Mechanism of substrate recognition by the chaperonin GroEL

Biochemistry and Cell Biology

Volumn 79, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 569-577

  Houry, Walid A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Binding; Chaperone; Folding; Hydrophobic interaction; Structure

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); ESCHERICHIA COLI;

CHAPERONIN; DNAK PROTEIN, E COLI; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEIN; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 70; WATER;

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; CYTOPLASM; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; METABOLISM; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; REVIEW;

CYTOPLASM; ESCHERICHIA COLI; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEINS; GROEL PROTEIN; HSP70 HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY; WATER;

EID: 85047684938     PISSN: 08298211     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/o01-131     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Beissinger, M., Rutkat, K., and Buchner, J. 1999. Catalysis, commitment and encapsulation during GroE-mediated folding. J. Mol. Biol. 289: 1075-1092.
2. Ben-Zvi, A.P., Chatellier, J., Fersht, A.R., and Goloubinoff, P. 1998. Minimal and optimal mechanisms for GroE-mediated protein folding [published erratum appears in Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96(10): 5890]. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95: 15 275-15 280.
3. Boisvert, D.C., Wang, J.M., Otwinowski, Z., Horwich, A.L., and Sigler, P.B. 1996. The 2.4 angstrom crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL complexed with ATP-gamma-S. Nat. Struct. Biol. 3: 170-177.
4. Braig, K., Otwinowski, Z., Hegde, R., Boisvert, D.C., Joachimiak, A., Horwich, A.L., and Sigler, P.B. 1994. The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 A. Nature (London), 371: 578-586.
5. Buckle, A.M., Zahn, R., and Fersht, A.R. 1997. A structural model for GroEL-polypeptide recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94: 3571-3575.
6. Bukau, B., and Walker, G.C. 1990. Mutations altering heat shock specific subunit of RNA polymerase suppress major cellular defects of E. coli mutants lacking the DnaK chaperone. EMBO J. 9: 4027-4036.
7. Bukau, B., Hesterkamp, T., and Luirink, J. 1996. Growing up in a dangerous environment - a network of multiple targeting and folding pathways for nascent polypeptides in the cytosol. Trends Cell Biol. 6: 480-486.
8. Chatellier, J., Buckle, A.M., and Fersht, A.R. 1999. GroEL recognises sequential and non-sequential linear structural motifs compatible with extended β-strands and α-helices. J. Mol. Biol. 292: 163-172.
9. Chen, L.L., and Sigler, P.B. 1999. The crystal structure of a GroEL/peptide complex: plasticity as a basis for substrate diversity. Cell, 99: 757-768.
10. Clark, A.C., and Frieden, C. 1997. GroEL-mediated folding of structurally homologous dihydrofolate reductases. J. Mol. Biol. 268: 512-525.
11. Clark, A.C., Hugo, E., and Frieden, C. 1996. Determination of regions in the dihydrofolate reductase structure that interact with the molecular chaperonin GroEL. Biochemistry, 35: 5893-5901.
12. Coyle, I.E., Jaeger, J., Gross, M., Robinson, C.V., and Radford, S.E. 1997. Structural and mechanistic consequences of polypeptide binding by GroEL. Folding & Design, 2: R93-R104.
13. Coyle, J.E., Texter, F.L., Ashcroft, A.E., Masselos, D., Robinson, C.V., and Radford, S.E. 1999. GroEL accelerates the refolding of hen lysozyme without changing its folding mechanism. Nat. Struct. Biol. 6: 683-690.
