The alignment of written peer feedback with draft problems and its impact on revision in peer assessment

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2019, Pages 294-308

  Gao, Ying ^a,b   Schunn, Christian Dieter D ^b   Yu, Qiuying ^a,b  

^a NORTHEAST NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

literature review writing; peer comments; Problems in writing; repair rates

Indexed keywords

EID: 85053937879     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1499075     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Allen, D., and A., Mills. 2016. “The Impact of Second Language Proficiency in Dyadic Peer Feedback.” Language Teaching Research 20 (4): 498–513
2. Barstow, B., L., Fazio, C. D., Schunn, and K., Ashley. 2017. “Experimental Evidence for Diagramming Benefits in Science Writing.” Instructional Science 45 (3): 1–20
3. Berggren, J. 2015. “Learning from Giving Feedback: A Study of Secondary-Level Students.” ELT Journal 69 (1): 58–70
4. Boud, D., and E., Molloy. 2013. “Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (6): 698–712
5. Bruffee, K. A. 1980. A Short Course in Writing. Practical Rhetoric for Composition Courses, Writing Workshops, and Tutor Training Programs. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company
6. Chang, C. 2016. “Two Decades of Research in L2 Peer Review.” Journal of Writing Research 8 (1): 81–117
7. Chen, C. W. 2010. “Graduate Students’ Self-Reported Perspectives Regarding Peer Feedback and Feedback from Writing Consultants.” Asia Pacific Education Review 11 (2): 151–158
8. Cho, K., and C. D., Schunn. 2007. “Scaffolded Writing and Rewriting in the Discipline: A Web-Based Reciprocal Peer Review System.” Computers and Education 48 (3): 409–426
9. Cho, Y. H., and K., Cho. 2011. “Peer Reviewers Learn from Giving Comment.” Instructional Science 39 (5): 629–643
10. Chong, I. 2017. “How Students’ Ability Levels Influence the Relevance and Accuracy of Their Feedback to Peers: A Case Study.” Assessing Writing 31: 13–23
11. Cote, R. A. 2014. “Peer Feedback in Anonymous Peer Review in an EFL Writing Class in Spain.” Gist Education and Learning Research Journal 9: 67–87
12. Flower, L., J. R., Hayes, L., Carey, K., Schriver, and J., Stratman. 1986. “Detection, Diagnosis, and the Strategies of Revision.” College Composition and Communication 37 (1): 16–55
13. Flowerdew, J. 2000. “Discourse Community, Legitimate Peripheral Participation, and the Nonnative-English-Speaking Scholar.” TESOL Quarterly 34 (1): 127–150
14. Partnerships for 21st Century Learning. 2016. Framework for 21st Century Learning. http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/docs/P21_framework_0816.pdf
15. Gao, Y., F. Zhang, S. Zhang, and C. D. Schunn. 2018. “ Effects of Receiving Peer Feedback in English Writing: A Study Based on Peerceptiv.” Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education 180 (2): 3 – 9, 67
16. Hayes, J. R., L., Flower, K. A., Schriver, J. F., Stratman, and L., Carey. 1987. “Cognitive Processes in Revision.” In Advances in Applied Psycholinguistics. Vol. 2 of Reading, Writing, and Language Learning, edited by S., Rosenberg, 176–240. New York: Cambridge University Press
17. Hinkel, E. 1997. “Indirectness in L1 and L2 Academic Writing.” Journal of Pragmatics 27 (3): 361–386
18. Hu, G. 2005. “Using Peer Review with Chinese ESL Student Writers.” Language Teaching Research 9 (3): 321–342
19. Hu, G., and S. T. E., Lam. 2010. “Issues of Cultural Appropriateness and Pedagogical Efficacy: Exploring Peer Review in a Second Language Writing Class.” Instructional Science 38 (4): 371–394
20. Huisman, B., N., Saab, J., Driel, and P., Broek. 2018. “Peer Feedback on Academic Writing: Undergraduate Students’ Peer Feedback Role, Peer Feedback Perceptions and Essay Performance.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (6): 955–968. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1424318
21. Hyland, K., and F., Hyland. 2006. “Feedback on Second Language Students’ Writing.” Language Teaching 39 (2): 83–101
22. Kwan, B. S. C. 2006. “The Schematic Structure of Literature Reviews in Doctoral Theses of Applied Linguistics.” English for Specific Purposes 25 (1): 30–55
23. Li, H., Y., Xiong, X., Zang, M., L. Kornhaber, Y., Lyu, K. S., Chung, and H., K. Suen. 2016. “Peer Assessment in the Digital Age: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher ratings.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (2): 245–264
24. Liu, J., and J., Hansen. 2002. Peer Response in Second Language Writing Classroom. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press
25. Liu, N. F., and D., Carless. 2006. “Peer Feedback: The Learning Element of Peer Assessment.” Teaching in Higher Education 11 (3): 279–290
26. Lundstrom, K., and W., Baker. 2009. “To Give Is Better than to Receive: The Benefits of Peer Review to the Reviewer’s Own Writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing 18 (1): 30–43
