Examining the construct validity of mastery-avoidance achievement goals: A meta-analysis

Human Performance

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 265-282

  Baranik, Lisa E ^a   Stanley, Laura J ^a   Bynum, Bethany H ^b   Lance, Charles E ^b  

^a EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954634985     PISSN: 08959285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08959285.2010.488463     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency and social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 55, 1175-1184.
2. Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248-287.
3. Baranik, L. E., Barron, K. E., & Finney, S. J. (2007). Measuring goal orientation in a work domain: Evidence for the 2 × 2 framework. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 697-718.
4. Baranik, L. E., Barron, K. E., & Finney, S. J. (in press). A comparison of general vs. specific measures of achievement goal orientation. Human Performance.
5. Baranik, L., Stanley, L., Lau, A., & Barron, K. (2009). Does mastery-avoidance matter at work? Manuscript submitted for publication.
6. Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, W. J. (2002). Goal orientation and ability: Interactive effects on self-efficacy, performance and knowledge. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 497-505.
7. Bodmann, S. M., Hulleman, C. S. & Schrager, S. M. (2007, April). The 2 × 2 model of achievement goals: A meta-analysis. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
8. Conroy, D. E., & Elliot, A. J. (2004). Fear of failure and achievement goals in sport: Addressing the issue of the chicken and the egg. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping: An International Journal, 17, 271-285.
9. Conroy, D. E., Elliot, A. J., & Hofer, S. M. (2003). A 2 × 2 achievement goals questionnaire for sport: Evidence for factorial invariance, temporal stability, and external validity. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 25, 456-476.
10. Cury, F., Elliot, A. J., DaFonesca, D., & Moller, A. C. (2006). The social-cognitive model of achievement motivation and the 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 666-679.
11. DeShon, R. P., & Gillespie, J. Z. (2005). A motivated action theory account of goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1096-1127.
12. Dweck, C. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.
13. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95,256-273.
14. Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169-189.
15. Elliot, A. J. (2005). A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52-72). New York: Guilford.
16. Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 5-12.
17. Elliot, A. J., & Dweck, C. S. (2005). Competence and motivation: Competence as the core of achievement motivation. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 3-12). New York: Guilford.
18. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501-519.
19. Elliot, A. J., & Murayama, K. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 3, 613-628.
20. Finney, S. J., Pieper, S. L., & Barron, K. E. (2004). Examining the psychometric properties of the achievement goal questionnaire in a general academic context. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 64, 365-382.
21. Guan, J., Xiang, P., McBride, R., & Bruene, A. (2006). Achievement goals, social goals, and students' reported persistence and effort in high school education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 25, 58-74.
22. Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Pintrich, P. R., Elliot, A. J. & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 3, 638-645.
23. Hargis, M. B., Senter, J. L., & LeBreton, J. M. (2004, April). Examining the factor structure and nomological network of goal orientation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago, IL.
24. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Karabenick, S. A. (2003). Seeking help in large college classes: A person-centered approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 37-58.
26. Karabenick, S. A. (2004). Perceived achievement goal structure and college student help seeking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 569-581.
27. Moller, A. C., & Elliot, A. J. (2006). The 2 × 2 achievement goal framework: An overview of empirical research. In A. V. Mitel (Ed.), Focus on educational psychology (pp. 307-326). New York: Nova Science.
28. Murphy, K. R. (1989). Is the relationship between cognitive ability and job performance stable over time? Human Performance, 2, 183-200.
29. Ntoumanis, N., & Biddle, S. J. H. (1999). Affect and achievement goals in physical activity: A meta-analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 8, 120-124.
30. Pastor, D. E., Barron, K. E., Miller, B. J., & Davis, S. L. (2007). A latent profile analysis of college students'achievement goal orientation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 8-47.
31. Payne, S. C., Youngcourt, S. S., & Beaubien, M. J. (2007). A meta-analytic investigation of the goal orientation nomological net. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 128-150.
32. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92-104.
33. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research and applications (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill Prentice-Hall.
34. Radosevich, D. J. (2006). Understanding goal adjustment strategies based on goal orientation. International Journal of Business Research, 6, 58-72.
35. Radosevich, D. J., Allyn, M., & Yun, S. (2007). Predictive validity of goal orientation: Four-factor versus three-factor model. Review of Business Research, 7, 175-183.
36. Radosevich, D. J., Allyn, M., Yun, S., & Wallace, J. C. (2007, April). Predicting performance by integrating four-factor goal orientation theory with goal setting theory. Seoul Journal of Business, 13, 21-47.
37. Raju, N.S., Burke, M. J., Normand, J., & Langlois, G. M. (1991). A new meta-analytic approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 432-446.
38. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1977). Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 529-540.
39. Sideridis, G. D. (2007a). Goal orientations and classroom goal structures as predictors of classroom behaviors for Greek students with and without learning difficulties: Clarifying the differential role of motivational orientations. Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities, 20, 101-138.
40. Sideridis, G. D. (2007b). The regulation of affect, anxiety, and stressful arousal from adopting MAV goal orientations. Stress and Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 24, 55-69.
41. Silver, N. C., & Dunlap, W. P. (1987). Averaging correlation coefficients: Should Fisher's z transformation be used? Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 146-148.
42. Spence, J., & Helmreich, R. (1983). Achievement-related motives and behaviors. In J. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 7-74). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
43. Tanaka, A., & Yamauchi, H. (2004). Cultural self-construal and achievement goal. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 1, 221-237.
44. Van Yperen, N. W. (2003). Task interest and actual performance: The moderating effects of assigned and adopted purpose goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 660-671.
45. Van Yperen, N. W. (2006). A novel approach to assessing achievement goals in the context of the 2 × 2 framework: Identifying distinct profiles of individuals with different dominant achievement goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1432-1445.
46. VandeWalle, D. (1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 995-1015.
47. VandeWalle, D., & Cummings, L. L. (1997). A test of the influence of goal orientation on the feedback-seeking process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 390-400.
48. VandeWalle, D., Ganesan, S., Challagalla, G. N., & Brown, S. P. (2000). An integrated model of feedback-seeking behavior: Disposition, context, and cognition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 996-1003.
49. Wang, C. K., Biddle, S. J. H., & Elliot, A. J. (2007). The 2 × 2 achievement goal framework in a physical education context. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8, 147-168.