Framework for selecting sustainable supply chain processes and industries using an integrated approach

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 184, Issue , 2018, Pages 969-984

  Padhi, Sidhartha S ^a   Pati, Rupesh K ^a   Rajeev, A ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT KOZHIKODE   (India)

Author keywords

Fuzzy multi criteria decision making; Group decision making; Indian industry; Resource based view; Stakeholder theory; Sustainable supply chain

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; DECISION THEORY; GROUP THEORY; PRODUCT DESIGN; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

FUZZY - MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; GROUP DECISION MAKING; INDIAN INDUSTRIES; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; STAKEHOLDER THEORY; SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAINS;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 85046027629     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.306     Document Type: Article

References (108)

1. Ahi, P., Searcy, C., A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 52 (2013), 329–341.
2. Ahi, P., Searcy, C., Assessing sustainability in the supply chain: a triple bottom line approach. Appl. Math. Model. 39:10–11 (2015), 2882–2896.
3. Akhavan, R.M., Beckmann, M., A configuration of sustainable sourcing and supply management strategies. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 23:2 (2017), 137–151.
4. Barla, S.B., A case study of supplier selection for lean supply by using a mathematical model. Logist. Inf. Manag. 16:6 (2003), 451–459.
5. Barney, J., Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Manag. 17:1 (1991), 99–120.
6. Bazerman, M.H., Moore, D.A., Judgement in Managerial Decision Making. seventh ed., 2008, Wiley, New York, NY.
7. Blome, C., Hollos, D., Paulraj, A., Green procurement and green supplier development: antecedents and effects on supplier performance. Int. J. Prod. Res. 52:1 (2014), 32–49.
8. Brabazon, P.G., MacCarthy, B., Woodcock, A., Hawkins, R.W., Mass customization in the automotive industry: comparing interdealer trading and reconfiguration flexibilities in order fulfillment. Prod. Oper. Manag. 19:5 (2010), 489–502.
9. Carter, C.R., Easton, L.P., Sustainable supply chain management: evolution and future directions. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 41:1 (2011), 46–62.
10. CBSE, CGPA Calculator 2017. 2017 available at: https://varic.com/cgpa/qw (accessed 15.07.2017).
11. Central pollution control board of India, CPCB 2017. 2017 available at: http://cpcb.nic.in/ (accessed on 18.01.2017).
12. Chai, J., James, N.K., Liu, E., Ngai, W.T., Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: a systematic review of literature. Expert Syst. Appl. 40:10 (2013), 3872–3885.
13. Chappin, M.M.H., Cambre, B., Vermeulen, P.A.M., Lozano, R., Internalizing sustainable practices: a configurational approach on sustainable forest management of the Dutch wood trade and timber industry. J. Clean. Prod. 107 (2015), 760–774.
14. Chauhan, A., Singh, A., A hybrid multi-criteria decision making method approach for selecting a sustainable location of healthcare waste disposal facility. J. Clean. Prod. 139 (2016), 1001–1010.
15. Chen, S.C., Hung, C.W., Elucidating the factors influencing the acceptance of green products: an extension of theory of planned behavior. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 112 (2016), 155–163.
16. Cho, H.J., Pucik, V., Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value. Strat. Manag. J. 26:6 (2005), 555–575.
17. Clarkson, M.E., A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20:1 (1995), 92–117.
18. De Boer, L., Labro, E., Morlacchi, P., A review of methods supporting supplier selection. Eur. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 7:2 (2001), 75–89.
19. Desanctis, G., Gallupe, R.B., A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Manag. Sci. 33:5 (1987), 589–609.
20. Dey, P.K., Cheffi, W., Green supply chain performance measurement using the analytic hierarchy process: a comparative analysis of manufacturing organisations. Prod. Plann. Contr. 24:8–9 (2013), 702–720.
21. Diego-Mas, J.A., Poveda-Bautista, R., Alcaide-Marzal, J., Designing the appearance of environmentally sustainable products. J. Clean. Prod. 135 (2016), 784–793.
