Erratum: Reducing phenolic off-flavors through CRISPR-based gene editing of the FDC1 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae x Saccharomyces eubayanus hybrid lager beer yeasts (PLoS ONE (2019) 14:1(e0209124)DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209124);Reducing phenolic off-flavors through CRISPR-based gene editing of the FDC1 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae x Saccharomyces eubayanus hybrid lager beer yeasts

PLoS ONE

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2019, Pages

  Mertens, Stijn ^a,b   Gallone, Brigida ^a,b,c   Steensels, Jan ^a,b   Herrera Malaver, Beatriz ^a,b   Cortebeek, Jeroen ^a,b   Nolmans, Robbe ^a,b   Saels, Veerle ^a,b   Vyas, Valmik K ^d   Verstrepen, Kevin J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SYSTEMS BIOLOGY   (Belgium)

^c GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^d WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEER; BIODIVERSITY; CLUSTERED REGULARLY INTERSPACED SHORT PALINDROMIC REPEAT; FLAVOR; GENE EDITING; GENE MUTATION; INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION; INTERSPECIFIC HYBRID; NONHUMAN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; MICROBIOLOGY; SACCHAROMYCES;

BEER; BIODIVERSITY; CLUSTERED REGULARLY INTERSPACED SHORT PALINDROMIC REPEATS; GENE EDITING; SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 85059798605     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224525     Document Type: Erratum

References (63)

