Correction: Engaging policy-makers, health system managers, and policy analysts in the knowledge synthesis process: A scoping review [Implementation Science 13, (2018) (31)] DOI: 10.1186/s13012-018-0717-x;Engaging policy-makers, heath system managers, and policy analysts in the knowledge synthesis process: A scoping review

Implementation Science

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  Tricco, Andrea C ^a,b   Zarin, Wasifa ^a   Rios, Patricia ^a   Nincic, Vera ^a   Khan, Paul A ^a   Ghassemi, Marco ^a   Diaz, Sanober ^a   Pham, Ba' ^a   Straus, Sharon E ^c   Langlois, Etienne V ^d  

^a ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Engagement; Health policy; Health system; Knowledge synthesis; Knowledge translation; Knowledge user; Policy maker; Policy relevant; Stakeholder

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; MANAGEMENT; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT;

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; DECISION MAKING; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; HEALTH POLICY; HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; POLICY MAKING;

EID: 85041947594     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13012-018-0749-2     Document Type: Erratum

References (76)

1. Chalmers I, Bracken MB, Djulbegovic B, Garattini S, Grant J, Gulmezoglu AM, et al. How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet. 2014;383(9912):156-65.
2. Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet. 2009;374(9683):86-9.
3. Macleod MR, Michie S, Roberts I, Dirnagl U, Chalmers I, Ioannidis JP, et al. Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste. Lancet. 2014;383(9912):101-4.
4. CIHR. Glossary of funding-related terms Canada: Canadian Institutes for Health Research; 2017. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/34190.html.
5. CIHR. Knowledge user engagement: Canadian Institutes of Health Research; 2016. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/49505.html ].
6. CIHR. Integrated knowledge translation (iKT): Canadian Institutes of Health Research; 2015. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/45321.html
7. Bragge P, Clavisi O, Turner T, Tavender E, Collie A, Gruen RL. The global evidence mapping initiative: scoping research in broad topic areas. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:92.
8. Deverka PA, Lavallee DC, Desai PJ, Esmail LC, Ramsey SD, Veenstra DL, et al. Stakeholder participation in comparative effectiveness research: defining a framework for effective engagement. J Comp Eff Res. 2012;1(2):181-94.
9. WHO. WHO strategy on health policy and systems research: changing mindsets. 2012. http://www.who.int/alliance-hpsr/alliancehpsr_changingmindsets_strategyhpsr.pdf.
10. Bastian H, Glasziou P, Chalmers I. Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up? PLoS Med. 2010;7(9):e1000326.
11. Murad MH, Montori VM. Synthesizing evidence: shifting the focus from individual studies to the body of evidence. JAMA. 2013;309(21):2217-8.
12. Langlois EV, Becerril Montekio V, Young T, Song K, Alcalde-Rabanal J, Tran N. Enhancing evidence informed policymaking in complex health systems: lessons from multi-site collaborative approaches. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016;14:20.
13. Vindrola-Padros C, Pape T, Utley M, Fulop NJ. The role of embedded research in quality improvement: a narrative review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26(1):70-80.
14. Ghaffar A, Langlois EV, Rasanathan K, Peterson S, Adedokun L, Tran NT. Strengthening health systems through embedded research. Bull World Health Organ. 2017;95(2):87.
15. Tricco AC, Zarin W, Rios P, Pham B, Straus SE, Langlois EV. Barriers, facilitators, strategies and outcomes to engaging policymakers, healthcare managers and policy analysts in knowledge synthesis: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 2016;6(12):e013929.
16. Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19-32.
17. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien K, Colquhoun H, Kastner M, et al. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16:15.
18. Peters M, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Soares C, Hanan K, Parker D. The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers' Manual 2015: methodology for JBI scoping reviews. 2015.
19. Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349:g7647.
20. Tricco AC, Zarin W, Rios P, Pham B, Straus SE, Langlois E. Barriers, facilitators, strategies and outcomes to engaging policy-makers, healthcare managers, and policy analysts in knowledge synthesis: a scoping review protocol. Open Science Framwork. 2016; https://osf.io/4dy53/
21. Stone PW. Popping the (PICO) question in research and evidence-based practice. Appl Nurs Res. 2002;15(3):197-8.
22. Langlois EV, Straus SE, Mijumbi-Deve R, Lewin S, Tricco AC. Chapter 1: the need for rapid reviews to inform health policy and systems. In: Tricco AC, Langlois EV, Straus SE, editors. Rapid reviews to strengthen health policy and systems: a. Practical Guide Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.
23. McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C. PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;75:40-6.