22. Elhedhli, S., Merrick, R., Green supply chain network design to reduce carbon emissions. Transport. Res. Transport Environ. 17:5 (2012), 370–379.
23. Ellram, L.M., Golicic, S.L., The role of legitimacy in pursuing environmentally responsible transportation practices. J. Clean. Prod. 139 (2016), 597–611.
24. Fahy, J., A resource-based analysis of sustainable competitive advantage in a global environment. Int. Bus. Rev. 11 (2002), 57–78.
25. Forrester, Forrester Research 2005. 2005 available at: http://www.forrester.com/ (accessed on 21.02.2017).
26. Gangolells, M., Casals, M., Forcada, N., Macarulla, M., Analysis of the implementation of effective waste management practices in construction projects and sites, Resources. Conserv. Recycl. 93 (2014), 99–111.
27. Gold, S., Seuring, S., Beske, P., Sustainable supply chain management and inter-organizational resources: a literature review. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 17:4 (2010), 230–245.
28. Golicic, S.L., Smith, C.D., A meta-analysis of environmentally sustainable supply chain management practices and firm performance. J. Supply Chain Manag. 49:2 (2013), 78–95.
29. González-Benito, J., González-Benito, Ó., A review of determinant factors of environmental proactivity. Bus. Strat. Environ. 15:2 (2006), 87–102.
30. Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., Jafarian, A., A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. J. Clean. Prod. 47 (2013), 345–354.
31. Guide, V.D.R., Wassenhove, L.N.V., The Evolution of closed-loop supply chain research. Oper. Res. 57:1 (2009), 10–18.
32. Haghighi, S.M., Torabi, S.A., Ghasemi, R., An integrated approach for performance evaluation in sustainable supply chain networks (with a case study). J. Clean. Prod. 137 (2016), 579–597.
33. Hart, S.L., A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20:4 (1995), 986–1014.
34. Hasan, M., Sustainable supply chain management practices and operational performance. Am. J. Ind. Bus. Manag., 3(1), 2013, 42.
35. Ho, W., Xu, X., Dey, P.K., Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 202:1 (2010), 16–24.
36. Hong, J., Zhang, Y., Ding, M., Sustainable supply chain management practices, supply chain dynamic capabilities, and enterprise performance. J. Clean. Prod. 172 (2018), 3508–3519.
37. Hörisch, J., Freeman, R.E., Schaltegger, S., Applying stakeholder theory in sustainability management: links, similarities, dissimilarities, and a conceptual framework. Organ. Environ. 27:4 (2014), 328–346.
38. Hsu, C.C., Tan, K.C., Zailani, S.H.M., Strategic orientations, sustainable supply chain initiatives, and reverse logistics: empirical evidence from an emerging market. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 36:1 (2016), 86–110.
39. Ilgin, M.A., Gupta, S.M., Environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery (ECMPRO): a review of the state of the art. J. Environ. Manag. 91:3 (2010), 563–591.
40. Ilgin, M.A., Gupta, S.M., Battaïa, O., Use of MCDM techniques in environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery: state of the art. J. Manuf. Syst. 37:3 (2015), 746–758.
41. Ishizaka, A., Nemery, P., Multi-criteria Decision Analysis: Methods and Software. 2013, John Wiley & Sons, USA.
42. IBEF, Indian Brand Equity 2018 Foundation. 2018 available at: https://www.ibef.org/industry/manufacturing-sector-india.aspx (assessed on 10.02.2018).
43. Jayaraman, V., Production planning for closed-loop supply chains with product recovery and reuse: an analytical approach. Int. J. Prod. Res. 44:5 (2006), 981–998.
44. Karakosta, C., Doukas, H., Psarras, J., Directing clean development mechanism towards developing countries’ sustainable development priorities. Energy for Sustainable Development 13:2 (2009), 77–84.
45. Kleindorfer, P.R., Singhal, K., Wassenhove, L.N.V., Sustainable operations management. Prod. Oper. Manag. 14:4 (2005), 482–492.