14. Deuerling, E., Schulze-Specking, A., Tomoyasu, T., Mogk, A., and Bukau, B. 1999. Trigger factor and DnaK cooperate in folding of newly synthesized proteins. Nature (London), 400: 693-696.
15. Ellis, R.J., and Hemmingsen, S.M. 1989. Molecular chaperones: proteins essential for the biogenesis of some macromolecular structures. Trends Biochem. Sci. 14: 339-342.
16. Elowitz, M.B., Surette, M.G., Wolf, P.E., Stock, J.B., and Leibler, S. 1999. Protein mobility in the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 181: 197-203.
17. Ewalt, K.L., Hendrick, J.P., Houry, W.A., and Hartl, F.U. 1997. In vivo observation of polypeptide flux through the bacterial chaperonin system. Cell, 90: 491-500.
18. Fair, G.W., Furtak, K., Rowland, M.B., Ranson, N.A., Saibil, H.R., Kirchhausen, T., and Horwich, A.L. 2000. Multivalent binding of nonnative substrate proteins by the chaperonin GroEL. Cell, 100: 561-573.
19. Fayet, O., Ziegelhoffer, T., and Georgopoulos, C. 1989. The GroES and GroEL heat shock gene products of Escherichia coli are essential for bacterial growth at all temperatures. J. Bacteriol. 171: 1379-1385.
20. Fenton, W.A., and Horwich, A.L. 1997. GroEL-mediated protein folding. Protein Sci. 6: 743-760.
21. Fenton, W.A., Kashi, Y., Furtak, K., and Horwich, A.L. 1994. Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release. Nature (London), 371: 614-619.
22. Fulton, A.B. 1982. How crowded is the cytoplasm? Cell, 30: 345-347.
23. Gaitanaris, G.A., Vysokanov, A., Hung, S.C., Gottesman, M.E., and Gragerov, A. 1994. Successive action of Escherichia coli chaperones in vivo. Mol. Microbiol. 14: 861-869.
24. Gervasoni, P., Staudenmann, W., James, P., and Pluckthun, A. 1998. Identification of the binding surface on beta-lactamase for GroEL by limited proteolysis and MALDI-mass spectrometry. Biochemistry, 37: 11 660-11 669.
25. Goodsell, D.S. 1991. Inside a living cell. Trends Biochem. Sci. 16: 203-206.
26. Guex, N., and Peitsch, M.C. 1997. SWISS-MODEL and the SwissPdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis, 18: 2714-2723.
27. Hartl, F.U. 1996. Molecular chaperones in cellular protein folding. Nature (London), 381: 571-579.
28. Hlodan, R., Tempst, P., and Hartl, F.U. 1995. Binding of defined regions of a polypeptide to GroEL and its implications for chaperonin-mediated protein folding. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2: 587-595.
29. Horwich, A.L., Weber-Ban, E.U., and Finley, D. 1999. Chaperone rings in protein folding and degradation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96: 11 033-11 040.
30. Houry, W.A., Frishman, D., Eckerskorn, C., Lottspeich, F., and Hartl, F.U. 1999. Identification of in vivo substrates of the chaperonin GroEL. Nature (London), 402: 147-154.
31. Hubbard, T.J.P., Alley, B., Brenner, S.E., Murzin, A.G., and Chothia, C. 1999. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database. Nucleic Acids Res. 27: 254-256.
32. Hunt, J.F., Weaver, A.J., Landry, S.J., Gierasch, L., and Deisenhofer, J. 1996. The crystal structure of the GroES cochaperonin at 2.8 A resolution. Nature (London), 379: 37-45.
33. Itzhaki, L.S., Otzen, D.E., and Fersht, A.R. 1995. Nature and consequences of GroEL-protein interactions. Biochemistry, 34: 14 581-14 587.
34. Kang, P.J., and Craig, E A. 1990. Identification and characterization of a new Escherichia coli gene that is a dosage-dependent suppressor of a dnaK deletion mutation. J. Bacteriol. 172: 2055-2064.
35. Katsumata, K., Okazaki, A., and Kuwajima, K. 1996. Effect of GroEL on the re-folding kinetics of alpha-lactalbumin. J. Mol. Biol. 258: 827-838.