27. Min, H. T. 2005. “Training Students to Become Successful Peer Reviewers.” System 33 (2): 293–308
28. Min, H. T. 2008. “Reviewer Stances and Writer Perceptions in EFL Peer Review Training.” English for Specific Purposes 27 (3): 285–305
29. Nelson, G. L., and J. M., Murphy. 1993. “Peer Response Groups: Do L2 Writers Use Peer Comments in Revising Their Drafts?” TESOL Quarterly 27 (1): 135–141
30. Nelson, M. M., and C. D., Schunn. 2009. “The Nature of Feedback: How Different Types of Peer Feedback Affect Writing Performance.” Instructional Science 37 (4): 375–401
31. Nussbaum, E. M., and G., Schraw. 2007. “Promoting Argument-Counterargument Integration in Students’ Writing.” The Journal of Experimental Education 76 (1): 59–92
32. Patchan, M. M., D., Charney, and C. D., Schunn. 2009. “A Validation Study of Students’ End Comments: Comparing Comments by Students, a Writing Instructor, and a Content Instructor.” Journal of Writing Research 1 (2): 124–152
33. Patchan, M. M., B., Hawk, C. A., Stevens, and C. D., Schunn. 2013. “The Effects of Skill Diversity on Commenting and Revision.” Instructional Science 41 (2): 381–405
34. Patchan, M. M., and C. D., Schunn. 2015. “Understanding the Benefits of Providing Peer Feedback: How Students Respond to Peers’ Texts of Varying Quality.” Instructional Science 43 (5): 591–614
35. Patchan, M. M., and C. D., Schunn. 2016. “Understanding the Effects of Receiving Peer Feedback for Text Revision: Relations Between Author and Reviewer Ability.” Journal of Writing Research 8 (2): 227–265
36. Paulus, T. M. 1999. “The Effect of Peer and Teacher Feedback on Student Writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing 8 (3): 265–289
37. Rahimi, M. 2013. “Is Training Students’ Reviewers Worth Its While? A Study of How Training Influences the Quality of Students’ Feedback and Writing.” Language Teaching Research 17 (1): 67–89
38. Ruegg, R. 2015. “The Relative Effects of Peer and Teacher Feedback on Improvement in EFL Students’ Writing Ability.” Linguistics and Education 29: 73–82
39. Schiefele, U. 1999. “Interest and Learning from Text.” Scientific Studies of Reading 3 (3): 257–279
40. Schunn, C. D. 2016. “Writing to Learn and Learning to Write through SWoRD.” In Adaptive Educational Technologies for Literacy Instruction, edited by S. A., Crossley and D. S., McNamara. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis
41. Schwarz, B. B., Y., Neuman, J., Gil, and M., Ilya. 2003. “Construction of Collective and Individual Knowledge in Argumentative Activity.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 12 (2): 219–256
42. Swales, J. M. 2004. Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press
43. Swales, J. M. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press
44. Tsui, A. B. M., and M., Ng. 2000. “Do Secondary L2 Writers Benefit from Peer Comments?” Journal of Second Language Writing 9 (2): 147–170
45. Tuzi, F. 2004. “The Impact of e-Feedback on the Revisions of L2 Writers in an Academic Writing Course.” Computers and Composition 21 (2): 217–235
46. Villamil, O. S., and M., De Guerrero. 2006. “Socio-Cultural Theory: A Framework for Understanding the Socio-Cognitive Dimensions of Peer Feedback.” In Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues, edited by K., Hyland and F., Hyland, 23–42. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press
47. Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
48. Walker, M. 2015. “The Quality of Written Peer Feedback on Undergraduates’ Draft Answers to an Assignment, and the Use Made of the Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 40 (2): 232–247
49. Wallace, D. L., and J. R., Hayes. 1991. “Redefining Revision for Freshmen.” Research in the Teaching of English 25 (1): 54–66
50. Yang, M., R., Badger, and Z., Yu. 2006. “A Comparative Study of Peer and Teacher Feedback in a Chinese EFL Writing Class.” Journal of Second Language Writing 15 (3): 179–200
51. Yang, M., and D., Carless. 2013. “The Feedback Triangle and the Enhancement of Dialogic Feedback Processes.” Teaching in Higher Education 18 (3): 285–297
52. Yu, S., and G., Hu. 2016. “Can Higher-Proficiency L2 Learners Benefit from Working with Lower-Proficiency Partners in Peer Feedback?” Teaching in Higher Education 22 (2): 178–192
53. Yu, S., and I., Lee. 2016. “Peer Feedback in Second Language Writing (2005–2014).” Language Teaching 49 (4): 461–493
54. Zhao, H. 2010. “Investigating Learners’ Use and Understanding of Peer and Teacher Feedback on Writing: A Comparative Study in a Chinese English Writing Classroom.” Assessing Writing 15 (1): 3–17
55. Zhao, H. 2014. “Investigating Teacher-Supported Peer Assessment for EFL Writing.” ELT Journal 68 (2): 155–168
56. Zheng, C. 2012. “Understanding the Learning Process of Peer Feedback Activity: An Ethnographic Study of Exploratory Practice.” Language Teaching Research 16 (1): 109–126
57. Zou, Y, C. D., Schunn, Y., Wang and F., Zhang. 2018. “Student Attitudes That Predict Participation in Peer Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (5): 800–811