Assessing and Evaluating Multidisciplinary Translational Teams: A Mixed Methods Approach

Evaluation and the Health Professions

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 33-49

  Wooten, Kevin C ^a   Rose, Robert M ^b   Ostir, Glenn V ^b   Calhoun, William J ^b   Ameredes, Bill T ^b   Brasier, Allan R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON CLEAR LAKE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH   (United States)

Author keywords

logic models; mixed methods; process evaluation; team science; translational teams

Indexed keywords

AWARDS AND PRIZES; COOPERATION; EVALUATION STUDY; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; MANPOWER; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES; PUBLIC RELATIONS; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL MODEL; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

AWARDS AND PRIZES; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; EVALUATION STUDIES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; LOGISTIC MODELS; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC; TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84893547101     PISSN: 01632787     EISSN: 15523918     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0163278713504433     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Aboelela S. W.,Merrill J. A.,Carley K. M.,Larson E.Social network analysis to evaluate an interdisciplinary research center.Journal of Research Administration. 2007;38:61-78.
2. Bennett L. M.,Gadlin H.,Levine-Finley S.Collaboration & team science: A field guide. 2010;:.
3. Börner K.,Contractor N.,Falk-Krzesinski H. J.,Fiore S. M.,Keyton J.,Spring B.A multi-level systems perspective for the science of team science.Science Translational Medicine. 2010;15:49cm24.
4. Calhoun W. J.,Wooten K.,Bhavnani S.,Anderson K. E.,Freeman J.,Brasier A. R.The CTSA as an exemplar framework for developing multidisciplinary translational teams.Clinical and Translational Science. 2013;6:60-71.
5. Cohen S. G.,Bailey D. E.What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive level.Journal of Management. 1997;23:239-290.
6. Coryn C. L. S.,Hattie J. A.,Scriven M.,Hartmann D. J.Models and mechanisms for evaluating government-funded research: An international comparison.American Journal of Evaluation. 2007;28:437-457.
7. Creswell J. W.,Clark V. L. P.Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Los Angeles, CA: Sage; 2011:.
8. Devine D. J.,Clayton L. D.,Phillips J. L.,Dunford B. B.,Melner B. B.Teams in organizations: Prevalence, characteristics, and effectiveness.Small Group Research. 1999;30:678-711.
9. Disis M. L.,Slattery J. T.The road we must take: Multidisciplinary team science.Science Translational Medicine. 2010;2:22cm29.
10. Falk-Krzesinski H. J.,Börner K.,Contractor N.,Fiore S. M.,Hall K. L.,Keyton J.Advancing the science of team science.Clinical and Translation Science Journal. 2010;23:263-266.
11. Falk-Krzesinski H. J.,Contractor N.,Fiore S. M.,Hall K. L.,Kane C.,Keyton J.Mapping a research agenda for the science of team science.Research Evaluation. 2011;20:145-158.
12. Fiore S. M.Interdisciplinarity as teamwork: How the science of team science can inform team science.Small Group Research. 2008;39:251-277.
13. Frechtling J. A.Logic modeling methods in program evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2007:.
14. Gravetter F. J.Research methods for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Thompson/Wadsworth; 2003:.
15. Gray D. O.Making team science better: Applying improvement-oriented evaluation principles to evaluation of cooperative research centers.New Directions of Evaluation. 2008;118:73-87.
16. Greene J. C.,Caracelli V. J.,Graham W. F.Toward a conceptual framework for mixed methods evaluation designs.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 1989;11:255-274.
17. Guzzo R. A.,Dickson M. W.Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness.Annual Review of Psychology. 1996;47:307-338.
18. Hall K. L.,Feng A. X.,Moser R. P.,Stokols D.,Taylor B. K.Moving the science of team science forward: Collaboration and creativity.American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2008;35:243-249.
19. Hall K. L.,Vogel A. L.,Stipleman B. A.,Stokols D.,Morgan G.,Gehlert S.A four phase model of translational team-based research: Goals, team processes, and strategies.Translational Behavioral Medicine. 2012;2:415-430.
20. Hansen H. F.Choosing evaluational models: A discussion of evaluation design.Evaluation. 2005;11:447-462.
21. Hoggarth L.,Comfort H.A practical guide to outcome evaluation. Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley; 2010:.
