TPCK in K-6 literacy education it's not that elementary!

Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 61-85

  Schmidt, Denise A ^a   Gurbo, Marina ^b  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b InVITe Consulting Ltd ^*  (Latvia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85075982240     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (98)

1. A to Z Teacher Stuff, L.L.C. (1997-2006). A to Z Teacher Stuff. http://atozteacherstuff.com.
2. ALTEC, the University of Kansas. (2000-2006). RubiStar. http://rubistar.4teachers.org/index.php.
3. Anderson, R. S., & Speck, B. W. (2001). Using technology in K-8 literacy classrooms. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
4. Anderson-Inman, L., & Horney, M. A. (1999). Electronic books: Reading and studying with sup-portive resources. Reading Online [Online]. Retrieved May 22, 2006, from http://www.readingonline.org/electronic/ebook/index.html.
5. Armstrong, S. (2003). The power of storytelling in education. In S. Armstrong (ed.), Snapshots! Educational insights from the Thornburg Center (pp. 11-20). The Thornburg Center: Lake Barrington, Illinois.
6. Atwell, N. (1984). Coming to know: Writing to learn in the intermediate grades. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
7. Atwell, N. (1987). In the middle: Writing, reading and learning with adolescents. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
8. Becker, H., & Ravitz, J. (1998). The influence of computer and Internet use on teachers' pedagog-ical practices and perceptions. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(4), 356-384.
9. Bialo, E., & Sivin, J. (1990). Report on the effectiveness of microcomputers in schools. Washing-ton, DC: Software Publishers Association.
10. Brush, T. A. (1998). Teaching preservice teachers to use technology in the classroom. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 6(4), 243-258.
11. Brush, T., Glazewski, K., Rutowski, K., Berg, K., Stromfors, C., Hernandez Van-Nest, M., et al. (2003). Integrating technology into a pre-service teacher training program: The PT3 at ASU project. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 57-72.
12. Calkins, L. M. (1986). The art of teaching writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
13. Cambourne, B. (1984). Language, learning, and literacy (reproduced from Towards a Reading-Writing Classroom by permission of Primary English Teaching Association, Sydney, Aus-tralia). Crystal Lake, IL: Rigby.
14. Cazden, C. (1988). Classroom discourse. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
15. Center for Technology in Learning and Teaching, Iowa State University. Faculty technology men-toring. Retrieved May 31, 2006, from http://www.ci.hs.iastate.edu/mentor/about.htm.
16. Cummins, J. (1979). Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, 49, 222-251.
17. Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1998, Spring/Summer). What reading does for the mind. American Educator, 22, 8-15.
18. Daiute, C., & Morse, F. (1994). Access to knowledge and expression: Multimedia writing tools for students with diverse needs and strengths. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12, 221-256.
19. Dawson, K., & Norris, A. (2000). Pre-service teachers' experiences in a K-12/university techno-logy-based field initiative: Benefits, facilitators, constraints, and implications for teacher educators. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 17(1), 4-12.
20. Dawson, K., Pringle, R., & Adams, T. (2003). Providing links between technology integra-tion, methods courses and traditional field experiences: Implementing a model of curriculum-based and technology-enhanced microteaching. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 20(1), 41-47.
21. Dodge, B. WebQuest Portal. Retrieved May 31, 2006, from http://webquest.org.
22. Ertmer, P. A. (2003). Transforming teacher education: Vision and strategies. Educational Techno-logy Research and Development, 51(1), 124-128.
23. Faison, C. (1996). Modeling instructional technology use in teacher preparation: Why we can't wait. Educational Technology, 36(5), 57-59.
24. Fletcher, J. M., & Lyon, G. R. (1998). Reading: A research-based approach. In W. Evers (ed.), What's gone wrong in America's classrooms? (pp. 49-90). Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
25. Floden, R. E., & Meniketti, M. (2005). Research on the effects of coursework in the arts and sci-ences and in the foundations of education. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (eds), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Educa-tion (pp. 261-308). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Genishi, C., McCarrier, A., & Nussbaum, N. R. (1988). Research currents: Dialogue as a context for teaching and learning. Language Arts, 65, 182-191.
27. Giff, P. R. (1997). Lily's crossing. New York: Delacorte.
28. Goodman, Y. M., & Wilde, S. (eds) (1992). Literacy events in a community of young writers. New York: Teachers College Press.
29. Graves, D. H. (1983). Writing: Teachers and children at work. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
30. Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (eds), Handbook of reading research (3rd edn). New York: Longman.
31. Guthrie, J. T., Schafer, W. D., & Huang, C. (2000). Benefits of opportunity to read and balanced reading instruction for reading achievement and engagement: A policy analysis of state NAEP in Maryland. Journal of Educational Research, 94(3), 145-162.
32. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Humenick, N. M., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., & Barbosa, P. (2006). Influences of stimulating tasks on reading motivation and comprehension. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(4), 232-245.
