Students' response to traditional and computer-assisted formative feedback: A comparative case study

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 486-500

  Denton, Philip ^a   Madden, Judith ^a   Roberts, Matthew ^a   Rowe, Philip ^a  

^a LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; ELECTRONIC MAIL; STRATEGIC PLANNING; STUDENTS;

ELECTRONIC FEEDBACK FREEWARE; EMAIL FEEDBACK; PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT;

FEEDBACK;

EID: 42449103457     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00745.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bhalerao, A. Ward, A. (2001). Towards electronically assisted peer assessment: a case study. Association of Learning technology Journal, 9, 26 37.
2. Buchanan, T. (2000). The efficacy of a worldwide web mediated formative assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, 193 200.
3. Bull, J. Stephens, D. P. (1999). The use of question mark software for formative & summative assessment in two universities. Innovations in Education & Training International, 36, 128 136.
4. Case, S. (2007). Reconfiguring and realigning the assessment feedback process for an undergraduate criminology degree. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32, 285 299.
5. Clarke, M., Butler, C., Schmidt-Hansen, P. Somerville, M. (2004). Quality assurance for distance learning: A case study at Brunel university. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35, 5 11.
6. Clegg, S. (2004). Critical readings: Progress files & the production of the autonomous learner. Teaching in Higher Education, 9, 287 298.
7. Collis, B., De Boer, W. Slotman, K. (2001). Feedback for web-based assignments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 306 313.
8. Deacon, A., Jaftha, J. Horwitz, D. (2004). Customising Microsoft office to develop a tutorial learning environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35, 223 234.
9. Denton, P. (2001). Generating coursework feedback for large groups of students using MS Excel & MS Word. University Chemistry Education, 5, 1 8.
10. Denton, P. (2003). Evaluation of the 'electronic feedback' marking assistant & analysis of a novel collusion detection facility. In J. Christie (Ed Proceedings of the 7th international computer aided assessment conference (pp. 157 173). Loughborough : Learning and Teaching Development.
11. Gibbs, G. Habeshaw, T. (1993). Preparing to teach: An introduction to effective teaching in higher education (p. 95). Bristol : Technical & Educational Services.
12. Gipps, C. V. (2005). What is the role for ICT-based assessment in universities? Studies in Higher Education, 30, 171 180.
13. Hase, S. Saenger, H. (1997). Videomail - a personalised approach to providing feedback on assessment to distance learners. Distance Education, 18, 362 369.
14. Heinrich, E. (2004). Electronic repositories of marked student work & their contributions to formative evaluation. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 7, 82 96.
15. Heo, M. Chow, A. (2005). The impact of computer augmented online learning & assessment tool. Educational Technology & Society, 8, 113 125.
16. Higgins, R., Hartley, P. Skelton, A. (2002). The conscientious consumer: reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 53 64.
17. Kanuka, H. (2001). University student perceptions of the use of the web in distance-delivered programs. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 31, 49 71.
18. Orsmond, P., Merry, S. Callaghan, A. (2004). Implementation of a formative assessment model incorporating peer & self-assessment. Innovations in Education & Training International, 41, 273 290.
19. Orsmond, P., Merry, S. Reiling, K. (2005). Biology students' utilization of tutors' formative feedback: A qualitative interview study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 369 386.
20. Peterson, M. W., Gordon, J., Elliott, S. Kreiter, C. (2004). Computer-based testing: Initial report of extensive use in a medical school curriculum. Teaching & Learning in Medicine, 16, 1040 1334.
21. Ramprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 28, 4 13.
22. Roberts, D. (1996). Feedback on assignments. Distance Education, 17, 95 116.
23. Taras, M. (2001). The use of tutor feedback & student self-assessment in summative assessment tasks: Towards transparency for students & for tutors. Evaluation in Higher Education, 26, 605 614.
24. Tuzi, F. (2004). The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of l2 writers in an academic writing course. Computers & Composition, 21, 217 236.
25. van der Hem-Stokroos, H. H., Daelmans, H. E., Van Der Vleuten, C. P., Haarman, H. J. Scherpbier, A. J. (2003). A qualitative study of constructive clinical learning experiences. Medicinal Teacher, 25, 120 126.
26. Ypsilandis, G. S. (2002). Feedback in distance education. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15, 167 181.
27. Zakrzewski, S. Bull, J. (1998). The mass implementation & evaluation of computer-based assessments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23, 141 152.