A process-oriented guided inquiry approach to teaching medicinal chemistry

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Volumn 74, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1-6

  Brown, Stacy D ^a  

^a EAST TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Active learning; Guided inquiry; Medicinal chemistry; Process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL); Team based learning

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EDUCATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PHARMACY STUDENT; PROBLEM BASED LEARNING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED STATES; ACTIVE LEARNING; GUIDED INQUIRY; MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY; PROCESS-ORIENTED GUIDED-INQUIRY LEARNING (POGIL); TEAM-BASED LEARNING;

CHEMISTRY, PHARMACEUTICAL; EDUCATION, PHARMACY; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HUMANS; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; QUESTIONNAIRES; STUDENTS, PHARMACY; TENNESSEE;

ACTIVE LEARNING; GUIDED INQUIRY; MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY; PROCESS-ORIENTED GUIDED-INQUIRY LEARNING (POGIL); TEAM-BASED LEARNING;

EID: 77957107031     PISSN: 00029459     EISSN: 15536467     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5688/aj7407121     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Alsharif NZ, Galt KA, Mehanna A, Chapman R, Ogunbadeniyi AM. Instructional model to teach clinically relevant medicinal chemistry. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006;70(4):Article 91.
2. Currie BL, Chapman RL, Christoff JJ, Sikorski L. Patient related case studies in medicinal chemistry. Am J Pharm Educ. 1994;58(4):446-450.
3. Harrold MW. Importance of functional group chemistry in the drug selection process: case study. Am J Pharm Educ. 1998;62(2):24-30.
4. Herrier RN, Jackson TR, Consroe PF. Use of student centered, problem based, clinical case discussions to enhance learning in pharmacology and medicinal chemistry. Am J Pharm Educ. 1997;61(4):441-446.
5. Currie BL, Roche VF, Zito SW. Medicinal Chemistry Case Study Workbook. Baltimore, Maryland: Williams & Wilkins; 1996.
6. Roche VF, Zito SW. Computerized medicinal chemistry case studies. Am J Pharm Educ. 1997;61(4):447-452.
7. Harrold MW, Newton GD. Development and evaluation of computer based tutorials in biochemistry and medicinal chemistry. Am J Pharm Educ. 1998;62(1):24-30.
8. Roche VF, Aitken M, Zito SW. Evaluation of computerized medicinal chemistry case study modules as tools to enhance student learning and clinical problem-solving skills. Am J Pharm Educ. 1999;63(3):289-295.
9. Abate MA, Meyer-Stout PJ, Stamatakis MK, Gannett PM, Nardi AH. Development and evaluation of computerized problem-based learning cases emphasizing basic science concepts. Am J Pharm Educ. 2000;64(1):74-82.
10. Alsharif NZ, Theesen KA, Roche VF. Structurally-based therapeutic evaluation: A therapeutic and practical approach to teaching medicinal chemistry. Am J Pharm Educ. 1997;61(1):55-60.
11. Alsharif NZ, Roche VF, Destache C. Teaching medicinal chemistry to meet outcome objectives for pharmacy graduates. Am J Pharm Educ. 1999;63(1):34-40.
12. Alsharif NZ, Shara M, Roche VF. Structurally-based therapeutic evaluation (SBTE): An opportunity for curriculum integration and interdisciplinary teaching. Am J Pharm Educ. 2001;65:314-323.
13. Accreditation Standards and Guidelines for the Professional Program in Pharmacy Leading to the Doctor of Pharmacy Degree. Accreditation Council on Pharmaceutical Education. Available at http://acpe-accredit.org/standards. Accessed July 20, 2010.
14. Hanson D, Wolfskill T. Improving the Teaching/Learning Process in General Chemistry. J Chem Educ. 1998;75(2):143-147.
15. Spencer JN. New Directions in Teaching Chemistry: A Philosophical and Pedagogical Basis. J Chem Educ. 1999;76(4):566-569.
16. Farrell JJ, Moog RS, Spencer JN. A Guided Inquiry Chemistry Course. J Chem Educ. 1999;76(4):570-574.
17. What is Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL)? Available at http://pogil.org. Accessed July 20, 2010.
18. Minderhout V, Loertscher J. Lecture-free Biochemistry: A Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Approach. Biochem Mol Bio Educ. 2007;35(3):172-180.
19. Eberlein T, Kampmeier J, Minderhout V, Moog RS, Platt T, Varma-Nelson P, White HB. Pedagogies of engagement in science: a comparison of PBL, POGIL, and PLTL. Biochem Mol Bio Educ. 2008;36(4):262-273.
20. Hinde RJ, Kovac J. Student active learning methods in physical chemistry. J Chem Educ. 2001;78(1):93-99.
21. Rasmussen C, Kwon O. An inquiry oriented approach to undergraduate mathematics. J Math Behav. 2007;26(3):189-194.
22. Hale D, Mullen LG. Designing process-oriented guided-inquiry activities: a new innovation for marketing class. Market Educ Rev. 2009;19(Spring):73-80.
23. Blouin RA, Joyner PU, Pollack GM. Preparing for a renaissance in pharmacy education: the need, opportunity, and capacity for change. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72(2):Article 42.
24. Straumanis AR, Simons EA. A multi-institutional assessment of the use of POGIL in Organic Chemistry, in Moog RS, Spencer JN, eds. Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning. Oxford University Press, New York; 2008: 226-239.
25. Flower RJ. The Development of COX2 Inhibitors. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003;2 (March):179-191.
26. Allen DD, Bond CA. Prepharmacy predictors of success in pharmacy school: grade point averages, pharmacy college admissions test, communication abilities, and critical thinking skills. Pharmacotherapy. 2001;21(7):842-849.
27. Chisholm MA, Cobb HH, Kotzan JA. Significant factors for predicting academic success of first-year pharmacy students. Am J Pharm Educ. 1995;59(4):364-370.
28. Persky AM, Pollack GM. Using answer-until-correct examinations to provide immediate feedback to students in a pharmacokinetics course. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72(4):Article 83.