Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing

Assessing Writing

Volumn 36, Issue , 2018, Pages 90-102

  Hyland, Ken ^b  

^a Victor)   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

AWE feedback; L2 writing; Student engagement; Teacher feedback

Indexed keywords

EID: 85042906779     PISSN: 10752935     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Appleton, J.J., Christenson, S.L., Kim, D., Reschly, A.L., Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology 44:5 (2006), 427–445, 10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002.
2. Attali, Y., Exploring the feedback and revision features of Criterion. Paper presented at the national council on measurement in education (NCME), San Diego, CA, 2004.
3. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P.R., Zeider, M., Handbook of self-regulation. 1999, Academic Press, United States.
4. Carless, D., Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education 31:2 (2006), 219–233, 10.1080/03075070600572132.
5. Chen, C.-F.E., Cheng, W.-Y.E., Beyond the design of automated writing evaluation: Pedagogical practices and perceived learning effectiveness in EFL writing classes?. Language Learning & Technology 12:2 (2008), 94–112.
6. Dikli, S., An overview of automated scoring of essays. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment 5:1 (2006), 1–35.
7. El Ebyary, K., Windeatt, S., The impact of computer-based feedback on students’ written work?. International Journal of English Studies (IJES) 10:2 (2010), 121–142.
8. Ellis, R., EPILOGUE. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32:2 (2010), 335–349, 10.1017/S0272263109990544.
9. Ferris, D., The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly 31:2 (1997), 315–339, 10.2307/3588049.
10. Ferris, D., Treatment of error in second language student writing. 2002, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
11. Ferris, D., Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. Hyland, K., Hyland, F., (eds.) Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues, 2006, Cambridge University Press, New York, 81–104.
12. Finn, J.D., Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research 59:2 (1989), 117–142, 10.3102/00346543059002117.
13. Fredricks, J., McColskey, W., The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments. Christenson, S.L., Reschly, A.L., Wylie, C., (eds.) Handbook of research on student engagement, 2012, Springer, New York, NY, 763–782.
14. Fredricks, J., Blumenfeld, P.C., Paris, A., School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research 74 (2004), 59–109.
15. Fredricks, J., Behavior engagement in learning. Hattie, J., Anderman, E.M., (eds.) International guide to student achievement, 2013, Routledge, New York, NY, 42–44.
16. Gamoran, A., Nystrand, M., Taking students seriously. Newmann, F., (eds.) Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools, 1992, Teachers College Press, New York, 40–61.
17. Goldstein, L.M., Teacher written commentary in second language writing classrooms. 2005, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
18. Grimes, D., Assessing automated assessment: essay evaluation software in the classroom. Paper presented at the computers and writing conference, Stanford, CA, 2005.
19. Han, Y., Hyland, F., Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback in a Chinese tertiary EFL classroom. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 2015, 31, 10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.002.
20. Handley, K., Price, M., Millar, J., Beyond ‘doing time’: Investigating the concept of student engagement with feedback. Oxford Review of Education 37:4 (2011), 543–560, 10.1080/03054985.2011.604951.
21. Hyland, F., The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing 7:3 (1998), 255–286.
22. Hyland, F., Focusing on form: student engagement with teacher feedback?. System 31:2 (2003), 217–230.
23. Hyland, K., Faculty feedback: Perceptions and practices in L2 disciplinary writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 22:3 (2013), 240–253, 10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.003.
24. Hyland, K., Teaching and researching writing. 2016, Routledge, New York, NY.
25. Lai, Y.H., Which do students prefer to evaluate their essays: peers or computer program. British Journal of Educational Technology 41:3 (2010), 432–454, 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00959.x.
26. Lee, G., Schalert, D.L., Meeting in the margins: Effects of the teacher?student relationship on revision processes of EFL college students taking a composition course. Journal of Second Language Writing 17 (2008), 165–182.
27. Mendonca, C.O., Johnson, K.E., Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction. Tesol Quarterly 28:4 (1994), 745–769.
28. Perry, N.E., Turner, J.C., Meyer, D.K., Classrooms as contexts for motivating learning. Alexander, P.A., Winne, P.H., (eds.) Handbook of educational psychology, 2nd ed., 2006, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah NJ, 327–348.
29. Pessoa, L., On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 9 (2008), 148–158.
30. Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., Feedback: Focusing attention on engagement. Studies in Higher Education 36:8 (2011), 879–896, 10.1080/03075079.2010.483513.
31. Qi, D.S., Lapkin, S., Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task. Journal of Second Language Writing 10:4 (2001), 277–303, 10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00046-7.
32. Skinner, E.A., Belmont, M.J., Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology 85:4 (1993), 571–581, 10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571.
33. Skinner, E.A., Pitzer, J.R., Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. Christenson, S.L., Reschly, A.L., Wylie, C., (eds.) Handbook of research on student engagement, 2012, Springer, New York, NY, 21–44.
34. Stevenson, M., Phakiti, A., The effects of computer-generated feedback on the quality of writing. Assessing Writing 19 (2014), 51–65, 10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.007.
35. Stipek, D., Good instruction is motivating. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J., (eds.) Development of achievement motivation, 2002, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 309–332.
36. Storch, N., Wigglesworth, G., Learners’ processing, uptake, and retention of corrective feedback on writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32:2 (2010), 303–334, 10.1017/S0272263109990532.
37. Strauss, A.L., Corbin, J.M., Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2nd ed., 1998, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
38. Truscott, J., Hsu, A.Y.-P., Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing 17:4 (2008), 292–305, 10.1016/j.jslw.2008.05.003.
39. Voelkl, K.E., Identification with school. American Journal of Education 105:3 (1997), 294–318, 10.1086/444158.
40. Warden, C.A., EFL business writing behaviors in differing feedback environments. Language Learning 50:4 (2000), 573–616, 10.1111/0023-8333.00141.
41. Warschauer, M., Ware, P., Automated writing evaluation: Defining the classroom research agenda. Language Teaching Research 10:2 (2006), 157–180, 10.1191/1362168806lr190oa.
42. Weissberg, R., Conversations about writing: Building oral scaffolds with advanced L2 writers. Hyland, K., Hyland, F., (eds.) Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues, 2006, Cambridge University Press, New York.
43. Willms, J., Student engagement at school a sense of belonging and participation results from PISA 2000. 2003, OECD, Paris.
44. Zhang, Z., Student engagement with computer-generated feedback: A case study. ELT Journal 71:3 (2017), 317–328.
45. Zimmerman, B.J., A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 81:3 (1989), 329–339, 10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329.