Cognitive Load Theory and Human Movement: Towards an Integrated Model of Working Memory

Educational Psychology Review

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2019, Pages 293-317

  Sepp, Stoo ^a   Howard, Steven J ^a   Tindall Ford, Sharon ^a   Agostinho, Shirley ^a   Paas, Fred ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Attention; Cognitive load theory; Gesturing; Human movement; Learning; Working memory model

Indexed keywords

EID: 85061060494     PISSN: 1040726X     EISSN: 1573336X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10648-019-09461-9     Document Type: Review

References (113)

1. Agostinho, S., Tindall-Ford, S., Ginns, P., Howard, S. J., Leahy, W., & Paas, F. (2015). Giving learning a helping hand: finger tracing of temperature graphs on an iPad. Educational Psychology Review, 27(3), 427–443. 10.1007/s10648-015-9315-5.
2. Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: a proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 2, pp. 89–195). London: Academic.
3. Ayres, P. L. (1993). Why goal-free problems can facilitate learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18(3), 376–381. 10.1006/ceps.1993.1027.
4. Ayres, P., Marcus, N., Chan, C., & Qian, N. (2009). Learning hand manipulative tasks: when instructional animations are superior to equivalent static representations. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 348–353. 10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.013.
5. Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (1990). Locus of difficulty in multi-stage mathematics problems (Ph.D. thesis). The American Journal of Psychology, 103(2), 167–193.
6. Baddeley, A. D. (1983). Working memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 302(1110), 311–324. 10.1098/rstb.1983.0057.
7. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory (p. 1986). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556–559. 10.1126/science.1736359.
9. Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417–423. 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2.
10. Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), 829–839. 10.1038/nrn1201.
11. Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 1–29. 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422.
12. Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York: Academic.
13. Baddeley, A. D., & Lieberman, K. (1980). Spatial working memory. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance VIII (pp. 521–539). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
14. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptions of perceptual symbols. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(04), 637–660.
15. Bauhoff, V., Huff, M., & Schwan, S. (2012). Distance matters: spatial contiguity effects as trade-off between gaze switches and memory load. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(6), 863–871. 10.1002/acp.2887.
16. Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and Communication. New York: Pergamon.
17. Broadbent, D. E. (1982). Task combination and selective intake of information. Acta Psychologica, 50(3), 253–290.
18. Brucker, B., Ehlis, A.-C., Häußinger, F. B., Fallgatter, A. J., & Gerjets, P. (2015). Watching corresponding gestures facilitates learning with animations by activating human mirror-neurons. An fNIRS study, 36(C), 27–37. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.11.003.
19. Castro-Alonso, J. C., Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2014). Learning from observing hands in static and animated versions of non-manipulative tasks. Learning and Instruction, 34, 11–22.
20. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293–332. 10.1207/s1532690xci0804_2.
21. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1992). The split-attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62(2), 233–246. 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1992.tb01017.x.
22. Chen, O., Castro-Alonso, J. C., Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2017). Extending cognitive load theory to incorporate working memory resource depletion: evidence from the spacing effect. Educational Psychology Review, 61(2), 1–19. 10.1007/s10648-017-9426-2.
23. Choi, H. H., Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2014). Effects of the physical environment on cognitive load and learning: towards a new model of cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), 225–244.
24. Chu, M., & Kita, S. (2008). Spontaneous gestures during mental rotation tasks: insights into the microdevelopment of the motor strategy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(4), 706–723. 10.1037/a0013157.
25. Chu, M., Meyer, A., Foulkes, L., & Kita, S. (2013). Individual differences in frequency and saliency of speech-accompanying gestures: the role of cognitive abilities and empathy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 694–709. 10.1037/a0033861.supp.
26. Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149–210.
27. Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: a methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 769–786. 10.3758/BF03196772.
