Scaffolding students' learning using Test My Code

Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 117-122

  Vihavainen, Arto ^a   Vikberg, Thomas ^a   Luukkainen, Matti ^a   Pärtel, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Automatic assessment; Extreme apprenticeship; Programming; Situated learning; Testing; Verification

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATED ASSESSMENT; AUTOMATIC ASSESSMENT; EXTREME APPRENTICESHIP; PROBLEM SOLVING SKILLS; PROGRAMMING ENVIRONMENT; PROGRAMMING EXERCISE; PROGRAMMING PROCESS; SITUATED LEARNING;

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; ENGINEERING RESEARCH; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING; SCAFFOLDS; TESTING; VERIFICATION;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84881144006     PISSN: 1942647X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2462476.2462501     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. K. Ala-Mutka. A survey of automated assessment approaches for programming assignments. Computer Science Education, 15(2):83-102, 2005.
2. K. Beck. Test Driven Development: By Example. Addison-Wesley, 2002.
3. J. Brown, A. Collins, and P. Duguid. Situated cognition culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1):32, 1989.
4. A. Collins, J. S. Brown, and A. Holum. Cognitive apprenticeship: making thinking visible. American Educator, 6, 1991.
5. A. Collins and J. G. Greeno. Situative view of learning. In V. G. Aukrust, editor, Learning and Cognition, pages 64-68. Elsevier Science, 2010.
6. C. Douce, D. Livingstone, and J. Orwell. Automatic test-based assessment of programming: A review. Journal of Educational Resources in Compututing, 5(3), Sept. 2005.
7. S. Edwards. Using test-driven development in the classroom: Providing students with automatic, concrete feedback on performance. In Proceedings of the EISTA '03, volume 3. Citeseer, 2003.
8. M. E. Fagan. Design and code inspections to reduce errors in program development. IBM Systems Journal, 15(3):182-211, 1976.
9. J. G. Greeno. Response: On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educ. Researcher, 26(1):5-17, 1997.
10. D. Hovemeyer and W. Pugh. Finding bugs is easy. SIGPLAN Not., 39(12):92-106, Dec. 2004.
11. P. Ihantola, T. Ahoniemi, V. Karavirta, and O. Seppälä. Review of recent systems for automatic assessment of programming assignments. In Proceedings of the 10th Koli Calling. ACM, 2010.
12. M. Kuperberg, M. Krogmann, and R. Reussner. ByCounter: portable runtime counting of bytecode instructions and method invocations. In Proceedings of the ETAPS'08, 2008.
13. J. Kurhila and A. Vihavainen. Management, structures and tools to scale up personal advising in large programming courses. In Proceedings of the SIGITE '11. ACM, 2011.
14. J. Spacco, D. Hovemeyer, W. Pugh, F. Emad, J. K. Hollingsworth, and N. Padua-Perez. Experiences with Marmoset: designing and using an advanced submission and testing system for programming courses. In Proceedings of the ITICSE '06. ACM, 2006.
15. A. Vihavainen, J. Kurhila, and M. Luukkainen. Multi-faceted support for MOOC in programming. In Proceedings of the SIGITE '12. ACM, 2012.
16. A. Vihavainen, M. Paksula, and M. Luukkainen. Extreme apprenticeship method in teaching programming for beginners. In Proceedings of the SIGCSE'11. ACM, 2011.
17. A. Vihavainen, T. Vikberg, M. Luukkainen, and J. Kurhila. Massive increase in eager TAs: Experiences from extreme apprenticeship-based CS1. To appear in Proceedings of the ITiCSE'13, July 2013.
18. D. Wood, J. S. Bruner, and G. Ross. The role of tutoring in problem solving. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 17(2):89-100, 1976.