46. Krikke, H., Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J., Wassenhove, L.N.V., Concurrent product and closed-loop supply chain design with an application to refrigerators. Int. J. Prod. Res. 41:16 (2003), 3689–3719.
47. Kusi-Sarpong, S., Bai, C., Sarkis, J., Wang, X., Green supply chain practices evaluation in the mining industry using a joint rough sets and fuzzy TOPSIS methodology. Resour. Pol. 46:1 (2015), 86–100.
48. Kumar, A., Jain, V., Kumar, S., A comprehensive environment friendly approach for supplier selection. Omega 42:1 (2014), 109–123.
49. Kumar, D., Rahman, Z., Buyer supplier relationship and supply chain sustainability: empirical study of Indian automobile industry. J. Clean. Prod. 131 (2016), 836–848.
50. Li, S., Jayaraman, V., Paulraj, A., Shang, K.C., Proactive environmental strategies and performance: role of green supply chain processes and green product design in the Chinese high-tech industry. Int. J. Prod. Res. 54:7 (2016), 2136–2151.
51. Lin, R.H., An integrated FANP–MOLP for supplier evaluation and order allocation. Appl. Math. Model. 33:6 (2009), 2730–2736.
52. Linton, J.D., Klassen, R., Jayaraman, V., Sustainable supply chains: an introduction. J. Oper. Manag. 25 (2007), 1075–1082.
53. Liu, H.C., Mao, L.X., Zhang, Z.Y., Li, P., Induced aggregation operators in the VIKOR method and its application in material selection. Appl. Math. Model. 37:9 (2013), 6325–6338.
54. Liu, S., Papageorgiou, L.G., Multi objective optimisation of production, distribution and capacity planning of global supply chains in the process industry. Omega 41:2 (2013), 369–382.
55. López-Gamero, M.D., Molina-Azorín, J.F., Claver-Cortes, E., The whole relationship between environmental variables and firm performance: competitive advantage and firm resources as mediator variables. J. Environ. Manag. 90:10 (2009), 3110–3121.
56. Luthra, S., Mangla, S.K., Xu, L., Diabat, A., Using AHP to evaluate barriers in adopting sustainable consumption and production initiatives in a supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 181 (2016), 342–349.
57. Marcoulides, G.A., Heck, R.H., Organizational culture and performance: proposing and testing a model. Organ. Sci. 4:2 (1993), 209–225.
58. Mariadoss, B.J., Chi, T., Tansuhaj, P., Pomirleanu, N., Influences of firm orientations on sustainable supply chain management. J. Bus. Res. 69 (2016), 3406–3414.
59. Maymand, M.M., Samaeizadeh, A.H., Explanation of the “strategic assessment model” and verification of its impacts on the “Managerial scientific process”. Pacific Business Review International 9:7 (2017), 148–171.
60. Meixell, M.J., Luoma, P., Stakeholder pressure in sustainable supply chain management: a systematic review. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 45:1/2 (2015), 69–89.
61. Meyskens, M., Carsrud, A.L., Nascent green-technology ventures: a study assessing the role of partnership diversity in firm success. Small Bus. Econ. 40:3 (2013), 739–759.
62. Newbert, S.L., Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: an assessment and suggestions for future research. Strat. Manag. J. 28 (2007), 121–146.
63. Olugu, E.U., Wong, K.Y., Shaharoun, A.-M., Development of key performance measures for the automobile green supply chain. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 65:6 (2010), 567–579.
64. Opricovic, S., Tzeng, G.H., Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 178:2 (2007), 514–529.
65. Padhi, S.S., Mohapatra, P.K.J., Contractor selection in government procurement auctions: a case study. Eur. J. Ind. Eng. 3:2 (2009), 170–186.
66. Paksoy, T., Pehlivan, N.Y., Özceylan, E., Application of fuzzy optimization to a supply chain network design: a case study of an edible vegetable oils manufacturer. Appl. Math. Model. 36:6 (2012), 2762–2776.
