Bloom's taxonomy for CS assessment

Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology Series

Volumn 78, Issue , 2008, Pages 155-161

  Thompson, Errol ^a   Luxton Reilly, Andrew ^b   Whalley, Jacqueline L ^c   Hu, Minjie ^d   Robbins, Phil ^c  

^a University of Auckland ^*  (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^c AUCKLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (New Zealand)

^d Tairawhiti Polytechnic   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Bloom's taxonomy; Multi institutional; Novice programmers

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; CURRICULA; TAXONOMIES;

ASSESSMENT TASKS; BLOOM TAXONOMIES; BLOOM'S TAXONOMY; INTRODUCTORY PROGRAMMING COURSE; MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL; NOVICE PROGRAMMER;

BLOOMS (METAL);

EID: 84869117897     PISSN: 14451336     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. ®, Los Alamitos, CA , IEEE-CS - Professional Practices Committee.
2. Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J. and Wittrock, M.C. (eds.) (2001). A taxonomy for learning and teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Addison Wesley Longman.
3. Biggs, J.B. and Collis, K.F. (1982) Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome). New York, Academic Press.
4. Bloom, B.S., Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H. and Krathwohl, D.R. (1956) Taxonomy of educational objectives Handbook 1: cognitive domain. London, Longman Group Ltd.
5. Johnson, C.G. and Fuller, U. (2006) Is Bloom's taxonomy appropriate for computer science. Berglund, A. ed. 6th Baltic Sea Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli Calling 2006), Koli National Park, Finland, 115-118.
6. Lister, R., Adams, E.S., Fitzgerald, S., Fone, W., Hamer, J., Lindholm, M., McCartney, R., Moström, J.E., Sanders, K., Seppälä, O., Simon, B. and Thomas, L. (2004) A multi-national study of reading and tracing skills in novice programmers. Inroads - The SIGCSE Bulletin, 36 (4). 119-150.
7. Lister, R. and Leaney, J. Introductory programming, criterion-referencing (2003) SIGCSE '03: Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, 143-147, ACM Press.
8. Oliver, D., Dobele, T., Greber, M. and Roberts, T. (2004), This course has a Bloom Rating of 3.9. in Proceedings of the sixth conference on Australasian computing education - Volume 30, Dunedin, New Zealand, 227-231, Australian Computer Society Inc.
9. Scott, T. (2003) Bloom's taxonomy applied to testing in computer science classes. Journal of Computing in Small Colleges, 19 (1). 267-274.
10. Shneider, E. and Gladkikh, O. (2006) Designing questioning strategies for information technology courses. Mann, S. and Bridgeman, N. eds. The 19th Annual Conference of the National Advisory Committee on Computing Qualifications: Preparing for the Future - Capitalising on IT, Wellington, 243-248, National Advisory Committee on Computing Qualifications.
11. Whalley, J., Lister, R., Thompson, E., Clear, T., Robbins, P., Kumar, A. and Prasard, C. (2006), An Australasian study of reading and comprehension skills in novice programmers, using the Bloom and SOLO taxonomies. in Eighth Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE2006), Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, CRIPT, 52, 243-252., Australian Computer Society Inc.