Ignoring heterozygous sites biases phylogenomic estimates of divergence times: Implications for the evolutionary history of Microtus voles

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 817-831

  Lischer, Heidi E L ^a,b   Excoffier, Laurent ^a,b   Heckel, Gerald ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b SWISS INSTITUTE OF BIOINFORMATICS   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

AFLP; Heterozygosity; High throughput sequencing; Microtus arvalis; Phylogenetics; Rodents

Indexed keywords

CONTIG;

AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DNA EXTRACTION; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHM; EVOLUTIONARY DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC ALGORITHM; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HAPLOTYPE; HETEROZYGOSITY; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; LAST GLACIAL MAXIMUM; MICROTUS ARVALIS; MUTATION RATE; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PHYLOGENOMICS; POPULATION MIGRATION; POPULATION SIZE; RADIOMETRIC DATING;

AFLP; HETEROZYGOSITY; HIGH-THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; MICROTUS ARVALIS; PHYLOGENETICS; RODENTS;

AMPLIFIED FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM ANALYSIS; ANIMALS; ARVICOLINAE; BAYES THEOREM; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC SPECIATION; HAPLOTYPES; HETEROZYGOTE; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE;

EID: 84897908606     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/mst271     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Arbogast BS, Edwards SV, Wakeley J, Beerli P, Slowinski JB. 2002. Estimating divergence times from molecular data on phylogenetic and population genetic timescales. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 33:707-740.
2. Baird NA, Etter PD, Atwood TS, Currey MC, Shiver AL, Lewis ZA, Selker EU, CreskoWA, Johnson EA. 2008. Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers. PLoS One 3:e3376.
3. Bapteste E, Brinkmann H, Lee JA, Moore DV, Sensen CW, Gordon P, Durufle L, Gaasterland T, Lopez P, Muller M, et al. 2002. The analysis of 100 genes supports the grouping of three highly divergent amoebae: Dictyostelium, Entamoeba, and Mastigamoeba. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 99:1414-1419.
4. Bastos-Silveira C, Santos SM, Monarca R, Mathias MD, Heckel G. 2012. Deep mitochondrial introgression and hybridization among ecologically divergent vole species. Mol Ecol. 21:5309-5323.
5. Berry RJ, Rose FEN. 1975. Islands and evolution of Microtus arvalis (Microtinae). J Zool. 177:395-409.
6. Beysard M, Heckel G. 2014. Structure and dynamics of hybrid zones at different stages of speciation in the common vole (Microtus arvalis). Mol Ecol. 23(3):673-687.
7. BeysardM, Perrin N, JaarolaM, Heckel G, Vogel P. 2012. Asymmetric and differential gene introgression at a contact zone between two highly divergent lineages of field voles (Microtus agrestis). J Evol Biol. 25: 400-408.
8. Bonin A, Taberlet P, Miaud C, Pompanon F. 2006. Explorative genome scan to detect candidate loci for adaptation along a gradient of altitude in the common frog (Rana temporaria). Mol Biol Evol. 23: 773-783.
9. Bouckaert RR. 2010. DensiTree: making sense of sets of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 26:1372-1373.
10. Boussau B, Szollosi GJ, Duret L, Gouy M, Tannier E, Daubin V. 2013. Genome-scale coestimation of species and gene trees. Genome Res. 23:323-330.
11. Braaker S, Heckel G. 2009. Transalpine colonisation and partial phylogeographic erosion by dispersal in the common vole (Microtus arvalis). Mol Ecol. 18:2518-2531.
12. Browning SR, Browning BL. 2007. Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering. Am J Hum Genet. 81: 1084-1097.
13. Browning SR, Browning BL. 2011. Haplotype phasing: existing methods and new developments. Nat Rev Genet. 12:703-714.
14. Bryant D, Bouckaert R, Felsenstein J, Rosenberg N, RoyChoudhury A. 2012. Inferring species trees directly from biallelic genetic markers: bypassing gene trees in a full coalescent analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 29: 1917-1932.
