Active-learning processes used in us pharmacy education

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Volumn 75, Issue 4, 2011, Pages

  Stewart, David W ^a   Brown, Stacy D ^a   Clavier, Cheri W ^a   Wyatt, Jarrett ^a  

^a EAST TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Active learning; Pharmacy education; Survey; Teaching

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE LEARNING; ARTICLE; EDUCATION; HUMAN; PHARMACY EDUCATION; PROBLEM BASED LEARNING; SURVEY; TEACHING; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY;

ACTIVE LEARNING; PHARMACY EDUCATION; SURVEY; TEACHING;

EDUCATION, PHARMACY; FACULTY; HUMANS; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85046979891     PISSN: 00029459     EISSN: 15536467     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5688/ajpe75468     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Blouin R, Riffee W, Robinson E, et al. AACP curricular change summit supplement: roles of innovation in education delivery. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009;73(8):Article 154.
2. Knapp D, Knapp D. Attributes of colleges and schools of pharmacy in the United States. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009;73(5):Article 96.
3. Oblinger D. Boomers, gen-Xers and millenials: understanding the new students. EDUCAUSE Rev. 2003;38(4):37-47.
4. Jungnickel P, Kelley K, Hammer D, Haines S, Marlowe K. Addressing competencies for the future in the professional classroom. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009;73(8):Article 156.
5. Cisneros R, Salisbury-Glennon J, Anderson-Harper H. Status of problem-based learning research in pharmacy education: a call for future research. Am J Pharm Educ. 2002;66(1):19-26.
6. Fisher R. The potential for problem-based learnign in pharmacy education: a clinical therapeutics course in diabetes. Am J Pharm Educ. 1994;58(2):183-9.
7. Romero R, Eriksen S, Haworth I. Quantitative assessment of assisted problem-based learning in a pharmaceutics course. Am J Pharm Educ. 2010;74(4):Article 66.
8. Shin Y, Kauf T, Biddle A, Simpson K. Incorporating problembased learning concepts into a lecture-based pharmacoeconomics course. Am J Pharm Educ. 1999;63(2):152-9.
9. Webster A, Riggs R. A quantitative assessment of a medicinal chemistry problem-based learning sequence. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006;70(4):Article 89.
10. Hogan S, Lundquist L. The impact of problem-based learning on students' perceptions of preparedness for advanced pharmacy practice experiences. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006;70(6):Article 127.
11. Chase P, Franson K, An A. Discovery maps: a student-centered approach to reinforcing the curriculum. Am J Pharm Educ. 2001;65(1): 74-7.
12. Gibson HL, Chase C. Longitudinal impact of an inquiry-based science program on middle school students' attitudes toward science. Sci Educ. 2002;86(5):693-705.
13. Brown S. A process-oriented guided inquiry approach to teaching medicinal chemistry. Am J Pharm Educ. 2010;74(7):Article 121.
14. Currie B, Chapman R, Christoff J, Sikorski L. Patient related case studies in medicinal chemistry. Am J Pharm Educ. 1994;58(4):446-50.
15. Reddy I. Implementation of a pharmaceutics course in a large class through active learning using quick-thinks and case-based learning. Am J Pharm Educ. 2000;64(4):348-55.
16. Sims P. Utilizing the peer group method with case studies to teach pharmacokinetics. Am J Pharm Educ. 1994;58(1):73-7.
17. Sims P. Utilizing the peer group method with case studies to teach pharmaceutics. Am J Pharm Educ. 1994;58(1):78-81.
18. Abate M, Meyer-Stout P, Stamatakis M, Gannett P, Nardi A. Development and evaluation of computerized problem-based learning cases emphasizing basic science concepts. Am J Pharm Educ. 2000;64(1):74-82.
19. Harrold M, Newton G. Development and evaluation of computer based tutorials in biochemistry and medicinal chemistry. Am J Pharm Educ. 1998;62(1):24-30.
20. Roche V, Aitken M, Zito S. Evaluation of computerized medicinal chemistry case study modules as tools to enhance student learning and clinical problem-solving skills. Am J Pharm Educ. 1999;63(3):289-95.