1. González SS, Barrio E, Gafner J, Querol A. Natural hybrids from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces bayanus and Saccharomyces kudriavzevii in wine fermentations. FEMS Yeast Res. 2006; 6 (8):1221-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1567-1364.2006.00126.x PMID: 17156019
2. Borneman AR, Desany BA, Riches D, Affourtit JP, Forgan AH, Pretorius IS, et al. The genome sequence of the wine yeast VIN7 reveals an allotriploid hybrid genome with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces kudriavzevii origins. FEMS Yeast Res. 2012; 12(1):88-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1567-1364.2011.00773.x PMID: 22136070
3. Rainieri S, Zambonelli C, Kaneko Y. Saccharomyces sensu stricto: systematics, genetic diversity and evolution. J Biosci Bioeng. 2003; 96(1):1-9. PMID: 16233475
4. Boynton PJ, Greig D. The ecology and evolution of non-domesticated Saccharomyces species. Yeast. 2014; 31(12):449-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.3040 PMID: 25242436
5. Dujon BA, Louis EJ. Genome diversity and evolution in the budding yeasts (Saccharomycotina). Genetics. 2017; 206(2):717-50. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.116.199216 PMID: 28592505
6. Gibson B, Liti G. Saccharomyces pastorianus: genomic insights inspiring innovation for industry. Yeast. 2014; 28(28):17-27.
7. Libkind D, Hittinger CT, Valério E, Gonçalves C, Dover J, Johnston M, et al. Microbe domestication and the identification of the wild genetic stock of lager-brewing yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108:14539-44. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1105430108 PMID: 21873232
8. Gibson B, Geertman J-MA, Hittinger CT, Krogerus K, Libkind D, Louis EJ, et al. New yeasts-new brews: modern approaches to brewing yeast design and development. FEMS Yeast Res. 2017; 1-32.
9. Dunn B, Sherlock G. Reconstruction of the genome origins and evolution of the hybrid lager yeast Saccharomyces pastorianus. Genome Res. 2008; 18:1610-23. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.076075.108PMID: 18787083
10. Querol A, Bond U. The complex and dynamic genomes of industrial yeasts. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009; 293(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01480.x PMID: 19175410
11. Christine LJ, Marc L, Catherine D, Claude E, Jean-Luc L, Michel A, et al. Characterization of natural hybrids of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces bayanus var. uvarum. FEMS Yeast Res. 2007; 7(4):540-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1567-1364.2007.00207.x PMID: 17302940
12. González SS, Barrio E, Querol A. Molecular characterization of new natural hybrids of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. kudriavzevii in brewing. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008; 74(8):2314-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01867-07 PMID: 18296532
13. Krogerus K, Preiss R, Gibson B. A Unique Saccharomyces cerevisiae × Saccharomyces uvarum Hybrid Isolated From Norwegian Farmhouse Beer: Characterization and Reconstruction. Front Microbiol. 2018; 9.
14. Steensels J, Snoek T, Meersman E, Nicolino MP, Voordeckers K, Verstrepen KJ. Improving industrial yeast strains: exploiting natural and artificial diversity. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2014; 1-49.
15. Snoek T, Picca Nicolino M, Van Den Bremt S, Mertens S, Saels V, Verplaetse A, et al. Large-scale robot-assisted genome shuffling yields industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeasts with increased ethanol tolerance. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015; 8(1).
16. Steensels J, Meersman E, Snoek T, Saels V, Verstrepen KJ. Large-scale selection and breeding to generate industrial yeasts with superior aroma production. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014; 80(22):6965-75. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02235-14 PMID: 25192996
17. Serra A, Strehaiano P, Taillandier P. Influence of temperature and pH on Saccharomyces bayanus var. uvarum growth; impact of a wine yeast interspecific hybridization on these parameters. Int J Food Microbiol. 2005; 104:257-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.03.006 PMID: 15979182
18. Sebastiani F, Barberio C, Casalone E, Cavalieri D, Polsinelli M. Crosses between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces bayanus generate fertile hybrids. Res Microbiol. 2002; 153:53-8. PMID: 11881899
19. Nikulin J, Krogerus K, Gibson B. Alternative Saccharomyces interspecies hybrid combinations and their potential for low-temperature wort fermentation. Yeast. 2018; 35(1):113-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.3246 PMID: 28755430