24. Grey Literature Report [Internet]. 2016. http://www.greylit.org/.
25. Open Grey [Internet]. 2017. http://www.opengrey.eu/.
26. EndNote. X7.7 ed: Thomson Reuters; 2016.
27. Synthesi.SR [Internet]. Knowledge Translation Program, St. Michael's Hospital. 2012. http://www.breakthroughkt.ca/login.php.
28. The World Bank. World Bank Country and Lending Groups. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519.
29. Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10:53.
30. Tricco AC, Cardoso R, Thomas SM, Motiwala S, Sullivan S, Kealey MR, et al. Barriers and facilitators to uptake of systematic reviews by policy makers and health care managers: a scoping review. Implement Sci. 2016;11:4.
31. Gagliardi AR, Berta W, Kothari A, Boyko J, Urquhart R. Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) in health care: a scoping review. Implement Sci. 2016;11:38.
32. Oliver K, Innvar S, Lorenc T, Woodman J, Thomas J. A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):1-12.
33. Keown K, Van Eerd D, Irvin E. Stakeholder engagement opportunities in systematic reviews: knowledge transfer for policy and practice. J Contin Educ Heal Prof. 2008;28(2):67-72.
34. Carter N, Martin-Misener R, Kilpatrick K, Kaasalainen S, Donald F, Bryant-Lukosius D, et al. The role of nursing leadership in integrating clinical nurse specialists and nurse practitioners in healthcare delivery in Canada. Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2010;23 Spec No 2010:167-85.
35. Nieuwlaat R, Connolly SJ, Mackay JA, Weise-Kelly L, Navarro T, Wilczynski NL, et al. Computerized clinical decision support systems for therapeutic drug monitoring and dosing: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review. Implement Sci. 2011;6:90.
36. Roshanov PS, You JJ, Dhaliwal J, Koff D, Mackay JA, Weise-Kelly L, et al. Can computerized clinical decision support systems improve practitioners' diagnostic test ordering behavior? A decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review. Implement Sci. 2011;6:88.
37. Sahota N, Lloyd R, Ramakrishna A, Mackay JA, Prorok JC, Weise-Kelly L, et al. Computerized clinical decision support systems for acute care management: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review of effects on process of care and patient outcomes. Implement Sci. 2011;6:91.
38. Souza NM, Sebaldt RJ, Mackay JA, Prorok JC, Weise-Kelly L, Navarro T, et al. Computerized clinical decision support systems for primary preventive care: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review of effects on process of care and patient outcomes. Implement Sci. 2011;6:87.
39. Scotto Rosato N, Correll CU, Pappadopulos E, Chait A, Crystal S, Jensen PS. Treatment of maladaptive aggression in youth: CERT guidelines II. Treatments and ongoing management. Pediatrics. 2012;129(6):e1577-86.
40. Leonard MM, Agar M, Spiller JA, Davis B, Mohamad MM, Meagher DJ, et al. Delirium diagnostic and classification challenges in palliative care: subsyndromal delirium, comorbid delirium-dementia, and psychomotor subtypes. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2014;48(2):199-214.
41. Akl E, Fadlallah R, Ghandour L, Kdouh O, Langlois E, Lavis J, et al. The SPARK tool for prioritizing questions for systematic reviews in health policy and systems research: development and initial validation. Health Res Policy Syst. 15(1):77.
42. Hatziandreu E, Archontakis F, Daly A. The potential cost savings of greater use of home and hospice-based end of life care in England: RAND Corporation; 2008.
43. Committee on Integrating Primary Care and Public Health. Primary care and public health-exploring integration to improve population health 2012.
44. Pakes B. Ethical analysis in public health practice-Heterogeny, Discensus and the Man-on-the-Clapham Omnibus Toronto: University of Toronto; 2014.
45. Rycroft-Malone J, Burton CR, Williams L, Edwards S, Fisher D, Hall B, et al. Health services and delivery research. Improving skills and care standards in the support workforce for older people: a realist synthesis of workforce development interventions. Southampton: NIHR Journals Library; 2016.
46. Cottrell E, Whitlock E, Kato E, Uhl S, Belinson S, Chang C, et al. AHRQ methods for effective health care. Defining the benefits of stakeholder engagement in systematic reviews. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2014.
47. Oliver S, Dickson K. Policy-relevant systematic reviews to strengthen health systems: models and mechanisms to support their production. Evidence & Policy: J Res, Debate Pract. 2016;12(2):235-59.
48. Guise JM, O'Haire C, McPheeters M, Most C, Labrant L, Lee K, et al. A practice-based tool for engaging stakeholders in future research: a synthesis of current practices. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(6):666-74.
49. Atkins D, Fink K, Slutsky J. Better information for better health care: the evidence-based practice center program and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(12 Pt 2):1035-41.
50. Best A, Terpstra JL, Moor G, Riley B, Norman CD, Glasgow RE. Building knowledge integration systems for evidence-informed decisions. J Health Organ Manag. 2009;23(6):627-41.
