Catalysis, commitment and encapsulation during GroE-mediated folding

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 289, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 1075-1092

  Beißinger, Martina ^a   Rutkat, Kerstin ^a   Buchner, Johannes ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Apyrase; ATP hydrolysis; Catalysis of folding; Chaperone mechanism; Electrostatic interactions

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; BACTERIAL PROTEIN; MALTOSE BINDING PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ENCAPSULATION; HYDROLYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; TEMPERATURE;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); ESCHERICHIA COLI; NEGIBACTERIA;

EID: 0038933540     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2780     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Agard D. A. To fold or not to fold. Science. 260:1993;1903-1904.
2. Amann E., Ochs B., Abel K. J. Tightly regulated tac promoter vectors useful for the expression of unfused and fused protiens inEscherichia coli. Gene. 69:1988;301-315.
3. 2chaperonin hetero-oligomer. Science. 265:1994;653-655.
4. Behlke J., Ristau O., Schönfeld H.-J. Nucleotide-dependent complex formation between the Escherichia coli chaperonins GroEL and GroES studied under equilibrium conditions. Biochemistry. 36:1997;5149-5136.
5. Beißinger M., Buchner J. How chaperones fold proteins. Biol. Chem. 379:1998;245-259.
6. Betton J.-M., Boscus D., Missiakas D., Raina S., Hofnung M. Probing the structural role of an αβ loop of maltose-binding protein by mutagenesis: heat-shock induction by loop variants of the maltose-binding protein that form periplasmic inclusion bodies. J. Mol. Biol. 262:1996;140-150.
7. Braig K., Otwinowski Z., Hegde R., Boisvert D. C., Joachimiak A., Horwich A. L., Sigler P. B. The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å Nature. 371:1994;578-586.
8. Buchner J., Schmidt M., Fuchs M., Jaenicke R., Rudolph R., Schmid F. X., Kiefhaber T. GroE facilitates refolding of citrate synthase by suppressing aggregation. Biochemistry. 30:1991;1586-1591.
9. Burston S. G., Ranson N. A., Clarke A. R. The origins and consequences of asymmetry in the chaperonin reaction cycle. J. Mol. Biol. 249:1995;138-152.
10. Burston S. G., Weissman J. S., Farr G. W., Fenton W. A., Horwich A. L. Release of both native and non-native proteins from a cis -only GroEL ternary complex. Nature. 383:1996;96-99.
11. Chen S., Roseman A. M., Hunter A. S., Wood S. P., Burston S. G., Ranson N. A., Clarke A. R., Saibil H. R. Location of a folding protein and shape changes in GroEL-GroES complexes imaged by cryo-electron microscopy. Nature. 371:1994;261-264.
12. Chun S.-Y., Strobel S., Bassford P. Jr, Randall L. L. Folding of maltose-binding protein. J. Biol. Chem. 268:1993;20855-20862.
13. 2complexes in molecular chaperone activity. Fold. Des. 1:1996;265-273.
14. Coyle J. E., Jaeger J., Groß M., Robinson C., Radford S. E. Structural and mechanistic consequences of polypeptide binding by GroEL. Fold. Des. 2:1997;93-104.
15. Creighton T. E. Molecular chaperones-unfolding protein folding. Nature. 352:1991;17-18.
16. Dubaquié Y., Looser R., Fünfschilling U., Jenö P., Rospert S. Identification of in vivo substrates of the yeast mitochondrial chaperonins reveals overlapping but non-identical requirement for hsp60 and hsp10. EMBO J. 17:1998;5868-5878.
17. Engel A., Hayer-Hartl M. K., Goldie K. N., Pfeifer G., Hegerl R., Müller S., da Silva A. C. R., Baumeister W., Hartl F.-U. Functional significance of symmetrical versus asymmetrical GroEL-GroES chaperonin complexes. Science. 269:1995;832-836.
