The origin and adaptive evolution of domesticated populations of yeast from Far East Asia

Nature Communications

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  Duan, Shou Fu ^a,b   Han, Pei Jie ^a   Wang, Qi Ming ^a   Liu, Wan Qiu ^a   Shi, Jun Yan ^a,b   Li, Kuan ^a   Zhang, Xiao Ling ^a   Bai, Feng Yan ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTE OF MICROBIOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MALTOSE;

ADAPTIVE RADIATION; EVOLUTION; EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; FERMENTATION; GENOME; NICHE; OUTCROSSING; YEAST;

ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; COPY NUMBER VARIATION; DOMESTIC SPECIES; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; FAR EAST; FUNGUS ISOLATION; HETEROZYGOSITY; INTROGRESSION; NONHUMAN; OUTCROSSING; PLOIDY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SPOROGENESIS; YEAST; ADAPTATION; ASIA; CLASSIFICATION; FERMENTATION; FUNGAL GENOME; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; POPULATION GENETICS;

CHINA;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ASIA; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FAR EAST; FERMENTATION; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOME, FUNGAL; PHYLOGENY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 85050020985     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05106-7     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. McGovern, P. E. et al. Fermented beverages of pre-and proto-historic China. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 17593-17598 (2004).
2. Goffeau, A. et al. Life with 6000 genes. Science 274, 563-547 (1996).
3. Darwin, C. The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication. 1st ed., (John Murray, London, 1868).
4. Larson, G. et al. Current perspectives and the future of domestication studies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 6139-6146 (2014).
5. Liti, G. The fascinating and secret wild life of the budding yeast S. cerevisiae. eLife 4, e05835 (2015).
6. Fay, J. C. &Benavides, J. A. Evidence for domesticated and wild populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS. Genet. 1, 66-71 (2005).
7. Sniegowski, P. D., Dombrowski, P. G. &Fingerman, E. Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus coexist in a natural woodland site in North America and display different levels of reproductive isolation from European conspecifics. FEMS Yeast Res. 1, 299-306 (2002).
8. Ludlow, C. L. et al. Independent origins of yeast associated with coffee and cacao fermentation. Curr. Biol. 26, 965-971 (2016).
9. Goddard, M. R. &Greig, D. Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a nomadic yeast with no niche? FEMS Yeast Res. 15, 1567-1364 (2015).
10. Novo, M. et al. Eukaryote-to-eukaryote gene transfer events revealed by the genome sequence of the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae EC1118. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 16333-16338 (2009).
11. Fraser, H. B., Moses, A. M. &Schadt, E. E. Evidence for widespread adaptive evolution of gene expression in budding yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 2977-2982 (2010).
12. Sicard, D. &Legras, J. L. Bread, beer and wine: yeast domestication in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex. C. R. Biol. 334, 229-236 (2011).
13. Borneman, A. R. et al. Whole-genome comparison reveals novel genetic elements that characterize the genome of industrial strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 7, e1001287 (2011).
14. Borneman, A. R. &Pretorius, I. S. Genomic insights into the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex. Genetics 199, 281-291 (2015).
15. Marsit, S. et al. Evolutionary advantage conferred by an eukaryote-toeukaryote gene transfer event in wine yeasts. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 1695-1707 (2015).
16. Marsit, S. &Dequin, S. Diversity and adaptive evolution of Saccharomyces wine yeast: a review. FEMS Yeast Res. 15, fov067 (2015).
17. Strope, P. K. et al. The 100-genomes strains, an S. cerevisiae resource that illuminates its natural phenotypic and genotypic variation and emergence as an opportunistic pathogen. Genome Res. 25, 762-774 (2015).
18. Gallone, B. et al. Domestication and divergence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae beer yeasts. Cell 166, 1397-1410 e1316 (2016).
19. Goncalves, M. et al. Distinct domestication trajectories in top-fermenting beer yeasts and wine yeasts. Curr. Biol. 26, 2750-2761 (2016).
20. Liti, G. et al. Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature 458, 337-341 (2009).