51. Crawford C, Boyd C, Jain S, Khorsan R, Jonas W. Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Literature (REAL((c))): streamlining the systematic review process and creating utility for evidence-based health care. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8:631.
52. Khangura S, Konnyu K, Cushman R, Grimshaw J, Moher D. Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach. Syst Rev. 2012;1:10.
53. McIntosh HM, Calvert J, Macpherson KJ, Thompson L. The healthcare improvement Scotland evidence note rapid review process: providing timely, reliable evidence to inform imperative decisions on healthcare. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2016;14(2):95-101.
54. Saul JE, Willis CD, Bitz J, Best A. A time-responsive tool for informing policy making: rapid realist review. Implement Sci. 2013;8:103.
55. Mindell J, Bowen C, Herriot N, Findlay G, Atkinson S. Institutionalizing health impact assessment in London as a public health tool for increasing synergy between policies in other areas. Public Health. 2010;124(2):107-14.
56. Concannon TW, Fuster M, Saunders T, Patel K, Wong JB, Leslie LK, et al. A systematic review of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(12):1692-701.
57. Concannon TW, Meissner P, Grunbaum JA, McElwee N, Guise JM, Santa J, et al. A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(8):985-91.
58. Hayden JA, Killian L, Zygmunt A, Babineau J, Martin-Misener R, Jensen JL, et al. Methods of a multi-faceted rapid knowledge synthesis project to inform the implementation of a new health service model: collaborative emergency centres. Syst Rev. 2015;4:7.
59. Tricco AC, Langlois EV, Straus SE, editors. Rapid reviews to strengthen health policy and systems: a practical guide. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO
60. Goodyear-Smith F, Jackson C, Greenhalgh T. Co-design and implementation research: challenges and solutions for ethics committees. BMC Med Ethics. 2015;16:78.
61. Oliver K, Lorenc T, Innvaer S. New directions in evidence-based policy research: a critical analysis of the literature. Health Res Policy Syst. 2014;12:34.
62. Jackson CL, Greenhalgh T. Co-creation: a new approach to optimising research impact? Med J Aust. 2015;203(7):283-4.
63. Greenhalgh T, Jackson C, Shaw S, Janamian T. Achieving research impact through co-creation in community-based health services: literature review and case study. Milbank Q. 2016;94(2):392-429.
64. Moore A, Brouwers M, Straus SE, Tonelli M. Advancing patient and public involvement in guideline development. Toronto: Canadian Taskforce on Preventative Health Care; 2015.
65. Soobiah C, Daly C, Blondal E, Ewusie J, Ho J, Elliott MJ, et al. An evaluation of the comparative effectiveness of geriatrician-led comprehensive geriatric assessment for improving patient and healthcare system outcomes for older adults: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2017;6(1):65.
66. Haddaway N, Kohl C, da Silva NR, Schiemann J, Spök A, Stewart R, et al. A framework for stakeholder engagement during systematic reviews and maps in environmental management. Environmental Evidence. 2017;6(1):11.
67. Land M, Macura B, Bernes C, Johansson S. A five-step approach for stakeholder engagement in prioritisation and planning of environmental evidence syntheses. Environmental Evidence. 2017;6(1):25.
68. Agweyu A, Opiyo N, English M. Experience developing national evidence-based clinical guidelines for childhood pneumonia in a low-income setting-making the GRADE? BMC Pediatr. 2012;12:1.
69. Buchan J, Fronteira I, Dussault G. Continuity and change in human resources policies for health: lessons from Brazil. Hum Resour Health. 2011;9:17.
70. Clarke D, Duke J, Wuliji T, Smith A, Phuong K, San U. Strengthening health professions regulation in Cambodia: a rapid assessment. Hum Resour Health. 2016;14:9.
71. Higashi H, Khuong TA, Ngo AD, Hill PS. The development of Tobacco Harm Prevention Law in Vietnam: stakeholder tensions over tobacco control legislation in a state owned industry. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2011;6:24.
72. Muller L, Flisher A. Standards for the mental health care of people with severe psychiatric disorders in South Africa: part 2. Methodology and results. South African Psychiatr Rev. 2005;8:146-52.
73. Orem JN, Mafigiri DK, Marchal B, Ssengooba F, Macq J, Criel B. Research, evidence and policymaking: the perspectives of policy actors on improving uptake of evidence in health policy development and implementation in Uganda. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:109.
74. Sidibe S, Pack AP, Tolley EE, Ryan E, Mackenzie C, Bockh E, et al. Communicating about microbicides with women in mind: tailoring messages for specific audiences. J Int AIDS Soc. 2014;17(3 Suppl 2):19151.
75. Teerawattananon Y, Kingkaew P, Koopitakkajorn T, Youngkong S, Tritasavit N, Srisuwan P, et al. Development of a health screening package under the universal health coverage: the role of health technology assessment. Health Econ. 2016;25(Suppl 1):162-78.
76. Wiysonge CS, Ngcobo NJ, Jeena PM, Madhi SA, Schoub BD, Hawkridge A, et al. Advances in childhood immunisation in South Africa: where to now? Programme managers' views and evidence from systematic reviews. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:578.