Improving sustainable supply chain management using a novel hierarchical grey-DEMATEL approach

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 134, Issue Part B, 2016, Pages 469-481

  Su, Chun Mei ^a   Horng, Der Juinn ^a   Tseng, Ming Lang ^b   Chiu, Anthony S F ^c   Wu, Kuo Jui ^d   Chen, Hui Ping ^e  

^a NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b LUNGHWA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^c DE LA SALLE UNIVERSITY   (Philippines)

^d NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^e NATIONAL PINGTUNG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

DEMATEL; Grey theory; Supplier selection; Sustainable supply chain management

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; SUPPLY CHAINS;

DECISION MAKING TRIAL AND EVALUATION LABORATORIES; DEMATEL; GREY THEORY; HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURES; INCOMPLETE INFORMATION; MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; SUPPLIER SELECTION; SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAINS;

SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84930812980     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.080     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Ahi, P., Searcy, C., An analysis of metrics used to measure performance in green and sustainable supply chains. J. Clean. Prod. 86:1 (2015), 360–377.
2. Amindoust, A., Ahmed, S., Saghafinia, A., Bahreininejad, A., Sustainable supplier selection: a ranking model based on fuzzy inference system. Appl. Soft Comput. 12:6 (2012), 1668–1677.
3. Bai, C., Sarkis, J., Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with grey system and rough set methodologies. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 124:1 (2010), 252–264.
4. Büyüközkan, G., Çifçi, G., A novel fuzzy multi-criteria decision framework for sustainable supplier selection with incomplete information. Comput. Ind. 62:2 (2011), 164–174.
5. Caniato, F., Caridi, M., Crippa, L., Moretto, A., Environmental sustainability in fashion supply chains: an exploratory case based research. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 135:2 (2012), 659–670.
6. Carter, G.R., Rogers, D.S., A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 38:5 (2008), 360–387.
7. Chaabane, A., Ramudhin, A., Paquet, M., Design of sustainable supply chains under the emission trading scheme. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 135:1 (2012), 37–49.
8. Chang, B., Chang, C.W., Wu, C.H., Fuzzy DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria. Expert Syst. Appl. 38 (2011), 1850–1858.
9. Chardine-Baumann, E., Botta-Genoulaz, V., A framework for sustainable performance assessment of supply chain management practices. Comput. Ind. Eng. 76 (2014), 138–147.
10. Chen, C.T., Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 114 (2000), 1–9.
11. Chen, M.F., Tzeng, G.H., Combining grey relation and TOPSIS concept for selecting an expatriate host country. Math. Comput. Model. 40 (2004), 1473–1490.
12. Deng, J.L., The introduction of grey system. J Grey Syst. 1:1 (1982), 1–24.
13. Diaz-Garrido, E., Martin-Pena, M.L., Sanchez-Lopez, J.M., Competitive priorities in operations: development of an indicator of strategic position. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 4 (2011), 118–125.
14. Fontela, E., Gabus, A., The DEMATEL Observe. 1976, Battelle Institute Geneva Research Center.
15. Gold, S., Seuring, S., Beske, P., Sustainable supply chain management and inter-organizational resources: a literature review. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 17:4 (2010), 230–245.
16. Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., Jafarian, A., A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. J. Clean. Prod. 47 (2013), 345–354.
17. Gupta, S., Palsule-Desai, O.D., Sustainable supply chain management: review and research opportunities. IIMB Manag. Rev. 23:4 (2011), 234–245.
18. Hassini, E., Surti, C., Searcy, C., A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 140 (2012), 69–82.
19. Hsu, C.W., Kuo, T.C., Chen, S.H., Hu, A.K., Using DEMATEL to develop a carbon management model of supplier selection in green supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 56:2013 (2013), 164–172.
20. Hsu, C.W., Hu, A.H., Applying hazardous substance management to supplier selection using analytic network process. J. Clean. Prod. 17:2 (2009), 255–264.
21. Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., Ulukan, Z., Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logist. Inf. Manag. 16:6 (2003), 382–394.
22. Kannan, D., Jabbour, A.B.L.S., Jabbour, C.J.C., Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 233 (2014), 432–447.
23. Koplin, J., Seuring, S., Mesterharm, M., Incorporating sustainability into supply management in the automotive industry – the case of the Volkswagen AG. J. Clean. Prod. 15 (2007), 1053–1062.
24. Lambert, D.M., Croxton, K.L., Garcia-Dastugue, S.J., Knemeyer, M., Rogers, D.S., Supply Chain Management Processes, Partnerships, Performance. second ed., 2006, Hartley Press Inc., Jacksonville.
25. Lee, A.H.I., Kang, H.Y., Hsu, C.F., Hung, H.C., A green supplier selection model for high-tech industry. Expert Syst. Appl. 36:4 (2009), 7917–7927.
26. Lee, K.H., Integrating carbon footprint into supply chain management: the case of Hyundai Motor Company (HMC) in the automobile industry. J. Clean. Prod. 19:11 (2011), 1216–1223.
27. Lee, K.H., Saen, R.F., Measuring corporate sustainability management: a data envelopment analysis approach. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 140 (2012), 219–226.
28. Lin, Y.H., Tseng, M.L., Assessing the competitive priorities within sustainable supply chain management under uncertainty. J. Clean. Prod. 112 (2016), 2133–2144.