15. Buckley TR, Simon C, Chambers GK. 2001. Exploring among-site rate variation models in a maximum likelihood framework using empirical data: effects of model assumptions on estimates of topology, branch lengths, and bootstrap support. Syst Biol. 50: 67-86.
16. Buzan EV, Forster DW, Searle JB, Krystufek B. 2010. A new cytochrome b phylogroup of the common vole (Microtus arvalis) endemic to the Balkans and its implications for the evolutionary history of the species. Biol J Linn Soc. 100:788-796.
17. Corbet GB. 1986. Temporal and spatial variation of dental pattern in the voles, Microtus arvalis, of the Orkney Islands. J Zool. 208: 395-402.
18. Davey JW, Hohenlohe PA, Etter PD, Boone JQ, Catchen JM, Blaxter ML. 2011. Genome-wide genetic marker discovery and genotyping using next-generation sequencing. Nat Rev Genet. 12:499-510.
19. Degnan JH, Rosenberg NA. 2006. Discordance of species trees with their most likely gene trees. PLoS Genet. 2:762-768.
20. Dehal P, Satou Y, Campbell RK, Chapman J, Degnan B, De Tomaso A, Davidson B, Di Gregorio A, Gelpke M, Goodstein DM, et al. 2002. The draft genome of Ciona intestinalis: insights into chordate and vertebrate origins. Science 298:2157-2167.
21. Delsuc F, Brinkmann H, Philippe H. 2005. Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life. Nat Rev Genet. 6:361-375.
22. DePristo MA, Banks E, Poplin R, Garimella KV, Maguire JR, Hartl C, Philippakis AA, del Angel G, Rivas MA, Hanna M, et al. 2011. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using nextgeneration DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet. 43:491-498.
23. Drake JW, Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D, Crow JF. 1998. Rates of spontaneous mutation. Genetics 148:1667-1686.
24. Drummond AJ, Suchard MA, Xie D, Rambaut A. 2012. Bayesian Phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol Biol Evol. 29: 1969-1973.
25. Edwards SV, Liu L, Pearl DK. 2007. High-resolution species trees without concatenation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 104:5936-5941.
26. Excoffier L, Foll M. 2011. fastsimcoal: a continuous-time coalescent simulator of genomic diversity under arbitrarily complex evolutionary scenarios. Bioinformatics 27:1332-1334.
27. Felsenstein J. 2005. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.6: distributed by the author. Seattle (WA): Department of Genome Science, University of Washington.
28. Fink S, Excoffier L, Heckel G. 2004. Mitochondrial gene diversity in the common vole Microtus arvalis shaped by historical divergence and local adaptations. Mol Ecol. 13:3501-3514.
29. Fink S, Fischer MC, Excoffier L, Heckel G. 2010. Genomic scans support repetitive continental colonization events during the rapid radiation of voles (Rodentia: Microtus): the utility of AFLPs versus mitochondrial and nuclear sequence markers. Syst Biol. 59:548-572.
30. Fischer MC, Foll M, Excoffier L, Heckel G. 2011. Enhanced AFLP genome scans detect local adaptation in high-altitude populations of a small rodent (Microtus arvalis). Mol Ecol. 20:1450-1462.
31. Gaggiotti OE. 2010. Bayesian statistical treatment of the fluorescence of AFLP bands leads to accurate genetic structure inference. Mol Ecol. 19:4586-4588.
32. Garrick RC, Sunnucks P, Dyer RJ. 2010. Nuclear gene phylogeography using PHASE: dealing with unresolved genotypes, lost alleles, and systematic bias in parameter estimation. BMC Evol Biol. 10:118.
33. Gompert Z, ForisterML, Fordyce JA, Nice CC, Williamson RJ, Buerkle CA. 2010. Bayesian analysis of molecular variance in pyrosequences quantifies population genetic structure across the genome of Lycaeides butterflies. Mol Ecol. 19:2455-2473.
34. Griffiths AJF, Miller JH, Suzuki DT, Lewontin RC, Gelbart WM. 2000. An introduction to genetic analysis. New York: Freeman.
35. Hamilton G, Currat M, Ray N, Heckel G, Beaumont M, Excoffier L. 2005. Bayesian estimation of recent migration rates after a spatial expansion. Genetics 170:409-417.
36. Hausser J. 1995. Säugetiere der Schweiz: Verbreitung, Biologie,Ökologie. Basel (Switzerland): Birkhäuser Verlag.
37. Haynes S, Jaarola M, Searle JB. 2003. Phylogeography of the common vole (Microtus arvalis) with particular emphasis on the colonization of the Orkney archipelago. Mol Ecol. 12:951-956.
