INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS IN ACTION

Research in the Sociology of Organizations

Volumn 39 Part A, Issue , 2013, Pages 3-22

  Lounsbury, Michael ^a   Boxenbaum, Eva ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Institution; Institutional complexity; Institutional logics; Practice

Indexed keywords

EID: 85123790299     PISSN: 0733558X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1108/S0733-558X(2013)0039AB004     Document Type: Chapter

References (83)

1. Alvarez, J. L., Mazza, C., Strandgaard Pedersen, J., & Svejenova, S. (2005). Shielding idiosyncrasy from isomorphic pressures: Towards optimal distinctiveness in European filmmaking. Organization, 12, 863–888.
2. Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1419–1440.
3. Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3, 65–107.
4. Borum, F., & Westenholz, A. (1995). An organization’s incorporation of institutional models: Actors and institutional ambiguity: Organizational field multiplicity and the role of actors. In W. Richard Scott & S. Christensen (Eds.), The institutional construction of organizations (pp. 113–131). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Boxenbaum, E. (2006). Lost in translation? The making of Danish diversity management. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 939–948.
6. Boxenbaum, E., & Battilana, J. (2005). Importation as innovation: Transposing managerial practices across fields. Strategic Organization, 3, 355–383.
7. Boxenbaum, E., & Jonsson, S. (2008). Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin & R. Suddaby (Eds.), Handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 78–98). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Boxenbaum, E., & Strandgaard Pedersen, J. (2009). Scandinavian institutionalism – a case of institutional work. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work (pp. 178–204). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. Byrkjeflot, H., Strandgaard Pedersen, J., & Svejenova, S. (2013). From label to practice: The process of creating new nordic cuisine. Journal of Culinary Science & Technology, 11, 36–55.
10. Christiansen, L. J. H., & Lounsbury, M. (2013). Strange Brew: Bridging logics via institutional bricolage and the reconstitution of organizational identity. In M. Lounsbury & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Institutional logics in action, Part B: Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 39b, pp. 199–232). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
11. Daudigeos, T., Boutinot, A., & Jaumier, S. (2013). Taking stock of institutional complexity: Anchoring a pool of institutional logics into the interinstitutional system with a descendent hierarchical analysis. In M. Lounsbury & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Institutional logics in action, Part B: Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 39b, pp. 319–350). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
12. Davis, G. F., McAdam, D., Scott, W. R., & Zald, M. N. (Eds.). (2005). Social movements and organizational theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.
14. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1–38). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
15. Dunn, M. B., & Jones, C. (2010). Institutional logics and institutional pluralism: The contestation of care and science logics in medical education, 1967–2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 114–149.
16. Durand, R., Szostak, B., Jourdan, J., & Thornton, P. H. (2013). Institutional logics as strategic resources. In M. Lounsbury & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Institutional logics in action, Part: Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 39a, pp. 165–201). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
17. Fairclough, S., & Micelotta, E. R. (2013). Beyond the family firm: Reasserting the influence of the family institutional logic across organizations. In M. Lounsbury & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Institutional logics in action, Part B: Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 39b, pp. 63–98). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
18. Feng, V. (2013). The internal complexity of market logics: Financial sophistication and price determination. In M. Lounsbury & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Institutional logics in action, Part B: Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 39b, pp. 275–317). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
19. Friedland, R. (2002). Money, sex and god: The erotic logic of religious nationalism. Sociological Theory, 20, 381–424.
20. Friedland, R. (2009). Institution, practice and ontology: Towards a religious sociology. Research in the Sociology of Organisations, 27, 45–83.
21. Friedland, R. (2011). The institutional logic of religious nationalism: Sex, violence and the ends of history. Politics, Religion and Ideology, 12, 1–24.
22. Friedland, R. (2013). God, love and other good reasons for practice: Thinking through institutional logics. In M. Lounsbury & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Institutional logics in action, Part: Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 39a, pp. 25–50). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
23. Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–263). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
24. Glynn, M. A., & Lounsbury, M. (2005). From the critics’ corner: Logic blending, discursive change and authenticity in a cultural production system. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 1031–1055.
25. Glynn, M. A., & R., Raffaelli (2013). Logic pluralism, organizational design, and practice adoption: The structural embeddedness of CSR programs. In M. Lounsbury & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Institutional logics in action, Part B: Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 39b, pp. 175–197). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
