College students’ perception of e-feedback: a grounded theory perspective

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 44, Issue 7, 2019, Pages 1090-1105

  Chong, Sin Wang ^a  

^a THE EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

community college; E feedback; Google docs; grounded theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 85061448447     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1572067     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Alvarez, I., A., Espasa, and T., Guasch. 2012. “The Value of Feedback in Improving Collaborative Writing Assignments in an Online Learning Environment.” Studies in Higher Education 37 (4): 387–400. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2010.510182.
2. Boud, D., and E., Molloy, eds. 2013. Feedback in Higher and Professional Education: Understanding it and Doing it Well. New York, NY: Routledge.
3. Brearley, F. Q., and W. R., Cullen. 2012. “Providing Students with Formative Audio Feedback.” Bioscience Education 20 (1): 22–36. doi: 10.11120/beej.2012.20000022.
4. Busse, V. 2013. “How Do Students of German Perceive Feedback Practices at University? A Motivational Exploration.” Journal of Second Language Writing 22 (4): 406–424. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2013.09.005.
5. Carless, D. 2006. “Differing Perceptions in the Feedback Process.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 219–233. doi: 10.1080/03075070600572132.
6. Carless, D. 2016. “Feedback as Dialogue.” Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory 1–6. http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_389-1
7. Carless, D., and D., Boud. 2018. “The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (8): 1315–1325. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354.
8. Carless, D., and K. K. H., Chan. 2017. “Managing Dialogic Use of Exemplars.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (6): 930–941. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2016.1211246.
9. Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Charmaz, K. 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Chong, I. 2017. “Assessment Dialogues between Teachers and Students in e-writing Portfolios.” TESOL Journal 8 (1): 240–243. doi: 10.1002/tesj.312.
12. Chong, I. 2018a. “Interplay among Technical, Socio-Emotional and Personal Factors in Written Feedback Research.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (2): 185–196. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2017.1317712.
13. Chong, S. W. 2018b. “Interpersonal Aspect of Written Feedback: A Community College Students’ Perspective.” Research in Post-Compulsory Education 23 (4): 499–519.
14. Denton, D. W. 2014. “Using Screen Capture Feedback to Improve Academic Performance.” TechTrends 58 (6): 51–56. doi: 10.1007/s11528-014-0803-0.
15. Denton, P. 2001. “Generating Coursework Feedback for Large Groups of Students Using MS Excel & MS Word.” University Chemistry Education 5:1–8.
16. Denton, P., J., Madden, M., Roberts, and P., Rowe. 2008. “Students’ Response to Traditional and Computer-assisted Formative Feedback: A Comparative Case Study.” British Journal of Educational Technology 39 (3): 486–500. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00745.x.
17. Ende, J., A., Pomerantz, and F., Erickson. 1995. “Preceptors’ Strategies for Correcting Residents in an Ambulatory Care Medicine Setting.” Academic Medicine 70 (3): 224–229. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199503000-00014.
18. Ene, E., and T. A., Upton. 2018. “Synchronous and Asynchronous Teacher Electronic Feedback and Learner Uptake in ESL Composition.” Journal of Second Language Writing 41:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2018.05.005.
19. Espasa, A., T., Guasch, M., Mayordomo, R. M., Martínez-Melo, and D., Carless. 2018. “A Dialogic Feedback Index Measuring Key Aspects of Feedback Processes in Online Learning Environments.” Higher Education Research & Development 37 (3): 499–513. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2018.1430125.
20. Gibbs, G., and C., Simpson. 2004. “Does Your Assessment Support Your Students’ Learning.” Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 1 (1): 3–31.
21. Glover, C., and E., Brown. 2006. “Written Feedback for Students: Too Much, too Detailed or Too Incomprehensible to Be Effective?” Bioscience Education 7 (1): 1–16. doi: 10.3108/beej.2006.07000004.
22. Habermas, J. 1971. Knowledge and Human Interests. Trans. Jeremy J. Shaprio. London: Heinemann.
23. Habermas, J. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action: Vol.1. Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston, MA: Beacon.
24. Hattie, J., and H., Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112. doi: 10.3102/003465430298487.
