Benefits of opportunity to read and balanced instruction on the naep

Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 94, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 145-162

  Guthrie, John T ^a   Schafer, William D ^a   Huang, Chun Wei ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Classroom effects; Engaged reading; Naep; Opportunity to read; Reading achievement

Indexed keywords

EID: 0011616040     PISSN: 00220671     EISSN: 19400675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220670109599912     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Allington, R. L. (1991). How policy and regulation influence instruction for at-risk learners or why poor readers rarely comprehend well and probably never will. In L. Ido & B. F. Jones (Eds.), Educational values and cognitive instruction: Implications for reform (pp. 273-296). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
2. Allington, R. L., & Woodside-Jiron, H. (1999). The politics of literacy teaching: How “research” shaped educational policy. Educational Researcher, 28, 4-13
3. Almasi, J. E (1995). The nature of fourth graders' sociocognitive conflicts in peer-led and teacher-led discussions of literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 314-351
4. Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255-291). New York: Longman
5. Anderson, R. C., Wilson, P. T., & Fielding, L. G. (1988). Growth in reading and how children spend their time outside of school. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 285-303
6. Baumann, J., Hoffman, J., Moon, J., & Duffy-Hexter, A. M. (1998). Where are teachers' voices in the phonics/whole language debate? Results from a survey of U.S. elementary teachers. The Reading Teacher, 51, 636-652
7. Borska, J. (1997). Steps to success in reading. American School Board Journal, 184(6), 36-37
8. Bryk, A., Raudenbush, S., & Congdon, R. (1996). Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling with the HLM/2L and HIM 3L programs. Chicago: Scientific Software International
9. Bullock, C. D., & DeStefano, L. (1998). A study of the utility of results from the 1992 Trial State Assessment (TSA) in reading for state-level administrators of assessment. American Educational Research Association, 20(1), 47-51
10. Campbell, J. R., Voelkl, K. E., & Donahue, P. L. (1997). NAEP 1996 trends in academic progress. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics
11. Cunningham, P., & Hall, D. (1998). The four blocks: A balanced framework for literacy in primary classrooms. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, & D. Deshler. Teaching every child every day: Learning in diverse schools and classrooms. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books
12. Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33(6), 934-945
13. Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26, 325-346
14. Donahue, P. L., Voelkel, K. E., Campbell, J. R., & Mazzao, J. (1999). NAEP 1998 reading: Report card for the nation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education
15. Floden, R. E. (1995). Capacity building in systemic reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(1), 19-21
16. Goatley, V. J., Brock, C. H., & Raphael, T. E. (1995). Diverse learners participating in regular education "book clubs.” Reading Research Quarterly, 30(3), 352-380
17. Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371-395
18. Guthrie, J. T., & Alao, S. (1997). Designing contexts to increase motivations for reading. Educational Psychologist, 32, 95-107
19. Guthrie, J. T., & Anderson, E. (1999). Engaged reading: Processes of motivated strategic, knowledgeable, social readers. In J. T. Guthrie & D. E. Alvermann (Eds.), Engaged reading: Processes, practices, and policy implications (pp. 17-45). New York: Teachers College Press
20. Guthrie, J. T., Anderson, E., Alao, S., & Rinehart, J. (1999). Influences of concept-oriented reading Instruction on strategy use and conceptual learning from text. Elementary School Journal, 99(4), 343-366
21. Guthrie, J. T., Schafer, W. D., Von Seeker, C., & Alban, T. (2000). Contributions of integrated reading instruction and text resources to achievement and engagement in a statewide school improvement program. The Journal of Educational Research, 93, 211-226
22. Guthrie, J. T., Schafer, W. D., Wang, Y. Y., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Relationships of instruction to amount of reading: An exploration of social, cognitive, and instructional connections. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(l), 8-25
23. Guthrie, J. T., Van Meter, P., Hancock, G. R., Alao, S., Anderson, E., & McCann, A. (1998). Does concept-oriented reading instruction increase strategy use and conceptual learning from text? Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 261-278
