Different selective pressures lead to different genomic outcomes as newly-formed hybrid yeasts evolve

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Piotrowski, Jeff S ^a,c   Nagarajan, Saisubramanian ^b,c   Kroll, Evgueny ^c   Stanbery, Alison ^c   Chiotti, Kami E ^c   Kruckeberg, Arthur L ^d   Dunn, Barbara ^e   Sherlock, Gavin ^e   Rosenzweig, Frank ^c  

^a RIKEN   (Japan)

^b SASTRA UNIVERSITY   (India)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

^d DUPONT COMPANY   (United States)

^e STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EUKARYOTE; GENOMICS; HYBRID; HYBRIDIZATION; INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTION; POLYPLOIDY; POPULATION STRUCTURE; SELECTION; YEAST;

EUKARYOTA; SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES UVARUM;

ALCOHOL;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; FUNGAL GENOME; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; HYBRIDIZATION; KARYOTYPE; POPULATION DENSITY; SACCHAROMYCES; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TEMPERATURE;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; ETHANOL; GENOME, FUNGAL; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; KARYOTYPE; POPULATION DENSITY; SACCHAROMYCES; SELECTION, GENETIC; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 84859133877     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712148     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-46     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Gompert Z, Fordyce JA, Forister ML, Shapiro AM, Nice CC: Homoploid hybrid speciation in an extreme habitat. Science 2006, 314:1923-1925.
2. Mallet J: Hybrid speciation. Nature 2007, 446:279-283.
3. Mercer KL, Andow DA, Wyse DL, Shaw RG: Stress and domestication traits increase the relative fitness of crop-wild hybrids in sunflower. Ecol Lett 2007, 10:383-393.
4. Sexton JP, McIntyre PJ, Angert AL, Rice KJ: Evolution and ecology of species range limits. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Systemat 2009, 40:415-436.
5. Gross BL, Rieseberg LH: The ecological genetics of homoploid hybrid speciation. J Hered 2005, 96:241-252.
6. Meyer A, Salzburger W, Schartl M: Hybrid origin of a swordtail species (Teleostei: Xiphophorus clemenciae) driven by sexual selection. Mol Ecol 2006, 15:721-730.
7. Rieseberg LH, Raymond O, Rosenthal DM, Lai Z, Livingstone K, Nakazato T, Durphy JL, Schwarzbach AE, Donovan LA, Lexer C: Major ecological transitions in wild sunflowers facilitated by hybridization. Science 2003, 301:1211-1216.
8. Nolte AW, Tautz D: Understanding the onset of hybrid speciation. Trends Genet 2010, 26:54-58.
9. East EM: Heterosis. Genetics 1936, 21:375-397.
10. Darwin C: The effects of cross and self fertilisation in the vegetable kingdom. J. Murray; 1900.
11. Coyne JA, Orr HA: Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 1989, 43:362-381.
12. Alipaz JA, Fang S, Osada N, Wu C: Evolution of sexual isolation during secondary contact: genotypic versus phenotypic changes in laboratory populations. Am Nat 2005, 165:420-428.
13. Alipaz JA, Karr TL, Wu C-I: Evolution of sexual isolation in laboratory populations: fitness differences between mating types and the associated hybrid incompatibilities. Am Nat 2005, 165:429-438.
14. Lenski RE, Rose MR, Simpson SC, Tadler SC: Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. I. adaptation and divergence during 2,000 generations. Am Nat 1991, 138:1315-1341.
15. Travisano M, Mongold J, Bennett A, Lenski R: Experimental tests of the roles of adaptation, chance, and history in evolution. Science 1995, 267:87-90.
16. Paquin CE, Adams J: Relative fitness can decrease in evolving asexual populations of S. cerevisiae. Nature 1983, 306:368-371.
17. Stelkens R, Seehausen O: Genetic distance between species predicts novel trait expression in their hybrids. Evolution 2009, 63:884-897.
18. Kvitek DJ, Will JL, Gasch AP: Variations in stress sensitivity and genomic expression in diverse S. cerevisiae isolates. PLoS Genet 2008, 4: e1000223.
19. Ferea TL, Botstein D, Brown PO, Rosenzweig RF: Systematic changes in gene expression patterns following adaptive evolution in yeast. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1999, 96:9721-9726.
20. Zeyl C: Capturing the adaptive mutation in yeast. Res Microbiol 2004, 155:217-223.
21. Liti G, Louis EJ: Yeast evolution and comparative genomics. Ann Rev Microbiol 2005, 59:135-153.
22. Wenger JW, Piotrowski J, Nagarajan S, Chiotti K, Sherlock G, Rosenzweig F: Hunger artists: yeast adapted to carbon limitation show trade-offs under carbon sufficiency. PLoS Genet 2011, 7:e1002202.
23. Dunham MJ, Badrane H, Ferea T, Adams J, Brown PO, Rosenzweig F, Botstein D: Characteristic genome rearrangements in experimental evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2002, 99:16144-16149.