26. Greenwood, R., Dı´az, A. M., Li, S. X., & Lorente, J. C. (2010). The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science, 21, 521–539.
27. Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 317–371.
28. Haveman, H., & Rao, H. (1997). Structuring a theory of moral sentiments: Institutional and organizational coevolution in the early thrift industry. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 1606–1651.
29. Hills, S., Voronov, M., & Hinings (Bob), C. R. (2013). Putting new wine in old bottles: Utilizing rhetorical history to overcome stigma associated with a previously dominant logic. In M. Lounsbury & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Institutional logics in action, Part B: Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 39b, pp. 99–137). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
30. Ho¨llerer, M., Jancsary, D., Meyer, R. E., & Vettori, O. (2013). Imageries of corporate social responsibility: Visual recontextualization and field-level meaning. In M. Lounsbury & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Institutional logics in action, Part B: Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 39b, pp. 139*ndash;174). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
31. Jarzabkowski, P., Smets, M., Bednarek, R., Burke, G., & Spee, J. (2013). Institutional ambidexterity: Leveraging institutional complexity in practice. In M. Lounsbury & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Institutional logics in action, Part B: Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 39b, pp. 37–61). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
32. Jones, C., Boxenbaum, E., & Anthony, C. (2013). The immateriality of material practices in institutional logics. In M. Lounsbury & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Institutional logics in action, Part: Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 39a, pp. 51–75). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
33. Jones, C., Maoret, M., Massa, F. G., & Svejenova, S. (2012). Rebels with a cause: Formation, contestation, and expansion of the de Novo category ‘‘Modern Architecture,’’ 1870–1975. Organization Science 23, 1523–1545.
34. Kraatz, M., & Block, E. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 243–275). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. Lawrence & W. Nord (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational studies (pp. 215–254). London: Sage.
36. Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2009). Institutional work: Actors, agency in institutional studies of organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Lefsrud, L., & Meyer, R. E. (2012). Science or science fiction? Professionals’ discursive construction of climate change. Organization Studies, 33, 1477–1506.
38. Loewenstein, J., Ocasio, W., & Jones, C. (2012). Vocabularies and vocabulary structure: A new approach linking categories, practices, and institutions. Academy of Management Annals, 6, 1–46.
39. Lok, J. (2010). Institutional logics as identity projects. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1305–1335.
40. Lounsbury, M. (2002). Institutional transformation and status mobility: The professionalization of the field of finance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 255–266.
41. Lounsbury, M. (2007). A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 289–307.
42. Lounsbury, M., & Crumley, E. T. (2007). New practice creation: An institutional approach to innovation. Organization Studies, 28, 993–1012.
43. Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. A. (2001). Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 545–564.
44. Marquis, C., & Lounsbury, M. (2007). Vive la resistance: Competing logics and the consolidation of US community banking. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 799–820.
45. Meyer, R. E., Egger-Peitler, I., Ho¨llerer, M. A., & Hammerschmid, G. (2013). Of bureaucrats and passionate public managers: Institutional logics, executive identities, and public service motivation. Public Administration. (Published online April 18, 2013).
46. Meyer, R. E., & Hammerschmid, G. (2006). Changing institutional logics and executive identities: A managerial challenge to public administration in Austria. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 1000–1014.
47. Meyer, R. E., & Ho¨llerer, M. A. (2010). Meaning structures in a contested issue field: A topographic map of shareholder value in Austria. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1241–1262.
48. Meyer, R. E., Höllerer, M. A., Jancsary, D., & van Leeuwen, T. (2013). The visual dimension in organizing, organization, and organization research: Core ideas, current developments, and promising applications. Academy of Management Annals, 7, 487–553.
49. Misutka, P. J., Coleman, C., Jennings, P. D., & Hoffman, A. J. (2013). Processes for retrenching logics: The Alberta Oil Sands case, 2008–2011. In M. Lounsbury & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Institutional logics in action, Part: Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 39a, pp. 131–163). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
50. Nigam, A., & Ocasio, W. (2010). Event attention, environmental sensemaking, and change in institutional logics: An inductive analysis of the effects of public attention to Clinton’s health care reform initiative. Organization Science, 21, 823–841.
51. Pache, A., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35, 455–476.
52. Pache, A., & Santos, F. (2013). Embedded in hybrid contexts: How individuals in organizations respond to competing institutional logics. In M. Lounsbury & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Institutional logics in action, Part B: Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 39b, pp. 3–35). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