38. Heckel G, Burri R, Fink S, Desmet J-F, Excoffier L. 2005. Genetic structure and colonization processes in European populations of the common vole Microtus arvalis. Evolution 59:2231-2242.
39. Heled J, Drummond AJ. 2010. Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data. Mol Biol Evol. 27:570-580.
40. Herman JS, Searle JB. 2011. Post-glacial partitioning of mitochondrial genetic variation in the field vole. Proc Biol Sci. 278:3601-3607.
41. Horvath JE, Weisrock DW, Embry SL, Fiorentino I, Balhoff JP, Kappeler P, Wray GA, Willard HF, Yoder AD. 2008. Development and application of a phylogenomic toolkit: resolving the evolutionary history of Madagascar's lemurs. Genome Res. 18:489-499.
42. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754-755.
43. Huse SM, Huber JA, Morrison HG, Sogin ML, Mark Welch D. 2007. Accuracy and quality of massively parallel DNA pyrosequencing. Genome Biol. 8: R143.
44. Kelleher CT, Chiu R, Shin H, Bosdet IE, Krzywinski MI, Fjell CD, Wilkin J, Yin TM, DiFazio SP, Ali J, et al. 2007. A physical map of the highly heterozygous Populus genome: integration with the genome sequence and genetic map and analysis of haplotype variation. Plant J. 50:1063-1078.
45. Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotidesequences. J Mol Evol. 16:111-120.
46. Kubatko LS, Carstens BC, Knowles LL. 2009. STEM: species tree estimation using maximum likelihood for gene trees under coalescence. Bioinformatics 25:971-973.
47. Kubatko LS, Degnan JH. 2007. Inconsistency of phylogenetic estimates from concatenated data under coalescence. Syst Biol. 56:17-24.
48. Kumar S, Filipski AJ, Battistuzzi FU, Pond SLK, Tamura K. 2012. Statistics and truth in phylogenomics. Mol Biol Evol. 29:457-472.
49. Künsch HR. 1989. The jackknife and the bootstrap for general stationary observations. Ann Stat. 17:1217-1241.
50. Leache AD, Rannala B. 2011. The accuracy of species tree estimation under simulation: a comparison of methods. Syst Biol. 60:126-137.
51. Leroux S, Feve K, Vignoles F, Bouchez O, Klopp C, Noirot C, Gourichon D, Richard S, Leterrier C, Beaumont C, et al. 2010. Non PCRamplified transcripts and AFLP fragments as reduced representations of the quail genome for 454 titanium sequencing. BMC Res Notes. 3:214.
52. Liu L. 2008. BEST: Bayesian estimation of species trees under the coalescent model. Bioinformatics 24:2542-2543.
53. Liu L, Edwards SV. 2009. Phylogenetic analysis in the anomaly zone. Syst Biol. 58:452-460.
54. Liu L, Pearl DK. 2007. Species trees from gene trees: reconstructing Bayesian posterior distributions of a species phylogeny using estimated gene tree distributions. Syst Biol. 56:504-514.
55. Liu L, Yu LL, Pearl DK, Edwards SV. 2009. Estimating species phylogenies using coalescence times among sequences. Syst Biol. 58:468-477.
56. Liu LA, Yu LL, Edwards SV. 2010. A maximum pseudo-likelihood approach for estimating species trees under the coalescent model. BMC Evol Biol. 10:302.
57. Lynch M. 2010. Evolution of the mutation rate. Trends Genet. 26: 345-352.
58. Maddison WP. 1997. Gene trees in species trees. Syst Biol. 46:523-536.
59. Martínková N, Barnett R, Cucchi T, Struchen R, Pascal M, Pascal M, Fischer MC, Higham T, Brace S, Ho SYW, et al. 2013. Divergent evolutionary processes associated with colonization of offshore islands. Mol Ecol. 22:5205-5220.
60. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, Garimella K, Altshuler D, Gabriel S, Daly M, et al. 2010. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20: 1297-1303.
61. Meredith RW, Janecka JE, Gatesy J, Ryder OA, Fisher CA, Teeling EC, Goodbla A, Eizirik E, Simao TLL, Stadler T, et al. 2011. Impacts of the cretaceous terrestrial revolution and KPg extinction on mammal diversification. Science 334:521-524.
62. Mitchell-Jones AJ, Amori G, Bogdanowicz W, Krystufek B, Reijnders PJH, Spitzenberger F, Stubbe M, Thissen JBM, Vohralik V, Zima J. 1999. The atlas of European mammals. London: Poyser.
63. Nichols R. 2001. Gene trees and species trees are not the same. Trends Ecol Evol. 16:358-364.
64. O'Neill EM, Schwartz R, Bullock CT, Williams JS, Shaffer HB, Aguilar- Miguel X, Parra-Olea G, Weisrock DW. 2013. Parallel tagged amplicon sequencing reveals major lineages and phylogenetic structure in the North American tiger salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum) species complex. Mol Ecol. 22:111-129.
