LEADERSHIP FOR DATA-BASED DECISION MAKING: COLLABORATIVE EDUCATOR TEAMS

Learner-Centered Leadership: Research, Policy, and Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 189-206

  Wayman, Jeffrey C ^a   Midgley, Steve ^b   Stringfield, Sam ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b Stupski Foundation   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85141643270     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315091945-9     Document Type: Chapter

References (40)

1. Armstrong, J., & Anthes, K. (2001). How data can help. American School Board Journal 188 (11), 38-41.
2. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through student assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 139-148.
3. Brown, J. H., D’Emidio-Caston, M., & Benard, B. (2001). Resilience education . Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
4. Brunner C., Fasca C., Heinze, J., Honey, M., Light, D., Mandinach, E., et al. (2005). Linking data and learning: The Grow Network study. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 10(3), 241-267.
5. Chen, E., Heritage, M., & Lee, J. (2005). Identifying and monitoring students’ learning needs with technology. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 10(3), 309-332.
6. Chrispeels, J. H. (1992). Purposeful restructuring: Creating a climate of learning and achievement in elementary schools . London: Falmer.
7. Chrispeels, J. H., Brown, J. H., & Castillo, S. (2000). School leadership teams: Factors that influence their development and effectiveness. Advances in Research and Theories of School Management and Educational Policy, 4, 39-73.
8. Copland, M. A. (2003). Leadership of inquiry: Building and sustaining capacity for school improvement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 375-395.
9. Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37, 15-27.
10. Earl, L., & Katz, S. (2002). Leading schools in a data-rich world. In K. Leithwood & P. Hallinger (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 1003-1022). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
11. Feldman, J., & Tung, R. (2001). Using data-based inquiry and decision making to improve instruction. ERS Spectrum, 19(3), 10-19.
12. Gunn, J. H., & King, B. (2003). Trouble in paradise: Power, conflict, and community in an interdisciplinary teaching team. Urban Education, 38, 173-195.
13. Herman, J. L., & Gribbons, B. (2001, February). Lessons learned in using data to support school inquiry and continuous improvement: Final report to the Stuart Foundation (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 535). Los Angeles, CA: Center for the Study of Evaluation (CSE), University of California, Los Angeles.
14. Huffman, D., & Kalnin, J. (2003). Collaborative inquiry to make data-based decisions in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 569-580.
15. Ingram, D., Louis, K. S., & Schroeder, R. G. (2004). Accountability policies and teacher decision making: Barriers to the use of data to improve practice. Teachers College Record, 106, 1258-1287.
16. Lachat, M. A., & Smith, S. (2005). Practices that support data use in urban high schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 10(3), 333-349.
17. Massell, D. (2001). The theory and practice of using data to build capacity: State and local strategies and their effects . In S. H. Fuhrman (Ed.), From the capitol to the classroom: Standards-based reform in the states (pp. 148-169). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. Mason, S. A. (2003, April). Learning from data: The role of professional learning communities. Paper presented at the 2003 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago IL.
19. Murnane, R. J., Sharkey, N. S., & Boudett, K. P. (2005). Using student assessment results to improve instruction: Lessons from a workshop. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 10(3), 269-280.
20. Murphy, J. (2002). Reculturing the profession of educational leadership: New blueprints. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 176-191.
21. Nichols, B. W., & Singer, K. P. (2000). Developing data mentors. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 34-37.
22. Petrides, L., Nodine, T., Nguyen, L., Karaglani, A., & Gluck, R. (2005). Anatomy of school system improvement: Performance-driven practices in urban school districts . San Francisco: Institute for the Study of Knowledge Management of Education.
23. Porter, A. C., Chester, M. D., & Schlesinger, M. D. (2004). Framework for an effective assessment and accountability program: The Philadelphia Example. Teachers College Record, 106, 1358-1400.
24. Reeves, D. B. (2004). Accountability in action: A blueprint for learning organizations . Englewood, CO: Advanced Learning.
25. Schmoker, M. (2004). Tipping point: From feckless reform to substantive instructional improvement. Phi Delta Kappan, 85, 424-432.
26. Stiggins, R. L. (1999). Assessment, student confidence, and school success. Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 191-198.
27. Stringfield, S. (1994). Outlier studies of school effects. In D. Reynolds, B. Creemers, P. Nesselrodt, E. Schaffer, S. Stringfield, & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Advances in school effectiveness research (pp. 73-83). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
28. Stringfield, S., Reynolds, D., & Schaffer, E. (2001, January). Fifth-year results from the High Reliability Schools project. Symposium presented at the meeting of the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement, Toronto, Canada.
29. Stringfield, S., Wayman, J. C., & Yakimowski, M. (2005). Scaling up data use in classrooms, schools and districts. In C. Dede, J. P. Honan, & L. C. Peters (Eds.), Scaling up success: Lessons learned from technology-based educational innovation . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30. Streifer, P. A., & Schumann, J. A. (2005). Using data mining to identify actionable information: Breaking new ground in data-driven decision-making. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 10, 281-293.
31. Supovitz, J. A., & Klein, V. (2003). Mapping a course for improved student learning: How innovative schools systematically use student performance data to guide improvement . Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
32. Symonds, K. W. (2003). After the test: How schools are using data to close the achievement gap . San Francisco, CA: Bay Area School Reform Collaborative.
33. Teddlie, C., & Reynolds, D. (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research . London: Falmer.
34. Thorn, C. A. (2001). Knowledge management for Educational Information Systems: What is the state of the field? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 9(47). Retrieved June 22, 2006, fromhttp://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v9n47/
35. Wayman, J. C. (2005a). Involving teachers in data-based decision-making: Using computer data systems to support teacher inquiry and reflection. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 10(3), 295-308.
36. Wayman, J. C. (2005b). Technology that facilitates school improvement through data-informed practice . Presentation at the 10th Annual K-12 School Networking Conference of the Consortium for School Networking (CoSN), Washington DC.
37. Wayman, J. C., & Stringfield, S. (2006). Technology-supported involvement of entire faculties in examination of student data for instructional improvement. American Journal of Education, 112(4), 549-571.
38. Wayman, J. C., Stringfield, S., & Yakimowski, M. (2004). Software enabling school improvement through analysis of student data (CRESPAR Technical Report No. 67). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University. Retrieved June 22, 2006, from http://www.csos.jhu.edu/crespar/techRe-ports/Report67.pdf
39. Weber, G. (1971). Inner city children can be taught to read: Four successful schools (Occasional Paper No. 18). Washington, DC: Council for Basic Education.
40. Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology users in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 807-840.