Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application

Systematic Reviews

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2021, Pages

  Peters, Micah D J ^a,b   Marnie, Casey ^a   Colquhoun, Heather ^c   Garritty, Chantelle M ^d   Hempel, Susanne ^e   Horsley, Tanya ^f   Langlois, Etienne V ^g   Lillie, Erin ^h   O’Brien, Kelly K ^c,i   Tunçalp, Ӧzge ^j   Wilson, Michael G ^k,l,m   Zarin, Wasifa ⁿ   Tricco, Andrea C ^i,n,o  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF CANADA   (Canada)

^g WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION   (Switzerland)

^h Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre   (Canada)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^j UNICEF   (United States)

^k MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^l MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^m MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

ⁿ ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^o QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

more..

Author keywords

Evidence synthesis; Methodological guidance; Reporting guidelines; Research methodology; Scoping reviews

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONSULTATION; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; MEDICAL EDUCATION; META ANALYSIS; NOMENCLATURE; NOTE; POLICY; PUBLIC HEALTH; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT; SYNTHESIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; METHODOLOGY;

HUMANS; POLICY; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 85117334990     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20464053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-021-01821-3     Document Type: Note

References (44)

1. Pham MT, Rajić A, Greig JD, Sargeant JM, Papadopoulos A, McEwen SA. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods. 2014;5(4):371–85. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1123
2. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16:15. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4
3. Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):143. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
4. Peters M, Marnie C, Tricco A, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2020;18(10):2119–26. DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167
5. Paiva L, Dalmolin GL, Andolhe R, dos Santos W. Absenteeism of hospital health workers: scoping review. Av enferm. 2020;38(2):234–48. DOI: 10.15446/av.enferm.v38n2.79437
6. Visonà MW, Plonsky L. Arabic as a heritage language: a scoping review. Int J Biling. 2019;24(4):599–615. DOI: 10.1177/1367006919849110
7. McKerricher L, Petrucka P. Maternal nutritional supplement delivery in developing countries: a scoping review. BMC Nutr. 2019;5(1):8. DOI: 10.1186/s40795-019-0270-2
8. Fusar-Poli P, Salazar de Pablo G, De Micheli A, et al. What is good mental health? A scoping review. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020;31:33–46. DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2019.12.105
9. Jowsey T, Foster G, Cooper-Ioelu P, Jacobs S. Blended learning via distance in pre-registration nursing education: a scoping review. Nurse Educ Pract. 2020;44:102775. DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102775
10. Peters MD, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares CB. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid-based Healthc. 2015;13(3):141–6. DOI: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050
11. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73. DOI: 10.7326/M18-0850
12. Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco AC, Khalil H. Chapter 11: scoping reviews (2020 version). In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI manual for evidence synthesis: JBI; 2020.
13. Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32. DOI: 10.1080/1364557032000119616
14. Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):69. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
15. Miake-Lye IM, Hempel S, Shanman R, Shekelle PG. What is an evidence map? A systematic review of published evidence maps and their definitions, methods, and products. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):28. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-016-0204-x
16. Sutton A, Clowes M, Preston L, Booth A. Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements. Health Inf Libr J. 2019;36(3):202–22. DOI: 10.1111/hir.12276
17. Brady BR, De La Rosa JS, Nair US, Leischow SJ. Electronic cigarette policy recommendations: a scoping review. Am J Health Behav. 2019;43(1):88–104. DOI: 10.5993/AJHB.43.1.8
18. Truman E, Elliott C. Identifying food marketing to teenagers: a scoping review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019;16(1):67. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-019-0833-2
19. Tricco AC, Antony J, Zarin W, et al. A scoping review of rapid review methods. BMC Med. 2015;13(1):224. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-015-0465-6
20. Moher D, Stewart L, Shekelle P. All in the family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):183. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-015-0163-7