24. Gresham D, Desai MM, Tucker CM, Jenq HT, Pai DA, Ward A, DeSevo CG, Botstein D, Dunham MJ, Snyder M: The repertoire and dynamics of evolutionary adaptations to controlled nutrient-limited environments in yeast. PLoS Genet 2008, 4:e1000303.
25. Greig D, Travisano M, Louis EJ, Borts RH: A role for the mismatch repair system during incipient speciation in Saccharomyces. J Evol Biol 2003, 16:429-437.
26. Libkind D, Hittinger CT, Valério E, Gonçalves C, Dover J, Johnston M, Gonçalves P, Sampaio JP: Microbe domestication and the identification of the wild genetic stock of lager-brewing yeast. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2011, 108:14539-14544.
27. Kuehne HA, Murphy HA, Francis CA, Sniegowski PD: Allopatric divergence, secondary contact, and genetic isolation in wild yeast populations. Curr Biol 2007, 17:407-411.
28. Dujon B, Sherman D, Fischer G, Durrens P, Casaregola S, Lafontaine I, de Montigny J, Marck C, Neuveglise C, Talla E, Goffard N, Frangeul L, Aigle M, Anthouard V, Babour A, Barbe V, Barnay S, Blanchin S, Beckerich J-M, Beyne E, Bleykasten C, Boisrame A, Boyer J, Cattolico L, Confanioleri F, de Daruvar A, Despons L, Fabre E, Fairhead C, Ferry-Dumazet H, Groppi A, Hantraye F, Hennequin C, Jauniaux N, Joyet P, Kachouri R, Kerrest A, Koszul R, Lemaire M, Lesur I, Ma L, Muller H, Nicaud J-M, Nikolski M, Oztas S, Ozier- Kalogeropoulos O, Pellenz S, Potier S, Richard G-F, Straub M-L, Suleau A, Swennen D, Tekaia F, Wesolowski-Louvel M, Westhof E, Wirth B, Zeniou-Meyer M, Zivanovic I, Bolotin-Fukuhara M, Thierry A, Bouchier C, Caudron B, Scarpelli C, Gaillardin C, Weissenbach J, Wincker P, Souciet J-L: Genome evolution in yeasts. Nature 2004, 430:35-44.
29. Wolfe KH: Comparative genomics and genome evolution in yeasts. Philos Trans Roy Soc B 2006, 361:403-412.
30. Dunn B, Sherlock G: Reconstruction of the genome origins and evolution of the hybrid lager yeast Saccharomyces pastorianus. Genome Res 2008, 18:1610-1623.
31. Bulter T, Alcalde M, Sieber V, Meinhold P, Schlachtbauer C, Arnold FH: Functional expression of a fungal laccase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by directed evolution. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003, 69:987-995.
32. Edgardo A, Carolina P, Manuel R, Juanita F, Baeza J: Selection of thermotolerant yeast strains Saccharomyces cerevisiae for bioethanol production. Enzy Microb Technol 2008, 43:120-123.
33. Greig D, Louis EJ, Borts RH, Travisano M: Hybrid speciation in experimental populations of yeast. Science 2002, 298:1773-1775.
34. Kellis M, Patterson N, Endrizzi M, Birren B, Lander ES: Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements. Nature 2003, 423:241-254.
35. Rainieri S, Zambonelli C, Giudici P, Castellari L: Characterisation of thermotolerant Saccharomyces cerevisiae hybrids. Biotechnol Lett 1998, 20:543-547.
36. Salvadó Z, Arroyo-López FN, Guillamón JM, Salazar G, Querol A, Barrio E: Temperature adaptation markedly determines evolution within the genus Saccharomyces. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011, 77:2292-2302.
37. Piper PW: The heat shock and ethanol stress responses of yeast exhibit extensive similarity and functional overlap. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1995, 134:121-127.
38. Arroyo-López FN, Salvadó Z, Tronchoni J, Guillamón JM, Barrio E, Querol A: Susceptibility and resistance to ethanol in Saccharomyces strains isolated from wild and fermentative environments. Yeast 2010, 27:1005-1015.
39. Belloch C, Orlic S, Barrio E, Querol A: Fermentative stress adaptation of hybrids within the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex. Intl J Food Microbiol 2008, 122:188-195.
40. Vitousek P, Howarth R: Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea: how can it occur? Biogeochem 1991, 13: 87-115.
41. Goddard MR, Bradford MA: The adaptive response of a natural microbial population to carbon- and nitrogen-limitation. Ecol Lett 2003, 6:594-598.
42. Forche A, Abbey D, Pisithkul T, Weinzierl MA, Ringstrom T, Bruck D, Petersen K, Berman J: Stress alters rates and types of loss of heterozygosity in Candida albicans. mBio July, 2: e00129-11.
43. Trollmo C, André L, Blomberg A, Adler L: Physiological overlap between osmotolerance and thermotolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1988, 56:321-325.
44. van Dijken JP, Bauer J, Brambilla L, Duboc P, Francois JM, Gancedo C, Giuseppin MLF, Heijnen JJ, Hoare M, Lange HC, Madden EA, Niederberger P, Nielsen J, Parrou JL, Petit T, Porro D, Reuss M, van Riel N, Rizzi M, Steensma HY, Verrips CT, Vindeløv J, Pronk JT: An interlaboratory comparison of physiological and genetic properties of four Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Enzy Microb Technol 2000, 26:706-714.
45. Godfrey MH: Hybrid zones-natural laboratories for evolutionary studies. Trends Ecol Evol 1988, 3:158-167.
