Achievement Goal Orientation Profiles and Performance in a Programming MOOC

Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE

Volumn , Issue , 2020, Pages 411-417

  Polso, Kukka Maaria ^a   Tuominen, Heta ^b   Hellas, Arto ^c   Ihantola, Petri ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^c AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Achievement Goal Orientation; CS1; MOOC; Performance

Indexed keywords

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; EDUCATION COMPUTING; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; ENGINEERING RESEARCH;

COURSE PERFORMANCE; GOAL ORIENTATIONS; INTRODUCTORY PROGRAMMING; MOTIVATIONAL PROFILES; TWO-STEP CLUSTER ANALYSIS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 85086430405     PISSN: 1942647X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/3341525.3387398     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (42)

1. Tapio Auvinen, Lasse Hakulinen, and Lauri Malmi. 2015. Increasing students' awareness of their behavior in online learning environments with visualizations and achievement badges. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 8, 3 (2015), 261-273.
2. Lisa E Baranik, Laura J Stanley, Bethany H Bynum, and Charles E Lance. 2010. Examining the construct validity of mastery-Avoidance achievement goals: A meta-Analysis. Human Performance 23, 3 (2010), 265-282.
3. Lars R Bergman, David Magnusson, and Bassam M El Khouri. 2003. Studying individual development in an interindividual context: A person-oriented approach. Psychology Press.
4. Lia M Daniels, Tara L Haynes, Robert H Stupnisky, Raymond P Perry, Nancy E Newall, and Reinhard Pekrun. 2008. Individual differences in achievement goals: A longitudinal study of cognitive, emotional, and achievement outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology 33, 4 (2008), 584-608.
5. Paul Denny, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, Michelle Craig, and Andrew Petersen. 2018. Improving Complex Task Performance Using a Sequence of Simple Practice Tasks. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE 2018). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 4-9.
6. Carol S Dweck. 1986. Motivational processes affecting learning. American psychologist 41, 10 (1986), 1040.
7. Andrew J Elliot. 1999. Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational psychologist 34, 3 (1999), 169-189.
8. Andrew J Elliot and Judith M Harackiewicz. 1996. Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of personality and social psychology 70, 3 (1996), 461.
9. Andrew J Elliot and Holly A McGregor. 2001. A 2× 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of personality and social psychology 80, 3 (2001), 501.
10. Ursula Fuller, Colin G Johnson, Tuukka Ahoniemi, Diana Cukierman, Isidoro Hernán-Losada, Jana Jackova, Essi Lahtinen, Tracy L Lewis, Donna McGee Thompson, Charles Riedesel, et al. 2007. Developing a computer science-specific learning taxonomy. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 39, 4 (2007), 152-170.
11. Teresa Goncalves, Markku Niemivirta, and Marina S Lemos. 2017. Identification of students' multiple achievement and social goal profiles and analysis of their stability and adaptability. Learning and Individual Differences 54 (2017), 149-159.
12. Tony Greening. 2000. Emerging constructivist forces in computer science education: Shaping a new future? In Computer science education in the 21-T century. Springer, 47-80.
13. Lasse Hakulinen and Tapio Auvinen. 2014. The effect of gamification on students with different achievement goal orientations. In 2014 international conference on teaching and learning in computing and engineering. IEEE, 9-16.
14. Qiang Hao, Brad Barnes, Ewan Wright, and Robert Maribe Branch. 2017. The influence of achievement goals on online help seeking of computer science students. British Journal of Educational Technology 48, 6 (2017), 1273-1283.
15. Arto Hellas, Petri Ihantola, Andrew Petersen, Vangel V Ajanovski, Mirela Gutica, Timo Hynninen, Antti Knutas, Juho Leinonen, Chris Messom, and Soohyun Nam Liao. 2018. Predicting academic performance: a systematic literature review. In Proceedings Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. ACM, 175-199.
16. Chris S Hulleman, Sheree M Schrager, Shawn M Bodmann, and Judith M Harackiewicz. 2010. A meta-Analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels? Psychological bulletin 136, 3 (2010), 422.
17. Petri Ihantola, Essi Isohanni, Pietari Heino, and Tommi Mikkonen. 2019. Criterion-Based Grading, Agile Goal Setting, and Course (Un) Completion Strategies. In Agile and Lean Concepts for Teaching and Learning. Springer, 207-230.
18. Kalle Ilves, Juho Leinonen, and Arto Hellas. 2018. Supporting self-regulated learning with visualizations in online learning environments. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, 257-262.
19. Joost Jansen In De Wal, Lisette Hornstra, Frans J Prins, Thea Peetsma, and Ineke Van Der Veen. 2016. The prevalence, development and domain specificity of elementary school students' achievement goal profiles. Educational Psychology 36, 7 (2016), 1303-1322.
