Linking data and learning: The grow network study

Transforming Data Into Knowledge: Applications of Data-based Decision Making To Improve Instructional Practice: A Special Issue of the journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk

Volumn , Issue , 2024, Pages 241-267

  Brunner, Cornelia ^a   Fasca, Chad ^a   Heinze, Juliette ^a   Honey, Margaret ^a   Light, Daniel ^a   Mandinach, Ellen ^a   Wexler, Dara ^a  

^a Education Development Center Center for Children and Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85203609080     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Ackoff, R. L. (1989). From data to wisdom. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 16, 3-9.
2. Barr, J. M. (2004). Teacher location choice and distribution of quality. Newark, NJ: Rutgers University, Department of Economics.
3. Brophy, J. (2001). Teaching. Brussels, Belgium: International Academy of Education.
4. Cizek, G. J. (2001). Conjectures on the rise and fall of standards setting: An introduction to context and practice. In G. J. Cizek (Ed.), Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives (pp. 3-18). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5. Confrey, J., & Makar, K. (2002). Developing secondary teachers' statistical inquiry through immersion in high-stakes accountability data. In D. Mewbom, R Sztajn, & D. White (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-fourth annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education PME-NA24 (Vol. 3, pp. 1267-1279). Columbus, OH: The ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, & Environmental Education.
6. Council for Basic Education. (2000). Closing the gap. Washington, DC: Author.
7. Cromey, A. D. (2001, Spring). Data retreats: A conduit for change in schools. Newsletter of the Comprehensive Center-Region VI, 6, 21-23.
8. Drucker, P. E (1989). The new realities: In government andpolitics/in economics and business/in society and world view. New York: Harper & Row.
9. Elliot, E. (1993). National testing and assessment strategies: Equity implications of leading proposals for national examinations. In M. T. Nettles (Ed.), Equity and excellence in educational testing and assessment (pp. 415-424). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
10. Elmore, R., & Abelmann, C. (1999). When accountability knocks, will anyone answer? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Center for Policy Research in Education.
11. Fullan, M. (2000). The three stories of education reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 581-584.
12. Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
13. Fuqua, D. R., Newman, J. L., & Dickman, M. (1999, Winter). Barriers to effective assessment in organizational consultation. Consulting Psychology Journal·. Practice and Research, 51(Y), 14-23.
14. Grow Network. (2004). About the Grow Network. Retrieved April 1, 2004, from http://grownetwork.com/
15. Heistad, D., & Spicuzza, R. (2003, April). Beyond zip code analyses: What good measurement has to offer and how it can enhance the instructional delivery to all students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
16. Herman, J., & Golan, S. (1990). Effects of standardized testing on teachers and learning. Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
17. Herman, J., & Gribbons, B. (2001). Lessons learned in using data to support school inquiry and continuous improvement: Final report to the Stuart Foundation (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 535). Los Angeles: University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation.
18. Kearns, D. T, & Harvey, J. (2000). A legacy of learning. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
19. Lemann, N. (1999). The big test. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
20. Linn, R. L. (1998). Standards-based accountability-Ten suggestions (Policy Brief No. 1). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
21. Linn, R. L. (2001a). The design and evaluation of educational assessment and accountability systems (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 540). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
22. Linn, R. L. (2001b). Reporting school quality in standards-based accounting systems (Policy Brief No. 3). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
23. Linn, R. L. (2003a). Accountability: Responsibility and reasonable expectations. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 3-13.
24. Linn, R. L. (2003b). Requirements for measuring adequate yearly progress (Policy Brief No. 6). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
25. Mandinach, E. B., & Cline, H. F. (1994). Classroom dynamics: Implementing a technology-based learning environment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
26. Meyers, E., & O'Connell, E O. (2000, May 31). The test doesn't tell all. Education Week, 19, pp. 34,37.
27. Mitchell, D., & Lee, J. (1998, September). Quality School Portfolio: Reporting on school goals and student achievement. Paper presented at the National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Conference, Los Angeles, CA.
28. Mitchell, D., Lee, J., & Herman, J. (2000, October). Computer software systems and using data to support school reform. In the Joyce and Johnston Foundations (Sponsors), Technology's role in urban school reform: Achieving equity and quality. Symposium conducted at the Wingspread Meeting of the Education Development Center, Center for Children and Technology, New York.
29. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk. Washington, DC: Author.
30. Newman, F. W., King, M. B., & Rigdon, M. (1997, Spring). Accountability and school performance: Implications from restructuring schools. Harvard Educational Review, 67(1), 41-74.
31. Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
32. Robelen, E.W. (2003, September 3). State reports on progress vary widely. Education Week. Retrieved December 1, 2004, from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2003/09/03/01ayp.h23.html
33. Sacks, P. (1999). Standardized minds: The high price of America's testing culture and what we can do to change it. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
34. Salpeter, J. (2004). Data: Mining with a mission. Technology and Learning, 24(8), 30-37.
35. Secada, W. (2001, Spring). From the director. Newsletter of the Comprehensive Center-Region VI, 6, 1-2.
36. Senge, P., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., & Kleiner, A. (2000). Schools that learn. New York: Doubleday.
37. Sharkey, N., & Muntane, R. (2003, April). Helping K-12 educators learn from student assessment data. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
38. Spielvogel, B., Brunner, C., Pasnik, S., Keane, J. T., Friedman, W., Jeffers, L., John, K., & Hermos, J. (2001). IBM Reinventing Education Grant Partnership Initiative: Individual site reports. New York: Education Development Center, Center for Children and Technology.
39. Spielvogel, B., & Pasnik, S. (1999). From the school room to the state house: Data warehouse solutions for informed decision-making in education. New York: Education Development Center, Center for Children and Technology.
40. Stiggins, R. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 758-765.
41. Thom, C. (2002). Data use in the classroom: The challenges of implementing data-based decision-making at the school level. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
42. Viadero, D. (2000, May 3). High-stakes tests lead debate at researchers' gathering. Education Week, 19, 6.
43. Wayman, J. C., Stringfield, S., & Yakimowski, M. (2004). Software enabling school improvement through the analysis of student data (Report No. 67). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed At Risk.
44. Webb, N. (2002, April). Assessment literacy in a standards-based urban education setting. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.