25. Hattie, J., and S., Clarke. 2019. Visible Learning Feedback. New York, NY: Routledge.
26. Hyland, K. 2016. Teaching and Researching Writing. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge.
27. Ice, P., R., Curtis, P., Phillips, and J., Wells. 2007. “Using Asynchronous Audio Feedback to Enhance Teaching Presence and Students Sense of Community.” Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 11 (2). http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/JALN/v11n2/index.asp.
28. Ilgen, D., and C., Davis. 2000. “Bearing Bad News: Reactions to Negative Performance Feedback.” Applied Psychology 49 (3): 550–565. doi: 10.1111/1464-0597.00031.
29. Jones, N., P., Georghiades, and J., Gunson. 2012. “Student Feedback via Screen Capture Digital Video: Stimulating Student’s Modified Action.” Higher Education 64 (5): 593–607. doi: 10.1007/s10734-012-9514-7.
30. Kim, S. 2010. “Revising the Revision Process with Google Docs.” In TESOL Classroom Practice Series, edited by S. Kasten S, 171-178 (Effective Second Language Writing Chapter 18). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
31. Koelsch, L. E. 2013. “Reconceptualizing the Member Check Interview.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 12 (1): 168–179. doi: 10.1177/160940691301200105.
32. Long, M. H. 2007. Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Lumsdon, L. M., and P., McGrath. 2011. “Developing a Conceptual Framework for Slow Travel: A Grounded Theory Approach.” Journal of Sustainable Tourism 19 (3): 265–279. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2010.519438.
34. Lunt, T., and J., Curran. 2010. “Are You Listening Please?’ the Advantages of Electronic Audio Feedback Compared to Written Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (7): 759–769. doi: 10.1080/02602930902977772.
35. McCabe, J., A., Doerflinger, and R., Fox. 2011. “Student and Faculty Perceptions of e- Feedback.” Teaching of Psychology 38 (3): 173–179. doi: 10.1177/0098628311411794.
36. Merriam, S. B. 2009. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
37. Mitchell, D. 2014. “Advancing Grounded Theory: Using Theoretical Frameworks within Grounded Theory Studies.” The Qualitative Report 19 (36): 1–11.
38. Molloy, E., F., Borrell-Carrió, and R., Epstein. 2013. “The Impact of Emotions in Feedback.” In Reconceptualising. Feedback in Higher Education, edited by S., Merry, M., Price, D., Carless, and M., Taras, 50–71. New York, NY: Routledge.
39. Morse, J. M. 2007. “Sampling in Grounded Theory.” In The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory, edited by A., Bryant and K., Charmaz, 229–244. London: Sage.
40. Nicol, D. 2010. “From Monologue to Dialogue: Improving Written Feedback Processes in Mass Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 501–517. doi: 10.1080/02602931003786559.
41. Porte, G. K. 1997. “The Etiology of Poor Second Language Writing: The Influence of Perceived Teacher Preferences on Second Language Revision Strategies.” Journal of Second Language Writing 6 (1): 61–78. doi: 10.1016/S1060-3743(97)90006-0.
42. Samburskiy, D., and J., Quah. 2014. “Corrective Feedback in Asynchronous Online Interaction: Developing Novice Online Language Instructors.” CALICO Journal 31 (2): 158–178. doi: 10.11139/cj.31.2.158-178.
43. Savin-Baden, M., and C. H., Major. 2012. Qualitative Research: The Essential Guide to Theory and Practice. 1st ed. New York, NY: Routledge.
44. Shang, H. 2017. “An Exploration of Asynchronous and Synchronous Feedback Modes in EFL Writing.” Journal of Computing in Higher Education 29 (3): 496–513. doi: 10.1007/s12528-017-9154-0.
45. Shintani, N. 2016. “The Effects of Computer-mediated Synchronous and Asynchronous Direct Corrective Feedback on Writing: A Case Study.” Computer Assisted Language Learning 29 (3): 517–538. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2014.993400.
46. Stannard, R. 2017. “A Genuine Innovation in the Delivery and Form of Feedback on Students’ Written Work.” In Digital Language Learning and Teaching: Research, Theory, and Practice, edited by M., Carrie, R.M., Damerow, and K.M., Bailey, 179–187. New York, NY: Routledge.
47. Tai, J., R., Ajjawi, D., Boud, P., Dawson, and E., Panadero. 2018. “Developing Evaluative Judgement: Enabling Students to Make Decisions about the Quality of Work.” Higher Education 76 (3): 467–481. doi: 10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3.
48. Tuzi, F. 2004. “The Impact of e-feedback on the Revisions of L2 Writers in an Academic Course.” Computers and Composition 21 (2): 217–235. doi: 10.1016/j.compcom.2004.02.003.
49. Yang, M., and D., Carless. 2013. “The Feedback Triangle and the Enhancement of Dialogic Feedback Processes.” Teaching in Higher Education 18 (3): 285–297. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2012.719154.