28. Cook, S. W., Duffy, R. G., & Fenn, K. M. (2013). Consolidation and transfer of learning after observing hand gesture. Child Development, 84(6), 1863–1871. 10.1111/cdev.12097.
29. Cook, S. W., Mitchell, Z., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2008). Gesturing makes learning last. Cognition, 106(2), 1047–1058. 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.010.
30. Cook, S. W., Yip, T. K., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2012). Gestures, but not meaningless movements, lighten working memory load when explaining math. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(4), 594–610. 10.1080/01690965.2011.567074.
31. Cowan, N. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system. Psychological Bulletin, 104(2), 163–191.
32. Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and memory: an integrated framework. New York: Oxford University Press; Oxford: Clarendon, 1995.
33. Cowan, N. (2000). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 87–185.
34. Cowan, N. (2010). The magical mystery four. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 51–57. 10.1177/0963721409359277.
35. Cumming, C. E., & Rodda, M. (1985). The effects of auditory deprivation on successive processing. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 17(3), 232–245.
36. Delaney, P. F., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., & Spirgel, A. (2010). Spacing and testing effects: a deeply critical, lengthy, and at times discursive review of the literature. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: advances in research and theory (Vol. 53, pp. 63–147). New York: Academic. 10.1016/S0079-7421(10)53003-2.
37. De Groot, A. (1965). Thought and choice in chess. The Hague: Mouton. Original work published 1946.
38. De Koning, B., & Tabbers, H. K. (2013). Gestures in instructional animations: a helping hand to understanding non-human movements? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 683–689.
39. Ebbinghaus, H. (1885/1964). Memory: a contribution to experimental psychology. Oxford: Dover.
40. Engelkamp, J. (1995). Visual imagery and enactment of actions in memory. British Journal of Psychology, 86(2), 227–240. 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1995.tb02558.x.
41. Engelkamp, J., Seiler, K. H., & Zimmer, H. D. (2005). Differential relational encoding of categorical information in memory for action events. Memory & Cognition, 33(3), 371–389.
42. Engelkamp, J., Zimmer, H. D., Mohr, G., & Sellen, O. (1994). Memory of self-performed tasks: self-performing during recognition. Memory & Cognition, 22(1), 34–39. 10.3758/BF03202759.
43. Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 19–23. 10.1111/1467-8721.00160.
44. Florax, M., & Ploetzner, R. (2010). What contributes to the split-attention effect? The role of text segmentation, picture labelling, and spatial proximity. Learning and Instruction, 20(3), 216–224. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.021.
45. Foglia, L., & Wilson, R. A. (2013). Embodied cognition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 4(3), 319–325.
46. Ginns, P. (2005). Meta-analysis of the modality effect. Learning and Instruction, 15(4), 313–331. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.001.
47. Ginns, P. (2006). Integrating information: a meta-analysis of the spatial contiguity and temporal contiguity effects. Learning and Instruction, 16(6), 511–525. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.10.001.
48. Gluckman, M., Vlach, H. A., & Sandhofer, C. M. (2014). Spacing simultaneously promotes multiple forms of learning in children’s science curriculum. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(2), 266–273. 10.1002/acp.2997.
49. Goldin-Meadow, S. (2009). How gesture promotes learning throughout childhood. Child Development Perspectives, 3(2), 106–111.
50. Goldin-Meadow, S., Cook, S. W., & Mitchell, Z. (2009). Gesturing gives children new ideas about math. Psychological Science, 20(3), 267–272. 10.1086/659964?ref=search-gateway:4d5c7866182d0f01d9bef79f563ad121.
51. Goldin-Meadow, S., Nusbaum, H., Kelly, S. D., & Wagner, S. (2001). Explaining math: gesturing lightens the load. Psychological Science, 12(6), 516–522.
52. Healey, M. K., Hasher, L., & Danilova, E. (2011). The stability of working memory: do previous tasks influence complex span? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 573–585. 10.1037/a0024587.
53. Heitz, R. P., & Engle, R. W. (2007). Focusing the spotlight: individual differences in visual attention control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(2), 217–240. 10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.217.
54. Hu, F. T., Ginns, P., & Bobis, J. (2014). Does tracing worked examples enhance geometry learning? Australian Journal of Educational Developmental Psychology, 14, 45–49.
55. Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P. A., & Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 23–31. 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_4.
56. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1999). Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(S1), 123–S144. 10.1002/acp.1773.
57. Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (2001). A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(2), 169–183. 10.1037//0096-3445.130.2.169.
58. Kapler, I. V., Weston, T., & Wiseheart, M. (2015). Spacing in a simulated undergraduate classroom: long-term benefits for factual and higher-level learning. Learning and Instruction, 36, 38–45. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.11.001.
59. Halford, G. S., Wilson, W. H., & Phillips, S. (1998). Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 803–831.
60. Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: a meta-analysis. Learning an Instruction, 17(6), 722–738.
61. Holsanova, J., Holmberg, N., & Holmqvist, K. (2009). Reading information graphics: the role of spatial contiguity and dual attentional guidance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(9), 1215–1226. 10.1002/acp.1525.
62. Juan Pascual-Leone, (1970) A mathematical model for the transition rule in Piaget's developmental stages. Acta Psychologica, 32 301–345
63. Johnson, C. I., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). An eye movement analysis of the spatial contiguity effect in multimedia learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18(2), 178–191. 10.1037/a0026923.
64. Low, R., & Sweller, J. (2005). The modality principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 147–158). New York: Cambridge University Press.
65. Macedonia, M., & Klimesch, W. (2014). Long-term effects of gestures on memory for foreign language words trained in the classroom. Mind, Brain, and Education, 8(2), 74–88.
66. Mavilidi, M. F., Okely, A. D., Chandler, P. A., Cliff, D. P., & Paas, F. (2015). Effects of integrated physical exercises and gestures on preschool children’s foreign language vocabulary learning. Educational Psychology Review, 27(3), 413–426. 10.1007/s10648-015-9337-z.
67. Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1–19.
68. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69. Mayer, R. E. (2002). Multimedia learning. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 41, 85–139.
70. Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31–48). New York: Cambridge University Press.
71. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (p. 2009). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
72. Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B. (1992). The instructive animation: helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 444–452. 10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.444.
73. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 312–320. 10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.312.
74. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52. 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6.
75. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97. 10.1037/h0043158.
76. Mousavi, S. Y., Low, R., & Sweller, J. (1995). Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 319–334. 10.1037/0022-0663.87.2.319.
77. Novack, M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2015). Learning from gesture: how our hands change our minds. Educational Psychology Review, 27(3), 405–412.
78. Novack, M., Goldin-Meadow, S., & Woodward, A. L. (2015). Learning from gesture: how early does it happen? Cognition, 142, 138–147.
79. Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2012). An evolutionary upgrade of cognitive load theory: using the human motor system and collaboration to support the learning of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 24(1), 27–45.
80. Paivio, A., & Okovita, H. W. (1971). Word imagery modalities and associative learning in blind and sighted subjects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10(5), 506–510.
81. Pascual-Leone, J., & Baillargeon, R. (1994). Developmental measurement of mental attention. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 17(1), 161–200. 10.1177/016502549401700110.
82. Pascual-Leone, J., & Smith, J. (1969). The encoding and decoding of symbols by children: a new experimental paradigm and a neo-Piagetian model. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 8(2), 328–355. 10.1016/0022-0965(69)90107-6.
83. Penney, C. G. (1989). Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory. Memory & Cognition, 17(4), 398–422. 10.3758/BF03202613.
84. Ping, R., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2010). Gesturing saves cognitive resources when talking about nonpresent objects. Cognitive Science, 34(4), 602–619.
85. Pouw, W., Mavilidi, M.-F., Van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2016). Gesturing during mental problem solving reduces eye movements, especially for individuals with lower visual working memory capacity. Cognitive Processing, 17(3), 269–277. 10.1007/s10339-016-0757-6.
86. Pouw, W. T. J. L., de Nooijer, J. A., Van Gog, T., Zwaan, R. A. & Paas, F. (2014a). Toward a more embedded/extended perspective on the cognitive function of gestures. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–14. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00359.
87. Pouw, W., Van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2014b). An embedded and embodied cognition review of instructional manipulatives. Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), 51–72.