22. Hollingshead A. B.,Poole M. S.Research methods for studying groups and teams: A guide to approaches, tools, techniques. New York, NY: Routledge; 2012:.
23. Huutoniemi K.The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Frodeman R.Thompson Klein, J.Mitchum C., ed. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2010:309-320.
24. Ilgen D. R.,Hollenbeck J. R.,Johnson M.,Jandt D.Teams in organizations: From input-process-output model to IMOI models.Annual Review of Psychology. 2005;56:517-540.
25. Institute for Translational Sciences.Evaluation of scientific teams. 2013, June 26;:.
26. Johnson R. B.,Onwuegbuzie A. J.,Turner L. A.Toward a definition of mixed methods research.Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2008;1:112-133.
27. Jones B. F.,Wuchty S.,Uzzi B.Multi-university research teams: Shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science.Science. 2008;322:1259-1262.
28. Klein J. T.Afterword: The emergent literature on interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research evaluation.Research Evaluation. 2006;15:75-80.
29. Kotarba J. A.,Wooten K. C.,Freeman J.,Brasier A. R.The culture of translational science research: A qualitative analysis.International Review of Qualitative Research. 2013;6:127-142.
30. Lawrenz F.,Thao M.,Johnson K.Expert panel reviews of research centers: The site visit.Evaluation and Program Planning. 2012;35:390-397.
31. Masse L. C.,Moser R. P.,Stokols D.,Taylor B. K.,Marcus S. E.,Morgan L. D.Measuring collaboration and transdisciplinary integration in team science [Supplement].American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2008;35:151-160.
32. Mathieu J. E.,Maynard M. T.,Rapp T. L.,Gilson L. L.Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future.Journal of Management. 2008;34:410-476.
33. Norman C. D.,Best A.,Mortimer S. T.,Huerta T.,Buchan A.Evaluating the science of discovery in complex health systems.American Journal of Evaluation. 2011;32:85-97.
34. Olbrecht M.,Bornman L.Panel peer review of grant application: What do we know from research in social psychology on judgment and decision making in groups.Research Evaluation. 2010;19:293-204.
35. Patton M. Q.Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2010:.
36. Rubio D. M.,Schoenbaum E. E.,Lee L. S.,Schteingart D. E.,Marantz P. R.,Anderson K. E.Defining translational research: Implications for training.Academic Medicine. 2010;85:470-475.
37. Saunders R. P.,Evans M. H.,Joshi P.Developing a process-evaluation plan for assessing health promotion program implementation: A how-to guide.Health Promotion Practice. 2005;6:131-147.
38. Stokols D.Toward a science of transdisciplinary action research.American Journal of Community Psychology. 2006;38:63-77.
39. Stokols D.,Fuqua J.,Gress J.,Harvey R.,Phillips K.,Baezconde-Garbanati L.Evaluating transdisciplinary science.Nicotine and Tobacco Research. 2003;5:21-39.
40. Stokols D.,Hall K. L.,Taylor B. K.,Moser R. P.The science of team science: Overview of the field and introduction to the supplement [Supplement].American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2008;35:77-89.
41. Sundstrom E.,DeMuse K. P.,Futrell D.Work teams: Applications and effectiveness.American Psychologist. 1990;45:120-133.
42. Sung N. S.,Crowley W. F. J.,Genel M.,Salber P.,Sandy L.,Sherwood L. M.Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise.Journal of the American Medical Association. 2003;289:1278-1287.
43. Tashakkori A.,Teddlie C.Sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage; 2010:.
44. Teddlie C.,Tashakkori A.Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Los Angeles, CA: Sage; 2009:.
45. Trochim W. M.,Marcus S. E.,Masse L. C.,Moser R. P.,Weld P. C.The evaluation of large research initiatives: A participatory integrative mixed-methods approach.American Journal of Evaluation. 2008;29:8-28.
46. Trochim W. M. K.Research methods: The concise knowledge base. Cincinnati, OH: Atomic Dog; 2005:.
47. Van der Vegt G. S.,Janssen O.Joint impact of interdependence and group diversity on innovation.Journal of Management. 2003;29:729-751.
48. Westfall J. M.,Mold J.,Fagan L.Practice-based research: "Blue highways" on the NIH roadmap.Journal of the American Medical Association. 2007;297:403-406.
49. Wilson C.Our team survey. Old Saybrook, CT: Performance Programs; 2003:.
50. Wuchty S.,Jones B. F.,Uzzi B.The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge.Science. 2007;316:1036-1039.
51. Zerhouni E. A.Clinical research at a crossroads: The NIH roadmap.Journal of Investigative Medicine. 2006;54:171-173.