67. Pati, R.K., Vrat, P., Kumar, P., A goal programming model for paper recycling system. Omega 36:3 (2008), 405–417.
68. Patil, S.K., Kant, R., A fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for ranking the solutions of Knowledge Management adoption in supply chain to overcome its barriers. Expert Syst. Appl. 41 (2014), 679–693.
69. Pires, A., Chang, N.B., Martinho, G., An AHP-based fuzzy interval TOPSIS assessment for sustainable expansion of the solid waste management system in Setúbal Peninsula, Portugal. Res. Conserv. Recycl. 56:1 (2011), 7–21.
70. Pohekar, S.D., Ramachandran, M., Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning- A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 8:4 (2004), 365–381.
71. Prakash, C., Barua, M.K., A combined MCDM approach for evaluation and selection of third-party reverse logistics partner for Indian electronics industry. Sustainable Production and Consumption 7 (2016), 66–78.
72. Rachuba, S., Werners, B., A robust approach for scheduling in hospitals using multiple objectives. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 65:4 (2014), 546–556.
73. Rajeev, A., Pati, R.K., Padhi, S.S., Kannan, G., Evolution of sustainability in supply chain management: a literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 162 (2017), 299–314.
74. Ramanathan, J., Ramnath, R., Bolinger, J., Nagarajan, P., Stakeholder-driven enterprise process model for complex services adaptation. International Conference on ENTERprise Information Systems, 2010, October, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 83–96.
75. Raut, R., Cheikhrouhou, N., Kharat, M., Sustainability in the banking industry: a strategic multi-criterion analysis. Bus. Strat. Environ. 26:4 (2017), 550–568.
76. Ray, G., Barney, J.B., Muhanna, W.A., Capabilities, business processes, and competitive advantage: choosing the dependent variable in empirical tests of the resource-based view. Strat. Manag. J. 25:1 (2004), 23–37.
77. Ren, J., Gao, S., Tan, S., Dong, L., Scipioni, A., Mazzi, A., Role prioritization of hydrogen production technologies for promoting hydrogen economy in the current state of China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 41 (2015), 1217–1229.
78. Roberts, P.W., Dowling, G.R., Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strat. Manag. J. 23:12 (2002), 1077–1093.
79. Rostamzadeh, R., Govindan, K., Esmaeili, A., Sabaghi, M., Application of fuzzy VIKOR for evaluation of green supply chain management practices. Ecol. Indicat. 49 (2015), 188–203.
80. Ruan, J., Xu, Z., Constructing environment-friendly return road of metals from e-waste: combination of physical separation technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 54 (2016), 745–760.
81. Saaty, T.L., A natural way to make momentous decisions. J. Sci. Ind. Res. (India) 51:8–9 (1992), 561–571.
82. Sabaghi, M., Mascle, C., Baptiste, P., Rostamzadeh, R., Sustainability assessment using fuzzy-inference technique (SAFT): a methodology toward green products. Expert Syst. Appl. 56 (2016), 69–79.
83. Saban, K., Mawhinney, J.R., Drake, M.J., An integrated approach to managing extended supply chain networks. Bus. Horiz. 60:5 (2017), 689–697.
84. Sarkis, J., Benchmarking the greening of business. Benchmark Int. J., 17(3), 2010.
85. Sawik, T., Joint supplier selection and scheduling of customer orders under disruption risks: single vs. dual sourcing. Omega 43 (2014), 83–95.
86. Shen, L., Olfat, L., Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., Diabat, A., A fuzzy multi criteria approach for evaluating green supplier's performance in green supply chain with linguistic preferences. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 74 (2013), 170–179.
87. Sheu, J.B., Chou, Y.H., Hu, C.C., An integrated logistics operational model for green-supply chain management. Transport. Res. E Logist. Transport. Rev. 41:4 (2005), 287–313.