65. Potts AJ, Hedderson TA, Grimm GW. 2014. Constructing phylogenies in the presence of intra-individual site polymorphisms (2ISPs) with a focus on the nuclear ribosomal cistron. Syst Biol. 63:1-16.
66. Pupko T, Huchon D, Cao Y, Okada N, Hasegawa M. 2002. Combining multiple data sets in a likelihood analysis: which models are the best?. Mol Biol Evol. 19:2294-2307.
67. Rannala B, Yang ZH. 2003. Bayes estimation of species divergence times and ancestral population sizes using DNA sequences from multiple loci. Genetics 164:1645-1656.
68. Rannala B, Yang ZH. 2008. Phylogenetic inference using whole genomes. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 9:217-231.
69. Ro S, Rannala B. 2007. Inferring somatic mutation rates using the stopenhanced green fluorescent protein mouse. Genetics 177:9-16.
70. Ryszkowski L, Goszczynski J, Truszkowski J. 1973. Trophic relationships of the common vole in cultivated fields. Acta Theriol. 18:125-165.
71. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
72. Schweizer M, Excoffier L, Heckel G. 2007. Fine-scale genetic structure and dispersal in the common vole (Microtus arvalis). Mol Ecol. 16: 2463-2473.
73. Sota T, Vogler AP. 2003. Reconstructing species phylogeny of the carabid beetles Ohomopterus using multiple nuclear DNA sequences: heterogeneous information content and the performance of simultaneous analyses. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 26:139-154.
74. Stamatakis A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22:2688-2690.
75. Stephens M, Donnelly P. 2003. A comparison of Bayesian methods for haplotype reconstruction from population genotype data. Am J Hum Genet. 73:1162-1169.
76. Stephens M, Smith NJ, Donnelly P. 2001. A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. Am J Hum Genet. 68:978-989.
77. Struck TH, Paul C, Hill N, Hartmann S, Hosel C, KubeM, Lieb B,Meyer A, Tiedemann R, Purschke G, et al. 2011. Phylogenomic analyses unravel annelid evolution. Nature 471:95-98.
78. Sutter A, Beysard M, Heckel G. 2013. Sex-specific clines support incipient speciation in a common European mammal. Heredity 110: 398-404.
79. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 28:2731-2739.
80. Tegelstrom H, JaarolaM. 1998. Geographic localization of a contact zone between bank voles Clethrionomys glareolus with distinctly different mitochondrial DNA. Acta Theriol. 43:175-183.
81. Tougard C, Renvoise E, Petitjean A, Quere JP. 2008. New insight into the colonization processes of common voles: inferences from molecular and fossil evidence. PLoS One 3:e3532.
82. van Orsouw NJ, Hogers RCJ, Janssen A, Yalcin F, Snoeijers S, Verstege E, Schneiders H, van der Poel H, van Oeveren J, Verstegen H, et al. 2007. Complexity reduction of polymorphic sequences (CRoPS (TM)): a novel approach for large-scale polymorphism discovery in complex genomes. PLoS One 2:e1172.
83. von Reumont BM, Jenner RA, Wills MA, Dell'Ampio E, Pass G, Ebersberger I, Meyer B, Koenemann S, Iliffe TM, Stamatakis A, et al. 2012. Pancrustacean phylogeny in the light of new phylogenomic data: support for Remipedia as the possible sister group of Hexapoda. Mol Biol Evol. 29:1031-1045.
84. Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, Vandelee T, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M, et al. 1995. AFLP-a new technique for DNA-fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:4407-4414.
85. Waters JM, Rowe DL, Burridge CP, Wallis GP. 2010. Gene trees versus species trees: reassessing life-history evolution in a freshwater fish radiation. Syst Biol. 59:504-517.
86. Weisrock DW, Smith SD, Chan LM, Biebouw K, Kappeler PM, Yoder AD. 2012. Concatenation and concordance in the reconstruction of mouse lemur phylogeny: an empirical demonstration of the effect of allele sampling in phylogenetics. Mol Biol Evol. 29: 1615-1630.
87. Yalden DW. 1982. When did the mammal fauna of the British-Isles arrive. Mammal Rev. 12:1-57.
88. Yalden DW. 1999. The history of British mammals. London: Poyser.
89. Yang ZH, Rannala B. 2012. Molecular phylogenetics: principles and practice. Nat Rev Genet. 13:303-314.