OntoPeFeGe: Ontology-based personalized feedback generator

IEEE Access

Volumn 6, Issue , 2018, Pages 31644-31664

  Demaidi, Mona Nabil ^a   Gaber, Mohamed Medhat ^a   Filer, Nick ^b  

^a BIRMINGHAM CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bloom's taxonomy; feedback generation; formative feedback; Ontology; personalized; question generation

Indexed keywords

BLOOMS (METAL); COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; ONTOLOGY; SURVEYS; TAXONOMIES; TEACHING;

FORMATIVE FEEDBACKS; PERSONALISED; QUESTION GENERATION; RULE BASED ALGORITHMS; STUDENT CHARACTERISTICS; UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS; VIRTUAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; WEB BASED PLATFORM;

STUDENTS;

EID: 85048481983     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21693536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2846398     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. S. Narciss et al., Exploring feedback and student characteristics relevant for personalizing feedback strategies,'' Comput. Educ., vol. 71, pp. 56-76, Feb. 2014
2. J. R. Anderson, A. T. Corbett, K. R.Koedinger, and R. Pelletier, Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned,'' J. Learn. Sci., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 167-207, 1995
3. A. Mitrovic, Fifteen years of constraint-based tutors: What we have achieved and where we are going,'' User Model. User-Adapt. Interact., vol. 22, nos. 1-2, pp. 39-72, 2012
4. M. Demaidi and N. Filer, Wireless ray tracing educational land,'' in Proc. INTED Conf., Int. Assoc. Technol., Educ. Develop. (IATED), 2012, pp. 0402-0411
5. P. Black and D.Wiliam, Developing the theory of formative assessment,'' Educ. Assessment, Eval. Accountability, vol. 21, p. 5, Feb. 2009
6. E. Brown and C. Glover, Evaluating written feedback,'' in Innovative Assessment in Higher Education. Oxfordshire, U.K.: Routledge Taylor &Francis Group plc., 2006, pp. 81-91
7. M. Price, K. Handley, J. Millar, and B. O'Donovan, Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect?'' Assessment Eval. Higher Educ., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 277-289, 2010
8. V. J. Shute, Focus on formative feedback,'' Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 153-189, Mar. 2008
9. Providing Feedback in Computer-based Instruction: What the Research Tells Us. [Online]. Available: http://dwb.unl.edu/Edit/ MB/MasonBruning.html (2001)
10. E. H. Mory, Feedback research revisited,'' in Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, vol. 2. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004, pp. 745-783
11. K. VanLehn, The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems,'' Educ. Psychol., vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 197-221, 2011
12. S. Narciss and K. Huth, How to design informative tutoring feedback for multimedia learning,'' in Instructional Design for Multimedia Learning. Munster, Germany: Waxmann, 2004, pp. 181-195
13. S. Narciss, Designing and evaluating tutoring feedback strategies for digital learning environments on the basis of the interactive tutoring feedback model,'' in Digital Education Review, vol. 23. Barcelona, Spain: Univ. Barcelona, 2013, pp. 7-26
14. E. Vasilyeva, P. Bra, M. Pechenizkiy, and S. Puuronen, Tailoring feedback in online assessment: Inuence of learning styles on the feedback preferences and elaborated feedback effectiveness,'' in Proc. 8th IEEE Int. Conf. Adv. Learn. Technol. (ICALT), Jul. 2008, pp. 834-838
15. G. S. Ana and D.-S. Macario, Designing feedback to support language acquisition using the ingenio authoring tool,'' Procedia-Social Behav. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1239-1243, 2009
16. I. Arroyo, J. E. Beck, B. P. Woolf, C. R. Beal, and K. Schultz, Macroadapting animalwatch to gender and cognitive differences with respect to hint interactivity and symbolism,'' in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Springer, 2000, pp. 574-583