24. Guthrie, J. T., Van Meter, P., McCann, A. D., Wigfield, A., Bennett, L., Poundstone, C. C., Rice, M. E., Faibisch, F. M., Hunt, B., & Mitchell, A. M. (1996). Growth of literacy engagement: Changes in motivations and strategies during concept-oriented reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 306-332
25. Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. Hamil, R. Barr, P. Mosenthal, & D. Pearson. Handbook of reading research 3 (pp. 403-425). New York: Longman
26. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Metsala, J. L., & Cox, K. E. (1999). Motivational and cognitive predictors of text comprehension and reading amount. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 231-256
27. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & VonSecker, C. (2000). Effects of integrated instruction on motivation and strategy use in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 331-341
28. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press
29. Hiebert, E. H., & Raphael, T. E. (1998). Early Reading Instruction. New York: Harcourt Brace
30. Hinkle, D. E., Proffitt, T. D., Pilato, V. H., & Rosenthal, M. (1998). Shaping educational policy in Maryland: Teacher education reform and beyond [Program description]
31. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
32. Lorch, R. F., & van den Broek (1997). Understanding reading comprehension: Current and future contributions of cognitive science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 213-247
33. McLoyd, V. (1979). The effects on extrinsic rewards of differential value on high and low intrinsic interest. Child Development, 50, 1010-1019
34. Morrow, L. M. (1996). Motivating reading and writing in diverse classrooms (NCTE Research Report No. 28). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English
35. Mosenthal, P. B. (1999). Understanding engagement: Historical and political contexts. In J. T. Guthrie & D. E. Alvermann (Eds.), Engaged reading: Processes, practices and policy implications (pp. 1-16). New York: Teachers College Press
36. Ng, M. M., Guthrie, J. T., McCann, A. D., Van Meter, P., & Alao, S. (1998). How do classroom characteristics influence intrinsic motivations for literacy? Reading Psychology, 19(4), 319-398
37. O'Reilly, P. E., Zelenak, C. A., Rogers, A. M., & Kline, D. L. (1996). 1994 trial state assessment in reading secondary-use data files user guide. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics
38. Pearson, P. D. (1998). Standards and assessments: Tools for crafting effective instruction? In J. Osborn & F. Lehr (Eds.), Literacy for all: Issues in teaching and learning. New York: Guilford
39. Pearson, P. D., & Fielding, L. (1991). Comprehension instruction. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 815-861). New York: Longman
40. Phillippi, K. (1998, April). Mandating a constructivist approach to early elementary literacy instruction: The intended and unintended consequences in one school district. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA
41. Pintrich, P. R., & Schrauben, B. (1992). Students' motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom tasks. In D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom: Causes and consequences (pp. 149-183). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
42. Pressley, M. (1997). The cognitive science of reading. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(4), 247-260
43. Pressley, M. (1998). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. New York: Guilford
44. Pressley, M., Wharton-McDonald, R., Mistretta-Hampston, J., & Echevarria, M. (1998). Literacy instruction in 10 fourth-and fifth-grade classrooms in upstate New York. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2(2), 159-194
45. Richardson, P. (1998). Maryland Reading Task Force: Final report. Baltimore: Maryland State Department of Education
46. Schiefele, U. (1999). Interest and learning from text. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 257-279
47. Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571-581
48. Skinner, E. A., Wellborn, J. G., & Connell, J. P. (1990). What it takes to do well in school and whether I've got it: A process model of perceived control and children's engagement and achievement in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 22-32
49. Sweet, A., Guthrie, J. T., & Ng, M. (1998). Teachers' perceptions and students' reading motivations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 210-223
50. Thompson, L. (1996). Reading failure and social deprivation: Implications for policy and practice. Educational Psychology in Practice, 12(3), 166-174
51. Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of children's motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 420-432