Value-Added Models of Assessment: Implications for Motivation and Accountability

Educational Psychologist

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 123-137

  Anderman, Eric M ^a   Anderman, Lynley H ^a   Yough, Michael S ^a   Gimbert, Belinda G ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950900775     PISSN: 00461520     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00461521003703045     Document Type: Article

References (115)

1. Ames, C. (1990, April). Achievement goals and classroom structure: Developing a learning orientation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.
2. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
3. Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students' learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260-267.
4. Amrein, A. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2002, March 28). High-stakes testing, uncertainty, and student learning. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 10(18). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa.v10n18
5. Amrein-Beardsley, A. (2008). Methodological concerns about the education value-added assessment system. Educational Researcher, 37(2), 65-75.
6. Anderman, E. M. (1997). Motivation and school reform. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 303-337). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
7. Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2010). Classroom motivation. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
8. Anderman, E.M., Griesinger, T., & Westerfield, G. (1998). Motivation and cheating during early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 84-93.
9. Anderman, E. M., & Maehr, M. L. (1994). Motivation and schooling in the middle grades. Review of Educational Research, 64, 287-309.
10. Anderman, E. M., & Midgley, C. (1997). Changes in achievement goal orientations, perceived academic competence, and grades across the transition to middle-level schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22,269-298.
11. Anderman, E. M., & Weber, J. (2009). Continuing motivation revisited. In A. Kaplan, S. Karabenick, & L. DeGroot (Eds.), Culture, self, and motivation: Essays in honor of Martin L. Maehr (pp. 3-19). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
12. Anderman, E. M., & Wolters, C. (2006). Goals, values, and affect: Influences on student motivation. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 369-389). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Anderman, L. H. (1999). Classroom goal orientation, school belonging and social goals as predictors of students' positive and negative affect following the transition to middle school. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 32, 89-103.
14. Anderman, L. H. (2003). Academic and social perceptions as predictors of change in middle school students' sense of school belonging. Journal of Experimental Education, 72, 5-22.
15. Anderman, L. H., & Anderman, E. M. (1999). Social predictors of changes in students' achievement goal orientations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 21-37.
16. Anderman, L. H., Andrzejewski, C. E., & Allen, J. (in press). How do teachers support students motivation and learning in their classrooms? Teachers College Record.
17. Anderman, L. H., Patrick, H., Hruda, L. Z., & Linnenbrink, E. A. (2002). Observing classroom goal structures to clarify and expand goal theory. In C. Midgley (Ed.), Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning (pp. 243-278). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
19. Barber, B., Paris, S. G., Evans, M., & Gadsden, V. L. (1992). Policies for reporting test results to parents. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 11, 15-20.
20. Betebenner, D. W. (2008). A primer on student growth percentiles. Dover, NH: National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment.
21. Bock, R. D., Wolfe, R., & Fisher, T. H. (1996). A review and analysis of the Tennessee value-added assessment system: Summary and recommendations. Nashville, TN: Tennessee Office of Education Accountability.
22. Bong,M.(2009).Age-relateddifferencesinachievementgoaldifferentation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 879-896.
23. Bourque, M. L. (2005). Leave no standardized test behind. In R. P. Phelps (Ed.), Defending standardized testing (pp. 227-253). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Bracey, G. (2004). Serious questions about the Tennessee value added assessment system. Phi Delta Kappan, 85, 716-717.
25. Braun, H. I. (2005). Using student progress to evaluate teachers: A primer on value-added models. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Retrieved from http://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/PICVAM.pdf
26. Brookhart, S. M., & Durkin, D. T. (2003). Classroom assessment, student motivation, and achievement in high school social studies classes. Applied Measurement in Education, 16, 27-54.
27. Brookhart, S. M., Walsh, J. M., & Zientarski, W. A. (2006). The dynamics of motivation and effort for classroom assessments in middle school science and social studies. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 151-184.
28. Chubb, J., Linn, R., Haycock, K., & Wiener, R. (2005, Spring). Do we need to repair the monument? Debating the future of No Child Left Behind. Education Next, 5, 8-19.