53. Pouthier, V., Steele, C., & Ocasio, W. (2013). From agents to principles: The changing relationship between hospitalist identity and logics of health care. In M. Lounsbury & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Institutional logics in action, Part: Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 39a, pp. 203–241). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
54. Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
55. Purdy, J. M., & Gray, B. (2009). Conflicting logics, mechanisms of diffusion, and multilevel dynamics in emerging institutional fields. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 355–380.
56. Rao, H., Monin, P., & Durand, R. (2003). Institutional change in toque ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 795–843.
57. Raynard, M., Lounsbury, M., & Greenwood, R. (2013). Legacies of logics: Sources of community variation in CSR implementation in China. In M. Lounsbury & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Institutional logics in action, Part: Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 39a, pp. 243–276). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
58. Reay, T., & (Bob) Hinings, C. R. (Bob). The recomposition of an organizational field: Health care in Alberta. Organization Studies, 26, 349–382.
59. Reay, T., & (Bob) Hinings, C. R. (Bob). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30, 629–652.
60. Schneiberg, M. (2007). What’s on the Path? Path dependence, organizational diversity and the problem of institutional change in the US economy, 1900–1950. Socio-Economic Review, 5, 47–80.
61. Schneiberg, M. (2013). Lost in transposition? (A cautionary tale): The Bank of North Dakota and Prospects for Reform in American Banking. In M. Lounsbury & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Institutional logics in action, Part: Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 39a, pp. 277–310). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
62. Schneiberg, M., & Clemens, E. S. (2006). The typical tools for the job: Research strategies in institutional analysis. Sociological Theory, 3, 195–227.
63. Schneiberg, M., & Lounsbury, M. (2008). Social movements and institutional analysis. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 650–672). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
64. Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
65. Smets, M., Morris, T., & Greenwood, R. (2012). From practice to field: A multilevel model of practice-driven institutional change. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 877–904.
66. Strandgaard Pedersen, J., & Dobbin, F. (2006). In search of identity and legitimation: Organizational culture and neoinstitutionalism. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 897–907.
67. Strang, D. A., & Soule, S. A. (1998). Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 265–290.
68. Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51, 273–286.
69. Thornton, P. H. (2002). The rise of the corporation in a craft industry: Conflict and conformity in institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 81–101.
70. Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 801–843.
71. Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 99–129). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
72. Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
73. Townley, B. (1997). The institutional logic of performance appraisal. Organization Studies, 18, 261–285.
74. Tracey, P., Phillips, N., & Jarvis, O. (2011). Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: A multilevel model. Organization Science, 22, 60–80.
75. Vican, S., & Pernell-Gallagher, K. (2013). Instantiation of institutional logics: The ‘business case’ for diversity and the prevalence of diversity mentoring practices. In M. Lounsbury & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Institutional logics in action, Part B: Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 39b, pp. 233–273). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
76. Waldorff, S. B., Greenwood R. (2011). The dynamics of community translation: Danish healthcare centres. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 33, 113–142.
77. Waldorff, S. B., Reay, T., & Goodrick, E. (2013). A tale of two countries: How different constellations of logics impact action. In M. Lounsbury & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Institutional logics in action, Part: Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 39a, pp. 99–129). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
78. Weber, K. (2005). A toolkit for analyzing corporate cultural toolkits. Poetics, 33, 227–252.
79. Weber, K., Patel, H., & Heinze, K. L. (2013). From cultural repertoires to institutional logics: A content-analytic method. In M. Lounsbury & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Institutional logics in action, Part B: Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 39b, pp. 351–382). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
80. Westenholz, A. (2006). Identity work and meaning arena: Beyond actor/structure and micro/ macro. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 1015–1029.
81. Westenholz, A. (Ed.). (2012). The janus face of commercial open source software communities – An investigation into institutional (non)work by interacting institutional actors. Copenhagen Business School Press.
82. Westenholz, A., Strandgaard Pedersen, J., & Dobbin, F. (2006). Institutions in the making: Identity, power and the emergence of new organizational forms. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 889–896.
83. Zilber, T. (2013). Institutional logics and institutional work: Can they be agreed? In M. Lounsbury & E. Boxenbaum (Eds.), Institutional logics in action, Part: Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 39a, pp. 77–96). Bingley, UK: Emerald.