17. I. Arroyo, J. E. Beck, C. R. Beal, R. Wing, and B. P. Woolf, Analyzing students' response to help provision in an elementary mathematics intelligent tutoring system,'' in Proc. Papers AIED-Workshop Help Provision Help Seeking Interact. Learn. Environ., 2001, pp. 34-46
18. I. Arroyo, B. P. Woolf, D. G. Cooper, W. Burleson, and K. Muldner, The impact of animated pedagogical agents on girls' and boys' emotions, attitudes, behaviors and learning,'' in Proc. 11th IEEE Int. Conf. Adv. Learn. Technol. (ICALT), Jul. 2011, pp. 506-510
19. B. P.Woolf et al., The effect of motivational learning companions on low achieving students and students with disabilities,'' in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Springer, 2010, pp. 327-337
20. A. Mitrovic and B. Martin, Evaluating the effectiveness of feedback in SQL-tutor,'' in Proc. Int. Workshop Adv. Learn. Technol., Dec. 2000, pp. 143-144
21. H. Kazi, P. Haddawy, and S. Suebnukarn, Employing UMLS for generating hints in a tutoring system for medical problem-based learning,'' J. Biomed. Inform., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 557-565, 2012
22. A. Mitrovic, Experiences in implementing constraint-based modeling in SQL-Tutor,'' in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Springer, 1998, pp. 414-423
23. H. Passier and J. Jeuring, Ontology based feedback generation in designorientated e-learning systems,'' in Proc. IADIS Int. Conf. e-Soc., Avila, Spain, 2004, pp. 992-996
24. T. R. Gruber, A translation approach to portable ontology specications,'' Knowl. Acquisition, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 199-220, 1993
25. H. Kazi, P. Haddawy, and S. Suebnukarn, Leveraging a domain ontology to increase the quality of feedback in an intelligent tutoring system,'' in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Springer, 2010, pp. 75-84
26. H. Kazi, P. Haddawy, and S. Suebnukarn, Clinical reasoning gains in medical PBL: An UMLS based tutoring system,'' J. Intell. Inf. Syst., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 269-284, 2013
27. J.-R. Duboc, Dynamic feedback generation in virtual patients using semantic Web technologies,'' M.S. thesis, Univ. Southampton, Southampton, U.K., 2013
28. F. Frutos-Morales et al., An extension of the OeLE platform for generating semantic feedback for students and teachers,'' Procedia-Social Behav. Sci., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 527-531, 2010
29. M. Mar Sanchez-Vera, J. T. Fernandez-Breis, D. Castellanos-Nieves, F. Frutos-Morales, and M. P. Prendes-Espinosa, SemanticWeb technologies for generating feedback in online assessment environments,'' Know.-Based Syst., vol. 33, pp. 152-165, Sep. 2012
30. D. Castellanos-Nieves, J. T. Fernandez-Breis, R. Valencia-Garcia, R. Martinez-Bejar, and M. Iniesta-Moreno, Semantic Web technologies for supporting learning assessment,'' Inf. Sci., vol. 181, no. 9, pp. 1517-1537, 2011
31. E. Gouli, A. Gogoulou, K. A. Papanikolaou, and M. Grigoriadou, An adaptive feedback framework to support reection, guiding and tutoring,'' in Advances in Web-Based Education: Personalized Learning Environments. Hershey, PA, USA: IDEA Group, 2006, pp. 178-202
32. J.-R. Duboc, M.Weal, H. Davis, and S. Choi, Automatic feedback generation in virtual patients using semantic Web technologies,'' in Proc. Int. Comput. Assist. Assessment, 2011, pp. 1-11
33. A. Papasalouros, K. Kanaris, and K. Kotis, Automatic generation of multiple choice questions from domain ontologies,'' in Proc. e-Learn., 2008, pp. 427-434
34. A. Papasalouros, K. Kotis, and K. Kanaris, Automatic generation of tests from domain and multimedia ontologies,'' Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 5-23, 2011
35. M. Cubric and M. Tosic, Towards automatic generation of e-assessment using semanticWeb technologies,'' Int. J. e-Assessment, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 19, 2011
