PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation

Annals of Internal Medicine

Volumn 169, Issue 7, 2018, Pages 467-473

  Tricco, Andrea C ^a,b   Lillie, Erin ^a   Zarin, Wasifa ^a   O'Brien, Kelly K ^b   Colquhoun, Heather ^b   Levac, Danielle ^c   Moher, David ^d   Peters, Micah D J ^e   Horsley, Tanya ^f   Weeks, Laura ^g   Hempel, Susanne ^h   Akl, Elie A ⁱ   Chang, Christine ^j   McGowan, Jessie ^k   Stewart, Lesley ^l   Hartling, Lisa ^m   Aldcroft, Adrian ⁿ   Wilson, Michael G ^o   Garritty, Chantelle ^d   Lewin, Simon ^p,q   Godfrey, Christina M ^r   MacDonald, Marilyn T ^s   Langlois, Etienne V ^t   Soares Weiser, Karla ^u   Moriarty, Jo ^v   Clifford, Tammy ^g   Tunçalp, Özge ^t   Straus, Sharon E ^a,b   more..

^a ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^f Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of   (Canada)

^g CANADIAN AGENCY FOR DRUGS AND TECHNOLOGIES IN HEALTH   (Canada)

^h RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

ⁱ AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT   (Lebanon)

^j AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^l UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^m UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

ⁿ BMA House ^*  (United Kingdom)

^o MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^p NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (Norway)

^q SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL   (South Africa)

^r QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^s DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^t WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION   (Switzerland)

^u St Albans House ^*  (United Kingdom)

^v KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CHECKLIST; CONSUMER; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NOMENCLATURE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REVIEW; SCIENTIST; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; DELPHI STUDY; LITERATURE; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC);

CHECKLIST; DELPHI TECHNIQUE; HUMANS; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS AS TOPIC;

