Evaluation and the NIH Clinical and Translational Science Awards: A "Top Ten" List

Evaluation and the Health Professions

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 411-431

  Pincus, Harold Alan ^a,b,c,d   Abedin, Zainab ^a   Blank, Arthur E ^e   Mazmanian, Paul E ^f,g  

^a NewYork Presbyterian Hospital   (United States)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^c NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

^e MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g VCU Center for Clinical and Translational Research   (United States)

Author keywords

CTSA; evaluation; evaluation methods; quality improvement; science policy; team science; transformation; translational research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AWARDS AND PRIZES; CTSA; EVALUATION METHODS; EVALUATION STUDY; HUMAN; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; SCIENCE POLICY; TEAM SCIENCE; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; TRANSFORMATION; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

CTSA; EVALUATION; EVALUATION METHODS; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; SCIENCE POLICY; TEAM SCIENCE; TRANSFORMATION; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH;

AWARDS AND PRIZES; HUMANS; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84887439828     PISSN: 01632787     EISSN: 15523918     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0163278713507061     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Allen D.,Ripley E.,Coe A.,Clore J.Reorganizing the General Clinical Research Center to Improve the Clinical and Translational Research Enterprise.Evaluation and the Health Professions. (2013);36:492-504.
2. Balas E. A.,Elkin P. L.Technology Transfer From Biomedical Research to Clinical Practice: Measuring Innovation Performance.Evaluation and the Health Professions. 2013;6:505-517.
3. Butler D.Translational research: Crossing the valley of death.Nature. 2008;453:840-842.
4. Contopoulos-Ioannidis D. G.,Ntzani E.,Ioannidis J. P.Translation of highly promising basic science research into clinical applications.American Journal of Medicine. 2003;114:477-484.
5. Cook T. D.,Campbell D. T.Quasi Experimentation: Design & Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally; (1979):.
6. Cronbach L. J.Toward the reform of program evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1980:.
7. Cronbach L. J.Designing evaluations of educational and social programs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1982:.
8. Crowley W. F.Translation of basic research into useful treatments: How often does it occur?.American Journal of Medicine. 2003;114:503-505.
9. Dembe A. E.,Lynch M. S.,Gugiu P. C.,Jackson R. D.The translational research impact scale: development, construct validity, and reliability testing.Evaluation and the Health Professions. (2013);:.
10. Denzin N. K.,Lincoln Y. S.The landscape of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998:.
11. Dilts D. M.A "Three-Plus-One" Evaluation Model for Clinical Research Management.Evaluation and the Health Professions. (2013);36:464-477.
12. Dilts D. M.,Cheng S.,Crites J. S.,Sander A. B.,Doroshow J.Phase III clinical trial development: A process of chutes & ladders.Clinical Cancer Research. 2010;16:5381-89.
13. Diex Roux A. V.American Journal of Public Health. (2011):1627-1634.
14. Dozier A. M.,Martina C. A.,O'Dell N. L.,Fogg T. T.,Lurie S. J.,Rubinstein E. P.,Pearson T. A.Identifying Emerging Research Collaborations and Networks: Method Development.Evaluation and the Health Professions. (2013);:.
15. Falk-Krzesinski H. J.,Contractor N.,Fiore S. M.,Hall K. L.,Kane C.,Keyton J.Trochim W.Mapping a research agenda for team science.Research Evaluation. 2011;20:145-158.
16. Feeney M. K.,Johnson T.,Welch E. W.Methods for identifying translational researchers.Evaluation and the Health Professions. (2013);:.
17. Fetterman D. M.Foundations of empowerment evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2001:.
18. FrechtlingJ.RaueK.MichieJ.MiyaokaA.SpiegelmanM. (2012). The CTSA national evaluation phase 1 final report. Rockville, MD: Westat. Retrieved August 28, 2013 fromhttps://www.ctsacentral.org/sites/default/files/files/CTSANationalEval_FinalReport_20120416.pdf.
19. Gaglio B.,Shoup J. A.,Glasgow R. E.The RE-AIM framework: A systematic review of use over time.American Journal of Public Health. 2013;103:38-46.
20. Glasgow R.A focus on external validity.Evaluation and the Health Professions. 2007;30:115-117.
21. Grazier K. L.,Trochim W. M.,Dilts D. M.,Kirk R.Estimating Return on Investment in Translational Research: Methods and Protocols.Evaluation and the Health Professions. (2013);36:478-491.