21. Wellman G, Larson R. Using web-based prescription simulations as an active learning tool in an integrated practice skills laboratory. Am J Pharm Educ. 2002;66(4):411-5.
22. Medina M, Medina P, Wanzer D, Wilson J, Er N, Britton M. Use of an audience response system (ARS) in a dual-campus classroom environment. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72(2):Article 38.
23. Slain D, Abate M, Hodges B, Stamatakis M, Wolak S. An interactive response system to promote active learning in the Doctor of Pharmacy curriculum. Am J Pharm Educ. 2004;68(5):Article 117.
24. Beatty S, Kelley K, Metzger A, Bellebaum K, McAuley J. Teambased learning in therapeutics workshop sessions. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009;73(6):Article 100.
25. Letassy N, Fugate S, Medina M, Stroup J, Britton M. Using teambased learning in an endocrine module taught across two campuses. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72(5):Article 103.
26. Howe N, Strauss W. Millennials rising: the next great generation. New York, NY: Vintage Books; 2000.
27. Wells B, Beck D, Draugalis J. Report of the 2007-2008 Argus Commission: what future awaits beyond pharmaceutical care? Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72S(S):Article S8.
28. Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants, part I. On the Horizon. 2001;9(5):1-6.
29. Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants, part II. On the Horizon. 2001;9(6):1-6.
30. Cook D, Levinson A, Garside S, Dupras D, Erwin P, Montori V. Internet-based learning in the health professions: A meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008;300(10):1181-96.
31. Davis J, Crabb S, Rogers E, Zamora J, Khan K. Computer-based teaching is as good as face to face lecture-based teaching of evidence based medicine: A randomized controlled trial. Med Teach. 2008;30(3):302-7.
32. Ernst H, Colthorpe K. Expanding voluntary active-learning opportunities. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72(2):Article 28.
33. Persky A. Multi-faceted approach to improve learning in pharmacokinetics. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72(2):Article 36.
34. Premkumar K, Coupal C. Rules of engagement - 12 tips for successful use of "clickers" in the classroom. Med Teach. 2008;30(2):146-9.
35. Seybert A, Kobulinsky L, McKaveney T. Human patient simulation in a pharmacotherapy course. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72(2):Article 37.
36. Van Dijken P, Thevoz S, Jucker-Kupper P, Feihl F, Bonvin R, Waeber B. Evaluation of an online, case-based interactive approach to teaching pathophysiology. Med Teach. 2008;30(5):e131-6.
37. Eberlein T, Kampmeier J, Minderhout V, et al. Pedagogies of engagement in science: a comparison of PBL, POGIL, and PLTL. Biochem Mol Bio Educ. 2008;36(4):262-73.
38. Albanese M, Mitchell S. Problem-based learning: a review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Acad Med 1993;68(8):52-81.
39. Kay R, LeSage A. A strategic assessment of audience response systems used in higher education. Austr J Educ. Tech 2009;25(2):235-49.
40. Banks D. Audience response systems in higher education: applications and cases. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing, 2006.
41. Brice L. Deliberative discourse enacted: task, text, and talk. Theory Res Soc Educ 2002;30(1):66-87.
42. Gayford C. Science education and sutainability: a case-study in discussion-based learning. Res Sci Tech Educ. 1995;13(2):135-45.
43. Kerfoot B, DeWolf W, Masser B, Church P, Federman D. Spaced education improves the retention of clinical knowledge by medical students: randomized controlled trial. Med Educ. 2007;41(1):23-31.
44. Kerfoot B, Kearney M, Connelly D, Ritchey M. Interactive spaced education to assess and improve knowledge of clinical practice guidelines: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2009;249(5):744-9.
45. Mayer R. The promise of multimedia learning: using the same instructional method across different media. Learning Instruction. 2003;13(2):125-9.
46. Michaelsen L, Knight A, Fink L. Team-based learning: a transformative use of small groups in college teaching. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, 2004.