20. Krogerus K, Seppänen-Laakso T, Castillo S, Gibson B. Inheritance of brewing-relevant phenotypes in constructed Saccharomyces cerevisiae x Saccharomyces eubayanus hybrids. Microb Cell Fact. BioMed Central; 2017; 16(1):66.
21. Krogerus K, Magalhães F, Vidgren V, Gibson B. New lager yeast strains generated by interspecific hybridization. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015; 42(42):769-78.
22. Magalhães F, Krogerus K, Vidgren V, Sandell M, Gibson B. Improved cider fermentation performance and quality with newly generated Saccharomyces cerevisiae × Saccharomyces eubayanus hybrids. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2017; 44(8):1-11.
23. Mertens S, Steensels J, Saels V, De Rouck G, Aerts G, Verstrepen KJ. A large set of newly created interspecific yeast hybrids increases aromatic diversity in lager beers. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015; 81 (23).
24. Hebly M, Brickwedde A, Bolat I, Driessen MRM, de Hulster E, A. F,, van den Broek M, et al. S. cerevisiae x S. eubayanus interspecific hybrid, the best of both worlds and beyond. FEMS Yeast Res. 2015; 15 (3):fov005.
25. Arroyo-López FN, Orlić S, Querol A, Barrio E. Effects of temperature, pH and sugar concentration on the growth parameters of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, S. kudriavzevii and their interspecific hybrid. Int J Food Microbiol. 2009; 131:120-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.01.035 PMID: 19246112
26. Bellon JR, Eglinton JM, Siebert TE, Pollnitz AP, Rose L, De Barros Lopes M, et al. Newly generated interspecific wine yeast hybrids introduce flavour and aroma diversity to wines. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011; 91:603-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3294-3 PMID: 21538112
27. Steensels J, Verstrepen KJ. Taming Wild Yeast: Potential of Conventional and Nonconventional Yeasts in Industrial Fermentations. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2014; 68(April):61-80.
28. Mukai N, Masaki K, Fujii T, Iefuji H. Single nucleotide polymorphisms of PAD1 and FDC1 show a positive relationship with ferulic acid decarboxylation ability among industrial yeasts used in alcoholic beverage production. J Biosci Bioeng. 2014; 118(1):50-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2013.12.017PMID: 24507903
29. Vanbeneden N, Gils F, Delvaux F, Delvaux FR. Formation of 4-vinyl and 4-ethyl derivatives from hydro-xycinnamic acids: Occurrence of volatile phenolic flavour compounds in beer and distribution of Pad1-activity among brewing yeasts. Food Chem. 2008; 107:221-30.
30. Maclean CJ, Greig D. Prezygotic reproductive isolation between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus. BMC Evol Biol. 2008; 8(1).
31. Alexander WG, Peris D, Pfannenstiel BT, Opulente DA, Kuang M, Hittinger CT. Efficient engineering of marker-free synthetic allotetraploids of Saccharomyces. Fungal Genet Biol. Elsevier Inc.; 2016; 89:10-7.
32. Diderich JA, Weening SM, van den Broek M, Pronk JT, Daran J-MG. Selection of Pof-Saccharomyces eubayanus Variants for the Construction of S. cerevisiae × S. eubayanus Hybrids With Reduced 4-Vinyl Guaiacol Formation. Front Microbiol. 2018; 9:1-17.
33. Mertens S, Steensels J, G. B, V Kevin J. Rapid Screening Method for Phenolic Off-Flavor (POF) Production in Yeast. J Am Soc Brew Chem. 2017; 75(4):318-23.
34. Sander JD, Joung JK. CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes. Nature Biotechnology. 2014.
35. Mans R, van Rossum HM, Wijsman M, Backx A, Kuijpers NGA, van den Broek M, et al. CRISPR/Cas9: A molecular Swiss army knife for simultaneous introduction of multiple genetic modifications in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. Oxford University Press; 2015; 15(2):1-15.
36. Vigentini I, Gebbia M, Belotti A, Foschino R, Roth FP. CRISPR/Cas9 system as a valuable genome editing tool for wine yeasts with application to decrease urea production. Front Microbiol. Frontiers; 2017; 8:2194.
37. Denby CM, Li RA, Vu VT, Costello Z, Lin W, Chan LJG, et al. Industrial brewing yeast engineered for the production of primary flavor determinants in hopped beer. Nat Commun. Nature Publishing Group; 2018; 9(1):965.
38. de Vries ARG, de Groot PA, van den Broek M, Daran JMG. CRISPR-Cas9 mediated gene deletions in lager yeast Saccharomyces pastorianus. Microb Cell Fact. 2017; 16(1):222. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s12934-017-0835-1 PMID: 29207996
39. Pablo Orozco. Argentina and Brazil merge law and science to regulate new breeding techniques-Alliance for Science. 29 January [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2018 Aug 20]. https://allianceforscience.cornell.edu/blog/2018/01/argentina-and-brazil-merge-law-and-science-to-regulate-new-breeding-techniques/.
40. Waltz E. Gene-edited CRISPR mushroom escapes US regulation. Nature. 2016; 532(7599):293-293. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2016.19754 PMID: 27111611