18. Ewalt K. L., Hendrick J. P., Houry W. A., Hartl F.-U. In vivo observation of polypeptide flux through the bacterial chaperonin system. Cell. 90:1997;491-500.
19. Fayet O., Ziegelhoffer T., Georgopoulos C. The GroES and GroEL heat shock gene products are essential for bacterial growth at all temperatures. J. Bacteriol. 171:1989;1379-1385.
20. Fedorov A. N., Baldwin T. O. GroE modulates kinetic partitioning of folding intermediates between alternative states to maximize the yield of biologically active protein. J. Mol. Biol. 268:1997;712-723.
21. Frank J., van Heel M. Correspondence analysis of aligned images of biological particles. J. Mol. Biol. 161:1982;134-137.
22. Frieden C., Clark C. Protein folding: how the mechanism of GroEL action is defined by kinetics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 94:1997;5535-5538.
23. Georgopoulos C., Hendrix R. W., Casjens S. R., Kaiser A. D. Host participation in bacteriophage lambda head assembly. J. Mol. Biol. 76:1973;45-60.
24. Gorovits B. M., Ybarra J., Seale J. W., Horowitz P. M. Conditions for nucleotide-dependent GroES-GroEL interactions. J. Biol. Chem. 272:1997;26999-27004.
25. Hayer-Hartl M. K., Martin J., Hartl F.-U. Asymmetrical interacion of GroEL and GroES in the ATPase cycle of assisted protein folding. Science. 269:1995;836-841.
26. Hayer-Hartl M. K., Weber F., Hartl F.-U. Mechanism of chaperonin action: GroES binding and release can drive GroEL-mediated protein folding in the absence of ATP hydrolysis. EMBO J. 15:1996;6111-6121.
27. Hegerl R. The EM program package: a platform for image processing in biological electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 161:1996;30-34.
28. Hoshino M., Kawata Y., Goto Y. Interaction of GroEL with conformational states of horse cytochrome c. J. Mol. Biol. 262:1996;575-587.
29. Hunt J. F., Weaver A. J., Landry S. J., Gierasch L., Deisenhofer J. The crystal structure of the GroES co-chaperonin at 2.8 Å resolution. Nature. 379:1996;37-45.
30. Jackson G. S., Staniforth R. A., Halsall D. J., Atkinson T., Holbrook J. J., Clarke A. R., Burston S. Binding and hydrolysis of nucleotides in the chaperonin catalytic cycle: implications for the mechanism of assisted protein folding. Biochemistry. 32:1993;2554-2563.
31. Kad N. M., Ranson N. A., Cliff M. J., Clarke A. R. Asymmetry, commitment and inhibition in the GroE ATPase cycle impose alternating functions on the two GroEL rings. J. Mol. Biol. 278:1998;267-278.
32. Langer T., Pfeifer G., Martin J., Baumeister W., Hartl F.-U. Chaperonin-mediated protein folding: GroES binds to one end of the GroEL cylinder, which accommodates the protein substrate within its central cavity. EMBO J. 11:1992;4757-4765.
33. Lin Z., Eisenstein E. Nucleotide binding-promoted conformational changes release a non-native polypeptide from the Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 93:1996;1977-1981.
34. Llorca O., Marco S., Carrascosa J. L., Valpuesta J. M. The formation of symmetrical GroEL-GroES complexes in the presence of ATP. FEBS Letters. 345:1994;181-186.
35. Llorca O., Marco S., Carrascosa J. L., Valpuesta J. M. Symmetric GroEL-GroES complexes can contain substrate simultaneously in both GroEL rings. FEBS Letters. 405:1997;195-199.
36. Llorca O., Galan A., Carrascosa J. L., Muga A., Valpuesta J. M. GroEL under heat-shock. J. Biol. Chem. 273:1998;32587-32594.
37. Makino Y., Amada K., Taguchi H., Yoshida M. Chaperonin-mediated folding of green fluorescent protein. J. Biol. Chem. 272:1997;12468-12474.