88. Si, J., Marjanovic-Halburd, L., Nasiri, F., Bell, S., Assessment of building-integrated green technologies: a review and case study on applications of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method. Sustainable Cities and Society 27 (2016), 106–115.
89. Su, C.M., Horng, D.J., Tseng, M.L., Chiu, A.S.F., Wu, K.J., Chen, H.P., Improving sustainable supply chain management using a novel hierarchical grey-DEMATEL approach. J. Clean. Prod. 134:B (2016), 469–481.
90. Surroca, J., Tribó J.A., Waddock, S., Corporate responsibility and financial performance: the role of intangible resources. Strat. Manag. J. 31:5 (2010), 463–490.
91. Talaei, A., Ahadi, M.S., Maghsoudy, S., Climate friendly technology transfer in the energy sector: a case study of Iran. Energy Pol. 64 (2014), 349–363.
92. Thanki, S., Govindan, K., Thakkar, J., An investigation on lean-green implementation practices in Indian SMEs using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) approach. J. Clean. Prod. 135 (2016), 284–298.
93. Tidy, M., Wang, X., Hall, M., The role of Supplier Relationship Management in reducing Greenhouse Gas emissions from food supply chains: supplier engagement in the UK supermarket sector. J. Clean. Prod. 112:4 (2016), 3294–3305.
94. Touboulic, A., Walker, H., Theories in sustainable supply chain management: a structured literature review. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 45:1/2 (2015), 16–42.
95. Tseng, M.L., Lim, M.K., Wong, W.P., Chen, Y.C., Zhan, Y., A framework for evaluating the performance of sustainable service supply chain management under uncertainty. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 195 (2018), 359–372.
96. Van der Laan, G., Van Ees, H., Witteloostuijn, A.V., Corporate social and financial performance: an extended stakeholder theory, and empirical test with accounting measures. J. Bus. Ethics 79:3 (2008), 299–310.
97. Weber, C.A., Current, J.R., Benton, W.C., Vendor selection criteria and methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 50:1 (1991), 2–18.
98. Winter, S., Lasch, R., Environmental and social criteria in supplier evaluation – lessons from the fashion and apparel industry. J. Clean. Prod. 139 (2016), 175–190.
99. Wolf, J., Sustainable supply chain management integration: a qualitative analysis of the German manufacturing industry. J. Bus. Ethics 102:2 (2011), 221–235.
100. Wolf, J., The Relationship between sustainable supply chain management, stakeholder pressure and corporate sustainability performance. J. Bus. Ethics 119 (2014), 317–328.
101. Wu, K.J., Liao, C.J., Tseng, M.L., Chiu, K.K.S., Multi-attribute approach to sustainable supply chain management under uncertainty. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 116:4 (2016), 777–800.
102. Wu, K.J., Tseng, M.L., Chiu, A.S.F., Lim, K.K., Achieving competitive advantage through supply chain agility under uncertainty: a novel multi-criteria decision-making structure. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 190 (2017), 96–107.
103. Yang, C.H., Lee, K.C., Chen, H.C., Incorporating carbon footprint with activity-based costing constraints into sustainable public transport infrastructure project decisions. J. Clean. Prod. 133 (2016), 1154–1166.
104. Yu, F., Xue, L., Sun, C., Zhang, C., Product transportation distance based supplier selection in sustainable supply chain network. J. Clean. Prod. 137 (2016), 29–39.
105. Zailani, S., Jeyaraman, K., Vengadasan, G., Premkumar, R., Sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) in Malaysia: a survey. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 140:1 (2012), 330–340.
106. Żak, J., Węgliński, S., The selection of the logistics center location based on MCDM/a methodology. Transportation Research Procedia 3 (2014), 555–564.
107. Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., The moderating effects of institutional pressures on emergent green supply chain practices and performance. Int. J. Prod. Res. 45:18–19 (2007), 4333–4355.
108. Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., Lai, K.H., Green supply chain management: pressures, practices and performance within the Chinese automobile industry. J. Clean. Prod. 15:11–12 (2007), 1041–1052.