends of IT management in contemporary organizations. 2002;205-208 Idea Group Publishing, Hershey
26. Emurian H.H., Durham A.G. Computer-based tutoring systems: A behavioral approach. Jacko J.A., Sears A. Handbook of human-computer interaction. 2003;677-697 Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates, Mahwah, NJ
27. Emurian H.H., Hu X., Wang J., Durham A.G. Learning Java: A programmed instruction approach using applets. Computers in Human Behavior. 16:2000;395-422
28. Emurian H.H., Wang J., Durham A.G. Analysis of learner performance on a tutoring system for Java. McGill T. Current issues in IT education. 2003;46-76 IRM Press, Hershey, PA
29. Greer R.D. Designing teaching strategies: An applied behavior analysis systems approach. 2002;Academic Press, New York
30. Greer R.D., McDonough S.H. Is the learn unit a fundamental measure of pedagogy? The Behavior Analyst. 22:1999;5-16
31. Hall T.E., Hughes C.A. Computer assisted instruction in reading for students with learning disabilities: A research synthesis. Education and Treatment of Children. 23:2000;173-195
32. Hayes S.C. Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control. 1989;Plenum Press, New York
33. Hayes S.C., Barnes-Holmes D., Roche B. Relational frame theory: A post-skinnerian account of human language and cognition. 2001;Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York
34. Hayes S.C., Fox E., Gifford E.V., Wilson K.G., Barnes-Holmes D., Healy O. Derived relational responding as learned behavior. Hayes S.C., Barnes-Holmes D., Roche B. Relational frame theory: A post-skinnerian account of human language and cognition. 2001;Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York
35. Healy O., Barnes-Holmes D., Smeets P.M. Derived relational responding as generalized operant behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 74:2000;207-227
36. Holland J.G. Teaching machines: An application of principles from the laboratory. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 3:1960;275-287
37. Holland J.G., Skinner B.F. The analysis of behavior: A program for self-instruction. 1961;McGraw Hill Co, New York
38. Joyce J.H., Chase P.N. Effects of response variability on the sensitivity of rule-governed behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 54:1990;251-262
39. Keller F.S. Goodbye teacher. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1:1968;79-89
40. Kelly G., Crosbie J. Immediate and delayed effects of imposed postfeedback delays in computerized programmed instruction. The Psychological Record. 47:1997;687-698
41. Kerr K.P.J., Keenan M. Rules and rule-governance: New directions in the theoretical and experimental analysis of human behavior. Dillenburger K., O'Reilly M.F., Keenan M. Advances in behavior analysis. 1997;205-226 University College Dublin Press, Dublin
42. Kritch K.M., Bostow D.E. Degree of constructed-response interaction in computer-based programmed instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 31:1998;387-398
43. LeLouche R. The successive contributions of computers to education: A survey. European Journal of Engineering Education. 23:1998;297-308
44. Locke E.A., Chah D., Harrison S., Lustgarten N. Separating the effects of goal specificity from goal level. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 43:1989;270-287
45. Locke E.A., Latham G.P. A theory of goal setting and task performance. 1990;Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
46. Locke E.A., Latham G.P. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. American Psychologist. 57(9):2002;705-717
47. Lowenkron, B. (1999). Joint control and rule following: An analysis of purpose. In Annual convention of the association for behavior analysis, Chicago, May, 1999. Available: URL http://www.calstatela.edu/faculty/zlowenk/toc. htmlslash#papers [Web page]
48. Mace F.C. Basic research needed for stimulating the development of behavioral technologies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 61:1994;529-550
49. Martin T.L., Pear J.J., Martin G.L. Feedback and its effectiveness in a computer-aided personalized system of instruction course. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 35:2002;427-430
50. Maxwell S.E., Delaney H.D. Designing experiments and analyzing data. 2000;Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
51. Mayer R.E. The promise of educational psychology. Volume II. Teaching for meaningful learning. 2002;Pearson Education, Inc, Upper Saddle River, NJ
52. Morin L., Latham G.P. Effect of mental practice and goal setting as a transfer of training intervention on supervisors' self-efficacy and communication skills: An exploratory study. Applied Psychology: An International Review. 49:2000;566-578
53. Peel E.A. Programmed thinking. Programmed Learning & Educational Technology. 4:1967;151-157
54. Pressey S.L. A machine for automatic teaching of drill material. School and Society. 23:1927;549-552
55. Project Follow Through (1996). Effective School Practices, 15(1), entire issue
56. Sackett P.R., Mullen E.J. Beyond formal experimental design: Towards an expanded view of the training evaluation process. Personnel Psychology. 46:1993;613-627
57. Salas E., Cannon-Bowers J.A. The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology. 52:2001;471-499
58. Schmitt D.R. Effects of consequences of advice on patterns of rule control and rule choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 70:1998;1-21
59. Scriven M. The case for and use of programmed texts. Calvin A.D. Programmed instruction: Bold new adventure. 1969;3-36 Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN
60. Schunk D.H. Learning theories: An educational perspective. (pp. 355-401):2000;Prentice-Hall, Inc, Upper Saddle River, NJ
61. Shute V.J., Psotka J. Intelligent tutoring systems: Past, present, and future. Jonassen D. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. 1996;570-600 Macmillan Publishing, New York
62. Sidman M. Tactics of scientific research. 1960;Basic Books, New York
63. Sidman M. Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 74:2000;127-146
64. Skinner B.F. Verbal behavior. 1957;Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, NY
65. Skinner B.F. Teaching machines. Science. 128:1958;969-977
66. Skinner B.F. The technology of teaching. 1968;Prentice-Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
67. Suppes P., Morningstar M. Computer-assisted instruction. Science. 166:1969;343-350
68. Swezey R.W., Llaneras R.E. Models in training and instruction. Salvendy G. Handbook of human factors and ergonomics. 1997;514-577 Wiley, New York
69. Szabo M., Montgomerie T.C. Two decades of research on computer-managed instruction. Journal of Research on Computing in Education. 25:1992;113-134
70. Tennyson R.D. Goals for automated instructional systems. Journal of Structural Learning and Intelligent Systems. 13:1999;215-226
71. Tudor R.M., Bostow D.E. Computer-programmed instruction: The relation of required interaction to practical application. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 24:1991;361-368
72. Vargas E.A., Vargas J.S. Programmed instruction: What it is and how to do it. Journal of Behavioral Education. 1:1991;235-251
73. Vaughan M. Rule-governed behavior in behavior analysis: A theoretical and experimental history. Hayes S.C. Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control. 1989;97-118 Plenum Press, New York
74. Veenman M.V.J., Prins F.J., Elshout J.J. Initial inductive learning in a complex computer simulated environment: The role of metacognitive skills and intellectual ability. Computers in Human Behavior. 18:2002;327-341
75. Young J.D. The effect of self-regulated learning strategies on performance in learner controlled computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development. 44:1996;17-27
76. Zimmerman B.J. Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. Schunk D.H., Zimmerman B.J. Self-regulation of learning and performance. 1994;3-21 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