EID: 85054287365     PISSN: 00034819     EISSN: 15393704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7326/M18-0850     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien K, Colquhoun H, Kastner M, et al. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16:15. [PMID: 26857112] doi:10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4
2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. A guide to knowledge synthesis: a knowledge synthesis chapter. 2010. Accessed at www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/41382.html on 10 January 2018.
3. Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O'Brien KK, Straus S, Tricco AC, Perrier L, et al. Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:1291-4. [PMID: 25034198] doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013
4. Peters MD, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares CB. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13:141-6. [PMID: 26134548] doi:10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050
5. Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Baldini Soares C, Khalil H, Parker D. Scoping reviews. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, eds. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's Manual. Adelaide, Australia: Joanna Briggs Inst; 2017.
6. Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8:19-32.
7. Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:69. [PMID: 20854677] doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
8. Altman DG, Simera I. Using reporting guidelines effectively to ensure good reporting of health research. In: Moher D, Altman D, Schulz K, Simera I, Wager E, eds. Guidelines for Reporting Health Research: A User's Manual. Hoboken, NJ: J Wiley; 2014:32-40.
9. Moher D, Schulz KF, Simera I, Altman DG. Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines. PLoS Med. 2010;7: e1000217. [PMID: 20169112] doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000217
10. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264-9. [PMID: 19622511] doi:10.7326/0003-4819151-4-200908180-00135
11. Tricco AC, Zarin W, Ghassemi M, Nincic V, Lillie E, Page MJ, et al. Same family, different species: methodological conduct and quality varies according to purpose for five types of knowledge synthesis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;96:133-42. [PMID: 29103958] doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.014
12. McInnes MD, Bossuyt PM. Pitfalls of systematic reviews and metaanalyses in imaging research. Radiology. 2015;277:13-21. [PMID: 26402491] doi:10.1148/radiol.2015142779
13. Macaskill P, Gatsonis C, Deeks JJ, Harbord RM, Takwoingi Y. Analysing and presenting results. In: Deeks JJ, Bossuyt PM, Gatsonis C, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy. Version 1.0. London: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2010. Accessed at https://methods.cochrane.org/sites/methods.cochrane.org.sdt/files/public/uploads/Chapter%2010%20-%20Version%201.0.pdf on 3 August 2018.
14. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, et al; QUADAS-2 Group. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:529-36. [PMID: 22007046] doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-8- 201110180-00009
15. Schmucker C, Motschall E, Antes G, Meerpohl JJ. [Methods of evidence mapping. A systematic review]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2013;56:1390-7. [PMID: 23978984] doi:10.1007/s00103-013-1818-y
16. Miake-Lye IM, Hempel S, Shanman R, Shekelle PG. What is an evidence map? A systematic review of published evidence maps and their definitions, methods, and products. Syst Rev. 2016;5:28. [PMID: 26864942] doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0204-x
17. EQUATOR Network. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). 2017. Accessed at www.equator-network.org/library/reporting -guidelines-under-development/#55 on 10 January 2018.
18. PRISMA. Extensions in development: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). 2015. Accessed at www.prisma-statement.org/Extensions/InDevelopment.aspx on 10 January 2018.
19. Qualtrics. 2018. Accessed at www.qualtrics.com/uk on 10 January 2018.
20. O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, Baxter L, Tricco AC, Straus S, et al. Advancing scoping study methodology: a web-based survey and consultation of perceptions on terminology, definition and methodological steps. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:305. [PMID: 27461419] doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1579-z
21. The Royal Institute of International Affairs. Chatham House Rule. 2018. Accessed at www.chathamhouse.org/chatham-house-rule on 14 June 2018.
22. Jones J, Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ. 1995;311:376-80. [PMID: 7640549]
23. Sli.do. 2012. Accessed at www.sli.do on 10 January 2018.
24. TranscribeMe. 2018. Accessed at https://transcribeme.com on 27 February 2018.
25. Conceptboard. 2018. Accessed at https://conceptboard.com on 14 June 2018.
26. Lourida I, Abbott RA, Rogers M, Lang IA, Stein K, Kent B, et al. Dissemination and implementation research in dementia care: a systematic scoping review and evidence map. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17: 147. [PMID: 28709402] doi:10.1186/s12877-017-0528-y
27. Knowledge Translation Program. 2016. Accessed at https: //knowledgetranslation.net on 10 January 2018.
28. Penelope. 2017. Accessed at www.penelope.ai on 28 February 2018.
29. World Health Organization. Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research. 2018. Accessed at www.who.int/alliance-hpsr/en on 27 February 2018.
30. Global Evidence Synthesis Initiative. 2016. Accessed at www.gesiinitiative.com on 27 February 2018.
31. San A, Hiremagalur B, Muircroft W, Grealish L. Screening of cognitive impairment in the dialysis population: a scoping review. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2017;44:182-95. [PMID: 28869959] doi: 10.1159/000479679
32. Galloway T, Blackett H, Chatwood S, Jeppesen C, Kandola K, Linton J, et al. Obesity studies in the circumpolar Inuit: a scoping review. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2012;71:18698. [PMID: 22765938] doi:10.3402/ijch.v71i0.18698
