The effects of skill diversity on commenting and revisions

Instructional Science

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 381-405

  Patchan, Melissa M ^a   Hawk, Brandi ^a   Stevens, Christopher A ^b   Schunn, Christian D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Feedback; Grouping students; Peer assessment; Peer review; Revisions; Skill diversity; Written composition

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873734839     PISSN: 00204277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11251-012-9236-3     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Bok, D. (2006). Our underachieving colleges: A candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning more. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3. Cho, Y., & Cho, K. (2011). Peer reviewers learn from giving comments. Instructional Science, 39(5), 629-643.
4. Cho, K., Chung, T. R., King, W. R., & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Peer-based computer-supported knowledge refinement: An empirical investigation. Communications of the ACM, 51(3), 83-88.
5. Cho, K., & Schunn, C. D. (2007). Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system. Computers & Education, 48(3), 409-426.
6. Cobb, K. L. (1999). Interactive videodisc instruction with undergraduate nursing students using cooperative learning strategies. Computers in Nursing, 17(2), 89-96.
7. Cohen, P. A., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C.-L. C. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19(2), 237-248.
8. Day, E. A., Arthur, W., Bell, S. T., Edwards, B. D., Bennett, W., Mendoza, J. L., et al. (2005). Ability-based pairing strategies in the team-based training of a complex skill: Does the intelligence of your training partner matter? Intelligence, 33(1), 39-65.
9. De Lisi, R., & Golbeck, S. L. (1999). Implications of Piagetian theory for peer learning. In A. M. O'Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 3-37). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Goethals, G. R. (2001). Peer effects, gender, and intellectual performance among students at a highly selective college: A social comparison of abilities analysis. Discussion Paper. Document Number.
11. Goethals, G. R. (2002). Social comparison and peer effects at an elite college. Discussion Paper, Document Number.
12. Gouli, E., Gogoulou, A., & Grigoriadou, M. (2008). Supporting self-, peer-, and collaborative-assessment in e-learning: The case of PEer and Collaborative ASSessment Environment (PECASSE). Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19(4), 615-647.
13. Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 741-763.
14. Lin, S. S., Liu, E. Z., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Web-based peer assessment: Feedback for students with various thinking-styles. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(4), 420-432.
15. Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., Spence, J. C., Poulsen, C., Chambers, B., & d'Apollonia, S. (1996). Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 423-458.
16. Miller, G., & Polito, T. (1999). The effect of cooperative learning team compositions on selected learner outcomes. Journal of Agricultural Education, 40(1), 66-73.
17. Moshman, M., & Geil, D. (1998). Collaborative reasoning: Evidence for collective rationality. Thinking & Reasoning, 4(3), 231-248.
18. Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instructional Science, 37(4), 375-401.
19. Patchan, M. M., Charney, D., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). A validation study of students' end comments: Comparing comments by students, a writing instructor, and a content instructor. Journal of Writing Research, 1(2), 124-152.
20. Roscoe, R. D., & Chi, M. T. H. (2007). Understanding tutor learning: Knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors' explanations and questions. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 534-574.
21. Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276.
22. Topping, K. J. (2005). Trends in peer learning. Educational Psychology, 25(6), 631-645.
23. Topping, K. J., & Ehly, S. (1998). Peer-assisted learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Tutty, J. I., & Klein, J. D. (2008). Computer-mediated instruction: A comparison of online and face-to-face collaboration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(2), 101-124.
25. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26. Wallace, D. L., & Hayes, J. R. (1991). Redefining revision for freshmen. Research in the Teaching of English, 25(1), 54-66.
27. Watson, S. B., & Marshall, J. E. (1995). Effects of cooperative incentives and heterogeneous arrangement on achievement and interaction of cooperative learning groups in a college life-science course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(3), 291-299.
28. Webb, N. M., Troper, J. D., & Fall, R. (1995). Constructive activity and learning in collaborative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(3), 406-423.
29. Wooley, R. S., Was, C., Schunn, C. D., & Dalton, D. (2008). The effects of feedback elaboration on the giver of feedback. Paper presented at the Cognitive Science.