41. Ishii T, Araki M. A future scenario of the global regulatory landscape regarding genome-edited crops. GM Crops Food. 2017; 8(1):44-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2016.1261787 PMID: 27960622
42. Gallone B, Steensels J, Prahl T, Soriaga L, Saels V, Herrera-Malaver B, et al. Domestication and Divergence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Beer Yeasts. Cell. 2016; 166(6):1397-1410.e16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.020 PMID: 27610566
43. Rodríguez ME, Pérez-Través L, Sangorrín MP, Barrio E, Lopes CA. Saccharomyces eubayanus and Saccharomyces uvarum associated with the fermentation of Araucaria araucana seeds in Patagonia. FEMS Yeast Res. Oxford University Press; 2014; 14(6):948-65.
44. Baker Brachmann C, Davies A, Cost GJ, Caputo E, Li J, Hieter P, et al. Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: A useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast. 1998; 14(2):115-32. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)10970061(19980130)14:2<115::AID-YEA204>3.0.CO;2-2 PMID: 9483801
45. Vyas VK, Barrasa MI, Fink GR. A Candida albicans CRISPR system permits genetic engineering of essential genes and gene families. Sci Adv. American Association for the Advancement of Science; 2015; 1(3):e1500248-e1500248.
46. Vyas VK, Bushkin GG, Bernstein DA, Getz MA, Sewastianik M, Barrasa MI, et al. New CRISPR mutagenesis strategies reveal variation in repair mechanisms among fungi. Msph (in Press). 2018; 1-24.
47. Sikorski RS, Hieter P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989; 122(1):19-27. PMID: 2659436
48. Team R. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. 2013, posting date [Internet]. [cited 2014 Jan 1]. http://www.r-project.org/.
49. Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P, Heiberger RM, Schuetzenmeister A, Scheibe S. multcomp: simultaneous inference in general parametric models. R package version 1.4-8. Vienna, Austria; 2013.
50. Wickham H, Winson C. ggplot2: An implementation of the Grammar of Graphics." R package version 2.2.1. 2008.
51. Bhuiya MW, Lee SG, Jez JM, Yu O. Structure and mechanism of ferulic acid decarboxylase (FDC1) from saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. American Society for Microbiology; 2015; 81 (12):4216-23.
52. Waterhouse AM, Procter JB, Martin DMA, Clamp M and Barton GJ. Jalview Version 2-a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25(9) 1189-1191. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033 PMID: 19151095
53. Baker E, Wang B, Bellora N, Peris D, Hulfachor AB, Koshalek J et al. The Genome Sequence of Saccharomyces eubayanus and the Domestication of Lager-Brewing Yeasts. Mol Biol Evol. 2015; 32:2818-2831. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msv168 PMID: 26269586
54. Jakočinas T, Bonde I, Herrgård M, Harrison SJ, Kristensen M, Pedersen LE, et al. Multiplex metabolic pathway engineering using CRISPR/Cas9 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng. 2015; 28:213-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2015.01.008 PMID: 25638686
55. Piotrowski JS, Nagarajan S, Kroll E, Stanbery A, Chiotti KE, Kruckeberg AL, et al. Different selective pressures lead to different genomic outcomes as newly-formed hybrid yeasts evolve. BMC Evol Biol. BioMed Central Ltd; 2012; 12(1):1-46.
56. Lopandic K. Saccharomyces interspecies hybrids as model organisms for studying yeast adaptation to stressful environments. Yeast. Wiley-Blackwell; 2018; 35(1):21-38.
57. Colen L, Swinnen J. Economic Growth, Globalisation and Beer Consumption. J Agric Econ. Wiley/ Blackwell (10.1111); 2016; 67(1):186-207.
58. Edenbrandt AK, House LA, Gao Z, Olmstead M, Gray D. Consumer acceptance of cisgenic food and the impact of information and status quo. Food Qual Prefer. Elsevier; 2018; 69:44-52.
59. Stovicek V, Holkenbrink C, Borodina I. CRISPR/Cas system for yeast genome engineering: advances and applications. FEMS Yeast Res. Oxford University Press; 2017; 17(5).
60. de Vries ARG , Couwenberg LGF, Broek M van den, la Torre Cortes P de, ter Horst J , Pronk JT, et al. Allele-specific genome editing using CRISPR-Cas9 causes off-target mutations in diploid yeast. bioR-xiv. 2018.
61. DiCarlo JE, Chavez A, Dietz SL, Esvelt KM, Church GM. Safeguarding CRISPR-Cas9 gene drives in yeast. Nat Biotechnol. Nature Publishing Group; 2015; 33(12):1250-5.
62. Liti G, Louis EJ. Advances in Quantitative Trait Analysis in Yeast. PLoS Genet. Public Library of Science; 2012; 8(8):e1002912.
63. Muir A, Harrison E, Wheals A. A multiplex set of species-specific primers for rapid identification of members of the genus Saccharomyces. FEMS Yeast Res. 2011; 11:552-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.15671364.2011.00745.x PMID: 22093682