33. Beller EM, Glasziou PP, Altman DG, Hopewell S, Bastian H, Chalmers I, et al; PRISMA for Abstracts Group. PRISMA for Abstracts: reporting systematic reviews in journal and conference abstracts. PLoS Med. 2013;10:e1001419. [PMID: 23585737] doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001419
34. Hopewell S, Clarke M, Moher D, Wager E, Middleton P, Altman DG, et al; CONSORT Group. CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e20. [PMID: 18215107] doi:10.1371/ journal.pmed.0050020
35. Haynes RB, Mulrow CD, Huth EJ, Altman DG, Gardner MJ. More informative abstracts revisited. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113:69-76. [PMID: 2190518]
36. Piškur B, Beurskens AJ, Jongmans MJ, Ketelaar M, Norton M, Frings CA, et al. Parents' actions, challenges, and needs while enabling participation of children with a physical disability: a scoping review. BMC Pediatr. 2012;12:177. [PMID: 23137074] doi:10.1186/ 1471-2431-12-177
37. Richardson WS, Wilson MC, Nishikawa J, Hayward RS. The wellbuilt clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions [Editorial]. ACP J Club. 1995;123:A12-3. [PMID: 7582737]
38. Andrew B. Clear and present questions: formulating questions for evidence based practice. Library Hi Tech. 2006;24:355-68.
39. Joanna Briggs Institute. The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers' Manual 2015: Methodology for JBI Scoping Reviews. Adelaide, Australia: Joanna Briggs Institute; 2015. Accessed at http://joannabriggs.org/assets/docs/sumari/Reviewers-Manual-Methodology-for-JBI -Scoping-Reviews-2015-v2.pdf on 3 August 2018.
40. Tricco AC, Zarin W, Lillie E, Pham B, Straus SE. Utility of social media and crowd-sourced data for pharmacovigilance: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e013474. [PMID: 28104709] doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013474
41. Open Science Framework. 2011. Accessed at https://osf.io on 10 January 2018.
42. BioMed Central. Systematic Reviews. 2018. Accessed at https: //systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com on 10 January 2018.
43. JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports. 2018. Accessed at http://journals.lww.com/jbisrir/pages/default. aspx on 10 January 2018.
44. BMJ Open. Accessed at http://bmjopen.bmj.com on 1 March 2018.
45. Sav A, Salehi A, Mair FS, McMillan SS. Measuring the burden of treatment for chronic disease: implications of a scoping review of the literature. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017;17:140. [PMID: 28899342] doi:10.1186/s12874-017-0411-8
46. Cardoso R, Zarin W, Nincic V, Barber SL, Gulmezoglu AM, Wilson C, et al. Evaluative reports on medical malpractice policies in obstetrics: a rapid scoping review. Syst Rev. 2017;6:181. [PMID: 28874176] doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0569-5
47. McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C. PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;75:40-6. [PMID: 27005575] doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021
48. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Grey Matters: a practical tool for searching health-related grey literature. 2015. Accessed at https://cadth.ca/resources/finding-evidence/grey -matters on 10 January 2018.
49. Duffett M, Choong K, Hartling L, Menon K, Thabane L, Cook DJ. Randomized controlled trials in pediatric critical care: a scoping review. Crit Care. 2013;17:R256. [PMID: 24168782] doi:10.1186/cc13083
50. Lenzen SA, Daniëls R, van Bokhoven MA, van der Weijden T, Beurskens A. Disentangling self-management goal setting and action planning: a scoping review. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0188822. [PMID: 29176800] doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0188822
51. Leung M, Perumal N, Mesfin E, Krishna A, Yang S, Johnson W, et al. Metrics of early childhood growth in recent epidemiological research: a scoping review. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0194565. [PMID: 29558499] doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0194565
52. Tricco AC, Zarin W, Rios P, Nincic V, Khan PA, Ghassemi M, et al. Engaging policy-makers, heath system managers, and policy analysts in the knowledge synthesis process: a scoping review. Implement Sci. 2018;13:31. [PMID: 29433543] doi:10.1186/s13012-018- 0717-x
53. Zarin W, Veroniki AA, Nincic V, Vafaei A, Reynen E, Motiwala SS, et al. Characteristics and knowledge synthesis approach for 456 network meta-analyses: a scoping review. BMC Med. 2017;15:3. [PMID: 28052774] doi:10.1186/s12916-016-0764-6
54. Hutchinson J, Prady SL, Smith MA, White PC, Graham HM. A scoping review of observational studies examining relationships between environmental behaviors and health behaviors. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12:4833-58. [PMID: 25950651] doi:10.3390/ ijerph120504833
55. Hosking J, Campbell-Lendrum D. How well does climate change and human health research match the demands of policymakers? A scoping review. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120:1076-82. [PMID: 22504669] doi:10.1289/ehp.1104093
56. Strand M, Gammon D, Ruland CM. Transitions from biomedical to recovery-oriented practices in mental health: a scoping review to explore the role of Internet-based interventions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:257. [PMID: 28388907] doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2176-5
57. Constand MK, MacDermid JC, Dal Bello-Haas V, Law M. Scoping review of patient-centered care approaches in healthcare. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:271. [PMID: 24947822] doi:10.1186/1472- 6963-14-271
58. Tricco AC, Antony J, Zarin W, Strifler L, Ghassemi M, Ivory J, et al. A scoping review of rapid review methods. BMC Med. 2015;13:224. [PMID: 26377409] doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0465-6
59. Hall AJ, Lang IA, Endacott R, Hall A, Goodwin VA. Physiotherapy interventions for people with dementia and a hip fracture - a scoping review of the literature. Physiotherapy. 2017;103:361-8. [PMID: 28843451] doi:10.1016/j.physio.2017.01.001