36. Kobayashi, N., Freund, S.M., Chatellier, J., Zahn, R., and Fersht, A.R. 1999. NMR analysis of the binding of a rhodanese peptide to a minichaperone in solution. J. Mol. Biol. 292: 181-190.
37. Koradi, R., Billeter, M., and Wuthrich, K. 1996. MolMol - a program for display and analysis of macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Graphics, 14: 51.
38. Laminet, A.A., Ziegelhoffer, T., Georgopoulos, C., and Pluckthun, A. 1990. The Escherichia coli heat shock proteins GroEL and GroES modulate the folding of the beta-lactamase precursor. EMBO J. 9: 2315-2319.
39. Landry, S.J., Jordan, R., McMacken, R., and Gierasch, L.M. 1992. Different conformations for the same polypeptide bound to chaperones DnaK and GroEL. Nature (London), 355: 455-457.
40. Langer, T., Lu, C., Echols, H., Flanagan, J., Hayer, M.K., and Hartl, F.U. 1992. Successive action of DnaK, DnaJ and GroEL along the pathway of chaperone-mediated protein folding. Nature (London), 356: 683-689.
41. Laufen, T., Mayer, M.P., Beisel, C., Klostermeier, D., Mogk, A., Reinstein, J., and Bukau, B. 1999. Mechanism of regulation of hsp70 chaperones by DnaJ cochaperones. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96: 5452-5457.
42. Martin, J., and Hartl, F.U. 1997. Chaperone-assisted protein folding. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7: 41-52.
43. Martin, J., Langer, T., Boteva, R., Schramel, A., Horwich, A.L., and Hartl, F.U. 1991. Chaperonin-mediated protein folding at the surface of GroEL through a 'molten globule'-like intermediate. Nature (London), 352: 36-42.
44. Martin, J., Mayhew, M., Langer, T., and Hartl, F.U. 1993. The reaction cycle of GroEL and GroES in chaperonin-assisted protein folding. Nature (London), 366: 228-233.
45. Mendoza, J.A., and Campo, G.D. 1996. Ligand-induced conformational changes of GroEL are dependent on the bound substrate polypeptide. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 16 344-16 349.
46. Mogk, A., Tomoyasu, T., Goloubinoff, P., Rudiger, S., Roder, D., Langen, H., and Bukau, B. 1999. Identification of thermolabile Escherichia coli proteins: prevention and reversion of aggregation by DnaK and ClpB. EMBO J. 18: 6934-6949.
47. Netzer, W.J., and Hartl, F.U. 1998. Protein folding in the cytosol: chaperonin-dependent and independent mechanisms. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23: 68-73.
48. Orengo, C.A., Pearl, F.M.G., Bray, J.E., Todd, A.E., Martin, A.C., Lo Conte, L., and Thornton, J.M. 1999. The CATH database provides insights into protein structure/function relationships. Nucleic Acids Res. 27: 275-279.
49. Partikian, A., Olveczky, B., Swaminathan, R., Li, Y.X., and Verkman, A.S. 1998. Rapid diffusion of Green Fluorescent Protein in the mitochondrial matrix J. Cell Biol. 140: 821-829.
50. Pierpaoli, E.V., Sandmeier, E., Baici, A., Schonfeld, H.J., Gisler, S., and Christen, P. 1997. The power stroke of the DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE molecular chaperone system. J. Mol. Biol. 269: 757-768.
51. Plaxco, K.W., Simons, K.T., and Baker, D. 1998. Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 277: 985-994.
52. Rudiger, S., Germeroth, L., Schneidermergener, J., and Bukau, B. 1997. Substrate specificity of the Dnak chaperone determined by screening cellulose-bound peptide libraries. EMBO J. 16: 1501-1507.
53. Russell, R., Wali Karzai, A., Mehl, A.F., and McMacken, R. 1999. DnaJ dramatically stimulates ATP hydrolysis by DnaK: insight into targeting of Hsp70 proteins to polypeptide substrates. Biochemistry, 38: 4165-4176.