36. A. Grubiic, Adaptive students knowledge acquisition model in elearningsystems Adaprive student's knowledge acquisition model in e-learning systems,'' M.S. thesis, Univ. Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia, 2012
37. A. Grubiic, S. Stankov, and B. Ŝitko, Stereotype student model for an adaptive e-learning system,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Inf. Intell. Syst., 2013, pp. 1-8
38. M. Al-Yahya, OntoQue: A question generation engine for educational assesment based on domain ontologies,'' in Proc. 11th IEEE Int. Conf. Adv. Learn. Technol. (ICALT), Jul. 2011, pp. 393-395
39. M. Al-Yahya, Ontology-based multiple choice question generation,'' Sci. World J., vol. 2014, Mar. 2014, Art. no. 274949
40. B. S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classication of Educational Goals, vol. 1. New York, NY, USA: Longmans, Green, 1956
41. D. R. Krathwohl, Arevision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview,'' Theory Pract., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 212-218, 2002
42. Assessment of Higher-Order Skills. [Online]. Available: http://www.caacentre.ac.uk/resources/faqs/higher.shtml (2002)
43. R. M. Felder and R. Brent, Objectively speaking,'' Chem. Eng. Educ., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 178-179, 1997
44. S. R. Murugan, P. Bala, and G. Aghila, An ontology for exploring knowledge in computer networks,'' Int. J. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 13-21, 2013
45. D. Allemang and J. Hendler, Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist: Effective Modeling in RDFS and OWL. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 2011
46. W3C XML Schema Denition Language. [Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/ (2012)
47. M. N. Demaidi, M. M. Gaber, and N. Filer, Evaluating the quality of the ontology-based auto-generated questions,'' Smart Learn. Environ., vol. 4, Dec. 2017, Art. no. 7
48. R. L. Bangert-Drowns, C.-L. Kulik, J. A. Kulik, and M. Morgan, The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events,'' Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 213-238, 1991
49. C. Glover and E. Brown, Written feedback for students: Too much, too detailed or too incomprehensible to be effective?'' Biosci. Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1-16, 2006
50. G. Rubner, mbclickAn electronic voting system that returns individual feedback,'' in Proc. IEEE 7th Int. Conf. Wireless, Mobile Ubiquitous Technol. Educ. (WMUTE), Mar. 2012, pp. 221-222
51. Classroom Response System. Accessed: Jan. 2012. [Online]. Available: https://mbclick.manchester.ac.uk
52. Java Programming. Accessed: Jan. 2012. [Online]. Available: http://www.eee.manchester.ac.uk/study/undergraduate/choosingcourse/ courses/mte/mechatronic-engineering-4-years-meng/course-unit-spec/ ?unitcode=EEEN10035
53. C. Matuszek, J. Cabral, M. J. Witbrock, and J. DeOliveira, An introduction to the syntax and content of cyc,'' in Proc. AAAI Spring Symp., Formal-izing Compiling Background Knowl. Appl. Knowl. Represent. Question Answering, 2006, pp. 44-49
54. Data Networking. Accessed: Jan. 2013. [Online]. Available: http://www.eee.manchester.ac.uk/study/undergraduate/choosingcourse/ courses/eee/electrical-electronicbeng3years/course-unit-spec/?unitcode= EEEN30024
55. ComputerNetworks Course. [Online]. Available: http://studentnet.cs. manchester.ac.uk/ugt/COMP28411/syllabus
56. Computer Networks Course. [Online]. Available: http://trove.cs.man.ac.uk/moodle/ (2013)
57. L. Cohen, L. Manion, and K. Morrison, Research Methods in Education. Abingdon, U.K.: Routledge, 2013
58. P. Black and D.Wiliam, Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment. Granada, Spain: Learning Sciences, 1998
59. S. Bedford and G. Price, A study into the use of computer aided assessment to enhance formative assessment during the early stages of undergraduate chemistry courses,'' in Proc. 11th CAA Int. Comput. Assist. Conf., 2007, pp. 57-69