21. Tricco AC, Zarin W, Ghassemi M, et al. Same family, different species: methodological conduct and quality varies according to purpose for five types of knowledge synthesis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;96:133–42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.014
22. Barker M, Adelson P, Peters MDJ, Steen M. Probiotics and human lactational mastitis: a scoping review. Women Birth. 2020;33(6):e483–e491.
23. O’Donnell N, Kappen DL, Fitz-Walter Z, Deterding S, Nacke LE, Johnson D. How multidisciplinary is gamification research? Results from a scoping review. Extended abstracts publication of the annual symposium on computer-human interaction in play. Amsterdam: Association for Computing Machinery; 2017. p. 445–52.
24. O’Flaherty J, Phillips C. The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: a scoping review. Internet High Educ. 2015;25:85–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002
25. Di Pasquale V, Miranda S, Neumann WP. Ageing and human-system errors in manufacturing: a scoping review. Int J Prod Res. 2020;58(15):4716–40. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1773561
26. Knowledge Synthesis Team. What review is right for you? 2019. https://whatreviewisrightforyou.knowledgetranslation.net/
27. Lv M, Luo X, Estill J, et al. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a scoping review. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(15):2000125. DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.15.2000125
28. Shemilt I, Simon A, Hollands GJ, et al. Pinpointing needles in giant haystacks: use of text mining to reduce impractical screening workload in extremely large scoping reviews. Res Synth Methods. 2014;5(1):31–49. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1093
29. Khalil H, Bennett M, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Peters M. Evaluation of the JBI scoping reviews methodology by current users. Int J Evid-based Healthc. 2020;18(1):95–100.
30. Kennedy K, Adelson P, Fleet J, et al. Shared decision aids in pregnancy care: a scoping review. Midwifery. 2020;81:102589. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.102589
31. Dall’Ora C, Ball J, Recio-Saucedo A, Griffiths P. Characteristics of shift work and their impact on employee performance and wellbeing: a literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;57:12–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.01.007
32. Feo R, Conroy T, Wiechula R, Rasmussen P, Kitson A. Instruments measuring behavioural aspects of the nurse–patient relationship: a scoping review. J Clin Nurs. 2020;29(11-12):1808–21. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14947
33. Rycroft-Malone J, McCormack B, Hutchinson AM, et al. Realist synthesis: illustrating the method for implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):33. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-33
34. Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O’Brien KK, et al. Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(12):1291–4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013
35. Tricco AC, Zarin W, Rios P, et al. Engaging policy-makers, health system managers, and policy analysts in the knowledge synthesis process: a scoping review. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):31. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-018-0717-x
36. Cooper S, Cant R, Kelly M, et al. An evidence-based checklist for improving scoping review quality. Clin Nurs Res. 2021;30(3):230–240.
37. Pollock A, Campbell P, Struthers C, et al. Stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews: a scoping review. Syst Rev. 2018;7(1):208. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-018-0852-0
38. Tricco AC, Zarin W, Rios P, Pham B, Straus SE, Langlois EV. Barriers, facilitators, strategies and outcomes to engaging policymakers, healthcare managers and policy analysts in knowledge synthesis: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 2016;6(12):e013929. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013929
39. Denton M, Borrego M. Funds of knowledge in STEM education: a scoping review. Stud Eng Educ. 2021;1(2):71–92. DOI: 10.21061/see.19
40. Masta S, Secules S. When critical ethnography leaves the field and enters the engineering classroom: a scoping review. Stud Eng Educ. 2021;2(1):35–52. DOI: 10.21061/see.26
41. Li Y, Marier-Bienvenue T, Perron-Brault A, Wang X, Pare G. Blockchain technology in business organizations: a scoping review. In: Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii international conference on system sciences; 2018. https://core.ac.uk/download/143481400.pdf
42. Houlihan M, Click A, Wiley C. Twenty years of business information literacy research: a scoping review. Evid. Based Libr. Inf. Pract. 2020;15(4):124–163.
43. Plug I, Stommel W, Lucassen P, Hartman T, Van Dulmen S, Das E. Do women and men use language differently in spoken face-to-face interaction? A scoping review. Rev Commun Res. 2021;9:43–79.
44. McGowan J, Straus S, Moher D, et al. Reporting scoping reviews - PRISMA ScR extension. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;123:177–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.016