29. Church, M. A., Elliot, A. J., & Gable, S. L. (2001). Perceptions of classroom environment, achievement goals, and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 43-54.
30. Colorado Department of Education. (2008). Colorado's Academic Growth Model, 2008. Retrieved from http://www.cde.state.co.us/cdeedserv/ GrowthModelDistSchReport.htm
31. Deci, E., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
32. Doyle, W. (1983). Academic work. Review of Educational Research, 53, 159-199.
33. Dweck, C. S. (2002). The development of ability conceptions. In A. Wigfield &J.S.Eccles(Eds.), Development of achievement motivation(pp.57-88). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
34. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
35. Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169-189.
36. Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232.
37. Elliot,A.J., & McGregor, H.A.(2001). A2*2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501-519.
38. Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 5-12.
39. Epstein, J. L. (1989). Family structures and student motivation: A developmental perspective. In C.Ames&R.Ames(Eds.), Research on motivation and education (vol. 3, pp. 259-295). San Diego, CA: Academic.
40. Ercikan, K. (2006). Development in assessment of student learning. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 929-952). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Finn, C., Ryan, T., & Partin, E. (2008). Ohio value-added primer: A user's guide. Washington, DC: The Thomas B. Fordham Institute. Retrieved from http://www.edexcellence.net/ issues/index.cfm?topic=1
42. Ford, H. H. (2009). Norm-referenced testing. In E. M. Anderman & L. H. Anderman (Eds.), Psychology of classroom learning: An encyclopedia (Vol. 2, pp. 645-648). Detroit, MI: Cengage.
43. Freeman, T. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2005). Changes in mastery goals in urban and rural middle school students. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 20(1). Retrieved from http://www.umaine.edu/jrre/articles/vol20.htm
44. Fuligini, A. J., Eccles, J. S., & Barber, B. L. (1995). The long-term effects of seventh-grade ability grouping in mathematics. Journal of Early Adolescence, 15(1), 58-89.
45. Graham, S., & Golan, S. (1991). Motivational influences on cognition: Task involvement, ego involvement, and depth of information processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 187-194.
46. Greene, B. A., & Miller, R. B. (1996). Influences on achievement: Goals, perceived ability, and cognitive engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 181-192.
47. Hambleton, R. K. (2009). Criterion-referenced tests. In E. M. Anderman & L. H. Anderman (Eds.), Psychology of classroom learning: An encyclopedia (Vol. 1, pp. 281-284). Detroit, MI: Cengage.
48. Hershberg, T., Simon, V., & Lea-Kruger, B. (2004). The revelations of value-added: An assessment model that measures student growth in ways that NCLB fails to do. School Administrator, 61(11), 10-13.
49. Hong, G., & Raudenbush, S.W. (2008). Casual inference for time-varying instructional treatments. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33, 333-362.
50. Kaplan, A., Gheen, M. H., & Midgley, C. (2002). Classroom goal structure and student disruptive behaviour. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 191-212.
51. Kaplan, A., Middleton, M. J., Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2002). Achievement goals and goal structures. In C. Midgley (Ed.), Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning (pp. 21-53). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Kim, J. S., & Sunderman, G. L. (2005). Measuring academic proficiency under the No Child Left Behind Act: Implication for education equity. Educational Researcher, 34(8), 3-13.
53. Kupermintz, H. (2003). Teacher effects and teacher effectiveness. A validity investigation of the Tennessee Value Added Assessment System. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(3), 287-298.
54. Lane, S. (2004). Validity of high-stakes assessment: Are students engaged in complex thinking? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 23, 6-14.
55. Linn, R.L.(2000).Assessments and accountability.EducationalResearcher, 29,4-16.
56. Lockwood, J. R., Doran, H., & McCaffrey, D. F. (2003). Using R for estimating longitudinal student achievement models. R News, 3(3), 17-23.