21. Goddard, M. R., Anfang, N., Tang, R., Gardner, R. C. &Jun, C. A distinct population of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in New Zealand: evidence for local dispersal by insects and human-aided global dispersal in oak barrels. Environ. Microbiol. 12, 63-73 (2010).
22. Warringer, J. et al. Trait variation in yeast is defined by population history. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002111 (2011).
23. Zörgö, E. et al. Life history shapes trait heredity by accumulation of loss-offunction alleles in yeast. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 1781-1789 (2012).
24. Legras, J. L., Merdinoglu, D., Cornuet, J. M. &Karst, F. Bread, beer and wine: Saccharomyces cerevisiae diversity reflects human history. Mol. Ecol. 16, 2091-2102 (2007).
25. Schacherer, J., Shapiro, J. A., Ruderfer, D. M. &Kruglyak, L. Comprehensive polymorphism survey elucidates population structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 458, 342-345 (2009).
26. Cromie, G. A. et al. Genomic sequence diversity and population structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae assessed by RAD-seq. G3 (Bethesda) 3, 2163-2171 (2013).
27. Almeida, P. et al. A population genomics insight into the Mediterranean origins of wine yeast domestication. Mol. Ecol. 24, 5412-5427 (2015).
28. Wang, Q. M., Liu, W. Q., Liti, G., Wang, S. A. &Bai, F. Y. Surprisingly diverged populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in natural environments remote from human activity. Mol. Ecol. 21, 5404-5417 (2012).
29. Naumov, G. I. &Nikonenko, P. E. The East Asia is a probable land of the cultured yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae (in Russia). Izv. Sib. Otd. Akad. Nauk SSSR Seriya Biol. Nauk 20, 97-101 (1988).
30. Naumov, G. I., Gazdiev, D. O. &Naumova, E. S. The finding of the yeast species Saccharomyces bayanus in Far East Asia. Microbiology 72, 738-743 (2003).
31. Bing, J., Han, P. J., Liu, W. Q., Wang, Q. M. &Bai, F. Y. Evidence for a Far East Asian origin of lager beer yeast. Curr. Biol. 24, R380-R381 (2014).
32. Gayevskiy, V. &Goddard, M. R. Saccharomyces eubayanus and Saccharomyces arboricola reside in North Island native New Zealand forests. Environ. Microbiol. 18, 1137-1147 (2016).
33. Alexander, D. H., Novembre, J. &Lange, K. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Res. 19, 1655-1664 (2009).
34. Magwene, P. M. et al. Outcrossing, mitotic recombination, and life-history trade-offs shape genome evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 1987-1992 (2011).
35. Maciaszczyk, E., Wysocki, R., Golik, P., Lazowska, J. &Ulaszewski, S. Arsenical resistance genes in Saccharomyces douglasii and other yeast species undergo rapid evolution involving genomic rearrangements and duplications. FEMS Yeast Res. 4, 821-832 (2004).
36. Bergstrom, A. et al. A high-definition view of functional genetic variation from natural yeast genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31, 872-888 (2014).
37. Argueso, J. L. et al. Genome structure of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain widely used in bioethanol production. Genome Res. 19, 2258-2270 (2009).
38. Sampaio, J. P. &Goncalves, P. Natural populations of Saccharomyces kudriavzevii in Portugal are associated with oak bark and are sympatric with S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 2144-2152 (2008).
39. Barbosa, R. et al. Evidence of natural hybridization in Brazilian wild lineages of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Biol. Evol. 8, 317-329 (2016).
40. Knight, S. &Goddard, M. R. Quantifying separation and similarity in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae metapopulation. ISME J. 9, 361-370 (2015).
41. Tapsoba, F., Legras, J. L., Savadogo, A., Dequin, S. &Traore, A. S. Diversity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains isolated from Borassus akeassii palm wines from Burkina Faso in comparison to other African beverages. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 211, 128-133 (2015).
42. Wang, J. et al. Revealing a 5000-y-old beer recipe in China. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 6444-6448 (2016).
43. Magwene, P. M. Revisiting Mortimer's Genome Renewal Hypothesis: heterozygosity, homothallism, and the potential for adaptation in yeast. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 781, 37-48 (2014).
44. Plech, M., Visser, J. A. &Korona, R. Heterosis is prevalent among domesticated but not wild strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. G3 (Bethesda) 4, 315-323 (2014).
45. Hou, J., Friedrich, A., de Montigny, J. &Schacherer, J. Chromosomal rearrangements as a major mechanism in the onset of reproductive isolation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Biol. 24, 1153-1159 (2014).
46. Liti, G., Barton, D. B. &Louis, E. J. Sequence diversity, reproductive isolation and species concepts in Saccharomyces. Genetics 174, 839-850 (2006).