46. Schulze U, Lidén G, Nielsen J, Villadsen J: Physiological effects of nitrogen starvation in an anaerobic batch culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology 1996, 142:2299-2310.
47. Thomsson E, Gustafsson L, Larsson C: Starvation response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae grown in anaerobic nitrogen- or carbon-limited chemostat cultures. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005, 71:3007-3013.
48. Allen C, Büttner S, Aragon AD, Thomas JA, Meirelles O, Jaetao JE, Benn D, Ruby SW, Veenhuis M, Madeo F, Werner-Washburne M: Isolation of quiescent and nonquiescent cells from yeast stationary-phase cultures. J Cell Biol 2006, 174:89-100.
49. Piper P: Induction of heat shock proteins and thermotolerance. In Yeast Protocols. New Jersey: Humana Press; 1996, 53:313-318.
50. Piper PW: Molecular events associated with acquisition of heat tolerance by the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Rev 1993, 11:339-355.
51. Aguilar-Uscanga B, François JM: A study of the yeast cell wall composition and structure in response to growth conditions and mode of cultivation. Lett Appl Microbiol 2003, 37:268-274.
52. Lesage G, Bussey H: Cell wall assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2006, 70:317-343.
53. Ovalle R, Lim ST, Holder B, Jue CK, Moore CW, Lipke PN: A spheroplast rate assay for determination of cell wall integrity in yeast. Yeast 1998, 14:1159-1166.
54. Denning DW: Echinocandins: a new class of antifungal. J Antimicrob Chemother 2002, 49:889-891.
55. Steinmetz LM, Sinha H, Richards DR, Spiegelman JI, Oefner PJ, McCusker JH, Davis RW: Dissecting the architecture of a quantitative trait locus in yeast. Nature 2002, 416:326-330.
56. Piper PW, Davies MW, Curran B, Lockheart A, Spalding A, Tuite MF: The influence of cell ploidy on the thermotolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 1987, 11:595-598.
57. Mable BK: Ploidy evolution in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a test of the nutrient limitation hypothesis. J Evol Biol 2001, 14:157-170.
58. Schmelzle T, Helliwell SB, Hall MN: Yeast protein kinases and the RHO1 exchange factor TUS1 are novel components of the cell integrity pathway in yeast. Mol Cell Biol 2002, 22:1329-1339.
59. Lesage G, Shapiro J, Specht CA, Sdicu A-M, Menard P, Hussein S, Tong AHY, Boone C, Bussey H: An interactional network of genes involved in chitin synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Genet 2005, 6:8.
60. Alabrudzinska M, Skoneczny M, Skoneczna A: Dipoid-specific genome stability genes of S. cerevisiae: genomic screen reveals haploidization as an escape from persisting DNA rearrangement stress. PLoS One 2011, 6:e21124.
61. Yazawa H, Iwahashi H, Uemura H: Disruption of URA7 and GAL6 improves the ethanol tolerance and fermentation capacity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 2007, 24:551-560.
62. Anderson MJ, Barker SL, Boone C, Measday V: Identification of RCN1 and RSA3 as ethanol-tolerant genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using a high copy barcoded library. FEMS Yeast Res 2012, 12:48-60.
63. Verna J, Lodder A, Lee K, Vagts A, Ballester R: A family of genes required for maintenance of cell wall integrity and for the stress response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1997, 94:13804-13809.
64. Li L, Ye Y, Pan L, Zhu Y, Zheng S, Lin Y: The induction of trehalose and glycerol in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to various stresses. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 2009, 387:778-783
65. Van Dijck P, Colavizza D, Smet P, Thevelein J: Differential importance of trehalose in stress resistance in fermenting and nonfermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. Appl Environ Microbiol 1995, 61:109-115.
66. Jimenez J, Benitez T: Selection of ethanol-tolerant yeast hybrids in pH-regulated continuous culture. Appl Environ Microbiol 1988, 54:917-922.
67. Stephanopoulos G: Metabolic engineering by genome shuffling. Nat Biotech 2002, 20:666-668.
68. D-jian S, C-lu W, K-ming W: Genome shuffling to improve thermotolerance, ethanol tolerance and ethanol productivity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2008, 36:139-147.
69. Verduyn C, Postma E, Scheffers WA, Van Dijken JP: Effect of benzoic acid on metabolic fluxes in yeasts: a continuous-culture study on the regulation of respiration and alcoholic fermentation. Yeast 1992, 8:501-517.
70. Chu G, Vollrath D, Davis RW: Separation of large DNA molecules by contourclamped homogeneous electric fields. Science 1986, 234:1582-1585.
71. Carle GF, Olson MV: An electrophoretic karyotype for yeast. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1985, 82:3756-3760.
72. Haase SB, Reed SI: Improved flow cytometric analysis of the budding yeast cell cycle. Cell Cycle 2002, 1:132-136.