Delaying judgments of learning affects memory, not metamemory

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 918-929

  Kimball, Daniel R ^a,b   Metcalfe, Janet ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; RANDOMIZATION; REACTION TIME; RECALL; THEORY; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 0242330761     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196445     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. ALLEN, G. W., MAHLER, W. A., & ESTES, W. K. (1969). Effects of recall tests on long-term retention of paired associates. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 8, 463-470.
2. BEGG, I., DUFT, S., LALONDE, P., MELNICK, R., & SANVITO, J. (1989). Memory predictions are based on ease of processing. Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 610-632.
3. BENJAMIN, A. S., BJORK, R. A., & SCHWARTZ, B. L. (1998). The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamemory index. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 55-68.
4. BOWER, G., & WINCHESTER, P. (1970). Metamemory judgments. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
5. CROWDER, R. G. (1976). Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. DUNLOSKY, J., & NELSON, T. O. (1992). Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect. Memory & Cognition, 20, 374-380.
7. DUNLOSKY, J., & NELSON, T. O. (1994). Does the sensitivity of judgments of learning (JOLs) to the effects of various study activities depend on when the JOLs occur? Journal of Memory & Language, 33, 545-565.
8. DUNLOSKY, J., & NELSON, T. O. (1997). Similarity between the cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the cue for test is not the primary determinant of JOL accuracy. Journal of Memory & Language, 36, 34-49.
9. GLENBERG, A. M. (1979). Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition. Memory & Cognition, 7, 95-112.
10. GLENBERG, A. M., SANOCKI, T., EPSTEIN, W., & MORRIS, C. (1987). Enhancing calibration of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 119-136.
11. GREENE, R. L. (1989). Spacing effects in memory: Evidence for a two-process account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 15, 371-377.
12. HINTZMAN, D. L. (1974). Theoretical implications of the spacing effect. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Theories in cognitive psychology: The Loyola symposium (pp. 77-99). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. HINTZMAN, D. L. (1976). Repetition and memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 11, pp. 47-91). New York: Academic Press.
14. KELEMEN, W. L., & WEAVER, C. A., III (1997). Enhanced metamemory at delays: Why do judgments of learning improve over time? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 1394-1409.
15. KELLEY, C. M., & LINDSAY, D. S. (1993). Remembering mistaken for knowing: Ease of retrieval as a basis for confidence in answers to general knowledge questions. Journal of Memory & Language, 32, 1-24.
16. KORIAT, A. (1993). How do we know what we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 100, 609-639.
17. KORIAT, A. (1997). Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349-370.
18. MAZZONI, G., & NELSON, T. (1995). Judgments of learning are affected by the kind of encoding in ways that cannot be attributed to the level of recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1263-1274.
19. METCALFE, J. (2002). Is study time allocated selectively to a region of proximal learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 349-363.
20. METCALFE, J., SCHWARTZ, B. L., & JOAQUIM, S. G. (1993). The cue familiarity heuristic in metacognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 851-861.
21. NELSON, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 109-133.
22. NELSON, T. O., & DUNLOSKY, J. (1991). When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: The "delayed-JOL effect." Psychological Science, 2, 267-270.
23. NELSON, T. O., & DUNLOSKY, J. (1992). How shall we explain the delayed-judgment-of-learning effect? Psychological Science, 3, 317-318.
24. NELSON, T. O., DUNLOSKY, J., GRAF, A., & NARENS, L. (1994). Utilization of metacognitive judgments in the allocation of study during multitrial learning. Psychological Science, 5, 207-213.
25. NELSON, T. O., & NARENS, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 26, pp. 125-173). New York: Academic Press.
26. RABINOWITZ, J. C., ACKERMAN, B. P., CRAIK, F. I. M., & HINCHLEY, J. L. (1982). Aging and metamemory: The roles of relatedness and imagery. Journal of Gerontology, 37, 688-695.
27. SON, L. K., & METCALFE, J. (2000). Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 204-221.
28. SPELLMAN, B. A., & BJORK, R. A. (1992). When predictions create reality: Judgments of learning may alter what they are intended to assess. Psychological Science, 3, 315-316.
29. VESONDER, G. T., & VOSS, J. F. (1985). On the ability to predict one's own responses while learning. Journal of Memory & Language, 24, 363-376.
30. WEAVER, C. A., III, & KELEMEN, W. L. (1997). Judgments of learning at delays: Shifts in response patterns or increased metamemory accuracy? Psychological Science, 8, 318-321.
31. WHITTEN, W. B., & BJORK, R. A. (1977). Learning from tests: Effects of spacing. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 16, 465-478.