22. Greene J. C.Mixed methods in social inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2007:.
23. Hogle J. A.,Moberg D. P.Success Case Studies Contribute to Evaluation of Complex Research Infrastructure.Evaluation and the Health Professions. (2013);:.
24. The CTSA program at NIH: Opportunities for advancing clinical and translational research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2013:.
25. Kane C.,Alexander A.,Hogle J. A.,Parsons H. M.,Phelps L.Heterogeneity at Work: Implications of the 2012 Clinical Translational Science Award Evaluators Survey.Evaluation and the Health Professions. 2013;6:447-463.
26. MannS. (2013). Team-based science increases, but promotion and tenure lag behind: AAMC Reporter. Retrieved August 2013, fromhttps://www.aamc.org/newsroom/reporter/jan2013/325940/team-based-science.html.
27. Mazmanian P. E.,Coe B. A.,Evans J. E.,Longo D. R.,Wright B. A.Are researcher development interventions, alone or in any combination, effective in improving researcher behavior? A systematic review.Evaluation and the Health Professions. 2013;:.
28. A framework for development and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. London, England: Author; 2000:.
29. Mercer S. L.,DeVinney B. J.,Fine L.,Green L. W.,Dougherty D.Study designs for effectiveness and translation research: Identifying trade-offs.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2007;33:139-154.
30. Mills B. A.,Caetano R.,Rhea A. E.Factor structure of the clinical research appraisal inventory (CRAI).Evaluation and the Health Professions. 2013;:.
31. Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2004:.
32. Research universities and the future of America. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2012a:.
33. Using science as evidence in public policy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2012b:.
34. Best care at lower cost: The path to continuously learning health care in America. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2013:.
35. Office of Science and Technology Policy, National Science and Technology Council. (2008). The science of science policy: A federal research roadmap. Retrieved from:http://scienceofsciencepolicy.net/sites/default/files/public_files/0257.SoSP_Roadmap.pdf.
36. Olsen L.,Aisner D.,McGinnis M.The learning health care system: Workshop summary. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2007:.
37. Patton M. Q.Utilization focused evaluation. 2008). Utilization focused evaluation (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2008:.
38. Pawson R.,Tilley N.Realistic Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1997:.
39. Rawlins M.De testimonial: On the evidence for decisions about the use of therapeutic interventions.Lancet. 2008;372:2152-2161.
40. Rubio D. M.Common Metrics to Assess the Efficiency of Clinical Research.Evaluation and the Health Professions. (2013);36:432-446.
41. Scott C. S.,Nagasawa P. R.,Abernethy N. F.,Ramsey B. W.,Martin P. J.,Hacker B. M.,Schwartz H. D.,Brock D. M.,Robins L. S.,Wolf F. M.,Carter-Dubois M.,Disis M. L.Expanding Assessments of Translational Research Programs: Supplementing Metrics With Value Judgments.Evaluation and the Health Professions. (2013);:.
42. Shadish W. R.,Cook T. D.The renaissance of field experiments in evaluating interventions.The Annual Review of Psychology. 2009;60:607-629.
43. Shadish W. R.,Cook T. D.,Campbell D. T.Experimental and Quasi- experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton-Miflin; 2002:.
44. Stake R. E.Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2006:.
45. Thornton P. H.,Ocasio W.,Lounsbury M.The Institutional logics perspective: A new approach to cultures, structure, and process. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2012:.
46. Tillman R. E.,Jang S.,Abedin Z.,Richards B. F.,Spaeth-Rublee B.,Pincus H. A.Policies, activities, and structures supporting research mentoring: A national survey of academic health centers with clinical and translational science awards.Academic Medicine. (2013);88:90-96.
47. Trochim W.,Kane C.,Graham M. J.,Pincus H. A.Evaluating translational research: A process marker model.Clinical and Translational Science. 2011;4:153-162.
48. Wooten K. C.,Rose R. M.,Ostir G. V.,Calhoun W. J.,Ameredes B. T.,Brasier A. R.Assessing and evaluating multidisciplinary translational teams: A mixed methods approach.Evaluation and the Health Professions. (2013);:.
49. Yin R. K.Case study research: Design and methods. 2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2009:.