38. Martin J., Hartl F.-U. The effect of macromolecular crowding on chaperonin-mediated protein folding. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 94:1997;1107-1112.
39. Mayhew M., da Silva A. C. R., Martin J., Erdjument-Bromage H., Tempst P., Hartl F.-U. Protein folding in the central cavity of the GroEL-GroES chaperonin complex. Nature. 379:1996;420-426.
40. Miller D. M. III, Olson J. S., Pflugrath J. W., Quiocho R. A. Rates of ligand binding to periplasmic proteins involved in bacterial transport and chemotaxis. J. Biol. Chem. 258:1983;13665-13672.
41. Pajot P. Fluorescence of proteins in 6-M guanidine hydrochloride. A method for the quantitative determination of tryptophan. Eur. J. Biochem. 63:1976;263-269.
42. Peralta D., Hartman D. J., Hoogenraad N. J., Hoj P. B. Generation of a stable folding intermediate which can be rescued by the chaperonins GroEL and GroES. FEBS Letters. 339:1994;45-49.
43. Perrett S., Zahn R., Stenberg G., Fersht A. R. Importance of electrostatic interactions in the rapid binding of polypeptides to GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 269:1997;892-901.
44. Persson M., Carlsson U., Bergenhem N. GroEL provides a folding pathway with lower apparent activation energy compared to spontaneous refolding of human carbonic anhydrase II. FEBS Letters. 411:1997;43-47.
45. Phillips T. A., VanBogelen R. A., Neidhardt F. C. Lon gene product of Escherichia coli is a heat-shock protein. J. Bacteriol. 159:1984;283-287.
46. Raffy S., Sassoon N., Hofnung M., Betton J.-M. Tertiary structure-dependence of misfolding substitutions in loops of the maltose-binding protein. Protein Sci. 7:1998;2136-2142.
47. Ranson N. A., Dunster N. J., Burston S. G., Clarke A. R. Chaperonins can catalyse the reversal of early aggregation steps when a protein misfolds. J. Mol. Biol. 250:1995;581-586.
48. Ranson N. A., Burston S. G., Clarke A. R. Binding, encapsulation and ejection: substrate dynamics during a chaperonin-assisted folding reaction. J. Mol. Biol. 266:1997;656-664.
49. Ranson N. A., White H. E., Saibil H. R. Chaperonins. Biochem. J. 333:1998;233-242.
50. Roseman A., Chen S., White H., Braig K., Saibil H. The chaperonin ATPase cycle: mechanism of allosteric switching and movements of substrate-binding domains in GroEL. Cell. 87:1996;241-251.
51. Rye H. S., Burston S. G., Fenton W. A., Beechem J. M., Xu Z., Sigler P. B., Horwich A. L. Distinct actions of cis and trans ATP within the double ring of the chaperonin GroEL. Nature. 388:1997;792-798.
52. Saxton W. O. Semper: distortion compensation, selective averaging, 3-D reconstruction, and transfer function correction in a highly programmable system. J. Struct. Biol. 116:1996;230-236.
53. Schmidt M., Buchner J., Todd M. J., Lorimer G. H., Viitanen P. V. On the role of GroES in the chaperonin-assisted folding reaction. Three case studies. J. Biol. Chem. 269:1994a;10304-10311.
54. Schmidt M., Bücheler U., Kaluza B., Buchner J. Correlation between the stability of GroEL-protein ligand complex and the release mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 45:1994b;27964-27972.
55. Schmidt M., Rutkat K., Rachel R., Pfeifer G., Jaenicke R., Viitanen P., Lorimer G. H., Buchner J. Symmetric complexes of GroE chaperonins as part of the functional cycle. Science. 271:1994c;656-659.
