An integrated FANP-MOLP for supplier evaluation and order allocation

Applied Mathematical Modelling

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 2730-2736

  Lin, Rong Ho ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIPEI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Analytic network process (ANP); Fuzzy preference programming (FPP); Multi objective linear programming (MOLP); Supplier selection; Supply chain management (SCM)

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING; ELECTRIC LOAD MANAGEMENT; LINEARIZATION; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS; STRATEGIC PLANNING; SUPPLY CHAINS;

ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS (ANP); FUZZY PREFERENCE PROGRAMMING (FPP); MULTI-OBJECTIVE LINEAR PROGRAMMING (MOLP); SUPPLIER SELECTION; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT (SCM);

SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT;

EID: 60549117496     PISSN: 0307904X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2008.08.021     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Dulmin R., and Mininno V. Supplier selection using a multi-criteria decision aid method. J. Purchasing Supply Manage. 9 4 (2003) 177-187
2. Boer L., Labro E., and Morlacchi P. A review of methods supporting supplier selection. Eur. J. Purchasing Supply Manage. 7 (2001) 75-89
3. Choy K.L., Lee W.B., and Lo V. Design of a case based intelligent supplier relationship management system - the integration of supplier rating system and product coding system. Expert Syst. Appl. 25 1 (2003) 87-100
4. Weber C.H., Current J.R., and Desai A. Non-cooperative negotiation strategies for vendor selection. Eur. J. Operat. Res. 108 1 (1998) 208-223
5. Talluri S. A buyer-seller game model for selection and negotiation of purchasing bids. Eur. J. Operat. Res. 143 1 (2002) 171-180
6. Tam M.C.Y., and Tummala V.M.R. An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system. Omega 29 2 (2001) 171-182
7. Degraeve Z., Labro E., and Roodhooft F. An evaluation of vendor selection models from a total cost of ownership perspective. Eur. J. Operat. Res. 125 1 (2000) 34-58
8. Roodhooft F., and Konings J. Vendor selection and evaluation an activity based costing approach. Eur. J. Operat. Res. 96 1 (1997) 97-102
9. Talluri S., and Narasimhan R. Vendor evaluation with performance variability: a max-min approach. Eur. J. Operat. Res. 146 3 (2003) 543-552
10. Zhu J. A buyer-seller game model for selection and negotiation of purchasing bids: extensions and new models. Eur. J. Operat. Res. 154 1 (2004) 150-156
11. Mikhailov L., and Singh M. Fuzzy assessment of priorities with application to the competitive bidding. J. Decision Syst. 8 1 (1999) 11-28
12. Sarkis J. Evaluating environmentally conscious business practices. Eur. J. Operat. Res. 107 1 (1998) 159-174
13. Meade L.M., and Presley A. R&D project selection using the analytic network process. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 49 1 (2002) 59-66
14. Niemira M.P., and Saaty T.L. An analytical network process model for financial-crisis forecasting. Int. J. Forecast. 20 4 (2004) 573-587
15. Yurdakul M. AHP as a strategic decision making tool to justify machine tool selection. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 146 3 (2004) 365-376
16. Gencer C., and Gürpinar D. Analytic network process in supplier selection: a case study in an electronic firm. Appl. Math. Modell. 31 (2007) 2475-2486
17. Wey W.M., and Wu K.Y. Using ANP priorities with goal programming in resource allocation in transportation. Math. Comput. Modell. 46 (2007) 985-1000
18. Ustun O., and Demirtas E.A. An integrated multi-objective decision-making process for multi-period lot-sizing with supplier selection. Omega 36 (2008) 509-521
19. Yu R., and Tzeng G.H. A soft computing method for multi-criteria decision making with dependence and feedback. Appl. Math. Comput. 180 1 (2006) 63-75
20. Saaty T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (1980), McGraw-Hill, New York
21. Srdjevic B. Combining different prioritization methods in the analytic hierarchy process synthesis. Comput. Oper. Res. 32 7 (2005) 1897-1919