88. Risko, E. F., & Gilbert, S. J. (2016). Cognitive offloading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(9), 676–688. 10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002.
89. Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27(1), 169–192. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230.
90. Rhodes, G. (1987). Auditory attention and the representation of spatial information. Perception & Psychophysics, 42(1), 1–14.
91. Rudner, M., Andin, J., & Rönnberg, J. (2009). Working memory, deafness and sign language. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50(5), 495–505. 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00744.x.
92. Rummer, R., Schweppe, J., Fürstenberg, A., Seufert, T., & Brünken, R. (2010). Working memory interference during processing texts and pictures: implications for the explanation of the modality effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(2), 164–176. 10.1002/acp.1546.
93. Rummer, R., Schweppe, J., Fürstenberg, A., Scheiter, K., & Zindler, A. (2011). The perceptual basis of the modality effect in multimedia learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(2), 159–173. 10.1037/a0023588.
94. Schmalenbach, S. B., Billino, J., Kircher, T., van Kemenade, B. M., & Straube, B. (2017). Links between gestures and multisensory processing: individual differences suggest a compensation mechanism. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 635–638. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01828.
95. Schmeichel, B. J. (2007). Attention control, memory updating, and emotion regulation temporarily reduce the capacity for executive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(2), 241–255. 10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.241.
96. Schmidt-Weigand, F., Kohnert, A., & Glowalla, U. (2010). Explaining the modality and contiguity effects: new insights from investigating students’ viewing behaviour. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(2), 226–237. 10.1002/acp.1554.
97. Schroeder, N. L., & Cenkci, A. T. (2018). Spatial contiguity and spatial split-attention effects in multimedia learning environments: a meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 679–701.
98. Skulmowski, A., Pradel, S., Kühnert, T., Brunnett, G., & Rey, G. D. (2016). Embodied learning using a tangible user interface: the effects of haptic perception and selective pointing on a spatial learning task. Computers & Education, 92-93(c), 64–75. 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.011.
99. Skulmowski, A., & Rey, G. D. (2017). Measuring cognitive load in embodied learning settings. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–6. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01191.
100. Smith, D., Davis, B., Niu, K., Healy, E., Bonilha, L., Fridriksson, J., Morgan, P. S., & Rorden, C. (2009). Spatial attention evokes similar activation patterns for visual and auditory stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 347–361.
101. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. 10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4.
102. Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
103. Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. A. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293–332. 10.1207/s1532690xci0804_2.
104. Sweller, J., Levine, M., 1982. (1982). Effects of goal specificity on means–ends analysis and learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 8(5), 463–474.
105. Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296.
106. Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). When two sensory modes are better than one. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, 257–287.
107. Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28(2), 127–154.
108. Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007). The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 104–132. 10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.104.
109. Van Gog, T., Paas, F., Marcus, N., Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2009). The mirror neuron system and observational learning: implications for the effectiveness of dynamic visualizations. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 21–30.
110. Wilson, M. (2001). The case for sensorimotor coding in working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(1), 44–57.
111. Wilson, M., & Emmorey, K. (1997). A visuospatial “phonological loop” in working memory: evidence from American Sign Language. Memory & Cognition, 25(3), 313–320. 10.3758/BF03211287.
112. Wilson, M., & Emmorey, K. (2003). The effect of irrelevant visual input on working memory for sign language. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 8(2), 97–103.
113. Wong, A., Marcus, N., Ayres, P., Smith, L., Cooper, G. A., Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2009). Instructional animations can be superior to statics when learning human motor skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 339–347. 10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.012.