54. Rye, H.S., Roseman, A.M., Chen, S.X., Furtak, K., Fenton, W.A., Saibil, H.R., and Horwich, A.L. 1999. GroEL-GroES cycling: ATP and nonnative polypeptide direct alternation of foldingactive rings. Cell, 97: 325-338.
55. Schmidt, M., and Buchner, J. 1992. Interaction of GroE with an all-beta-protein. J. Biol. Chem. 267: 16 829-16 833.
56. Shtilerman, M., Lorimer, G.H., and Englander, S.W. 1999. Chaperonin function: folding by forced unfolding. Science (Washington, D.C.), 284: 822-825.
57. Sigler, P.B., Xu, Z.H., Rye, H.S., Burston, S.O., Fenton, W.A., and Horwich, A.L. 1998. Structure and function in GroEL-mediated protein folding. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67: 581-608.
58. Swaminathan, R., Hoang, C.P., and Verkman, A.S. 1997. Photobleaching recovery and anisotropy decay of Green Fluorescent Protein GFP-S65T in solution and cells-cytoplasmic viscosity probed by Green Fluorescent Protein translational and rotational diffusion. Biophys. J. 72: 1900-1907.
59. Szabo, A., Langer, T., Schroder, H., Flanagan, J., Bukau, B., and Hartl, F.U. 1994. The ATP hydrolysis-dependent reaction cycle of the Escherichia coli Hsp70 system DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91: 10 345-10 349.
60. Teter, S.A., Houry, W.A., Ang, D., Tradler, T., Rockabrand, D., Fischer, G., Blum, P., Georgopoulos, C., and Hartl, F.U. 1999. Polypeptide flux through bacterial Hsp70: DnaK cooperates with trigger factor in chaperoning nascent chains. Cell, 97: 755-765.
61. Todd, M.J., Viitanen, P.V., and Lorimer, G.H. 1994. Dynamics of the chaperonin ATPase cycle: implications for facilitated protein folding. Science (Washington, D.C.), 265: 659-666.
62. Tsurupa, G.P., Ikura, T., Makio, T., and Kuwajima, K. 1998. Refolding kinetics of staphylococcal nuclease and its mutants in the presence of the chaperonin GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 277: 733-745.
63. Viitanen, P.V., Donaldson, O.K., Lorimer, G.H., Lubben, T.H., and Gatenby, A.A. 1991. Complex interactions between the chaperonin 60 molecular chaperone and dihydrofolate reductase. Biochemistry, 30: 9716-9723.
64. Viitanen, P.V., Gatenby, A.A., and Lorimer, G.H. 1992. Purified chaperonin 60 (GroEL) interacts with the nonnative states of a multitude of Escherichia coli proteins. Protein Sci. 1: 363-369.
65. Walter, S., Lorimer, G.H., and Schmid, F.X. 1996. A thermodynamic coupling mechanism for GroEL-mediated unfolding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93: 9425-9430.
66. Wang, Q., Buckle, A.M., and Fersht, A.R. 2000. From minichaperone to GroEL 1: information on GroEL-polypeptide interactions from crystal packing of minichaperones. J. Mol. Biol. 304: 873-881.
67. Wang, Z.L., Feng, H.P., Landry, S.J., Maxwell, J., and Gierasch, L.M. 1999. Basis of substrate binding by the chaperonin GroEL. Biochemistry, 38: 12 537-12 546.
68. Weissman, J.S., Kashi, Y., Fenton, W.A., and Horwich, A.L. 1994. GroEL-mediated protein folding proceeds by multiple rounds of binding and release of nonnative forms. Cell, 78: 693-702.
69. Wickner, S., Maurizi, M.R., and Gottesman, S. 1999. Posttranslational quality control: folding, refolding, and degrading proteins. Science (Washington. D.C.), 286: 1888-1893.
70. Xu, Z.H., Horwich, A.L., and Sigler, P.B. 1997. The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL-GroES-(ADP)(7) chaperonin complex. Nature (London), 388: 741-750.
71. Zhu, X.T., Zhao, X., Burkholder, W.F., Gragerov, A., Ogata, C.M., Gottesman, M.E., and Hendrickson, W.A. 1996. Structural analysis of substrate binding by the molecular chaperone Dnak. Science (Washington, D.C.), 272: 1606-1614.