Charting the publication and citation impact of the NIH clinical and translational science awards (CTSA) program from 2006 through 2016

Academic Medicine

Volumn 93, Issue 8, 2018, Pages 1162-1170

  Llewellyn, Nicole ^a   Carter, Dorothy R ^b   Rollins, Latrice ^c   Nehl, Eric J ^d  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University of Georgia ^*  (United States)

^c MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AWARDS AND PRIZES; BIBLIOMETRICS; COOPERATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PUBLICATION; STANDARDS; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH; TRENDS; UNITED STATES;

AWARDS AND PRIZES; BIBLIOMETRICS; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); PUBLICATIONS; RESEARCH DESIGN; TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85053213128     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: 1938808X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002119     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Institute of Medicine. The CTSA Program at NIH: Opportunities for Advancing Clinical and Translational Research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2013.
2. Califf RM, Berglund L; Principal Investigators of National Institutes of Health Clinical and Translational Science Awards. Linking scientific discovery and better health for the nation: The first three years of the NIH's Clinical and Translational Science Awards. Acad Med. 2010; 85:457-462.
3. National Institutes of Health. Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools. NIH RePORTER. https://projectreporter.nih.gov/reporter.cfm. Accessed January 31, 2017.
4. Rubio DM Common metrics to assess the efficiency of clinical research. Eval Health Prof. 2013; 36:432-446.
5. Frechtling J, Raue K, Michie J, Miyaoka A, Spiegelman M. The CTSA National Evaluation Final Report. Rockville, MD: Westat; 2012.
6. Steketee M, Frechtling J, Cross D, Schnell J. Final Report on CTSA-Supported Publications: 2006-2011. Rockville, MD: Westat; 2012.
7. Hara N, Solomon P, Kim SL, Sonnenwald DH. An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists' perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2003; 54(10):952-965.
8. Shi Q, Xu B, Xu X, Xiao Y, Wang W, Wang H. Diversity of social ties in scientific collaboration networks. Physica A. 2011; 390(23-24):4627-4635.
9. Sosa ME Where do creative interactions come from? The role of tie content and social networks. Organ Sci. 2011; 22(1):1-21.
10. Ofili EO, Fair A, Norris K, et al. Models of interinstitutional partnerships between research intensive universities and minority serving institutions (MSI) across the Clinical Translational Science Award (CTSA) consortium. Clin Transl Sci. 2013; 6:435-443.
11. Bikard M, Murray F, Gans JS. Exploring trade-offs in the organization of scientific work: Collaboration and scientific reward. Manage Sci. 2015; 61(7):1473-1495.
12. Cummings JN, Kiesler S. Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations. Res Policy. 2007; 36(10): 1620-1634.
13. U.S. National Library of Medicine. PubMed. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed. Accessed January 31, 2017.
14. National Institutes of Health. Revised policy on enhancing public access to archived publications resulting from NIH-funded research. NOT-OD-08-033. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-08-033.html. Revised 2013. Accessed November 16, 2017.
15. Clarivate Analytics. Web of Science. https://webofknowledge.com/. Accessed January 31, 2017.
16. Clarivate Analytics. InCites. https://incites.thomsonreuters.com/. Accessed January 31, 2017.
17. Thomson Reuters. InCites Handbook II. http://ipscience-help.thomsonreuters.com/inCites2Live/indicatorsGroup/aboutHandbook.html. Revised 2014. Accessed January 31, 2017.
18. National Institutes of Health Office of Portfolio Analysis. iCite. https://icite.od.nih.gov. Accessed February 15, 2017.
19. Hutchins BI, Yuan X, Anderson JM, Santangelo GM. Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A new metric that uses citation rates to measure influence at the article level. PLoS Biol. 2016; 14:e1002541.
20. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. CTSA program hubs. https://ncats.nih.gov/ctsa/about/hubs. Revised 2017. Accessed December 12, 2017.
21. National Institutes of Health. Clinical and Translational Science Award U54 program announcement (PAR) number: PAR-15-304. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-15-304.html. Published 2015. Accessed July 10, 2017.
22. Kline RB Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 1998.
23. Bentler PM Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990; 107:238-246.
24. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociol Methods Res. 1992; 21(2):230-258.
25. Schneider M, Kane CM, Rainwater J, et al. Feasibility of common bibliometrics in evaluating translational science. J Clin Transl Sci. 2017; 1:45-52.
26. Zhang Y, Wang L, Diao T. The quantitative evaluation of the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) program based on science mapping and scientometric analysis. Clin Transl Sci. 2013; 6:452-457.
27. Sibbald SL, MacGregor JC, Surmacz M, Wathen CN. Into the gray: A modified approach to citation analysis to better understand research impact. J Med Libr Assoc. 2015; 103:49-54.
28. Harris PA, Kirby J, Swafford JA, et al. Tackling the "so what" problem in scientific research: A systems-based approach to resource and publication tracking. Acad Med. 2015; 90:1043-1050.
29. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. Research performance progress report: Guidelines for 2017. Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) specific instructions. https://ncats.nih.gov/files/CTSA-RPPR-instructions-2017.pdf. Published December 2016. Accessed February 15, 2017.
30. Surkis A, Hogle JA, DiazGranados D, et al. Classifying publications from the Clinical and Translational Science Award program along the translational research spectrum: A machine learning approach. J Transl Med. 2016; 14:235.
31. Long JC, Hibbert P, Braithwaite J. Structuring successful collaboration: A longitudinal social network analysis of a translational research network. Implement Sci. 2016; 11:19.
32. Nagarajan R, Peterson CA, Lowe JS, Wyatt SW, Tracy TS, Kern PA. Social network analysis to assess the impact of the CTSA on biomedical research grant collaboration. Clin Transl Sci. 2015; 8:150-154.
33. Bian J, Xie M, Topaloglu U, Hudson T, Eswaran H, Hogan W. Social network analysis of biomedical research collaboration networks in a CTSA institution. J Biomed Inform. 2014; 52:130-140.
34. Hughes ME, Peeler J, Hogenesch JB. Network dynamics to evaluate performance of an academic institution. Sci Transl Med. 2010; 2:53ps49.
35. Okamoto J; Centers for Population Health and Health Disparities Evaluation Working Group. Scientific collaboration and team science: A social network analysis of the centers for population health and health disparities. Transl Behav Med. 2015; 5: 12-23.