33. Hansen, J. (1987). When writers read. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
34. Harris, T. L., & Hodges, R. E. (1995). The literacy dictionary: The vocabulary of reading and writing. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
35. Hasselbring, T. (1999, May). The computer doesn't embarrass me. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Reading Association, San Diego, CA.
36. Hastings, E. (1997). Effects of CD-ROM talking storybooks on word recognition and motivation in young students with reading disabilities: An exploratory study. Unpublished manu-script, Syracuse University.
37. Hesse, K. (1997). Out of dust. New York: Scholastic Press.
38. Hillinger, M. L., & Leu, D. L. (1994). Guiding instruction in hypermedia. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society's 38th annual meeting, 266-270.
39. International Reading Association. (2002). Integrating literacy and technology in the curriculum. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
40. International Reading Association. (2004). Standards for reading professionals-revised 2003. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
41. International Society for Technology in Education. (2000). National educational technology stand-ards for teachers. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
42. IRA/NCTE. (2002-2006). ReadWriteThink. http://www.readwritethink.org.
43. Jones, I. (1994). The effect of a word processor on the written composition of second-grade pupils. Computers in the Schools, 11(2), 43-54.
44. Kamil, M. L., & Lane, D. M. (1998). Researching the relationship between technology and liter-acy: An agenda for the 21st century. In D. Reinking, M. C. Mckenna, L. D. Labbo, & R. D. Kieffer (eds), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformation in a post-typographic world (pp. 323-341). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
45. Karchmer, R. A. (2000). Understanding teachers' perspectives of Internet use in the classroom: Implications for teacher education and staff development programs. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 16(1), 81-85.
46. KidPub Children's Publishing. Retrieved May 31, 2006, from http://www.kidpub.com/kidpub.
47. Kinzer, C. K., & Leander, K. (2003). Technology and the language arts: Implications of an expanded definition of literacy. In J. Flood, D. Lapp, J. R. Sauire, & J. M. Jensen (eds), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (2nd edn., pp. 546-565). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
48. Kovalchik, A. (1997). Technology portfolios as an instructional strategy: designing a reflexive approach to pre-service technology training. TechTrends, 42(9), 31-36.
49. Labbo, L. D., & Reinking, D. (1999). Negotiating the multiple realities of technology in literacy research and instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 34(4), 478-492.
50. Labbo, L. D., Murray, B. A., & Phillips, M. (1995-1996). Writing to read: From inheritance to innovation and invitation. The Reading Teacher, 49, 314-321.
51. Leu, D. J., Jr. (2000). Deictic consequences for literacy education in an information age. In M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (eds), Handbook of reading research (Volume III, pp. 743-770). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Leu, D. J., & Hillinger, M. (1994). Reading comprehension in hypermedia: Supporting changes to chil-dren's conceptions of a scientific principle. San Diego, CA: National Reading Conference.
53. Leu, D. J., Jr., & Kinzer, C. K. (2000). The convergence of literacy instruction with networked technologies for information and communication. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 108-127.
54. Lewin, C. (1997). Evaluating talking books: Ascertaining the effectiveness of multiple feedback modes and tutoring techniques. In C. K. Kinzer, K. A. Hinchman, & D. J. Leu (eds), Inquiries in literacy theory and practice (pp. 360-371). Chicago: National Reading Confer-ence.
55. Lowry, L. (1989). Number the stars. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
56. Maryland Public Television, & Johns Hopkins University Center for Technology in Education. (2006). Thinkport. http://www.thinkport.org/default.tp.
57. McGill-Franzen, A., & Lanford, C. (1994). Exposing the edge of the preschool curriculum: Teachers' talk about text and children's literacy understanding. Language Arts, 71, 264-273.
58. McKenna, M. C. (1998). Electronic texts and the transformation of beginning reading. In D. Reinking, M. C. McKenna, L. D. Labbo, & R. D. Kieffer (eds), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 45-59). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
59. McKenna, M. C., & Watkins, J. H. (1996, December). The effects of computer-mediated trade books on sight word acquisition and the development of phonics ability. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Reading Conference, Charleston, SC.
60. McKenna, M. C., Labbo, L. D., & Reinking, D. (2003). Effective use of technology in literacy instruction. In L. M. Morrow, L. B. Gambrell, & M. Pressley (eds), Best practices in literacy instruction (2nd ed., pp. 307-331). New York: The Guilford Press.
61. Merkley, D., Schmidt, D., & Allen, G. (2001). Addressing the technology standards in a secondary reading methodology class. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45(3), 220-231.
62. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
63. Moats, L. C. (1999). Teaching reading is rocket science: What expert teachers of reading should know and be able to do. Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED445323.)
64. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Jessup, MD: National Institute for Literacy. Retrieved May 20, 2006 from http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/smallbook.pdf.
65. Nicaise, M., & Barnes, D. (1996). The union of technology, constructivism, and teacher educa-tion. Journal of Teacher Education, 47(3), 205-212.
