Evaluation of the JBI scoping reviews methodology by current users

International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare

Volumn , Issue , 2019, Pages

  Khalil, Hanan ^a   Bennett, Marsha ^b   Godfrey, Christina ^c   McInerney, Patricia ^d   Munn, Zac ^e   Peters, Micah ^f  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b St Charles General Hospital Auxillary   (United States)

^c QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND   (South Africa)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^f UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

data extraction; guidance; methodology; scoping reviews

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DATA EXTRACTION; EMPLOYEE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EID: 85072586795     PISSN: 17441595     EISSN: 17441609     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000202     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bastian H, Glasziou P, Chalmers I. Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up? PLoS Med 2010; 7: e1000326.
2. Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2005; 8: 19-32.
3. Peters MD, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares CB. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2015; 13: 141-6.
4. Khalil H, Peters M, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Baldini Soares C, Parker D. An evidence-based approach to scoping reviews. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2016; 13: 118-23.
5. Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK. Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implement Sci 2010; 5: 69.
6. Tricco AC, Zarin W, Ghassemi M, et al. Same family, different species: methodological conduct and quality varies according to purpose for five types of knowledge synthesis. J Clin Epidemiol 2018; 96: 133-42.
7. Munn Z, Stern C, Aromataris E, Lockwood C, Jordan Z. What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences. BMC Med Res Methodol 2018; 18: 5.
8. Chalmers I, Hedges LV, Cooper H. A brief history of research synthesis. Eval Health Prof 2002; 25: 12-37.
9. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2016; 16: 15.
10. O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. Advancing scoping study methodology: A web-based survey and consultation of perceptions on terminology, definition and methodological steps. BMC Health Serv Res 2016; 16: 305.
11. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018; 169: 467-73.
12. Khalil H, Roughead L. Medication safety programs in primary care: A scoping review protocol. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep 2017; 15: 1512-7.
13. Wilson R, Godfrey CM, Sears K, Medves J, Ross-White A, Lambert N. Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: A scoping review protocol. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep 2015; 13: 146-55.
14. Al Thobaity A, Plummer V, Williams B. What are the most common domains of the core competencies of disaster nursing? A scoping review. Int Emerg Nurs 2017; 31: 64-71.
15. Harfield S, Davy C, Kite E, McArthur A, Munn Z, Brown N, Brown A. Characteristics of Indigenous primary healthcare models of service delivery: A scoping review protocol. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep 2015; 13: 43-51.
16. Ganann R, Ciliska D, Thomas H. Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews. Implement Sci 2010; 5: 56.
17. Khangura S, Konnyu K, Cushman R, Grimshaw J, Moher D. Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach. Syst Rev 2012; 1: 10.
18. Borah R, Brown AW, Capers PL, Kaiser KA. Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry. BMJ Open 2017; 7: e012545.
19. Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T. Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci 2013; 15: 398-405.
20. Straus SE, Kastner M, Soobiah C, Antony J, Tricco A. Introduction: engaging researchers on developing, using and improving knowledge synthesis methods: A series of articles describing the results of a scoping review on emerging knowledge synthesis methods. J Clin Epidemiol 2016; 73: 15-8.
21. Peters MD, Godfrey CM, McInerney P, Soares CB, Khalil H, Parker D. The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers' manual 2015: methodology for JBI scoping reviews Adelaide: The Joanna Briggs Institute; 2015.