47. Soares, E. V. Flocculation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a review. J. Appl. Microbiol. 110, 1-18 (2011).
48. Warringer, J. &Blomberg, A. Automated screening in environmental arrays allows analysis of quantitative phenotypic profiles in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 20, 53-67 (2003).
49. Warringer, J., Anevski, D., Liu, B. &Blomberg, A. Chemogenetic fingerprinting by analysis of cellular growth dynamics. BMC Chem. Biol. 8, 3 (2008).
50. Codón, A. C., Gasent-Ramirez, J. M. &Benitez, T. Factors which affect the frequency of sporulation and tetrad formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae baker's yeasts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61, 1677 (1995).
51. Albertin, W. et al. Evidence for autotetraploidy associated with reproductive isolation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: towards a new domesticated species. J. Evol. Biol. 22, 2157-2170 (2009).
52. Amberg, D. C., Burke, D. J. &Strathern, J. N. Methods in Yeast Genetics: A Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Course Manual Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2005).
53. Ilie, L., Fazayeli, F. &Ilie, S. HiTEC: accurate error correction in highthroughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 27, 295-302 (2011).
54. Zerbino, D. R. &Birney, E. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 18, 821-829 (2008).
55. Simpson, J. T. et al. ABySS: a parallel assembler for short read sequence data. Genome Res. 19, 1117-1123 (2009).
56. Walker, B. J. et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS ONE 9, e112963 (2014).
57. Swain, M. T. et al. A post-assembly genome-improvement toolkit (PAGIT) to obtain annotated genomes from contigs. Nat. Protoc. 7, 1260-1284 (2012).
58. Stanke, M. &Morgenstern, B. AUGUSTUS: a web server for gene prediction in eukaryotes that allows user-defined constraints. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, W465-W467 (2005).
59. Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. &Lipman, D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403-410 (1990).
60. Langmead, B. &Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie. Nat. Methods 9, 357-359 (2012).
61. Li, H. A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data. Bioinformatics 27, 2987-2993 (2011).
62. McKenna, A. et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297-1303 (2010).
63. Lam, H. M. et al. Resequencing of 31 wild and cultivated soybean genomes identifies patterns of genetic diversity and selection. Nat. Genet. 42, 1053-1059 (2010).
64. Crauwels, S. et al. Assessing genetic diversity among Brettanomyces yeasts by DNA fingerprinting and whole-genome sequencing. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 4398-4413 (2014).
65. Cingolani, P. et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly (Austin) 6, 80-92 (2012).
66. Katoh, K. &Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772-780 (2013).
67. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and postanalysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312-1313 (2014).
68. Lischer, H. E., Excoffier, L. &Heckel, G. Ignoring heterozygous sites biases phylogenomic estimates of divergence times: implications for the evolutionary history of microtus voles. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31, 817-831 (2013).
69. Sukumaran, J. &Holder, M. T. DendroPy: a Python library for phylogenetic computing. Bioinformatics 26, 1569-1571 (2010).
70. Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S. &Arkin, A. P. FastTree: computing large minimum evolution trees with profiles instead of a distance matrix. Mol. Biol. Evol. 26, 1641-1650 (2009).
71. Yang, J., Lee, S. H., Goddard, M. E. &Visscher, P. M. GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 88, 76-82 (2011).
72. Purcell, S. et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 559-575 (2007).
73. De Mita, S. &Siol, M. EggLib: processing, analysis and simulation tools for population genetics and genomics. BMC Genet. 13, 27 (2012).
74. Gutenkunst, R. N., Hernandez, R. D., Williamson, S. H. &Bustamante, C. D. Inferring the joint demographic history of multiple populations from multidimensional SNP frequency data. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000695 (2009).
75. Branco, S. et al. Genetic isolation between two recently diverged populations of a symbiotic fungus. Mol. Ecol. 24, 2747-2758 (2015).
76. Klambauer, G. et al. cn.MOPS: mixture of Poissons for discovering copy number variations in next-generation sequencing data with a low false discovery rate. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, e69 (2012).