20. Colin G Johnson and Ursula Fuller. 2006. Is Bloom's taxonomy appropriate for computer science?. In Proceedings of the 6th Baltic Sea conference on Computing education research: Koli Calling 2006. ACM, 120-123.
21. Juho Leinonen, Petri Ihantola, Antti Leinonen, Henrik Nygren, Jaakko Kurhila, Matti Luukkainen, and Arto Hellas. 2019. Admitting Students through an Open Online Course in Programming: A Multi-year Analysis of Study Success. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research. 279-287.
22. Andrew Luxton-Reilly, Simon, Ibrahim Albluwi, Brett A. Becker, Michail Giannakos, Amruth N. Kumar, Linda Ott, James Paterson, Michael James Scott, Judy Sheard, and et al. 2018. Introductory Programming: A Systematic Literature Review. In Proceedings Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE 2018 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 55-106.
23. John G Nicholls. 1984. Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological review 91, 3 (1984), 328.
24. Markku Niemivirta, Antti-Tuomas Pulkka, Anna Tapola, and Heta Tuominen. 2019. Achievement goal orientations: A person-oriented approach. In The Cambridge Handbook of Motivation and Learning. Cambridge University Press, 566-616.
25. Paul R Pintrich. 1999. The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining selfregulated learning. International journal of educational research 31, 6 (1999), 459-470.
26. Paul R Pintrich. 2000. Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of educational psychology 92, 3 (2000), 544.
27. Paul R Pintrich. 2003. A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of educational Psychology 95, 4 (2003), 667.
28. Malte Schwinger, Ricarda Steinmayr, and Birgit Spinath. 2016. Achievement goal profiles in elementary school: Antecedents, consequences, and longitudinal trajectories. Contemporary Educational Psychology 46 (2016), 164-179.
29. Corwin Senko. 2016. Achievement Goal Theory: A Story of Early Promises, Eventual Discords, and Future Possibilities. In Handbook of Motivation at School, Kathryn R Wentzel and David B Miele (Eds.). Routledge, 87-107.
30. Corwin Senko. 2019. When do mastery and performance goals facilitate academic achievement? Contemporary Educational Psychology 59 (2019), 101795.
31. Corwin Senko and Blair Dawson. 2017. Performance-Approach goal effects depend on how they are defined: Meta-Analytic evidence from multiple educational outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology 109, 4 (2017), 574.
32. Corwin Senko, Chris S Hulleman, and JudithMHarackiewicz. 2011. Achievement goal theory at the crossroads: Old controversies, current challenges, and new directions. Educational psychologist 46, 1 (2011), 26-47.
33. Errol Thompson, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, Jacqueline L Whalley, Minjie Hu, and Phil Robbins. 2008. Bloom's taxonomy for CS assessment. In Proceedings of the tenth conference on Australasian computing education-Volume 78. Australian Computer Society, Inc., 155-161.
34. Heta Tuominen-Soini, Katariina Salmela-Aro, and Markku Niemivirta. 2008. Achievement goal orientations and subjective well-being: A person-centred analysis. Learning and instruction 18, 3 (2008), 251-266.
35. Heta Tuominen-Soini, Katariina Salmela-Aro, and Markku Niemivirta. 2011. Stability and change in achievement goal orientations: A person-centered approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology 36, 2 (2011), 82-100.
36. Arto Vihavainen, Matti Luukkainen, and Jaakko Kurhila. 2012. Multi-Faceted Support for MOOC in Programming. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education (SIGITE '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 171-176.
37. Arto Vihavainen, Thomas Vikberg, Matti Luukkainen, and Martin Pärtel. 2013. Scaffolding students' learning using test my code. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education. 117-122.
38. Alexander Von Eye. 1990. Introduction to configural frequency analysis: The search for types and antitypes in cross-classification. Cambridge University Press.
39. Abeer Watted and Miri Barak. 2018. Motivating factors of MOOC completers: Comparing between university-Affiliated students and general participants. The Internet and Higher Education 37 (2018), 11-20.
40. Daniel Zingaro. 2015. Examining interest and grades in Computer Science 1: a study of pedagogy and achievement goals. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 15, 3 (2015), 14.
41. Daniel Zingaro, Michelle Craig, Leo Porter, Brett A Becker, Yingjun Cao, Phill Conrad, Diana Cukierman, Arto Hellas, Dastyni Loksa, and Neena Thota. 2018. Achievement goals in CS1: Replication and extension. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, 687-692.
42. Daniel Zingaro and Leo Porter. 2016. Impact of student achievement goals on CS1 outcomes. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM technical symposium on Computing Science Education. ACM, 279-296.