Scope, Influence, and Interdisciplinary Collaboration: The Publication Portfolio of the NIH Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Program From 2006 Through 2017

Evaluation and the Health Professions

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2020, Pages 169-179

  Llewellyn, Nicole ^a   Carter, Dorothy R ^b   DiazGranados, Deborah ^c   Pelfrey, Clara ^d   Rollins, Latrice ^e   Nehl, Eric J ^f  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b University of Georgia ^*  (United States)

^c VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

bibliometrics; CTSA; publications; research areas; translation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AWARDS AND PRIZES; BIBLIOMETRICS; HEALTH SCIENCE; IMMUNOLOGY; NEUROLOGY; PEDIATRICS; PUBLICATION; COOPERATION; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

BIBLIOMETRICS; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC; TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85063571887     PISSN: 01632787     EISSN: 15523918     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0163278719839435     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bian J., Xie M., Topaloglu U., Hudson T., Eswaran H., Hogan W., (2014). Social network analysis of biomedical research collaboration networks in a CTSA institution. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 52, 130–140. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2014.01.015
2. Bikard M., Murray F., Gans J. S., (2015). Exploring trade-offs in the organization of scientific work: Collaboration and scientific reward. Management Science, 61, 1473–1495.
3. Blau P., (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York, NY: The Free Press.
4. Califf R. M., Berglund L., (2010). Linking scientific discovery and better health for the nation: The first three years of the NIH’s Clinical and Translational Science Awards. Academic Medicine, 85, 457–462. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ccb74d
5. Clarivate. (2018). InCites. Retrieved from https://incites.thomsonreuters.com/
6. Clarivate. (2018). Web of Science. Retrieved from https://webofknowledge.com/
7. Cummings J. N., Kiesler S., (2007). Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations. Research Policy, 36, 1620–1634. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.09.001
8. Dozier A. M., Martina C. A., O’Dell N. L., Fogg T. T., Lurie S. J., Rubinstein E. P., Pearson T. A., (2014). Identifying emerging research collaborations and networks: Method development. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 37, 19–32. doi:10.1177/0163278713501693
9. Drawz P. E., Pajewski N. M., Bates J. T., Bello N. A., Cushman W. C., Dwyer J. P., … Rahman M., (2017). Effect of intensive versus standard clinic-based hypertension management on ambulatory blood pressure: Results from the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) ambulatory blood pressure study. Hypertension, 69, 42–50. doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.116.08076
10. Feeney M. K., Johnson T., Welch E. W., (2014). Methods for identifying translational researchers. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 37, 3–18. doi:10.1177/0163278713504583
11. Frechtling J., Raue K., Michie J., Miyaoka A., Spiegelman M., (2012). The CTSA national evaluation final report. Rockville, MD: Westat.
12. Grazier K. L., Trochim W., Dilts D. M., Kirk R., (2013). Estimating return on investment in translational research: Methods and protocols. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 36, 478–491. doi:10.1177/0163278713499587
13. Han X., Williams S. R., Zuckerman B. L., (2018). A snapshot of translational research funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH): A case study using behavioral and social science research awards and Clinical and Translational Science Awards funded publications. PLoS One, 13, e0196545. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0196545
14. Hara N., Solomon P., Kim S. L., Sonnenwald D. H., (2003). An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists’ perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 952–965.
15. Hutchins B. I., Yuan X., Anderson J. M., Santangelo G. M., (2016). Relative citation ratio (RCR): A new metric that uses citation rates to measure influence at the article level. PLoS Biology, 14, e1002541. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002541
16. Kost R. G., Mervin-Blake S., Hallarn R., Rathmann C., Kolb H. R., Himmelfarb C. D., … Schuff K. G., (2014). Accrual and recruitment practices at Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) institutions: A call for expectations, expertise, and evaluation. Academic Medicine, 89, 1180–1189. doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000000308
17. Krivitsky P. N., Handcock M. S., Hunder D. R., Goodreau S. M., Morris M, Bohme N., … Kirk L., (2017). Fit, stimulate, and diagnose models for network evolution based on exponential-family random graph models. Retrieved from http://www.statnet.org
