Involving teachers in data-driven decision making: Using computer data systems to support teacher inquiry and reflection

Transforming Data Into Knowledge: Applications of Data-based Decision Making To Improve Instructional Practice: A Special Issue of the journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk

Volumn , Issue , 2024, Pages 295-308

  Wayman, Jeffrey C ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85203614155     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (31)

1. Armstrong, J., & Anthes, K. (2001). How data can help. American School Board Journal 755(11), 38-41.
2. Bernhardt, V. (2004). Data analysis for continuous school improvement. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.
3. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through student assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 139-148.
4. Chrispeels, J. H. (1992). Purposefill restructuring: Creating a climate of learning and achievement in elementary schools. London: Falmer.
5. Chrispeels, J. H., Brown, J. H., & Castillo, S. (2000). School leadership teams: Factors that influence their development and effectiveness. Advances in Research and Theories of School Management and Educational Policy, 4, 39-73.
6. Copland, M. A. (2003). Leadership of inquiry: Building and sustaining capacity for school improvement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 375-395.
7. Earl, L., & Katz, S. (2002). Leading schools in a data-rich world. In K. Leithwood & P. Hallinger (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 1003-1022). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
8. Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37(1), 15-27.
9. Feldman, J., & Tung, R. (2001). Using data-based inquiry and decision making to improve instruction. ERS Spectrum 19(3), 10-19.
10. Fullan, M. (1999). Change forces: The sequel. London: Falmer.
11. Fullan, M. G., & Miles, M. M. (1992). Getting reform right: What works and what doesn't. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 744-752.
12. Gunn, J. H., & King, B. (2003). Trouble in paradise: Power, conflict, and community in an interdisciplinary teaching team. Urban Education, 38, 173-195.
13. Herman, J. L., & Gribbons, B. (2001). Lessons learned in using data to support school inquiry and continuous improvement: Final report to the Stuart Foundation (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 535). Los Angeles: University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation.
14. Ingram, D., Louis, K. S, & Schroeder, R. G. (2004). Accountability policies and teacher decision making: Barriers to the use of data to improve practice. Teachers College Record, 106, 1258-1287.
15. Johnson, R. (2002). Using data to close the achievement gap: How to measure equity in our schools ( 1 st ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
16. Lachat, M. A. (2002). Data-driven high school reform: The breaking ranks model. Hampton, NH: Center for Resource Management.
17. Masseli, D. (2001). The theory and practice of using data to build capacity: State and local strategies and their effects. In S. H. Fuhrman (Ed.), From the capitol to the classroom: Standards-based reform in the states (pp. 148-169). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. Newmann, E, King, B., & Youngs, P. (2000). Professional development that addresses school capacity: Lessons from urban elementary schools. American Journal of Education, 108, 259-299.
19. Nichols, B. W, & Singer, K. P. (2000). Developing data mentors. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 34-37.
20. Pardini, P. (2000). Data, well done. Journal of Staff Development 21(1), 12-18.
21. Protheroe, N. (2001). Improving teaching and learning with data-based decisions: Asking the right questions and acting on the answers. ERS Spectrum 19(3), 4-9.
22. Streifer, P. A. (2002). Using data to make better educational decisions. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
23. Stringfield, S. (1994). Outlier studies of school effects. In D. Reynolds, B. Creemers, P. Nesselrodt, E. Schaffer, S. Stringfield, & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Advances in school effectiveness research (pp. 73-83). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
24. Stringfield, S., Reynolds, D., & Schaffer, E. (2001, January). Fifth-year results from the High Reliability Schools project. Symposium presented at the meeting of the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement, Toronto, Canada.
25. Schmöker, M. (2004). Tipping point: From feckless reform to substantive instructional improvement. Phi Delta Kappan, 85, 424-432.
26. Symonds, K. W. (2003). After the test: How schools are using data to close the achievement gap. San Francisco: Bay Area School Reform Collaborative.
27. Teddlie, C., & Reynolds, D. (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. London: Falmer.
28. Wayman, J. C., Stringfield, S., & Yakimowski, M. (2004). Software enabling school improvement through the analysis of student data (Report No. 67). Retrieved December 14,2004, from Center for Social Organization of Schools Web site: http://www.csos.jhu.edu/crespar/techReports/Report 67.pdf
29. Weber, G. (1971). Inner city children can be taught to read: Four successful schools (Occasional Paper No. 18). Washington, DC: Council for Basic Education.
30. Wellman, B., & Lipton, L. (2004). Data-driven dialogue: A facilitator's guide to collaborative inquiry. Sherman, CT: Mira Via.
31. Zhao, Y, & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology users in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 807-840.