Potential benefits of an adaptive forward collision warning system

Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 471-484

  Jamson, A Hamish ^a   Lai, Frank C H ^a   Carsten, Oliver M J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Alarm timing; Collision warning; Driver behaviour; Driving simulator; Rear end collision

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS; AUTOMOBILE DRIVER SIMULATORS; AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; COLLISION AVOIDANCE; SUBJECTIVE TESTING; VEHICLES;

COLLISION WARNING; DRIVING SIMULATOR; FORWARD COLLISION WARNING (FCW) SYSTEMS;

ALARM SYSTEMS;

AUTOMOBILE; COLLISION; SIMULATOR; WARNING SYSTEM;

EID: 44349152376     PISSN: 0968090X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2007.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Abe G., and Richardson J. Alarm timing, trust and driver expectation for forward collision warning systems. Applied Ergonomics 37 5 (2006) 577-586
2. Brown T.L., Lee J.D., and McGehee D.V. Human performance models and rear-end collision avoidance algorithms. Human Factors 43 3 (2001) 462-482
3. Burgett, A.L., Carter, A., Miller, R.J., Najm, W.G., Smith, D.L., 1998. A collision warning algorithm for rear-end collisions (Tech Report 98-S2-P-31). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC.
4. de Brabander B., Boone C., Gerits P., and van Witteloostuijn A. Relationship between arousal and activation and sensation seeking. Personality and Individual Differences 18 3 (1995) 373-384
5. Heino, A., van der Molen, H.H., Wilde, G.J.S., 1992. Risk homeostasis process in car following behaviour: individual differences in car following and perceived risk. Report VK 92-02. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen Haven, The Netherlands.
6. Hirst S., and Graham R. The format and perception of collision warnings. In: Noy Y.I. (Ed). Ergonomics and Safety of Intelligent Driver Interfaces (1997), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 203-219
7. Horowitz, A.D., Dingus, T.A., 1992. Warning signal design: a key human factors issue in an in-vehicle front-to-rear-end collision warning system. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA, pp. 1011-1013.
8. Janssen W., and Thomas H. In-vehicle collision avoidance support under adverse visibility conditions. In: Noy I. (Ed). Ergonomics and Safety of Intelligent Driver Interfaces (1997), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 221-229
9. Jonah B.A. Sensation seeking and risky driving: a review and synthesis of the literature. Accident Analysis and Prevention 29 5 (1997) 651-665
10. Lee J., and Moray N. Trust, control strategies, and allocation of function in human-machine systems. Ergonomics 35 10 (1992) 1243-1270
11. Lee J.D., McGehee D.V., Brown T.L., and Reyes M.L. Collision warning timing, driver distraction, and driver response to imminent rear-end collisions in a high-fidelity driving simulator. Human Factors 44 2 (2002) 314-334
12. McGehee, D.V., Brown, T.L., Wilson, T.B., Burns, M., 1998. Examination of driver's collision avoidance behavior in a lead vehicle stopped scenario using a front-to-rear-end collision warning system (Tech Report DTNH22-93-C-07326). USDOT/NHTSA Office of Crash Avoidance Research, Washington, DC.
13. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2005a. Automotive collision avoidance system - field operational test report. DOT HS 809 900. US Department of Transportation.
14. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2005b. Traffic safety facts 2003: a compilation of motor vehicle crash data from the fatality analysis reporting system and the general estimates system. DOT HS 809 775. US Department of Transportation.
15. National Safety Council, 1996. Accident Facts. National Safety Council, Itasca, IL.
16. Perrett, K.E., Stevens, A., 1996. Review of the potential benefits of road transport telematics. TRL Report 220. Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, UK
17. Rudin-Brown C.M., and Noy Y.I. Investigation of behavioral adaptation to lane departure warnings. Transportation Research Record 1803 (2002) 30-37
18. Rudin-Brown C.M., and Parker H.A. Behavioural adaptation to adaptive cruise control (ACC): implications for preventive strategies. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 7 2 (2004) 59-76
19. Seller P., Song B., and Hedrick J.K. Development of a collision avoidance system. Automotive Engineering International 109 (1998) 24-28
20. van der Laan J.D., Heino A., and De Waard D. A simple procedure for the assessment of acceptance of Advanced Transport Telematics. Transportation Research Part C - Emerging Technologies 5 1 (1997) 1-10
21. Wiese E., and Lee J. Auditory alerts for in-vehicle information systems: the effects of temporal conflict and sound parameters on driver attitudes and performance. Ergonomics 47 9 (2004) 965-986
22. Wilson, T.B., Butler, W., McGehee, D.V., Dingus, T.A., 1997. Forward-looking collision warning system performance guidelines. SAE Technical Paper Series 970456. Society of Automobile Engineers, Warrendale, PA.
23. Zijlstra, F.R.H., 1993. Efficiency in working behaviour: a design approach for modern tools. Ph.D Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
24. Zuckerman M., and Neeb M. Demographic influences in sensation seeking and expression of sensation seeking in religion, smoking and driving habits. Personality and Individual Differences 1 (1980) 197-206
25. Zuckerman M. Behavioural Expressions and Biosocial Bases of Sensation Seeking (1994), University of Cambridge Press, Cambridge