18. Leshner A. I., Terry S. F., Schultz A. M., Liverman C. T., (2013). The CTSA program at NIH: Opportunities for advancing clinical and translational research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
19. Llewellyn N., Carter D. R., Rollins L., Nehl E. J., (2018). Charting the publication and citation impact of the NIH Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) Program from 2006 through 2016. Academic Medicine, 93, 1162–1170. doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000002119
20. National Institutes of Health NIH RePORTER. (2015). Research portfolio online reporting tools. Retrieved from https://projectreporter.nih.gov/reporter.cfm
21. NIH Grant Notice Number: NOT-OD-08-033. Retrieved from https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-08-033.html
22. NIH Office of Portfolio Analysis. (2018). iCite. Retrieved from https://icite.od.nih.gov
23. Okamoto J., (2015). Scientific collaboration and team science: A social network analysis of the centers for population health and health disparities. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 5, 12–23. doi:10.1007/s13142-014-0280-1
24. Pincus H. A., Abedin Z., Blank A. E., Mazmanian P. E., (2013). Evaluation and the NIH Clinical and Translational Science Awards: A “top ten” list. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 36, 411–431. doi:10.1177/0163278713507061
25. Reis S. E., Berglund L., Bernard G. R., Califf R. M., Fitzgerald G. A., Johnson P. C., (2010). Reengineering the national clinical and translational research enterprise: The strategic plan of the National Clinical and Translational Science Awards Consortium. Academic Medicine, 85, 463–469. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ccc877
26. Reuters T., (2014). InCites indicators handbook. Retrieved from http://researchanalytics.thomsonreuters.com/m/pdfs/indicators-handbook.pdf
27. Ripley R. M., Snijders T. A. B., Boda Z., Voros A., Preciado P., (2018). Manual for Siena version 4.0. R package version 1.2-12. Retrieved from https://www.cran.r-project.org/web/packages/RSiena/
28. Rubio D. M., (2013). Common metrics to assess the efficiency of clinical research. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 36, 432–446. doi:10.1177/0163278713499586
29. Sayavedra N., Hogle J. A., Moberg D. P., (2017). Using publication data to evaluate a Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) career development program: Early outcomes from KL2 scholars. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 1, 352–360. doi:10.1017/cts.2018.1
30. Schneider M., Kane C., Rainwater J., Guerrero L., Tong G., Desai S., Trochim W., (2017). Feasibility of common bibliometrics in evaluating translational science. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 1, 45–52.
31. Shah M., Culp M., Gersing K., Jones P., Purucker M., Urv T., … Kaufmann P., (2017). Early vision for the CTSA program trial innovation network: A perspective from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. Clinical and Translational Science, 10, 311–313. doi:10.1111/cts.12463
32. Shannon C., (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423, 623–656.
33. Shi Q., Xu B., Xu X., Xiao Y., Wang W., Wang H., (2011). Diversity of social ties in scientific collaboration networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 390, 4627–4635. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2011.06.072
34. Shirey-Rice J., Mapes B., Basford M., Zufelt A., Wehbe F., Harris P., … Pulley J., (2014). The CTSA Consortium’s Catalog of Assets for Translational and Clinical Health Research (CATCHR). Clinical and Translational Science, 7, 100–107. doi:10.1111/cts.12144
35. Snijders T. A. B., (2017). Stochastic actor-oriented models for network dynamics. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 4, 343–363.
36. Sosa M. E., (2011). Where do creative interactions come from? The role of tie content and social networks. Organization Science, 22, 1–21. doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0519
37. Steketee M., Frechtling J., Cross D., Schnell J., (2012). Final report on CTSA-supported publications: 2006-2011. Rockville, MD: Westat.
38. Surkis A., Hogle J. A., DiazGranados D., Hunt J. D., Mazmanian P. E., Connors E., … Mueller M., (2016). Classifying publications from the clinical and translational science award program along the translational research spectrum: A machine learning approach. Journal of Translational Medicine, 14, 235.
39. U.S. National Library of Medicine. (2018). PubMed. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed
40. Wooten K. C., Rose R. M., Ostir G. V., Calhoun W. J., Ameredes B. T., Brasier A. R., (2014). Assessing and evaluating multidisciplinary translational teams: A mixed methods approach. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 37, 33–49. doi:10.1177/0163278713504433
41. Yu S. Y., Wang H. M., (2016). Scientific collaboration: A social network analysis based on literature of animal-derived regenerative implantable medical devices. Regenerative Biomaterials, 3, 197–203. doi:10.1093/rb/rbw019