Embedded in hybrid contexts: How individuals in organizations respond to competing institutional logics

Research in the Sociology of Organizations

Volumn 39 Part B, Issue , 2013, Pages 3-35

  Pache, Anne Claire ^a   Santos, Filipe ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Institution; Institutional complexity; Institutional logics; Practice

Indexed keywords

EID: 85119970595     PISSN: 0733558X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1108/S0733-558X(2013)0039AB014     Document Type: Chapter

References (67)

1. Albert, S., Ashforth, B. E., & Dutton, J. E. (2000). Organizational identity and identification: Charting new waters and building new bridges. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 13.
2. Alexander, V. D. (1996). Pictures at an exhibition: Conflicting pressures in museums and the display of art. American Journal of Sociology, 101, 797–839.
3. Almandoz, J. (2012). Arriving at the starting line: The impact of community and financial logics on new banking ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1381–1406.
4. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20.
5. Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 6, 1419–1440.
6. Battilana, J., Pache, A. C., Sengul, M., & Model, J. (2012). Keeping a foot in both camps: Understanding the determinants of social performance in hybrid organizations. Working Paper.
7. Besharov, M., & Smith, W. (2012). Multiple logics within organizations: An integrative framework and model of organizational hybridity. Cornell University Working Paper.
8. Binder, A. (2007). For love and money: Organizations’ creative responses to multiple environmental logics. Theory and society, 36, 547–571.
9. Bourdieu, P. (1980). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10. Chen, K. K., & O’Mahony, S. (2006). The selective synthesis of competing logics. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings.
11. Creed, W. E. D., Dejordy, R., & Lok, J. (2010). Being the change: Resolving institutional contradiction through identity work. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1336– 1364.
12. DiMaggio, P. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (pp. 3–21). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Co/Harper & Row Publishers, Inc.
13. DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.
14. Dorado, S. (2005). Institutional entrepreneurship, partaking and convening. Organization Studies, 26(3), 385–414.
15. Elsbach, K. D., & Kramer, R. M. (1996). Members’ responses to organizational identity threats: Encountering and countering the business week rankings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), 442–476.
16. Ethier, K., & Deaux, K. (1994). Negotiating social identity when contexts change: Maintaining identification and responding to threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 243–251.
17. Fligstein, N. (1997). Social skill and institutional theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(4), 397–405.
18. Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–263). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
19. Glynn, M. A. (2000). When cymbals become symbols: Conflict over organizational identity within a symphony orchestra. Organization Science, 11(3), 285–298.
20. Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes, 18, 213–231.
21. Grant, A. M. (2012). Giving time, time after time: Work design and sustained employee participation in corporate volunteering. Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 589–615.
22. Greenwood, R., Diaz, A. M., Li, S. X., & Lorente, J. C. (2010). The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science, 21(2), 521–539.
23. Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1022.
24. Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5, 317–371.
25. Hallett, T. (2010). The myth incarnate: Recoupling processes, turmoil, and inhabited institutions in an urban elementary school. American Sociological Review, 75(1), 52–74.
26. Hallett, T., & Ventresca, M. J. (2006). Inhabited institutions: Social interactions and organizational forms in Gouldner’s patterns of industrial bureaucracy. Theory and Society, 35, 213–236.
27. Heimer, C. A. (1999). Competing institutions: Law, medicine and family in neonatal intensive care. Law & Society Review, 33(1), 17–66.
28. Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25, 121.
29. Huy, Q. N. (1999). Emotional capability, emotional intelligence, and radical change. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 325.
30. Hwang, H., & Powell, W. W. (2009). The rationalization of charity: The influences of professionalism in the nonprofit sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(2), 268–298.
31. Ingram, P., & Clay, K. (2000). The choice-within-constraints new institutionalism and implications for sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 525.
32. Jarzabkowski, P., Matthiesen, J., & Van De Ven, A. H. (2009). Doing which work? A practice approach to institutional pluralism. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work (pp. 284–316). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Jay, J. (2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 137–159.
34. Jones, C., Maoret, M., Massa, F. G., & Svejenova, S. (2011). Rebels with a cause: Formation, contestation, and expansion of the De Novo category ‘‘Modern Architecture,’’ 1870–1975. Organization Science, 23(6), 1523–1545.
35. Kleinbaum, A. M. (2012). Organizational misfits and the origins of brokerage in intrafirm networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 57(3), 407–452.
36. Kraatz, M. S., & Block, E. S. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby & K. Sahlin-Andresson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (p. 840). London: Sage.
37. Lok, J. (2010). Institutional logics as identity projects. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1305–1335.
38. Lounsbury, M. (1998). Collective entrepreneurship: The mobilization of college and university recycling coordinators. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 11(1), 50–69.
39. Lounsbury, M. (2001). Institutional sources of practice variation: Staffing college and university recycling programs. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 29–56.
40. Lounsbury, M. (2007). A tale of two cities: Competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 289–307.
41. Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 657–679.
42. Meyer, R. E., & Hammerschmid, G. (2006). Changing institutional logics and executive identities. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 1000–1014.
43. Ocasio, W. (1997). Towards and attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18(Summer Special Issue), 187–206.
44. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.
45. O’Reilly, C. A., III., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82(4), 74–81.
46. Pache, A. C. (2012). When competing logics enter organizations: The politics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. ESSEC Business School Working Paper, pp. 1–47.
47. Pache, A. C., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 455–476.
48. Pache, A. C., & Santos, F. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal.
49. Palmer, D. A., Jennings, P. D., & Zhou, X. (1993). Late adoption of the multidivisional form by large U.S. corporations: Institutional, political, and economic accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(1), 100–131.
50. Powell, W. W., & Colyvas, J. A. (2008). Microfoundations of institutional theory. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby & K. Sahlin-Andresson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (p. 840). London: Sage.
51. Powell, W. W., & Sandholtz, K. W. (2012). Amphibious entrepreneurs and the emergence of new organizational forms. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6(2), 94–115.
52. Rao, H., Monin, P., & Durand, R. (2003). Institutional change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle Cuisine as in identity movement in French gastronomy. American Journal of Sociology, 108(4), 795–843.
53. Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30(06), 629–652.
54. Scott, W. R. (2003). Institutional carriers: Reviewing modes of transporting ideas over time and space and considering their consequences. Industrial & Corporate Change, 12(4), 879–894.
55. Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the grass roots: A study of politics and organization. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
56. Seo, M., & Creed, W. E. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 222–247.
57. Smets, M., Burke, G. T., Jarzabkowski, P., & Spee, A. P. (2012). Reinsurance trading in lloyd’s of london: Balancing conflicting-yet-complementary logics in practice. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings.
58. Smets, M., Morris, T. I. M., & Greenwood, R. (2012). From practice to field: A multilevel model of practice-driven institutional change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 877–904.
59. Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 35–67.
60. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relation (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson Hall.
61. Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 801–844, University of Chicago Press.
62. Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby & K. Sahlin-Andresson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (p. 840). London: Sage.
63. Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
64. Tilcsik, A. (2010). From ritual to reality: Demography, ideology, and decoupling in a post communist government agency. Academy of Management Journal, 6, 1474–1498.
65. Townley, B. (1997). The institutional logic of performance appraisal. Organization Studies, 18(2), 261, Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG.
66. Turner, J. C. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: Self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
67. Zilber, T. B. (2002). Institutionalization as an interplay between actions, meaning and actors: The case of a rape crisis center in Israel. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 234–254.