Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews

JBI Evidence Synthesis

Volumn 18, Issue 10, 2020, Pages 2119-2126

  Peters, Micah D J ^a,b,c   Marnie, Casey ^a   Tricco, Andrea C ^d,e,f   Pollock, Danielle ^b   Munn, Zachary ^b   Alexander, Lyndsay ^g,h   McInerney, Patricia ^i,j   Godfrey, Christina M ^f,k   Khalil, Hanan ^l,m  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^c The Centre for Evidence based Practice South Australia   (Australia)

^d ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^f Queen s Collaboration for Health Care Quality: A Joanna Briggs Institute Center of Excellence   (Canada)

^g ROBERT GORDON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^h Scottish Centre for Evidence based Multi professional Practice: A JBI Centre of Excellence Aberdeen   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND   (South Africa)

^j UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND   (South Africa)

^k QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^l LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^m Mater Misericordiae Limited and Queensland Centre for Evidence Based Nursing and Midwifery: A Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence   (Australia)

more..

Author keywords

Evidence synthesis; Evidence based health care; Knowledge synthesis; Mapping reviews; Research methodology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; E-MAIL; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; PREFERRED REPORTING ITEMS FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS AND META-ANALYSES; SYNTHESIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TELECONFERENCE; WRITING; KNOWLEDGE; METHODOLOGY; POLICY; PUBLICATION; QUESTIONNAIRE;

KNOWLEDGE; POLICY; PUBLICATIONS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 85092752552     PISSN: 26898381     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bastian H, Glasziou P, Chalmers I. Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: How will we ever keep up? PLoS Med 2010;7(9):e1000326.
2. Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J 2009;26(2):91–108.
3. Tricco AC, Soobiah C, Antony J, Cogo E, MacDonald H, Lillie E, et al. A scoping review identifies multiple emerging knowledge synthesis methods, but few studies operationalize the method. J Clin Epidemiol 2016;73:19–28.
4. Sutton A, Clowes M, Preston L, Booth A. Meeting the review family: Exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements. Health Info Libr J 2019;36(3):202–22.
5. Ehrich K, Freeman GK, Richards SC, Robinson IC, Shepperd S. How to do a scoping exercise: Continuity of care. Res Policy Plann 2002;20(1):25–9.
6. Anderson S, Allen P, Peckham S, Goodwin N. Asking the right questions: Scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services. Health Res Policy Syst 2008;6(1):7.
7. Tricco A, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien K, Colquhoun H, Kastner M, et al. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2016;16:15.
8. Pham M, Raji A, Greig J, Sargeant J, Papadopoulos A, McEwen S. A scoping review of scoping reviews: Advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods 2014;5(4):371–85.
9. Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2005;8(1):19–32.
10. Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implement Sci 2010;5(1):69.
11. Khalil H, Peters M, Godfrey CM, McInerney P, Soares CB, Parker D. An evidence-based approach to scoping reviews. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2016;13(2):118–23.
12. Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Soares CB, Khalil H, Parker D. Chapter 11: Scoping reviews. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Reviewer’s Manual. Adelaide: JBI, 2015.
13. Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares C. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2015;13(3):141–6.
14. Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Soares CB, Khalil H, Parker D. Chapter 11: Scoping reviews. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Reviewer’s Manual. Adelaide: JBI, 2017.
15. Khalil H, Bennett M, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Peters M. Evaluation of the JBI scoping reviews methodology by current users. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2020;18(1):95–100.
16. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018;169(7): 467–73.
17. Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco A, Khalil H. Chapter 11: Scoping reviews. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis [Internet]. Adelaide: JBI, 2020. [cited 5 May 2020]. Available from: Https://synthesismanual.jbi.global.
18. Grimshaw J. A guide to knowledge synthesis: A knowledge synthesis chapter [Internet]. 2020 [cited 5 May 2020]. Available from: Https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/41382.html.
19. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien K, Colquhoun H, Kastner M, et al. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2016;16:15.
20. Munn Z, Stern C, Aromataris E, Lockwood C, Jordan Z. What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences. BMC Med Res Methodol 2018;18(1):5.
21. Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 2018;18(1):143.
22. Harfield SG, Davy C, McArthur A, Munn Z, Brown A, Brown N. Characteristics of Indigenous primary health care service delivery models: A systematic scoping review. Global Health 2018;14(1):12.
23. Watson R, Parr J, Joyce C, May C, Le Couteur A. Models of transitional care for young people with complex health needs: A scoping review. Child Care Health Dev 2011;37(6):780–91.
24. Tricco A, Zarin W, Ghassemi M, Nincic V, Lillie E, Page M, et al. Same family, different species: Methodological conduct and quality varies according to purpose for five types of knowledge synthesis. J Clin Epidemiol 2018;96:133–42.
25. Tricco A. What review is right for you? Knowledge Translation Program [Internet]. 2020 [cited 5 May 2020]. Available from: Https://whatreviewisrightforyou.knowledgetranslation.net/.
26. Snilstveit B, Vojtkova M, Bhavsar A, Stevenson J, Gaarder M. Evidence and gap maps: A tool for promoting evidence informed policy and strategic research agendas. J Clin Epidemiol 2016;79:120–9.
27. McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel D, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C. PRESS peer reviewof electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2016;75:40–6.
28. Davy C, Harfield S, McArthur A, Munn Z, Brown A. Access to primary health care services for Indigenous peoples: A framework synthesis. Int J Equity Health 2016;15(1):163.
29. Glegg SMN, Levac DE. Barriers, facilitators and interventions to support virtual reality implementation in rehabilitation: A scoping review. PM R 2018;10(11):1237–51.