Learner engagement with written feedback: A sociocognitive perspective

Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues

Volumn , Issue , 2019, Pages 247-264

  Han, Ye ^a   Hyland, Fiona ^b  

^a HARBIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85073800704     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/9781108635547.015     Document Type: Chapter

References (39)

1. Aljaafreh, A. & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the Zone of Proximal Development. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 465-83.
2. Atkinson, D. (2010). Sociocognition: what it can mean for second language acquisition. In R. Batstone (Ed.), Sociocognitive Perspectives on Language Use and Language Learning (pp. 24-39). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Atkinson, D., Churchill, E., Nishino, T. & Okada, H. (2007). Alignment and interaction in a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 169-88.
4. Barcelos, A. M. F. (2003). Research beliefs about SLA: A critical review. In P. Kalaja, & A. M. F. Barcelos (Eds.), Beliefs about SLA: New Research approaches (pp. 7-33). New York: Springer.
5. Batstone, R. (2010). Issues and options in sociocognition. In R. Batstone (Ed.), Sociocognitive Perspectives on Language Use and Language Learning (pp. 3-23). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Bitchener, J. (2012). A reflection on ‘the language learning potential’ of written CF. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 348-63.
7. Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L. & Wylie, C. (Eds.) (2012). The Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. New York: Springer.
8. Ellis, R. (2010). A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 335-49.
9. Ferris, D. R. (2004). The ‘grammar correction’ debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime…?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 49-62.
10. Ferris, D. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short-and long-term effects of written error correction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues, (pp. 81-104). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Ferris, D. R. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 181-201.
12. Ferris, D. R. & Kurzer, K. (2018). Does error feedback help L2 writers? Latest evidence on the efficacy of written corrective feedback. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues (2nd ed.) (page number to be assigned). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Ferris, D. R., Liu, H., Sinha, A. & Senna, M. (2013). Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 307-29.
14. Ferris, D. R. & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161-184.
15. Goldstein, L. (2006). Feedback and revision in second language writing: Contextual, teacher, and student variables. In K. Hyland &F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues (pp. 185-205). New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Goldstein, L. & Conrad, S. (1990). Input and the negotiation of meaning in ESLl writing conferences. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 443-60.
17. Han, Y. (2017). Mediating and being mediated: Learner beliefs and learner engagement with written corrective feedback. System, 69, 133-42. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2017.07.003
18. Han, Y. & Hyland, F. (in press). Academic emotions in written corrective feedback situations. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2018.12.003
19. Han, Y. & Hyland, F. (2017). Oral corrective feedback on L2 writing from a sociocultural perspective: A case study on two writing conferences in a Chinese university. Writing and Pedagogy, 8, 433-59. doi: 10.1558/wap.27165
20. Han, Y. & Hyland, F. (2015). Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback in a Chinese tertiary EFL classroom. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 31-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.002
21. Hyland, F. (1998). The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 255-86.
22. Hyland, F. (2000). ESL writers and Feedback: Giving more autonomy to students. Language Teaching Research, 4, 33-54.
23. Hyland, F. (2003). Focus on form: student engagement with teacher feedback. System, 31, 217-30.
24. Hyland, F. & Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 185-212.
25. Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (2006a). Context and issues in feedback on L2 writing: An introduction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in Second Language Writing (pp. 1-20). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
26. Hyland, K.&Hyland, F. (2006b). Interpersonal aspects of response: Constructing and interpreting teacher written feedback. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in Second Language Writing (pp. 206-24). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
27. Lantolf, J. P. & Appel, G. (1994). Theoretical framework: An introduction to Vygotskian Approaches to second language research. In J. P. Lantolf & A. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research (pp. 1-32). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
28. Lee, I. (2008a). Understanding teachers’ written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 69-85.
29. Lee, I. (2008b). Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 144-64.
30. Lee, I. (2014). Revisiting teacher feedback in EFL writing from sociocultural perspectives. TESOL Quarterly, 48, 201-13. doi: 10.1002/tesq.153
31. Qi, D. S. & Lapkin, S. (2001). Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 277-303.
32. Semke, H. (1984). Effects of the red pen. Foreign Language Annals, 17, 195-202.
33. Storch, N. & Wigglesworth, G. (2010). Learners’ processing, uptake, and retention of corrective feedback on writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 303-34.
34. Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing class. Language Learning, 46, 327-69.
35. Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accuracy. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 255-72.
36. van Lier, L. (2004). The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
37. Villamil, O. S. & Guerrero, M. C. M. de (2006). Sociocultural theory: A framework for understanding the social-cognitive dimensions of peer feedback. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues (pp. 23-41). New York: Cambridge University Press.
38. Zhang, Z. &Hyland, K. (2018). Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 36: 90-102.
39. Zheng, Y., & Yu, S. (2018). Student engagement with teacher written corrective feedback in EFL writing: A case study of Chinese lower-proficiency students. Assessing Writing, 37, 13-24.