29. Linton, J.D., Klassen, R., Jayaraman, V., Sustainable supply chains: an introduction. J. Oper. Manag. 25:6 (2007), 1075–1082 (p.1090).
30. Liu, S., Kasturiratne, D., Moizer, J., A hub-and-spoke model for multidimensional integration of green marketing and sustainable supply chain management. Ind. Mark. Manag. 41:4 (2012), 581–588.
31. Mafakheri, F., Breton, M., Ghoniem, A., Supplier selection-order allocation: a two stage multiple criteria dynamic programming approach. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 132:1 (2011), 52–57.
32. Manzini, R., Accorsi, R., The new conceptual framework for food supply chain assessment. J. Food Eng. 115:2 (2013), 251–263.
33. Michelsen, O., Fet, A.M., Dahlsrud, A., Eco-efficiency in extended supply chains: a case study of furniture production. J. Environ. Manag. 79:3 (2006), 290–297.
34. Preuss, L., Rhetoric and reality of corporate greening: a view from the supply chain management function. Bus. Strategy Environ. 14:2 (2005), 114–139.
35. Punniyamoorthy, M., Mathiyalagan, P., Parthiban, P., A strategic model using structural equation modeling and fuzzy logic in supplier selection. Expert Syst. Appl. 38:1 (2011), 458–474.
36. Rao, P., Greening supply chain: a new initiative in South East Asia. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 22:6 (2002), 632–655.
37. Rao, P., Holt, D., Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance?. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 25:9 (2005), 898–916.
38. Sarkis, J., Talluri, S., A model for strategic supplier selection. J. Supply Chain Manag. 38:1 (2002), 18–28.
39. Seuring, S., Gold, S., Sustainability management beyond corporate boundaries: from stakeholders to performance. J. Clean. Prod. 56 (2013), 1–6.
40. Seuring, S., Muller, M., From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 16:15 (2008), 1699–1710.
41. Seuring, S., Sarkis, J., Muller, M., Rao, P., Sustainability and supply chain management: an introduction to the special issue. J. Clean. Prod. 16:14 (2008), 1545–1551.
42. Shaverdi, M., Heshmati, M.R., Eskandaripour, E., Tabar, A.A.A., Developing sustainable SCM evaluation model using fuzzy AHP in publishing industry. Procedia Comput. Sci. 17 (2013), 340–349.
43. Schaltegger, S., Economics of life cycle assessment e inefficiency of the present approach. Bus. Strategy Environ. 6:1 (1997), 1–8.
44. Srivastava, S.K., Green supply-chain management: a state of the art literature review. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 9:1 (2007), 53–80.
45. Tang, C.S., Zhou, S., Research advances in environmentally and socially sustainable operations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 223 (2012), 585–594.
46. Tseng, M.L., Modeling the sustainable production indicators in linguistic preferences. J. Clean. Prod. 40 (2013), 46–56.
47. Tseng, M.L., A causal and effect decision-making model of service quality expectation using grey-fuzzy DEMATEL approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 36:4 (2009), 7738–7748.
48. Tseng, M.L., Application of ANP and DEMATEL to evaluate the decision-making of municipal solid waste management in Metro Manila. Environ. Monit. Assess. 156:1–4 (2009), 181–197.
49. Tseng, M.L., Using extension of DEMATEL to integrate hotel service quality perceptions into a cause-effect model in uncertainty. Expert Syst. Appl. 36:5 (2009), 9015–9023.
50. Tseng, M.L., Using linguistic preferences and grey relational analysis to evaluate the environmental knowledge management capacities. Expert Syst. Appl. 37:1 (2010), 70–81.
51. Tseng, M.L., Lim, K.M., Wong, W.P., Sustainable supply chain management: a closed-loop network approach. Ind. Manag. Data Syst., 2015 (Article in press).
52. Tseng, M.L., Lin, R.J., Lin, Y.H., Chen, R.H., Tan, K., Close-loop or open hierarchical structures in green supply chain management under uncertainty. Expert Syst. Appl. 41:7 (2014), 3250–3260.
53. Tseng, M.L., Lin, Y.H., Tan, K., Chen, R.H., Chen, Y.H., Using TODIM to evaluate green supply chain management under uncertainty. Appl. Math. Model. 38:2014 (2013), 2983–2995.
54. Tseng, M.L., Wu, W.W., Lin, Y.H., Liao, C.H., An exploration of relationships between environmental practice and manufacturing performance using the PLS path modeling. WSEAS Trans. Environ. Dev. 4:6 (2008), 487–502.
55. Tseng, M.L., Chiang, J.H., Lan, L.W., Selection of optimal supplier in supply chain management strategy with analytic network process and choquet integral. Comput. Ind. Eng. 57:1 (2009), 330–340.
56. Tseng, S.C., Hung, S.W., A strategic decision-making model considering the social costs of carbon dioxide emissions for sustainable supply chain management. J. Environ. Manag. 133 (2014), 315–322.
57. Wang, X., Chan, H.K., White, L., A comprehensive decision support model for the evaluation of eco-designs. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 65:6 (2014), 917–934.
58. Wong, Y.P., Tseng, M.L., Tan, K., A business process management capabilities perspective on organization performance. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 25:6 (2014), 602–617.
59. World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Eco-efficiency, creating more value with less impact. Available at: http://www.wbcsd.org, 2000 (accessed 10.12.14.).
60. Zhang, J., Wu, D., Olsen, D.L., The method of grey related analysis to multiple attribute decision making problems with interval numbers. Math. Comput. Model. 42 (2005), 991–998.
61. Zhu, Q., Geng, Y., Integrating environmental issues into supplier selection and management: a study of large and medium-sized state-owned enterprises in China. Greener Manag. Int. 35 (2001), 27–40.