66. Office of Technology Assessment. (1988). Power on! New tools for teaching and learning. Washing-ton, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
67. Padak, N., Rasinski, T., & Mraz, M. (2002). Scientifically-based reading research: A primer for adult and family literacy educators. Research to practice. Kent State University, OH: Ohio Liter-acy Resource Center. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED469865.)
68. Pearson, D. P., & Raphael, T. E. (2003). Toward a more complex view of balance in the literacy curriculum. In L. M. Morrow, L. B. Gambrell, & M. Pressley (eds), Best practices in literacy instruction (2nd edn, pp. 23-39). New York: The Guilford Press.
69. Pellegrino, J. W., & Altman, J. E. (1997). Information technology and teacher preparation: Some critical issues and illustrative solutions. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(1), 89-121.
70. Pressley, M., Wharton-McDonald, R., Rankin, J., El-Dinary, P., Brown, R., Afflerbach, P., et al. (1997). Elementary reading instruction. In G. D. Phye (ed.), Handbook of academic learn-ing: Construction of knowledge (pp. 151-198). New York: Academic Press.
71. Rodriguez, D., & Rodriguez, J. J. (1986). Teaching writing with a word processor, grades 7-13. Urbana, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills and National Council of Teachers of English.
72. Ruddell, R. B. (2006). Teaching children to read and write: Becoming an effective literacy teacher (4th edn). New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
73. Schmidt, D. A., Merkley, D. J., Fuhler, C. J., & Rinkleff, S. (2004). Technology for engaged learn-ing in a literacy methods course, Reading Online, 7(4). Retrieved May 25, 2006, from http://www.readingonline.org/articles/art_index.asp?HREF=/articles/schmidt.
74. Schmidt, J. A voice from the trenches. Retrieved May 31, 2006, from http://voice378. blogspot.com.
75. Shaw, C. G. (1947). It looked like spilt milk. New York: Harper.
76. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
77. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform. Harvard Educa-tional Review, 57(1), 1-22.
78. Snow, C. E., Griffin, P., & Burns, M. S. (eds). (2005). Knowledge to support the teaching of reading: Preparing teachers for a changing world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
79. Spitzer, M. (1990). Local and global networking: Implications for the future. In D. H. Holdstein & C. L. Selfe (eds), Computers and writing: Theory, research, practice (pp. 58-70). New York: Modern Language Association.
80. Strudler, N., & Grove, K. (2002). Integrating technology into teacher candidates' field experi-ences: A two-pronged approach. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 19(2), 33-39.
81. Strudler, N., & Wetzel, K. (1999). Lessons from exemplary teacher education programs. Paper pre-sented at the ninth annual conference of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education, Washington, DC.
82. Strudler, N., Archambault, L., Bendixen, L., Anderson, D., & Weiss, R. (2003). Project THREAD: Technology helping restructure educational access and delivery. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 41-56.
83. Swenson, J., Rozema, R., Young, C. A., McGrail, E., & Whitin, P. (2005). Beliefs about technology and the preparation of English teachers: Beginning the conversation. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 5(3/4), 210-236.
84. Thomas, J. C. (1998). I have heard of a land. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
85. Thompson, A., Schmidt, D. A., & Davis, N. E. (2003). Technology collaboratives for simultane-ous renewal in teacher education. Journal of Educational Technology Research and Develop-ment, 51(1), 73-89.
86. Thompson, A. D., Schmidt, D. A., & Hadjiyianni, E. (1995). A three year program to infuse technology throughout a teacher education program. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 3(1), 13-24.
87. Valmont, W. J. (2003). Technology for literacy teaching and learning. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
88. Vannatta, R. A., & O'Bannon, B. (2002). Beginning to put the pieces together: A technology infusion model for teacher education. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 18(4), 112-123.
89. Wang, J. H. Y., & Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading and past reading achievement on text comprehension between U.S. and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 162-186.
90. Wepner, S. B., Valmont, W. J., & Thurlow, R. (eds) (2000). Linking literacy and technology: A guide for K-8 classrooms. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
91. West, R. F., Stanovich, K. E., & Cunningham, A. E. (1995). Compensatory processes in reading. In R. Dixon & L. Backman (eds), Compensating for psychological deficits and declines: Man-aging losses and promoting gains (pp. 275-296). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
92. Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (1998). Child development and emergent literacy. Child Devel-opment, 68, 848-872.
93. Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of children's motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 420-432.
94. Wilkerson, T. L. (2003). A triad model for preparing preservice teachers for the integration of technology in teaching and learning. Action in Teacher Education, 24(4), 27-32.
95. Wong Fillmore, L. (1991). When learning a second language means losing the first. Early Child-hood Research Quarterly, 6, 323-346.
96. Wood, J. M. (2000) Literacy: Charlotte's web meets the World Wide Web. In D. T. Gordon (ed.), The digital classroom: How technology is changing the way we teach and learn (pp. 117-126). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Letter.
97. Young, E. E. (2001). Improving reading in America: Are teachers prepared? NCREL policy issues. Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. (ERIC Document Repro-duction Service No. ED464041.)
98. Zhao, Y. (ed.) (2003). What should teachers know about technology? Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, Inc.