57. Maehr,M.L.(1991).Enhancingstudentmotivation:Aschoolwideapproach. Educational Psychologist, 26, 399-427.
58. Maehr, M. L., & Anderman, E. M. (1993). Reinventing schools for early adolescents: Emphasizing task goals. Elementary School Journal, 93, 593-610.
59. Maehr, M. L., & Midgley, C. (1996). Transforming school cultures. Boulder, CO: Westview.
60. Martineau, J.A. (2006). Distorting value added: The use of longitudinal, vertically scaled student achievement data for growth-based, value-added accountability. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 35-62.
61. McCaffrey, D., Lockwood, J., Koretz, D., Louis, T., & Hamilton, L. (2004). Models for value-added modeling of teacher effects. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 67-101.
62. McCasllin, M. (2006). Student motivational dynamics in the era of school reform. The Elementary School Journal, 106, 479-490.
63. Meece, J., Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement Annual Review of Psychology (Vol. 57, pp. 502-528). Stanford, CA: Annual Reviews.
64. Meyer, R. (1997). Value-added indicators of school performance: A primer. Economics of Education Review, 16, 283-301.
65. Midgley, C. (Ed.). (2002). Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
66. Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., Middleton, M. J., Maehr, M. L., Urdan, T., Anderman, L. H., . . . Roeser, R. (1998). The development and validation of scales assessing students' achievement goal orientations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 113-131.
67. Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E. M., Anderman, L. H., Freeman, K. E.,...Urdan, T. (2000). Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Survey. Unpublished manual. Retrieved from http://www.umich.edu/pals/PALS%202000 V13Word97. pdf
68. Midgley, C., & Urdan, T. (1992). The transition to middle level schools: Making it a good experience for all students. Middle School Journal, 24(2),5-14.
69. Midgley, C., & Urdan, T. (2001). Academic self-handicapping and achievement goals: A further examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(1), 61-75.
70. Miller, R. B., Greene, B. A., Montalvo, G. P., Ravindran, B., & Nichols, J. D. (1996). Engagement in academic work: The role of learning goals, future consequences, pleasing others, and perceived ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 388-422.
71. Moller, A. C., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2006). Choice and ego-depletion: The moderating role of autonomy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1024-1036.
72. Natriello, G. (1987). The impact of evaluation processes on students. Educational Psychologist, 22, 155-175.
73. Nicholls, J. G. (1989). The competitive ethos and democratic education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
74. Nicholls, J. G., Patashnick, M., & Nolen, S. B. (1985). Adolescents' theories of education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 683-692.
75. Nichols, S. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2007). The pressure to cheat in a high stakes testing environment. In E. M. Anderman & T. B. Murdock (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on academic cheating (pp. 289-311). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
76. No Child Left Behind Act (2001). Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425.
77. Nolen, S. B. (1988). Reasons for studying: Motivational orientations and study strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 5, 269-287.
78. Nolen, S.B., & Haladyna, T.M. (1990). Motivation and studying in high school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 115-126.
79. Oakes, J., & Lipton, M. (1990). Tracking and ability grouping: A structural barrier to access and achievement. In J. I. Goodlad & P. Keating (Eds.), Access to knowledge: An agenda for our nation's schools (pp. 187-204). New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board.
80. Ohio Department of Education. (2009). Interactive local report card home. Columbus, OH: Author. Retrieved from http://ilrc.ode.state.oh.us/ Default.asp
81. Orfield, G., & Lee, C. (2005). Why segregation matters: Poverty and educational inequality. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project, Harvard University.
82. Paige, R. (2002). Elementary & secondary education: Key policy letters signed by the Education Secretary or Deputy Secretary. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/secletter/020724.html
83. Paris, S. G., & Cunningham, A. (1996). Children becoming students. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 117-147). New York, NY: Macmillan.
84. Patrick, H., Anderman, L. H., Ryan, A. M., Edelin, K. C., & Midgley, C. (2001). Teachers' communication of goal orientations in four fifth-grade classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 102(1), 35-58.