56. Sharff A. J., Rodseth L. E., Spurlino J. C., Quiocho F. A. Crystallographic evidence of a large ligand-induced hinge-twist motion between the two domains of the maltodextrin binding protein involved in active transport and chemotaxis. Biochemistry. 31:1992;10657-10663.
57. Sigler P. B., Xu Z., Rye H. S., Burston S. G., Fenton W. A., Horwich A. L. Structure and function in GroEL-mediated protein folding. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67:1998;581-608.
58. Smith K. E., Fisher M. T. Interactions between the GroE chaperonins and rhodanese. Multiple intermediates and release and rebinding. J. Biol. Chem. 270:1995;21517-21523.
59. Sparrer H., Buchner J. How GroES regulates binding of non-native protein to GroEL. J. Biol. Chem. 272:1997;14080-14086.
60. Sparrer H., Lilie H., Buchner J. Dynamics of the GroEL-protein complex: effects of nucleotides and folding mutants. J. Mol. Biol. 258:1996;74-87.
61. Sparrer H., Rutkat K., Buchner J. Catalysis of protein folding by symmetric chaperone complexes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 94:1997;1096-1100.
62. Spurlino J. C., Lu G.-Y., Quiocho F. A. The 2.3-Å resolution structure of the maltose- or maltodextrin-binding protein, a primary receptor of bacterial active transport and chemotaxis. J. Biol. Chem. 266:1991;5202-5219.
63. Taguchi H., Yoshida M. Chaperonin releases the substrate protein in a form with tendency to aggregate and ability to rebind to chaperonin. FEBS Letters. 359:1995;195-198.
64. Todd M. J., Viitanen P. V., Lorimer G. H. Dynamics of the chaperonin ATPase cycle: implications for facilitated protein folding. Science. 265:1994;659-666.
65. Todd M. J., Lorimer G. L., Thirumalai D. Chaperonin-facilitated protein folding: optimization of rate and yield by an iterative annealing mechanism. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 93:1996;4030-4035.
66. +dependent. Biochemistry. 29:1990;5665-5671.
67. Viitanen P. V., Donaldson G. K., Lorimer G. H., Lubben T. H., Gatenby A. A. Complex interactions between the chaperonin 60 molecular chaperone and dihydrofolate reductase. Biochemistry. 30:1991;9716-9723.
68. Walter S., Lorimer G. H., Schmid F. X. A thermodynamic coupling mechanism for GroEL-mediated unfolding. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 93:1996;9425-9430.
69. Weissman J. S., Kashi Y., Fenton W. A., Horwich A. L. GroEL-mediated protein folding proceeds by multiple rounds of binding and release of nonative forms. Cell. 78:1994;693-702.
70. Weissman J. S., Hohl C. M., Kovalenko O., Kashi Y., Chen S., Braig K., Saibil H. R., Fenton W. A., Horwich A. L. Mechanism of GroEL action: productive release of polypeptide from a sequestered position under GroES. Cell. 83:1995;577-587.
71. Weissman J. S., Rye H. W., Fenton W. A., Beechem J. M., Horwich A. L. Characterization of the active intermediate of a GroEL-GroES-mediated protein folding reaction. Cell. 84:1996;481-490.
72. 7chaperonin complex. Nature. 388:1997;741-750.
73. Yifrach O., Horovitz A. Nested cooperativity in the ATPase activity in the oligomeric chaperonin GroEL. Biochemistry. 34:1995;9716-9723.
74. Yifrach O., Horovitz A. Allosteric control by ATP of non-folded protein binding to GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 255:1996;356-361.
75. Zahn R., Plückthun A. Thermodynamic partitioning model for hydrophobic binding of polypeptides by GroEL. II. GroEL recognizes thermally unfolded mature β-lactamase. J. Mol. Biol. 242:1994;165-174.
76. Zahn R., Perrett S., Fersht A. R. Conformational states bound by the molecular chaperones GroEL and SecB: a hidden unfolding (annealing) activity. J. Mol. Biol. 261:1996;43-61.