85. Pintrich, P. R. (2000a). An achievement goal perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92-104.
86. Pintrich, P. R. (2000b). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544-555.
87. Pintrich, P. R., & de Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
88. Raudenbush, S. W. (2004). What are value-added models estimating and what does this imply for statistical practice? Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 121-129.
89. Roeser, R. W., Midgley, C., & Urdan, T. C. (1996). Perceptions of the school psychological environment and early adolescents' psychological and behavioral functioning in school: The mediating role of goals and belonging. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 408-422.
90. Rubin, D.B., Stuart, E.A., & Zanutto, E.L. (2004). A potential outcomes view of value-added assessment in education. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29(1), 103-116.
91. Ryan, R. M., & Brown, K. W. (2005). Legislating competence: High-stakes testing policies and their relations with psychological theories and research. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 354-372). New York: Guilford.
92. Ryan, R. M., & Grolnick, W. S. (1986). Origins and pawns in the classroom: Self-report and projective assessments of individual differences in children's perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 550-558.
93. Salel, M., Lazonder, A. W., & De Jong, T. (2005). Effects of within-class ability grouping on social interaction, achievement, and motivation. Instructional Science, 33, 105-119.
94. Sanders, W. (2000) Value-added assessment from student achievement data: Opportunities and hurdles. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 14,329-339.
95. Sanders, W. (2004). Compounding errors. Phi Delta Kappan, 86, 174-175.
96. Schraw, G., Horn, C., Thorndike-Christ, T., & Bruning, R. (1995). Academic goal orientations and student classroom achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 359-368.
97. Seidel, K., Bordenkircher, Franco, S., T., Hambright, G., Hanby, D., Herrington, K., & Shelly, A. (2007). Value-added in Ohio: Introducing Ohio teachers, school leaders, and higher education faculty to value-added measures [Electronic text and resources]. Columbus, OH: Ohio Board of Regents. Available from http://www.ohiorc.org/value-added
98. Skaalvik, E. M. (1997). Self-enhancing and self-defeating ego orientation: Relations with task and avoidance orientation, achievement, self-perceptions, and anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 71-81.
99. Skinner, B. F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24, 86-97.
100. Slaughter, R.(2008).Measuring middle school achievement growth with student growth percentile methodology (Paper 20). NERA Conference Proceedings 2008. Retrieved from from http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/nera 2008/20
101. Slavin, R. E. (1990). Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 60, 471-499.
102. Smith Hopkins, J., & Bowie, L. (2009, July 7). In real estate, test scores sell. Baltimore Sun. Retrieved from http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2009-07-26/business/0907260005 1 maryland-school-assessment-test-scores-public-school-test
103. Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity synthesized. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
104. Swann, W. B., & Pittman, T. S. (1997). Initiating play activity of children: The moderating influence of verbal cues on intrinsic motivation. Child Development, 48, 1128-1132.
105. Trautwein, U., Ludtke, O., Marsh, H. W., Koller, O., & Baumert, J. (2006). Tracking, grading, and student motivation: Using group composition and status to predict self-concept and interest in ninth-grade mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 788-806.
106. Turner, J. C., Midgley, C., Meyer, D. K., Gheen, M. H., Anderman, E. M., Kang, Y., & Patrick, H. (2002). The classroom environment and students' reports of avoidance strategies in mathematics: A multimethod study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 88-106.
107. Urdan, T., Midgley, C., & Anderman, E. M. (1998). The role of classroom goal structure in students' use of self-handicapping strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 101-122.
108. U.S. Department of Education. (2003). No Child Left Behind: A toolkit for teachers. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/teachers/nclbguide/nclb-teachers-toolkit.pdf
109. van de Grift, W. (2009). Reliability and validity in measuring the value-added of schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20, 269-285.
110. Viadero, D. (2008). Scrutiny heightens for value added research methods. Education Week, 27(36), 1, 12-13.
111. Weiner, B. (1985). An attribution theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573.
112. Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
113. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68-81.
114. Wolters, C. A. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students' motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 236-250.
115. Wolters, C. A., Yu, S. L., & Pintrich, P. R. (1996). The relation between goal orientation and students' motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 211-238.